Wiedermann, Joshua

Background: Access to high-quality airway equipment is critical for effective otolaryngological and emergency care. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), challenges in the procurement infrastructure may hinder equipment availability, impacting patient outcomes. Given the paucity of literature investigating equipment procurement in SSA, this study aims to map out the multilevel barriers to procurement of airway equipment in SSA to inform opportunities for improvement. Methods: A qualitative study design was employed using semi-structured interviews and open-ended survey responses. Participants included otolaryngologists in SSA, manufacturing company representatives and international policymakers, selected through purposive sampling to ensure representation of various roles in the procurement process. Six interviews, one focus group and six survey responses with regional healthcare providers (n = 13), manufacturing representatives (n = 3) and international policymakers (n = 2) explored supply chain dynamics, regulatory challenges, manufacturing capabilities, financial constraints and policy frameworks. Data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify recurrent themes and interrelationships. Results: Systemic barriers exist in the procurement process, including fragmented supply chains, inconsistent regulatory enforcement, limited local manufacturing capacity and insufficient funding mechanisms. Otolaryngologists emphasised frequent delays in equipment availability, while manufacturers reported logistical challenges and regulatory hurdles. Policymakers noted gaps in infrastructure and regional coordination. Emerging themes suggest opportunities for streamlining procurement processes, fostering local production and enhancing collaboration to improve supply chain efficiency. Conclusion: This study underscores the multifaceted challenges in airway equipment procurement in SSA and highlights the need for integrated approaches involving stakeholders across the supply chain. Contribution: Findings provide actionable insights to inform policy development and capacity-building initiatives with the goal of enhancing access to life-saving airway equipment and improving healthcare outcomes.

ImportanceUnderstanding the global barriers to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) care is crucial in addressing disparities in access to care, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).ObjectiveTo characterize barriers to comprehensive otolaryngology care across World Bank income groups.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing an online cross-sectional survey that was administered by the Global OHNS Initiative via international and national professional societies, personal contacts, and social media, this study captured the perceptions of otolaryngologists regarding barriers to OHNS care at the levels of the country, health sector, clinician, and patient. Participants included otolaryngologists from the 194 World Health Organization member states and Taiwan. Eligibility criteria included a medical degree and specialized training in managing conditions of the ear, nose, and throat. The nonresponse rate was not recorded. The data collection period spanned from October 2022 to June 2023.ExposuresExposures included World Bank income group classification.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were Likert scale responses regarding frequency of barriers to OHNS care. The a priori hypothesis was that LMICs would report more frequent barriers to OHNS care.ResultsThe study involved 146 otolaryngologists (47 female individuals [32%]), with 69 (47%) from high-income countries and 77 (53%) from LMICs. Male individuals represented 45 high-income country respondents (65%) and 54 LMIC respondents (70%). Barriers were reported across income groups at all levels of the health system, with a higher frequency in LMICs. Several barriers were reported to be more substantial in LMICs, such as the national volume and distribution of otolaryngologists, financial compensation for clinicians, and patient stigma, and others were common across income settings, such as the availability of operating rooms and inflexible working hours. Common concerns included national and health sector barriers: OHNS workforce, referral networks, government support; clinician barriers: excessive clinician workloads, understaffing, poor administration support; patient barriers: distance to health care facilities, financial burdens such as medical costs and foregone wages, stigma, and health literacy.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study suggest that there are barriers to otolaryngology care globally that affected all levels of the health care system. This work may inform prioritization of otolaryngology within research and policy, and it emphasizes the need for effective strategies to expand access to otolaryngology care, particularly in lower-income settings.

ABSTRACTImportanceHighlighting the global disparities in otolaryngology training and, ultimately, service delivery, emphasizing the need for equitable access to training resources and programs.ObjectiveTo describe the relationship between the quality, content, and location of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery training and education and the resulting impact on the delivery of otolaryngology care globally.DesignAn online cross‐sectional survey to otolaryngologists, gathering information on their training and education experiences, and factors influencing their choice of training location and practice.SettingThe online survey was available in multiple languages, distributed via national and international professional otolaryngology societies, snowballing and social media.ParticipantsThe respondents were practicing otolaryngologists representing all seven World Health Organization regions.ExposuresWorld Bank income groups classification.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOur expected outcome was that subspecialty training and access to educational resources were significantly readily available to respondents from high‐income countries, leading to more confidence in performing complex procedures post training.ResultsA total of 91 participants were included in the analysis, with 47 (52%) practicing in high‐income countries and 44 (48%) in low‐ and middle‐income countries. Sixty‐one participants (67%) were male. Subspecialty training and access to educational resources were significantly less available in low‐ and middle‐income countries, leading to lower confidence among low‐ and middle‐income countries physicians in performing complex procedures. High‐income country respondents reported better access to diverse training resources and felt more prepared for a broader range of procedures.Conclusion and RelevanceSignificant disparities exist in OHNS training resources and subspecialty training opportunities between high‐ and low‐middle‐income countries. There is a critical need to integrate complementary training and educational modalities into local systems. Addressing the shortage of educational resources and promoting open‐access initiatives in low‐middle‐income countries are essential steps toward enhancing surgical education and improving global otolaryngology healthcare outcomes.

