Dasari, Surendra

Abstract Background Adult xanthogranuloma (AXG) is a rare clonal histiocytic neoplasm (HN) with a poorly defined mutational landscape. Clinically and immunophenotypically, AXG can resemble other HNs such as Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) which frequently harbor MAPK pathway alterations and carry BRAF V600E mutations in close to 50% of cases. However, due to the rarity of AXG, the prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation and the broader mutational landscape is not well known. In this study, we characterize the mutational profile of AXG. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with AXG at our institution between January 1, 2016, and July 15, 2025. The study was approved by the institutional review board. To ensure inclusion of true AXG cases, only patients with a confirmed histopathologic diagnosis and without multisystemic involvement or characteristic imaging findings of ECD, such as symmetric long bone osteosclerosis, were included. BRAF alterations were identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS). We also performed an extensive literature review of mutational studies in AXG and included cases that underwent comprehensive NGS. Results Seventeen patients with AXG were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 40 years (range: 18–75 years). Out of the 17 patients, 11 (65%) reported the face as the primary site of disease, and 11 (65%) had solitary lesions. Of the 17 patients, 13 (76%) underwent BRAF V600E IHC staining, and none tested positive. Twelve (71%) patients had tissue samples analyzed via NGS, and none exhibited the BRAF V600E mutation. Eight of the 12 (67%) patients with NGS testing harbored other alterations involving the MAPK pathway. These included BRAF fusions (n=3), KRAS mutations (n=2), and individual cases with TRAF7 mutation, ALK1 fusion and FGFR1 fusion. One patient was found to have a mutation in WRN, which is not previously reported in AXG. Three patients had no identifiable pathogenic alterations on NGS. Ten patients were monitored without treatment, 2 underwent surgical resections and 3 received chemotherapy (1 had a complete response [CR], 2 achieved a partial response). One patient with FGFR1 fusion was treated with pemigatinib and achieved a CR for over 3 years. One patient with TRAF mutation obtained a CR after treatment with rituximab. We also identified 51 cases of AXG with adequate mutational testing reported in the literature, which reported findings similar to ours. In a retrospective study from France involving 29 patients, MAPK alterations were observed in 55% of cases: however, only 10% harbored BRAF V600E mutations (1). Another analysis of 270 patients with various HN subtypes included 13 individuals with AXG, none had BRAF mutations. MAP2K1 mutations were seen in 31% of patients (2). Taken together, across a combined cohort of 68 AXG patients, the most common alterations were: KRAS mutations (16%), fusions (14%), MAP2K1 mutations (7%) and BRAF V600E (6%). Among fusions, the most involved gene was BRAF (50%), and GAB2 was the most common fusion partner (n=2). In total, 59% of patients had MAPK alterations. These findings collectively underscore the diverse mutational landscape of AXG and highlight the rarity of BRAF V600E mutations relative to closely related HNs. Conclusion We present a series of AXG cases with mutational profiling, from our institution and the published literature. We demonstrate that MAPK alterations are frequently observed in AXG and are driven by heterogeneous mutations. In contrast to other HNs where BRAF V600E mutations are common, we identified no such mutations in our cohort and found only rare cases in the literature. Our institutional data, along with findings from the existing literature, suggest that AXG may have a distinct molecular profile compared to other HNs. A deeper understanding of its mutational landscape may offer insights into disease biology and identify therapeutic targets. ReferencesAnnabi E, Mahévas T, Chasset et al. Clinical, Histopathologic, and Molecular Features and Treatment of Multiple Xanthogranuloma in Adults. JAMA Dermatol. 2025;161(7):765-768. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.0886.Durham BH, Lopez Rodrigo E, Picarsic J, et al. Activating mutations in CSF1R and additional receptor tyrosine kinases in histiocytic neoplasms. Nat Med. 2019;25(12):1839-1842. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0653-6

