Alberts, Steven R.

572 Background: There is limited data regarding chemotherapy dosing in obese mCRC patients. Methods: A retrospective, single institution, cohort study of mCRC patients receiving mFOLFOX6 (fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus omitted) was conducted between January 2002 and January 2011. Patients were stratified into: obese (BMI > 30) full dose, obese dose reduced (oxaliplatin (OX) and/or 5-FU), non-obese (BMI 18-29.9) full dose, and non-obese dose reduced. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 3/4 myelosuppression within the first 12 wks of therapy. Secondary endpoints included incidence of any grade diarrhea and neuropathy, progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 236 patients (72 obese, 164 non-obese), 15 obese and 37 non-obese received a dose reduction. Grade 3/4 myelosuppression occurred in 0 obese OX dose reduced, 3 (7.5%) obese full dose, 1 (8.3%) non-obese dose reduced, and 7 (7.8%) non-obese full dose patients (p=0.93). Grade 3/4 myelosuppression occurred in 0 obese 5-FU dose reduced, 3 (7.5%) obese full dose, 2 (12.5%) non-obese dose reduced, and 6 (7%) non-obese full dose patients (p=0.8). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of neuropathy or diarrhea between groups. PFS was longer in OX full dose patients (obese dose reduced, 8.8 mos; obese full dose, 10 mos; non-obese dose reduced, 3.7 mos; non-obese full dose, 10.4 mos; p=0.0094). No difference in PFS was found with 5-FU dosing (p=0.0615). OS favored OX full dose patients (obese dose reduced, 1.6 yrs; obese full dose, 2.4 yrs; non-obese dose reduced, 0.7 yrs; non-obese full dose, 2 yrs; p=0.0006) and 5-FU full dose patients (obese dose reduced, 1.6 yrs; obese full dose, 2.2 yrs; non-obese dose reduced, 1.6 yrs; non-obese full dose, 1.9 yrs; p=0.0287). Conclusions: There is no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 myelosuppression, diarrhea or neuropathy in obese versus non-obese patients, dose reduced or not. OX dose reductions were associated with reduced PFS and OS. 5-FU dose reductions were associated with reduced OS. Our study supports ASCO recommendations against dose reductions in obese patients receiving chemotherapy.

453 Background: A 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX Colon Cancer) has been clinically validated as a predictor of recurrence risk in stage 2 colon cancer patients following surgery. We conducted the first prospective study to characterize the impact of Recurrence Score results on medical oncologists’ recommendations regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in T3, Mismatch Repair-proficient (MMR-P) stage 2 colon cancer patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with resected stage 2A colon cancer who were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy were consented and enrolled by 105 medical oncologists from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium. Each patient’s tumor specimen was assessed by the Recurrence Score test (quantitative RT-PCR) and MMR (IHC). Prior to and after receiving these results, physicians completed surveys indicating their planned treatments given hypothetical or known MMR results, recorded as Observation (Obs), 5FU-based chemotherapy (5FU), or 5FU + Oxaliplatin (Oxal). Change in treatment recommendation intensity from baseline to follow-up was defined as: increased if change from Obs to 5FU +/- Oxal or from 5FU to 5FU+Oxal, decreased if change from 5FU + Oxal to 5FU or Obs, or from 5FU to Obs, or no change. Results: 187 of 221 patients enrolled were evaluable including 141 who were MMR-P (avg age 63, 65% ECOG PS 0, med tumor size 5 cm, 11% high grade, 91% with 12+ nodes examined). In the primary analysis treatment recommendations changed for 63 (45%) of 141 MMR-P patients, with intensity decreasing for 47 (33%) and increasing for 16 (11%). Recommendations for chemotherapy (5-FU +/- Oxal) decreased from 73 (52%) patients pre-assay to 42 (30%) post-assay. Increased treatment intensity was more likely at higher Recurrence Score values and decreased intensity at lower Recurrence Score values (p=0.011), and any change was more likely when MMR status was unknown at baseline (p = 0.041). Conclusions: In this prospective study, quantitative recurrence risk information provided by the Recurrence Score test was associated with treatment recommendation changes for 45% of T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer patients. Use of the 12-gene assay may lead to overall reductions in chemotherapy.

