Hashash, Jana G

Abstract Background Complications such as intermittent pouchitis (IP) and chronic inflammatory disorders of the pouch (CP) are common after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), particularly among patients with both ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). There are no standardized approaches for prophylaxis against these complications for patients with PSC undergoing IPAA. We compared outcomes among patients with PSC and IPAA who received antibiotic or immunosuppressive therapies to those who did not. Methods We designed a retrospective cohort study that included patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC from 7 tertiary care centers that underwent IPAA between 1994 and 2023. Patients were categorized on whether they received medications following IPAA that may provide primary prophylactic benefit, such as antibiotics, probiotics, immunomodulators, or biologic medications; and the proportion of patients developing IP and CP was evaluated. Results A total of 172 patients were included in the cohort, and 13 (7.6%) patients received antibiotics or immunosuppressant medications. Antibiotics and probiotics were the most common therapy (5 patients, 2.9%), followed by biologics, small-molecule inhibitors, immunomodulators, or mesalamine (all 1 patient, 0.6%). Compared to patients not receiving antibiotics or immunosuppression, patients receiving antibiotics or immunosuppression were significantly less likely to develop IP (69.2% vs 91.2%; P = .03; odds ratio 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.80) and CP (23.1% vs 56.0%, P = 0.04; OR 0.24, 95% CI, 0.06-0.89). Conclusions In this retrospective cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC undergoing IPAA, usage of concomitant antibiotics or immunosuppression was low. However, use of concomitant antibiotics or immunosuppression may decrease the burden of inflammatory conditions of the pouch in these high-risk patients.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently modify their diet and use complementary medicine, but inconsistent evidence and persistent myths complicate clinical guidance. Our aim was to critically evaluate the evidence for dietary and complementary strategies in IBD and to clarify common misconceptions, supporting evidence-based, patient-centred management. A narrative synthesis of randomised trials, systematic reviews and international guidelines was conducted. Interventions that were evaluated included dietary strategies encompassing the Mediterranean diet, low-FODMAP (Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides and Polyols) diet, exclusive enteral nutrition, Crohn’s disease exclusion diet and the specific carbohydrate diet. Other interventions included complementary modalities such as probiotics, curcumin, herbal medicine, mind-body interventions and physical activity. The Mediterranean diet shows moderate evidence for improving quality of life and inflammatory biomarkers. A low-FODMAP diet can relieve functional symptoms but does not reduce inflammation. Exclusive enteral nutrition remains first-line induction therapy in paediatric Crohn’s disease. The Crohn’s disease exclusion diet/partial enteral nutrition shows promise in adults. Among complementary therapies, specific probiotics and curcumin demonstrate benefits in certain cases of ulcerative colitis, but evidence for their use in Crohn’s disease remains limited. Personalised, multidisciplinary supervised dietary and complementary approaches may support symptom control and quality of life in IBD patients. However, they should complement rather than replace evidence-based pharmacologic therapy, and high-quality trial and clinical studies are needed to define optimal, evidence-based nutritional strategies.

Background/Objectives: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition encompassing ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). The role of environmental factors in the pathogenesis of IBD remains elusive. Nevertheless, evidence suggests a pivotal role of viruses, specifically Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), in the progression of IBD through mechanisms such as molecular mimicry and bystander activation. Our previous findings demonstrate EBV DNA’s significant role in exacerbating colitis symptoms and elevating the levels of the pro-autoimmune cytokine interleukin-17A (IL-17A) in an IBD mouse model via toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9). Therefore, we aimed to examine the role of EBV particles in the pathogenesis of IBD, and the potential role of TLR9 inhibition in ameliorating disease outcomes. Methods: Three days post colitis induction, EBV particles were intra-rectally injected into female C57BL/6J mice, followed by the intra-peritoneal administration of TLR9 inhibitor. Thereupon, mice were monitored daily and the disease activity index (DAI), colon lengths, and damage scores, as well as the number of cells, double-positive for IL-17A+ and IFN-γ+, and triple-positive for IL-17A+, IFN-γ+, and FOXP3+, were evaluated. Results: Our findings revealed a significant role of TLR9 inhibition in mitigating colitis features in an EBV-injected IBD mouse model compared to the control group. Conclusions: These results indicate an essential role of TLR9 in initiating immune responses against recurrent EBV reactivation events, which ultimately contributes to inflammation aggravation in IBD patients. Consequently, TLR9 could serve as a potential therapeutic target to alleviate the severe symptoms of IBD in EBV-infected individuals.

