Back to Authors

Dubey, Divyanshu

0000-0001-6865-9045

Mayo Clinic

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Citations 106

Clinical, Radiologic, and Prognostic Features of Myelitis Associated With Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Autoantibody

JAMA Neurology | December 21, 2018 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 301

10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4053 | PMID 30575890

Paraneoplastic neuronal intermediate filament autoimmunity

Neurology | October 3, 2018 | Volume: 91 | Issue: 18 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000006435 | PMID 30282771

Botulinum Toxin in Restless Legs Syndrome—A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

Toxins | October 2, 2018 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 401

10.3390/toxins10100401 | PMID 30274305

Background: Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a common movement disorder with an estimated prevalence of up to 12%. Previous small studies with onabotulinumtoxin A (OnaA) for RLS have shown inconsistent results. Methods: Twenty-four patients with an International RLS score (IRLS) of >11 (moderate-severe) were enrolled in this blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study. Twenty-one patients completed the evaluations at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after each injection. One-hundred units of Incobotulinumtoxin A (IncoA) or normal saline were injected into tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and biceps femoris muscles each side. Results: Improvement from a severe (IRLS >21) to a mild/moderate (IRLS ≤20) score was significant at four weeks (p = 0.0036) and six weeks (p = 0.0325) following IncoA administration compared to placebo. Additionally, there was significant improvement in pain score at six weeks as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (p = 0.04) and the Johns Hopkins Quality of Life Questionnaire (p = 0.01) in the IncoA group. Definite or marked improvement on Patient Global Impression of Change was seen in 7 out of 21 patients in the IncoA group vs. 1 out of 21 patients in the placebo group at 4 weeks (p = 0.012). Conclusion: IncoA injection lead to a reduction in severity of RLS symptoms, pain score, and quality of life, without any adverse effects.
Area postrema syndrome

Neurology | September 26, 2018 | Volume: 91 | Issue: 17 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000006392 | PMID 30258024

LGI1 and CASPR2 neurological autoimmunity in children

Annals of Neurology | August 7, 2018 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 473-480

10.1002/ana.25310 | PMID 30076629

The clinical phenotype of leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) and contactin‐associated proteinlike 2 (CASPR2) autoimmunity is well defined in adults. Data for children are limited (<10 cases). Among 13,319 pediatric patients serologically tested for autoimmune neurological disorders (2010–2017), 264 were seropositive for voltage‐gated potassium channel‐complex–IgG (radioimmunoprecipitation). Only 13 (4.9%) were positive by transfected cell‐binding assay for LGI1‐IgG (n = 7), CASPR2‐IgG (n = 3), or both (n = 3). This is significantly less than in adults. Encephalopathy, seizures, and peripheral nerve hyperexcitability were common, as was coexisting autoimmunity. No faciobrachial dystonic seizures or cancers were identified. Functional neurologic disorders were frequently the initial diagnosis, and immunotherapy appeared beneficial. Ann Neurol 2018;84:473–480
Association of MOG-IgG Serostatus With Relapse After Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for MOG-IgG–Associated Disorders

JAMA Neurology | July 16, 2018 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1355

10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1814 | PMID 30014148

Reply to “epidemiology of autoimmune versus infectious encephalitis”

Annals of Neurology | April 11, 2018 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1038-1038

10.1002/ana.25230 | PMID 29637594

Elevated LGI1‐IgG CSF index predicts worse neurological outcome

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology | April 2, 2018 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 646-650

10.1002/acn3.561 | PMID 29761127

AbstractTo determine whether CSF leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1(LGI1)‐IgG titer, index or IgG subclass has prognostic significance, we tested serum and CSF specimens collected concomitantly from 39 seropositive patients. LGI1‐IgG index was elevated (>1) in 21 patients (54%), suggesting intrathecal synthesis. Patients with worse outcome at last follow‐up (modified Rankin Scale >2) had significantly higher index (median 6.57 vs. 0.5, P = 0.048) compared to those with better outcome. Higher CSF LGI1‐IgG4 subclass‐specific titer and index correlated with worse outcome (P < 0.005 for both). These data suggest that evidence of intrathecal LGI1‐IgG synthesis may correlate with neuronal injury and warrant consideration of aggressive immunotherapy.
Clinical presentation of autoimmune and viral encephalitides

Current Opinion in Critical Care | February 4, 2018 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 80-90

10.1097/mcc.0000000000000483 | PMID 29401173

Purpose of review We describe clinical and diagnostic features of various autoimmune and viral encephalitis subtypes. Recent findings Population-based studies have demonstrated both autoimmune and viral causes have similar prevalence and incident rates. Repertoire of autoimmune biomarkers has considerably increased with discovery of many novel neural antibodies including glial fibrillary acidic proteinα-immunoglobulin G. Similarly, with use of next generation sequencing and DNA libraries, many viral causes are being detected which would have been categorized as encephalitis of unknown cause a decade ago. Summary Autoimmune and viral encephalitides can resemble one another and sometimes autoimmune encephalitis may be triggered by viral infections. Early diagnosis and treatment is the key to both causes, which emphasizes the importance of clinical diagnosis before laboratory confirmation.
Autoimmune encephalitis epidemiology and a comparison to infectious encephalitis

Annals of Neurology | January 2, 2018 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 166-177

10.1002/ana.25131 | PMID 29293273

Objective To evaluate the incidence and prevalence of autoimmune encephalitis and compare it to that of infectious encephalitis. Methods We performed a population‐based comparative study of the incidence and prevalence of autoimmune and infectious encephalitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis and subgroups were defined by 2016 diagnostic criteria, and infectious encephalitis diagnosis required a confirmed infectious pathogen. Age‐ and sex‐adjusted prevalence and incidence rates were calculated. Patients with encephalitis of uncertain etiology were excluded. Results The prevalence of autoimmune encephalitis on January 1, 2014 of 13.7/100,000 was not significantly different from that of all infectious encephalitides (11.6/100,000; p = 0.63) or the viral subcategory (8.3/100,000; p = 0.17). The incidence rates (1995–2015) of autoimmune and infectious encephalitis were 0.8/100,000 and 1.0/100,000 person‐years, respectively ( p = 0.58). The number of relapses or recurrent hospitalizations was higher for autoimmune than infectious encephalitis ( p = 0.03). The incidence of autoimmune encephalitis increased over time from 0.4/100,000 person‐years (1995–2005) to 1.2/100,000 person‐years (2006–2015; p = 0.02), attributable to increased detection of autoantibody‐positive cases. The incidence (2.8 vs 0.7/100,000 person‐years, p = 0.01) and prevalence (38.3 vs 13.7/100,000, p = 0.04) of autoimmune encephalitis was higher among African Americans than Caucasians. The prevalence of specific neural autoantibodies was as follows: myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, 1.9/100,000; glutamic acid decarboxylase 65, 1.9/100,000; unclassified neural autoantibody, 1.4/100,000; leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated protein 1, 0.7/100,000; collapsin response‐mediator protein 5, 0.7/100,000; N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor, 0.6/100,000; antineuronal nuclear antibody type 2, 0.6/100,000; and glial fibrillary acidic protein α, 0.6/100,000. Interpretation This study shows that the prevalence and incidence of autoimmune encephalitis are comparable to infectious encephalitis, and its detection is increasing over time. Ann Neurol 2018;83:166–177