Williamson, Stephen K.

PURPOSE Three agents with differing mechanisms of action are available for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. In this study, we compared the activity and toxicity of three different two-drug combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had not been treated previously for advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to receive irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (IFL, control combination), oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX), or irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX). The primary end point was time to progression, with secondary end points of response rate, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 795 patients were randomly assigned between May 1999 and April 2001. A median time to progression of 8.7 months, response rate of 45%, and median survival time of 19.5 months were observed for FOLFOX. These results were significantly superior to those observed for IFL for all end points (6.9 months, 31%, and 15.0 months, respectively) or for IROX (6.5 months, 35%, and 17.4 months, respectively) for time to progression and response. The FOLFOX regimen had significantly lower rates of severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and dehydration. Sensory neuropathy and neutropenia were more common with the regimens containing oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION The FOLFOX regimen of oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin was active and comparatively safe. It should be considered as a standard therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Background Previous studies have established that higher baseline quality of life (QOL) scores are associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We examined the relationship between overall survival (OS) and baseline QOL. Patients and Methods A total of 1 247 patients with mCRC participating in N9741 (comparing bolus 5-FU/LV, irinotecan [IFL] vs infusional 5-FU/leucovorin [LV]/oxaliplatin [FOLFOX] vs. irinotecan/oxaliplatin [IROX]) provided data at baseline on overall QOL using a single-item linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) 0–100 point scale. The association of OS according to clinically deficient (defined as CD-QOL, score 0–50) vs not clinically deficient (nCD-QOL, score 51–100) baseline QOL scores was tested. A multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to adjust for the effects of multiple baseline factors. An exploratory analysis was performed evaluating OS according to baseline QOL status among patients who did or did not receive second-line therapy. Results Baseline QOL was a strong predictor of OS for the whole cohort (CD-QOL vs nCD-QOL: 11.2 months vs 18.4 months, P < .0001), and in each arm IFL 12.4 vs 15.1 months, FOLFOX 11.1 months vs 20.6 months, and IROX 8.9 months vs 18.1 months. Baseline QOL was associated with baseline performance status (PS) ( P < .0001). After adjusting for PS and treatment arm, baseline QOL was still associated with OS ( P = .017). Conclusions Baseline QOL is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with mCRC. The demonstration that patient-assessed QOL and PS are independent prognostic indicators suggests that these assessments provide important complementary prognostic information.

Glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011, GV) is a fully human Immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody directed against glycoprotein NMB coupled via a peptide linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor. This phase II study evaluated the overall response rate and safety of GV, glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) expression, and survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Eligible patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who had not previously been treated with chemotherapy received GV 1.9 mg/kg every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included GPNMB expression, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity analysis. GPNMB expression was assessed pre- and post-treatment via immunohistochemistry for patients with available tumor tissue. Out of 35 patients who received treatment, two patients had confirmed partial responses (PRs; 6%), and 18 patients had a stable disease (SD; 51%) as the best objective response. 38% of the patients had stable disease >100 days. The grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in two or more patients were neutropenia, rash, hyponatremia, and vomiting. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.5–5.6), and the median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI 9.0–16.9) in the evaluable study population. GV is well-tolerated in metastatic uveal melanoma. The disease control rate was 57% despite a low objective response rate. Exploratory immune correlation studies are underway to provide insight into target saturation, combination strategies, and antigen release.

3503 Background: The association between race & toxicity or response to systemic chemotherapy is poorly understood. We correlated relevent polymorphisms with toxicity & outcome data in AA & C patients (Pts) enrolled in N9741, a large randomized MCRC trial. Methods: Toxicity, response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), & dose intensity (DI) were examined as a function of race in 1412 Pts enrolled on IFL, both full and reduced dose, FOLFOX, or IROX including 486 Pts with pharmacogenomic data. Accrual by race permitted comparison of C (n=1297) to AA (n=112). Results: C & AA were similar in disease extent, PS, gender, prior adjuvant treatment, and DI at cycles 1, 3, 6, or 12. The impact of race on RR, toxicity & the distribution of four relevent drug metabolism genotypes are in the table . AA had lower RR overall & in each treatment arm. Lower toxicity rates were seen in AA Pts, mainly due to less diarrhea, as measured by both CTC V2 & patient reported outcome data. These relationships were maintained in multivariate models adjusting for arm, age, gender, & PS. In these multivariate models, the odds ratio between RR and race was 1.72 (p=0.012) (29% AA vs 41% C) & for severe toxicity the odds ratio was 1.76 (p=0.006) (34% AA vs 48% C). Overall, race was not a significant predictor of TTP or OS (p > 0.50 for each). The hazard ratio comparing FOLFOX to IFL for C was 0.67 and for AA was 0.55. TTP for FOLFOX was superior to both IFL and IROX for both C & AA. Significant differences in pharmacogenetic variants were observed between C & AA, although the sample size for investigating the three-way combination of Rx, race, & pharmacogenomics is too small (36 AA) to draw definitive conclusions. Conclusions: It appears that AA have less toxicity & a lower RR than C when treated with standard MCRC regimens. Different frequencies of polymorphisms in genes relevent to drug metabolism may help explain these clinical differences. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