Abstract Objectives Oral extraintestinal manifestations (OEIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impact IBD treatment. The aims of this study were to: (1) determine which OEIMs are most prevalent among patients with IBD, (2) investigate the presence of a temporal association between GI luminal disease activity and OEIMs, and (3) determine how often changes in therapeutic management of IBD are needed in the presence of OEIMs. Study Design A retrospective cohort study was performed for adult patients with IBD evaluated between January 2017 and November 2021 with at least 1 oral complaint. Demographic data were collected from the charts of these patients. Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous measures and Fisher’s Exact test for categorical measures were used. Results A total of 116 patients with IBD who had presented with at least 1 oral finding during the study time period were identified. Aphthous ulcers were the most common oral presentation in both Crohn’s disease (CD) (85.1%) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (75.0%). OEIMs were associated with CD activity in the small intestine (P = .004) and colon (P < .001). UC pancolitis was associated with OEIMs (P = .002). In 32.7% of patients, OEIMs led to either an increase in dose or frequency of IBD therapy. In an additional 16.4% of patients, new systemic agents were started because of the OEIMs. Conclusions This study provides evidence that patients with IBD may develop OEIMs synchronous with IBD flares and may require escalation of IBD therapy when OEIMs occur.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to establish the clinical utility of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-supported, model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) approach (precision-guided dosing [PGD]) by assessing the impact of pharmacokinetic (clearance [CL]) and clinical laboratory parameters on adalimumab (ADA) dosage adjustments during maintenance therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: In the EMPOWER study, blood was collected at any time post-ADA injection. Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing was conducted in an accredited lab. Inputs for the PGD test included ADA concentrations, antibodies to ADA, albumin levels, and the current dosing regimen. CL was calculated using nonlinear mixed-effect models. Results were reported to health care providers (HCPs) within 3 days. HCPs’ treatment decisions were recorded and classified as treatment reduction, continuation, intensification, or ADA discontinuation. The physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity was collected. Relationships between drug concentrations, CL, disease activity, and physician decision-making were assessed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 213 cases were assessed by 21 HCPs. ADA treatment was intensified in 24% and discontinued in 13% of cases. An ADA concentration ≤ 10 μg/mL was associated with a 23.7-fold and 3.0-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification and PGA > 0, respectively, compared to concentrations > 10 μg/mL. An ADA concentration < 5 μg/mL was associated with a 3.3-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation. CL ≥ 0.318 L/day was associated with a 10.4-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification. Higher CL (>0.8 L/day) was associated with a 3.5-fold and 4.2-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation and PGA > 0, respectively. Conclusions: PGD enables earlier and precise optimization of ADA dosing by predicting trough levels at any time during the therapy cycle. Optimized dosing to achieve target ADA concentrations and low clearance is crucial to mitigate therapy discontinuation and active disease in IBD patients.

Abstract Introduction There is limited real-world evidence comparing the effectiveness of ozanimod to vedolizumab as first-line advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional US database in adults with UC who were initiated on ozanimod compared to vedolizumab between January 1, 2021 and 22 June, 2024. The primary outcome was to compare the risk of a composite outcome of corticosteroid use, colectomy, or change to another advanced therapy between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for demographics, comorbid conditions, disease extent, laboratory parameters, and previous corticosteroid use. The risk was expressed as an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% CIs. Results We identified 222 patients in the ozanimod cohort (mean age 41.2 ± 15.7, 46.3% male sex, 68% White, and 22.5% ulcerative proctitis), and 4145 patients in the vedolizumab cohort (mean age 47.4 ± 18.3, 45.2% male sex, 69.7% White, and 17.2% ulcerative proctitis). After PSM, there was no significant difference in the risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.63-1.36) and corticosteroid use (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.53-1.18) between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. There was a higher risk of change in therapy in the ozanimod cohort (aOR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.09-3.49) compared to the vedolizumab cohort. Colectomy rates were low in both cohorts (&lt;0.04%). Conclusions Our real-world study showed that ozanimod use is associated with similar corticosteroid use but higher odds of a change in therapy compared to vedolizumab when used as first-line therapy in patients with UC. Further prospective studies are needed to understand long-term outcomes.