Abstract Background:Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) is a rare, incurable histiocytic neoplasm. Since its recognition in 1930, our understanding of ECD's pathophysiology has evolved. The identification of its clonal nature after 2015 established ECD as a cancer, prompting increased disease awareness and treatment advances. Targeted therapies show promising responses, but changes in ECD mortality over time have not been extensively documented. Methods:A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study analyzed adults with ECD consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic MN, AZ, and FL and the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2007 and 2024. Clinical and prognostic data were abstracted. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared to expected survival using U.S. Census data, based on age at diagnosis (by calendar year), date of diagnosis, and sex. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated by dividing the number of observed deaths in the study population by the expected number of deaths using U.S. population data. Risk of death was compared by date of diagnosis (pre- and post-2015) using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with R software. Results:A total of 159 ECD patients were included (median age 58 years [range 19-82], 65% male). Forty-nine patients were diagnosed between 1990-2014 and 110 between 2015-2024. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.0 years (95% CI: 3.2-4.4). Median follow-up for those diagnosed between 1990-2014 was 10.4 years (CI: 3.2-16.8), compared to 3.5 years (CI: 3.0-4.2) for those diagnosed between 2015-2024. The 5-year overall survival rate was 80% (95% CI: 72-88). Patients with ECD had an increase in mortality over expected, with 28 deaths compared to an expected 11.2, an SMR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.7-3.6, p<0.001). Of 17 patients with an identified cause of death, death was attributable to ECD in 11 (65%), secondary malignancy in 1 (7%), and unrelated causes in 5 (29%). Cause of death was unknown in 11 patients. Among deaths, 11 (39%) were treated with targeted therapy, 8 (29%) with chemotherapy, and 1 (4%) received both. One patient (4%) received steroids, 1 received immunomodulator and targeted therapy (4%), and 6 (21%) received no disease-directed therapy. Of the patients whose death was related to ECD, 10 (91%) had multisystem disease. For 49 patients diagnosed pre-2015, 14 deaths occurred during the follow-up, significantly higher than the expected 5.2 deaths based on U.S. population data (SMR of 2.7 [95% CI: 1.5-4.4, p=0.001]). Among those diagnosed between 2015 and 2024, 14 deaths occurred, compared to expected 6.1 (SMR of 2.3 [95% CI: 1.3-3.8, p=0.006]). In an age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, diagnosis after 2015 vs. diagnosis prior to 2015 yielded a hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.27-1.31, p=0.19). Conclusion:The mortality rate of ECD patients remains higher than the general population, despite advancements in disease recognition and development of targeted therapies. While our data suggest a possible trend toward improved survival among patients diagnosed after 2015, we did not find statistically significant evidence of decreased mortality compared to those diagnosed prior to 2015. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw definitive conclusions regarding mortality.

Abstract BACKGROUND Understanding long-term sequelae of cancer care is critical. Cognitive impairment is a common and disabling survivorship issue. Because sex influences tumor biology, therapy exposure, and dementia risk, we examined whether cancer care for a prior malignancy alters late-life cognitive outcomes differently in males and females. METHODS We assessed adults ≥50 years, cognitively normal at study entry, from a longitudinal, population-based cohort (Mayo Clinic Study of Aging). Participants were linked to our institutional cancer registry (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia were adjudicated by consensus. We fitted multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to estimate how prevalent cancer diagnosis influenced the risk of developing MCI/dementia. Sex-specific effects were determined by incorporating a cancer×sex interaction term and by generating separate hazard ratios. Analyses were controlled for age, APOE4 status, education, and presence of vascular/metabolic conditions. RESULTS 5793 MCSA participants (female: 49.4%, APOE4 positive: 27.5%) were included in the study, with a mean age of 73 years at study entry. Incident MCI was recorded in 866 participants, and 737 were diagnosed with incident dementia. About 20% (n=1176) of the cohort had a cancer diagnosis, most commonly prostate (n=423) and breast (n=277). There was no independent relationship between history of cancer and risk for MCI or dementia. We found that males with cancer had an increased risk for MCI (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.57, p=0.003) and dementia (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.6, p=0.053). Conversely, females with cancer had a lower risk for MCI (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.01, p=0.063), although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggests male cancer survivors may be more susceptible to cognitive impairment, independent of age, APOE4 status, education, and vascular/metabolic burden. Elucidating the hormonal, treatment-related, and systemic pathways driving this should be a priority for future mechanistic studies.