391 Background: Prior economic analysis of a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX), compared with patterns of care reported in the NCCN database of patients with stage II, T3, DNA mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) colon cancer, predicted that the assay would save medical costs and improve patient well-being (Hornberger et al., Value Health, 2012). This study assessed the validity of those findings with actual adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) recommendations. Methods: Outcomes and costs were estimated for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer using a Markov model. A study of 141 patients from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium collected data on aCT recommended before and after knowledge of the 12-gene assay results (Srivastava et al. abstract). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and medical resource use after recurrence were computed using guideline-validated state-transition probability estimation methods. Risk of progression and incidence of adverse events with different aCT regimens were based on published literature. Drug and administration costs for aCT were obtained from 2012 Medicare fee schedules. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter influence on economic impact. Results: After receiving the 12-gene assay results, physician recommendations in favor of aCT decreased 22% (95% CI 11%-32%; McNemar test p<0.001) from 73 (52%) to 42 (30%) patients. Oxaliplatin aCT and 5-FU monotherapy recommendations each declined 11%. Average aCT costs decreased $5,738 for drugs, $668 for administration, and $3,268 for adverse events management. Overall, average total direct medical costs decreased $4,203. The net effect on average patient well-being was a gain of 0.083 QALYs. Total medical costs are most influenced by change in aCT recommendations, 5-FU monotherapy efficacy, and oxaliplatin drug acquisition cost. Savings are expected to persist even if the cost of oxaliplatin dropped by >75% due to generic substitution. Conclusions: The 12-gene assayhas been shown to alter aCT recommendations for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer. This study provides real-world confirmation that these changes in aCT reduce direct medical costs and improve patient well-being.

508 Background: Severe adverse events (AEs) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) constitute a major dilemma in CC treatment. We recently demonstrated that specific deleterious DPYD variants in the coding region were highly predictive of grade >3 (G3+) AEs in stage III CC pts receiving adjuvant 5-FU based combination chemotherapy [Lee et al. JNCI. In press]. Other studies have suggested potential associations between AEs and non-coding DPYD variants: a novel haplotype (HapB3) containing three intronic variants (c.483+18 G>A, c.680+139 G>A, and c.959-51 T>C), one synonymous variant (c.1236 G>A, E412E), and a deep intronic variant (c.1129-5923 C>G) that affects pre-mRNA splicing. However, these studies included a diversity of cancer types, stages and treatments. The findings require further evaluation in a refined population. Methods: A total of 2,134 Caucasian stage III CC pts without DPYD*2A, D949V, and I560S variants from NCCTG N0147 trial who received adjuvant FOLFOX or FOLFIRI +/- cetuximab were genotyped by multiplexed single-base extension assays on the Sequenom MassARRAY. G3+ AEs were recorded (CTCAE v3) and classified as common to 5-FU treatment (5FU-AEs). Logistic regressions were used to assess the univariate and multivariate associations. Results: Analyzed pts displayed the following characteristics: 54.3% male, median age 59 [19-85], proficient MMR 87.5%, PS-0 76.5%, + irinotecan 8.5%, and + cetuximab 46.5%. Pts carrying c.1129-5923 C>G were significantly associated with higher risk of G3+ 5FU-AEs (Odds Ratio [OR]=1.539, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.001 – 2.367, p=0.049). Only marginal association was observed for one of the HapB3 variants, c.1236 G>A (p=0.058). A linearly increasing risk of G3+ 5FU-AEs was identified for HapB3, comparing pts with no, one or >1 variant present (unadjusted OR=1.539, 95% CI=1.001 – 2.367, p=0.041; adjusted OR=1.198, 95% CI=0.998-1.437, p=0.052). Conclusions: In the largest study to date, c.1129-5923 C>G and HapB3 were predictive of 5FU-AE risk in stage III CC patients without DPYD*2A, D949V, and I560S variants receiving 5-FU-based combination chemotherapy.

291 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy with poor survival. The only curative therapy is resection and the role of adjuvant therapy is not well defined. Despite the unproven benefit, adjuvant therapy is used in resected CCA. The aim of this study is to analyze our institution’s outcomes for peri-operative treatment of resected intrahepatic and extrahepatic CCA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 intrahepatic (iCCA) and 109 extrahepatic (eCCA) CCA patients who underwent resection at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The majority of treated patients received adjuvant chemotherapy; however neo-adjuvant and radiation were also included. Results: In stage 1-2 iCCA patients, the HR indicated worse outcomes for time to recurrence and death. For stage 3-4 or node positive disease, outcomes were not significantly different. Those with node unknown/negative disease had significantly worse time to recurrence but not OS. There was a significant difference in stage and treatment modality between these groups (see table). Among eCCA, for any stage and node positive disease, outcomes were not different. In the node unknown/negative group, neither time to recurrence nor OS differed significantly. In controlling for different features in multi-variable analyses, no significant differences were observed (see table). Conclusions: This retrospective study does not show a significant difference in recurrence free or OS for treated patients. The apparent lack of benefit most likely reflects selection bias among treatment groups. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to make sound recommendations in adjuvant treatment for CCA. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