Background: While bariatric surgery may reduce obesity-associated inflammation, alterations in gut microbiome and nutrition could impact inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) risk. This study aimed to investigate the association between bariatric surgery and new onset IBD. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted from inception to 31 January 2024. Risk estimates were pooled using a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model, and adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) was used to examine the risk of bias. Results: Of 98 articles screened, four studies comprising 4,727,600 participants were included in the systematic review and two studies in the meta-analysis. Included studies had high quality and low risk of bias according to NOS. The pooled analysis revealed a significant risk of new onset IBD (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04–1.53, I2 = 74.9%), particularly Crohn’s disease (HR: 1.75, 1.59–1.92, I2 = 0), following bariatric surgery, but no significant risk of ulcerative colitis (HR: 0.93, 0.75–1.11, I2 = 11.5%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that bariatric surgery was associated with a higher risk of developing Crohn’s disease. Patients should be counseled on IBD risk pre-surgery, and symptomatic patients should be evaluated post-surgery to enable early diagnosis and management.

Abstract Introduction Pouchitis is the most common complication in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), which can develop in up to 66% of patients. There is limited data on the effect of orthoptic liver transplantation (OLT) on the risk of developing pouchitis. We aimed to objectively assess whether OLT itself significantly modifies the risk of developing pouchitis in patients with overlap PSC and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Method We searched Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases from inception through September 2023 for studies that describe the outcomes of IPAA in patients with PSC and IBD who also have a history of OLT. Pooled proportions, Odds Ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for data were calculated utilizing a random effects model. Using the Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformation (FTT) method, the pooled weight-adjusted estimate of event rates for clinical outcomes in each group was also calculated. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q statistic (I2). Results Seven studies with a total of 291 patients with a history of PSC, IBD, and OLT were identified. The pooled overall risk of pouchitis in PSC/IBD patients with a history of OLT was 65% (95% CI: 0.57–0.72), with no heterogeneity observed in the analysis (I2 = 0%). In a subgroup analysis of patients who had IPAA followed by OLT, 3 studies with 28 patients were included; the pooled risk of pouchitis after IPAA and OLT was 83% (95% CI: 0.71–0.94; I2 = 0%), which was significantly higher (P &lt; .001) than the OLT followed by IPAA group (59%; 95 CI: 0.48–0.71; I2 = 0%). There was no difference in the risk of pouchitis between OLT and non-OLT groups (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 0.37–5.0). Conclusions Our meta-analysis revelaed that pouchitis is common in patients who underwent OLT for PSC, especially in those who had IPAA before the OLT. OLT before IPAA may reduce the risk of pouchitis. Further larger studies are warranted to reproduce this and investigate the reason behind this difference.

Introduction: Diet is thought to play an important role in the clinical course and quality of life (QOL) of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, dietary habits of patients with IBD are still unknown. This case–control study aims to compare the dietary habits of patients with IBD to healthy controls and evaluate differences in disease severity and QOL. Materials and methods: Food frequency, severity scores using the Harvey–Bradshaw and Ulcerative colitis activity index, and QOL were assessed using online questionnaires. Dietary habits were compared for patients with active disease and remission and for those with low QOL (LQOL) and high QOL (HQOL). Results: We recruited 61 patients with IBD and 101 controls. Significance was set at p = 0.05. Controls consumed significantly more daily calories (2546 vs. 1641, p = 0.001). However, patients with IBD consumed a higher percentage of carbohydrates (50% vs. 45%, p = 0.001), more red meat (p = 0.024), and less fiber, sucrose, and lactose (p = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.036). Patients with active disease had higher lipid intake, lower protein intake, and lower QOL (47 vs. 58, p = 0.001). Dietary differences between LQOL and HQOL mirrored those between active disease and remission. Conclusion: This study is the first to provide valuable insights into the nutritional profile of Lebanese patients with IBD.

Lay Summary This retrospective study assessed the use of Janus kinase inhibitors in treating chronic pouchitis. While showing relative safety, Janus kinase inhibitors demonstrated effectiveness in &lt;50% of cases, cautioning against their use as first-line agents. Larger randomized trials are recommended for further investigation.