4067 Background: N9741 randomized 1691 patients (pts) to seven 5FU, Ox and Iri containing regimens for MCRC. After 20.4 months median follow-up, FOLFOX and IROX improved time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) compared to IFL. Here we update OS and TTP, and report an analysis of factors prognostic of pt outcome. Methods: 5 yr OS and TTP were calculated by Kaplan-Meier per treatment (rx) arm. Pt factors [rx arm, age, gender, prior adjuvant rx, body mass index (BMI), performance status (PS), number of disease sites (#sites), neutrophil count (ANC), hemoglobin, platelets, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALK), aspartate aminotransferase (AST)] were assessed for univariate association with OS, TTP, response rate (RR), and any grade =3 toxicity. Associated factors were included in multivariate Cox and logistic regression models. Results: After a median follow-up of 4.3 yrs, FOLFOX treated pts were more likely to live 5 yrs, 9.2% versus 5.4% for IROX (p=.016) and 3.8% for IFL (p<.001). Median TTP was also significantly longer in the FOLFOX arm, 9.2 mo vs 6.5 mo for IROX (p=<.001) and 6.0 mo for IFL (p=<.001). The prognostic model found higher PS, ANC and ALK, and more disease sites were prognostic of worse OS (see table ). Age = 70 was associated with poorer survival (HR death 1.33, p=.03), but not TTP, RR, or grade =3 toxicity. FOLFOX rx was the most powerful prognostic factor for TTP and OS. The odds of grade =3 toxicity were significantly higher in FOLFOX treated pts (OR 1.65, p<.001) and lower in men (OR .63, p<.001). No significant interactions between rx arm and pt factors were present, suggesting no factor examined is predictive of rx-specific outcome. Conclusions: 9% 5 yr OS in MCRC pts treated with first-line FOLFOX sets a new benchmark. We confirmed pre-rx PS, WBC, and ALK are prognostic for OS, though FOLFOX rx was the strongest prognostic factor. No factor was associated with differential outcome or toxicity by rx arm, thus these factors cannot be used to guide rx selection. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

522 Background: In the METEOR study (NCT01865747), cabo demonstrated improved progression-free survival (median 7.4 vs. 3.8 mo; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74; p<0.0001), OS (median 21.4 vs. 16.5 mo; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.83, p=0.0003), and objective response rate (17% vs. 3%; p<0.0001) compared with eve in patients (pts) with advanced RCC who had received prior VEGFR TKI therapy (Choueiri NEJM 2015, Lancet Oncol 2016). Here we evaluate the impact of changes in target lesion size from baseline on OS. Methods: 658 pts were randomized 1:1 to receive cabo (60 mg qd) or eve (10 mg qd). Stratification factors were MSKCC risk group and number of prior VEGFR TKIs. Target lesion size was assessed per independent radiology review by CT/MRI scans at baseline, every 8 weeks for the first 12 months, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Three subgroups were defined by best change in target lesion size from baseline: decrease ≥30%, decrease <30%, and any increase. Results: The rate of target lesion regression was higher in the cabo arm (75%) compared with the eve arm (48%). A higher fraction of pts had a decrease ≥30% in target lesion size in the cabo arm, while a higher fraction of pts had an increase in target lesion size in the eve arm (Table). Medians for OS with cabo were not estimable (NE) (95% CI, NE‒NE), 20.8 mo (95% CI, 18.1‒NE), and 11.1 mo (95% CI, 7.6‒15.2) for the ≥30% decrease, <30% decrease, and any increase subgroups, respectively. Medians for OS with eve were NE (95% CI, 19.3‒NE), 18.0 mo (95% CI, 15.9‒20.4), and 14.0 mo (95% CI, 10.5‒16.3) for the ≥30% decrease, <30% decrease, and any increase subgroups, respectively. Median duration of follow-up for OS was 18.7 mo (IQR 16.1–21.1) for cabo and 18.8 mo (16.0–21.2) for eve. A higher proportion of pts received subsequent anticancer therapy in the any increase subgroup compared with the other subgroups. Conclusions: Cabo demonstrated a higher rate of tumor target lesion regression than eve, and greater target lesion regression was associated with improved OS in pts with advanced RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01865747. [Table: see text]