PURPOSE: Multitargeted antifolate (MTA) is an investigational agent that, like gemcitabine, exhibits broad activity in solid tumors. A phase I trial of MTA and gemcitabine was undertaken, based on the demonstration of preclinical cytotoxic synergy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (group I) received 164 courses (median, four; range, one to 14 courses) of treatment of gemcitabine at doses of 1,000 and 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and MTA at doses of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 mg/m2, given 90 minutes after gemcitabine on day 1. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Because the day 8 dose of gemcitabine was reduced or omitted in 57% of courses due to neutropenia, 21 patients (group II) were treated on an alternate schedule, with MTA administered on day 8 rather than day 1. This group received 85 treatment courses (median, four; range, one to 10 courses). RESULTS: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Other toxicities included nausea, fatigue, rash, and elevated hepatic transaminases. The maximum-tolerated dose was gemcitabine/MTA 1,000/500 mg/m2 for group I and 1,250/500 mg/m2 for group II. Thirteen objective responses were documented (colorectal cancer, n = 3; non–small-cell lung cancer, n = 3; cholangiocarcinoma, n = 2; ovarian carcinoma, n = 2; mesothelioma, n = 1; breast cancer, n = 1; and adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site, n = 1). Gemcitabine had no effect on the disposition of MTA. CONCLUSION: The gemcitabine/MTA combination is broadly active and warrants further evaluation. The sequence of gemcitabine administered on days 1 and 8 with MTA administered on day 8 is better tolerated and is recommended for further study at doses of gemcitabine/MTA 1,250/500 mg/m2.

PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and describe the toxicities of the combination of irinotecan and docetaxel administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies and, also, to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel and describe preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients received 85 courses (median, two courses; range, one to 15 courses) of treatment with irinotecan, administered over 90 minutes by intravenous infusion, followed by docetaxel, administered over 60 minutes by intravenous infusion. Four escalating dose levels of irinotecan/docetaxel (160/50 mg/m2, 160/65 mg/m2, 200/65 mg/m2, and 200/75 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel. RESULTS: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which consisted of neutropenia that was severe (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI CTC] grade 4) but brief (< 5 days) in 11 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities of anorexia, nausea, and stomatitis were mild to moderate (NCI CTC grades 1 and 2), but there was one incidence each of both CTC grade 3 anorexia and nausea. All patients had total alopecia. Diarrhea was dose-dependent and severe in four patients who failed to take adequate antidiarrhea therapy. Five out of 16 assessable patients, one with cholangiocarcinoma, one with leiomyosarcoma, and three with non–small-cell lung cancer, achieved partial remissions. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and docetaxel causes significant reversible myelosuppression, which was dose limiting but led to no serious sequelae. There was no evidence of a clinically significant interaction using these two agents in this sequence. The combination showed antitumor activity at all the dose levels tested and should be further studied in a number of tumor types. The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is irinotecan 160 mg/m2 and docetaxel 65 mg/m2.

PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of continuous venous infusion (CVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of oral eniluracil/5-FU and to describe toxicities and clinical activity of prolonged oral administration of eniluracil/5-FU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, cross-over study compared CVI 5-FU to an oral 5-FU/eniluracil combination. Seventeen patients (arm A) were randomly assigned to receive eniluracil/5-FU combination tablets (10:1 mg/m 2 BID for 7 days) during the first study period, followed by 5-FU (300 mg/m 2 CVI for 7 days) during period 2, with a 14-day washout between periods. Sixteen patients (arm B) received treatment in the opposite sequence. In period 3, all patients received eniluracil/5-FU tablets BID for 28 days. Plasma levels of 5-FU during CVI and oral administration were analyzed in periods 1 and 2. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity was determined by measuring plasma uracil, urinary α–fluoro-β-alanine, and peripheral-blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD activity. RESULTS: There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities in either arm. Partial responses were observed in three patients. Another three patients had stable disease for ≥ 3 months. Eniluracil and 5-FU pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in previous studies and were unaffected by administration sequence. The mean ± SD steady-state plasma concentration (C P ) and area under the curve (AUC) 144-168h for CVI 5-FU (104 ± 45 ng/mL and 2,350 ± 826 ng·h/mL, respectively) were three-fold greater than those for oral 5-FU (38.1 ± 7.7 ng/mL and 722 ± 182 ng·h/mL, respectively [P < .00001]). Individual 5-FU concentrations during CVI were highly variable, whereas those after eniluracil/5-FU were very reproducible. DPD activity in PBMCs before each study period was normal. CONCLUSION: Both CVI 5-FU and oral eniluracil/5-FU were well tolerated, with moderate activity in these heavily pretreated patients. However, 5-FU steady-state C P and AUCs achieved with oral eniluracil/5-FU were significantly less than with CVI 5-FU.