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), home to over 1 billion people, has only one paediatric otolaryngology fellowship program and nine fellowship-trained paediatric Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) specialists covering seven countries. Seven of these specialists estimated an average of 40+ patients per month are in need of critical surgical airway management in their respective countries and that 2–25 deaths per year (mainly paediatric) occur in their country from lack of access to foreign body removal equipment. Investing in paediatric airway infrastructure and capacity would largely benefit the health system in SSA, where the current lack of equipment alone leads to unmeasured morbidity and mortality. As a region of the world with the largest paediatric populations, sub-Saharan Africa’s need is all the more pressing given the disproportionately low number of medical specialists, institutions and resources. Collaborative approaches in procurement and maintenance of high-quality, cost-effective equipment are crucially desirable factors in both low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). We, as the Global OHNS Initiative, urge for multi-stakeholder engagement and collaboration to forge lasting change.

Introduction: Differential diagnoses of a pediatric neck mass are extensive, ranging across benign, malignant, congenital and infectious causes. Limited access to imaging in low-resource settings increases the complexity of narrowing this list to appropriately diagnose and treat neck masses. This occasionally allows neck masses to grow unchecked, increasing the morbidity of their presence and eventual excision. The goal of this report is to describe nuances in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric neck masses in resource-limited settings through a case report of a neck mass in a pediatric patient. Patient presentation: A 10-year-old girl in Harare, Zimbabwe, presented for surgical management of a midline neck mass that appeared 4 years prior to presentation for definitive treatment. A myriad of barriers delayed her care, allowing the mass to grow into her floor of mouth, displacing her tongue and leading to speech and feeding difficulties. Management and outcome: At presentation to the tertiary care facility, she received a pre-operative ultrasound showing a well-circumscribed, echogenic mass. Her neck mass was surgically excised through a transoral approach. Permanent pathology was consistent with a dermoid cyst. Conclusion: At 1-month postoperative follow-up, the patient had experienced no complications and had a complete resolution of her functional symptoms and appearance. Contribution: We present a case that can illuminate the utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of pediatric neck masses. Additionally, we facilitate an important discussion on transoral versus transcervical approach for midline neck masses with the decision hinging on size, location, surgeon preference and comfort and consideration of cosmesis.

AbstractObjectivesOnline educational platforms with open access have seen a growing adoption in the field of medical education. However, the extent of their global usage is still unclear. To fill this knowledge gap, our objective is to examine the usage patterns of two renowned open‐access resources in Otolaryngology. This includes identifying the most sought‐after topics and understanding the demographics of their users.MethodsRetrospective study of web analytics data between 2016 and 2021 extracted from the Headmirror.com and Mayo Clinic Otolaryngology YouTube channel platforms analyzing demographic and education topic trends via descriptive, geospatial, time‐series, t‐tests, and ANOVA analyses.ResultsViewership spanned 124 countries in 7 different geographic regions, with 72 countries comprising low‐ to middle‐income countries, mostly represented ages of 25–34 years old, came from high‐income countries rather than low‐income (p < .001), and used mobile phones followed by computers for device access. Video‐educational material comprised of subspecialty topics on Rhinology and Sinus Surgery (25%) at the highest end and Facial Trauma (1%) at the lowest. Controlling for the age of the video content, the most‐accessed videos comprised of subspecialty topics on Head and Neck Surgery at the highest end and Laryngology at the lowest with significant differentiation across topics of interest (p < .044).ConclusionsThis assessment of web‐analytics platforms from two widely used otolaryngology free, online‐access materials showed increasing global usage trends with significant differentiating factors along viewership demographics, as well as sought‐after subspecialty topics of interest. In turn, our results not only lay the groundwork for characterizing the global otolaryngology audience but also for future development of targeted educational materials and accessibility initiatives aimed at ameliorating global educational disparities in the field.

