Back to Authors

Erickson, Bradley J

0000-0001-7926-6095

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 44

Accelerometer‐Measured Behavior Patterns in Incident Cerebrovascular Disease: Insights for Preventative Monitoring From the UK Biobank

Journal of the American Heart Association | May 31, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.123.032965 | PMID 38818948

Background The goal was to compare patterns of physical activity (PA) behaviors (sedentary behavior [SB], light PA, moderate‐to‐vigorous PA [MVPA], and sleep) measured via accelerometers for 7 days between patients with incident cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) (n=2141) and controls (n=73 938). Methods and Results In multivariate models, cases spent 3.7% less time in MVPA (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.963 [95% CI, 0.929–0.998]) and 1.0% more time in SB (IRR, 1.010 [95% CI, 1.001–1.018]). Between 12 and 24 months before diagnosis, cases spent more time in SB (IRR, 1.028 [95% CI, 1.001–1.057]). Within the year before diagnosis, cases spent less time in MVPA (IRR, 0.861 [95% CI, 0.771–0.964]). Although SB time was not associated with CeVD risk, MVPA time, both total min/d (hazard ratio [HR], 0.998 [95% CI, 0.997–0.999]) and guideline threshold adherence (≥150 min/wk) (HR, 0.909 [95% CI, 0.827–0.998]), was associated with decreased CeVD risk. Comorbid burden had a significant partial mediation effect on the relationship between MVPA and CeVD. Cases slept more during 12:00 to 17:59 hours (IRR, 1.091 [95% CI, 1.002–1.191]) but less during 0:00 to 5:59 hours (IRR, 0.984 [95% CI, 0.977–0.992]). No between‐group differences were significant at subgroup analysis. Conclusions Daily behavior patterns were significantly different in patients before CeVD. Although SB was not associated with CeVD risk, the association between MVPA and CeVD risk is partially mediated by comorbid burden. This study has implications for understanding observable behavior patterns in cerebrovascular dysfunction and may help in developing remote monitoring strategies to prevent or reduce cerebrovascular decline.
Invited Commentary: The Double-edged Sword of Bias in Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence

RadioGraphics | April 18, 2024 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.230243 | PMID 38635455

Bone Age Prediction under Stress

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence | April 17, 2024 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/ryai.240137 | PMID 38629960

Uncover This Tech Term: Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning

Korean Journal of Radiology | March 25, 2024 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 395

10.3348/kjr.2024.0108 | PMID 38528697

FDA Review of Radiologic AI Algorithms: Process and Challenges

Radiology | January 2, 2024 | Volume: 310 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/radiol.230242 | PMID 38165243

Anonymizing Radiographs Using an Object Detection Deep Learning Algorithm

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence | September 13, 2023 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/ryai.230085 | PMID 38074777

Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning of Radiologic Images

Radiology | August 1, 2023 | Volume: 308 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/radiol.222217 | PMID 37526541

Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Cardiothoracic Imaging: A Scoping Review

Diagnostics | October 17, 2022 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2512

10.3390/diagnostics12102512 | PMID 36292201

Machine-learning (ML) and deep-learning (DL) algorithms are part of a group of modeling algorithms that grasp the hidden patterns in data based on a training process, enabling them to extract complex information from the input data. In the past decade, these algorithms have been increasingly used for image processing, specifically in the medical domain. Cardiothoracic imaging is one of the early adopters of ML/DL research, and the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in more research focus on the feasibility and applications of ML/DL in cardiothoracic imaging. In this scoping review, we systematically searched available peer-reviewed medical literature on cardiothoracic imaging and quantitatively extracted key data elements in order to get a big picture of how ML/DL have been used in the rapidly evolving cardiothoracic imaging field. During this report, we provide insights on different applications of ML/DL and some nuances pertaining to this specific field of research. Finally, we provide general suggestions on how researchers can make their research more than just a proof-of-concept and move toward clinical adoption.
Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 2. Model Development

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence | August 24, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/ryai.220010 | PMID 36204532

Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 1. Data Handling

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence | August 24, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/ryai.210290 | PMID 36204544