Abstract Background In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), studies have described different HFpEF phenogroups based on medical comorbidities and variable echocardiographic, invasive hemodynamic, and biomarker data. We hypothesized that myocardial histopathologic findings may define phenogroups with differing clinical features and outcomes in patients with HFpEF. Methods We analyzed consecutive patients with left HF and EF ≥50% who underwent right ventricular septal endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) at our institution between 2001 and 2022 to investigate HF etiology. Patients with infiltrative or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sarcoidosis, myocarditis, primary valvular heart disease, constrictive pericarditis, isolated right HF, or insufficient EMB samples were excluded. Clinical, echocardiographic, and invasive hemodynamic data were collected. The severity of hypertrophy and fibrosis on EMB specimens was characterized (semiquantitative grading) by experienced cardiac pathologists based on standard histologic stains. Patients were stratified into four phenogroups based on EMB findings: "mild" (none/mild hypertrophy and fibrosis), "hypertrophy" (moderate/marked hypertrophy, minimal/mild fibrosis), "fibrosis" (moderate/marked fibrosis, none/mild hypertrophy), and "severe" (moderate/marked hypertrophy and fibrosis). Results Among the 121 patients analyzed, the median age was 67 years, 50% were female and cardiovascular conditions were common (Table 1). Fibrosis was graded as minimal in 21% (n=25), mild in 64% (n=77), moderate in 12% (n=15), and marked in 3% (n=4). Hypertrophy was graded as none in 4% (n=5), mild in 41% (n=50), moderate in 40% (n=48), and marked in 15% (n=18). Only one patient had the isolated "fibrosis" phenogroup and was excluded from further analysis, while 54 had the "mild", 48 had the "hypertrophy", and 18 had the "severe" phenogroup (Table 1). The "hypertrophy" phenogroup exhibited significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, RV dilation, and higher pulmonary artery pressures. Over a median follow-up of 7.9 years (3.1–13.8), mortality rate varied according to the histopathologic phenogroups (Figure 1, p=0.034) with "severe" having the worst and "mild" having the best outcomes. Survival analyses based on fibrosis grades alone, hypertrophy grades alone, or echocardiographic hypertrophy did not reveal significant differences (all p = NS). Differences in survival remained significant adjusting for age (HR 3.39, 95% CI 1.20-9.58). Conclusions The integrated severity of histopathologic hypertrophic and fibrotic remodeling defined HFpEF phenogroups with variable prognosis. Clinical features did not reliably identify histopathologic phenogroups. These data suggest that advanced myocardial phenotyping (e.g., gene, protein, metabolism) may reveal unique HFpEF myocardial subtypes in need of specific therapies.Figure 1

ABSTRACT Objective We sought to characterize the sixth most common finding in our neuroimmunological laboratory practice (tissue assay‐observed unclassified neural antibodies [UNAs]), combining protein microarray and phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP‐Seq). Methods Patient specimens (258; 133 serums; 125 CSF) meeting UNA criteria were profiled; October 2022–September 2023. Top‐ranking candidate antigens were validated in silico, by dual‐staining confocal microscopy, and ≥ 1 protein‐specific assay. Clinical data were reviewed. Results Among 21 patients, 11 autoantibodies were characterized (serum, 19; CSF, all 9 available). Autoantigens were CACNA1I, 1; CAMK2B, 2; CLIP2, 1; FMN2, 2; MAP1A, 2; MAP2, 5; NECAB1, 1; SNAP91, 3; SRCIN1, 1; SYNJ1, 1; SYT3, 2. Analytical validation was by confocal TIIFA (all), western blot (10/10 available), and cell‐based assay (5/5 performed). Clinical accompaniments were: encephalitis, 6; brainstem encephalitis, 2; encephalomyelitis, 2; cerebellar ataxia, 2; longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), 2; sensory neuronopathy, 1; peripheral neuropathy, 4, and movement disorders, 2. Inflammatory MRI abnormalities were identified in 5/16 patients (31%) with CNS disorders: T2 signal change (2), LETM (2), leptomeningeal enhancement (1). Seven of 8 (88%) had inflammatory CSF (pleocytosis, 5 [median 25.5 cells, range 7–294]; elevated IgG index/synthesis rate, 4; CSF‐exclusive oligoclonal bands, 4). Six had paraneoplastic causation (lung cancer, 2; other, 4); 3 were postinfectious (1 each of COVID‐19, HSV‐1, and post‐Group A streptococcal infection). Of 9 immunotherapy‐treated patients, 5 improved. Interpretation UNAs are partly accounted for by a repertoire of diverse mostly intracellular synaptic antigens. Their characterization is expedited by protein arrays and PhIPSeq. Further individual studies are needed to assess them as disease biomarkers.