Abstract Importance: There is a notable lack of low-cost OHNS simulation models that are relevant for early medical trainees and students. By conducting this study, we will understand the current landscape of low-cost otolaryngology-head and neck surgery simulation for early medical trainees and students. Objectives: Medical simulation is essential for surgical training yet is often too expensive and inaccessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Furthermore, in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS), while simulation training is often focused on senior residents and specialists, there is a critical need to target general practitioners who carry a significant load of OHNS care in countries with limited OHNS providers. This scoping review aims to describe affordable, effective OHNS simulation models for early-stage trainees and non-OHNS specialists in resource-limited settings and discuss gaps in the literature. Evidence Review: This scoping review followed the five stages of Arksey and O’Malley’s Scoping Review Methodology. Seven databases were used to search for articles. Included articles discussed physical models of the ear, nose, or throat described as “low-cost,” “cost-effective,” or defined as <$150 if explicitly stated; related to the management of common and emergent OHNS conditions; and geared towards undergraduate students, medical, dental, or nursing students, and/or early-level residents. Findings: Of the 1706 studies screened, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in HICs. Most models were low fidelity (less anatomically realistic) models. The most common simulated skills were peritonsillar abscess aspiration and cricothyrotomy. Information on cost was limited, and locally sourced materials were infrequently mentioned. Simulations were evaluated using questionnaires and direct observation. Conclusion and Relevance: Low-cost simulation models can be beneficial for early medical trainees and students in LMICs, addressing resource constraints and improving skill acquisition. However, there is a notable lack of contextually relevant, locally developed, and cost-effective models. This study summarizes existing low-cost OHNS simulation models for early-stage trainees and highlights the need for additional locally sourced models. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of these models.

AbstractObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to identify existing literature on recurrent atypical mycobacterial cervicofacial lymphadenitis to augment our understanding of a unique patient who presented to our tertiary‐care center 5‐years posttreatment with recurrence following curettage.Data SourcesOVID Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science.MethodsA literature search was conducted yielding 49 original articles which were screened twice by two independent reviewers resulting in 14 studies meeting inclusion criteria for data extraction using Covidence software. Two independent reviewers extracted data on recurrence of atypical mycobacterial cervicofacial lymphadenitis and consensus was reached on data points from all included studies.ResultsThis study illuminated the paucity of recurrence reporting in the literature regarding atypical mycobacterial lymphadenitis. Sixteen studies identified in our review included discussions on recurrence with few elaborating beyond the rate of recurrence to describe their management. Fourteen out of sixteen studies provided recurrence rates for their cohort, 11 out of 14 specified the initial treatment modality, and only five out of eight studies that described initial treatment with surgery differentiated recurrence rates between complete and incomplete excision. The mean length of follow‐up in the included studies was 20 months. There was one previously reported case of late recurrence at 5‐years.ConclusionsWe identified few reports that discussed the management of recurrence of atypical mycobacterial cervicofacial lymphadenitis. There was minimal data on recurrence rates between surgical treatment modalities. The case discussed in our study showcases that treatment with curettage has the potential to present with late recurrence.

ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to explore the current body of literature to characterize how short‐term surgical trips (STSTs) in Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery (OtoHNS) contribute to surgical, educational, and sustainability‐based outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). We aim to use these data to synthesize aspects of STSTs that are successful with the hopes of shaping future global efforts.Data SourcesData sources included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus.Review MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted on several databases from inception to October 14, 2021. We included primary studies exploring any surgical or educational outcomes of global short‐term surgical endeavors within LMICs. Data were then extracted to evaluate the heterogenous body of literature that exists, characterizing the surgical, educational, and sustainability‐based outcomes.ResultsForty‐Seven studies were included in the final analysis. Most publications were focused on surgical interventions (39 of 47; 82.9%); 13 (27.7%) studies included education as the primary aim and 12 (25.5%) considered sustainability a significant aim. Of the 94 first and last authors, there were zero first authors and only one last author with an LMIC affiliation. Twenty‐six studies (55%) mentioned that any patients were seen in follow‐up, ranging from one day to five years.ConclusionOur scoping review demonstrates that most STSTs have focused primarily on surgical procedures with a lack of appropriate long‐term follow‐up. However, the available outcome‐based information presented helps identify factors that characterize a strong short‐term global surgical program.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 134:32–39, 2024

Purpose of review Identify patient-perceived barriers to head and neck cancer care and compare differences in barriers by country income status. Recent Findings Of the 37 articles, 51% (n = 19) were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), while 49% (n = 18) were from high-income countries. Of the papers from high-income countries, unspecified head and neck cancer (HNC) subtype (67%, n = 12) were the most common cancer type, while upper aerodigestive tract mucosal malignancies (58%, n = 11) were more common in LMICs (P = 0.02). Based on World Health Organization barriers, level of education (P = < 0.01) and alternative medicine use (P = 0.04) were greater barriers in LMICs compared to high-income countries. At least 50% of articles listed barriers at all three ‘Three Delays’ timepoints. There were no significant differences by country income status for the ‘Three Delays’ timepoints of deciding to seek care (P = 0.23), reaching the healthcare facility (P = 0.75), or receiving care (P = 1.00). Summary Patients face barriers to care for head and neck cancer regardless of country income status. There is overlap in several barriers and a need for systemic improvement in access. The differences in education and alternative medicine may guide region-specific interventions to improve the provision of head and neck services.