Kowlgi, Narayan G

Abstract Ventricular electrical storm (VES) is a clinical scenario characterized by the clustering of multiple episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) over a short duration. Patients with VES are prone to psychological disorders, heart failure decompensation, and increased mortality. Studies have shown that 10–28% of the patients with secondary prevention ICDs can sustain VES. The triad of a susceptible electrophysiologic substrate, triggers, and autonomic dysregulation govern the pathogenesis of VES. The rate of VA, underlying ventricular function, and the presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) determine the clinical presentation. A multi-faceted approach is often required for management consisting of acute hemodynamic stabilization, ICD reprogramming when appropriate, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and sedation. Some patients may be eligible for catheter ablation, and autonomic modulation with thoracic epidural anesthesia, stellate ganglion block, or cardiac sympathetic denervation. Hemodynamically unstable patients may benefit from the use of left ventricular assist devices, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Special scenarios such as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, Brugada syndrome, Long and short QT syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and cardiac sarcoidosis have been described as well. VES is a cardiac emergency that requires swift intervention. It is associated with poor short and long-term outcomes. A structured team-based management approach is paramount for the safe and effective treatment of this sick cohort.

Background: Some long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients experience breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) despite maximal therapy. Small studies have shown that intentional permanent atrial pacing (IPAP) is beneficial in refractory LQTS. As such, we sought to determine the genotype-specific utilization and efficacy of IPAP in a single-center LQTS registry. Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, electronic medical records from 1,065 LQTS patients were used to identify individuals that received IPAP. Pre- and post-IPAP heart rate, heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) values, annual BCE rate, and IPAP-related complications were compared between genotypes. BCEs were defined as LQTS-associated syncope/seizures, ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-terminating ICD therapies, and sudden cardiac arrest/death. Overall, 52/1065 LQTS patients received adjunctive IPAP therapy [77% female; median age 18.5 (IQR 1-35.5) years; 73% with prior VA]. Over an average IPAP follow-up of 121  82 months, the average heart rate increased from 65.8  20.4 bpm to 78.9  17.1 bpm; (p<0.01) and the average QTc decreased from 533.4  66.6 ms to 488.3  52.4 ms; (p<0.01). The mean BCE rate dropped from 0.88 to 0.19 per patient-year (p=0.01), driven by a marked decrease in LQT2 patients (1.01 BCE/year to 0.02 BCE/year; p=0.003). No serious IPAP-related complications were observed. Conclusion: In high-risk LQTS patients, namely those with recalcitrant LQT2, IPAP appears to be a safe and efficacious adjunct therapy. The beneficial effects of IPAP may stem from attenuating the QTc and circumventing a pause-dependent trigger. Whether IPAP might obviate the need for an ICD in some instances warrants further study.