Abstract Our inability to obtain nerve samples from the vast majority of neuropathic pain patients impedes our ability to understand the disease, creates challenges in understanding mechanisms in specific patient populations, and limits our ability to make treatment decisions based on quantifiable molecular data. Fields like oncology have overcome these problems to take advantage of the insight that sequencing offers for understanding mechanisms of disease and have leveraged these molecular insights to dramatically change the treatment landscape in the past decade. Here we tested the hypothesis that skin biopsies could be used to gain insight into neuronal transcriptomic changes in patients with paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN). Our analysis reveals that hundreds of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) found through bulk RNA sequencing in these skin biopsies are likely contributed by dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuronal axons and/or terminals. Up-regulated genes were representative of broad class of nociceptors whereas down-regulated genes were associated with putative injured DRG neurons expressing the PDIA2 gene. DEGs that could be confidently associated with specific subsets of skin cells were mostly expressed by keratinocytes supporting a growing literature tying keratinocyte-neuron communication abnormalities to pain in PIPN. We validated these findings by analyzing additional previously published datasets and through prospectively conducted spatial transcriptomics experiments on human skin biopsies. Our findings warrant further assessment of skin biopsies in additional neuropathic pain populations to gain insight into DRG neuron changes that have previously been thought to be inaccessible in routine clinical or scientific assessments in most patients.

Abstract Background The diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies relies on the detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins (M-proteins) in serum or urine. Mass-Fix utilizes matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) to detect and quantify M-proteins. This method employs immunoaffinity enrichment using antibodies against heavy chains (HC) and light chains (LC), followed by MS analysis to determine M-protein isotypes. Mass-Fix has also revealed novel M-protein characteristics, including LC glycosylation and fragmentation, facilitated by measuring the mass of LC. LC glycosylation is as an independent risk factor for disease progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), while light chain fragments have been postulated as the origin of amyloid light chain (AL) plaques. Since Mass-Fix enriches intact immunoglobulins before dissociating LCs, it potentially enhances fragment detection. However, the precise nature and clinical significance of these fragments remain to be fully elucidated. Methods Mass-Fix serum results from Mayo Clinic patients tested from September 10, 2018, to October 1, 2024, were reviewed for the presence of M-protein and LC fragments. The frequency and the isotype of fragment LC fragments was determined in the M-protein positive cohort (n=15410). Patients diagnosed with either MGUS (n=6996), AL amyloidosis (n=315), or both (n=32) who had positive M-protein results on Mass-Fix, either prior to or within one month after the diagnosis, were included for a retrospective clinical association study of LC fragments and disease. To validate that these fragments were not artifacts of MS analysis, PAGE gel analysis and Western blots were performed using clinical residual serum from 9 patients: 2 IgG/kappa and 3 IgG/lambda patients with detectable LC fragments and 2 IgG/kappa and 2 IgG/lambda patients without fragments. Samples were purified using antibodies against gamma heavy chains and reduced with TCEP prior to gel electrophoresis and Western blot. Results Of the 15410 patients with monoclonal proteins detected by Mass-Fix, 2896 (18.7%) had detectable LC fragments; kappa fragments in 1533 and lambda fragments in 1363. Most often, the fragments were observed in pairs, with combined molecular weight typically equaled that of the full-length monoclonal LC present in the same sample. LC fragments were observed more frequently among patients diagnosed with AL amyloidosis (118/347=34%) compared to those without the diagnosis (685/6996=10%), with an odds ratio of 4.75 (95% CI, 3.75-6.01). PAGE with Coomassie blue staining revealed bands with sizes representing LC fragments in the five M-protein samples with detectable LC fragments on Mass-Fix, while no such bands observed in those without LC fragments. Western blot using anti-kappa or anti-lambda antibodies confirmed the identity of the bands with higher molecular weight as a fragment of LC in each of the IgG/kappa and IgG/lambda samples. Conclusion Mass-Fix is able to discriminate LC fragments from intact LC based on their sizes. The detection of LC fragments with Western blot without ionization suggests a biological origin rather than analytical artifacts from MS. The clinical association study suggests that LC fragments may have utility in increasing the suspicion of AL amyloidosis in M-protein positive patients with LC fragments, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and improving patient outcomes.

Abstract Purpose: Germ cell tumors (GCTs) pose significant diagnostic challenges due to the limited sensitivity and specificity of current tumor markers. Hereby we utilize phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) technique to develop a unique immunosignature panel (iSIGN) with high sensitivity and specificity to improve the diagnosis and differentiation of GCTs. Patients and Methods: Serum samples from patients with confirmed gonadal or extragonadal GCTs and controls were collected from Mayo Clinic repositories. Controls included benign testicular lesions, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and other cancers. Samples were randomized into development and validation cohorts. PhIP-Seq identified antigen-autoantibody interactions, and enrichment scores were calculated to develop a biomarker panel distinguishing GCT from non-GCT cases. A second biomarker panel was developed to predict seminoma from nonseminoma cases. Results: A total of 427 serum samples were analyzed, including 150 from GCT patients and 277 controls. For our primary model to distinguish GCT cases (GCT-iSIGN), 24 peptides from 16 antigens were identified based on significant differential autoantibody binding enrichment in GCT patients (p < 0.05), ≥2 peptides per antigen, and enrichment scores ≥ 2.5-fold. GCT-iSIGN was highly sensitive (93%) and specific (99%) for identifying GCT cases from controls with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.93 and 9% Unknown Case Rate (UCR). The secondary panel (Sem-iSIGN) included 17 peptides corresponding to 5 unique proteins with high specificity (93%), moderate sensitivity (65%) and AUC of 0.77 to distinguish seminoma from nonseminoma GCT cases. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential use of PhIP-Seq to identify unique immunosignature panels that can serve as reliable biomarkers for GCT. These panels address the limitations of traditional markers and other proteomic techniques. This immunosignature model represents a cost-effective, stable, and scalable approach to enhancing GCT diagnosis and management. Citation Format: M Bakri Hammami, Andrew Knight, Haidara Kherbek, Brian Costello, Silvana De Lorenzo, Bradley C. Leibovich, John C. Cheville, Yong Guo, Jessica Sagen, Janet E. Olson, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Sean J. Pittock, John R. Mills, Surendra Dasari, Divyanshu Dubey. iSIGN panel identifies germ cell tumors via whole-proteome phage immunoprecipitation sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Cancer-related Autoimmunity; 2025 Sep 24-27; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B027.