TBCRC 019: A Phase II Trial of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel with or without the Anti-Death Receptor 5 Monoclonal Antibody Tigatuzumab in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Clinical Cancer Research | March 16, 2015 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2722-2729
A Novel Neutralizing Antibody Targeting Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A Inhibits Ovarian Cancer Growth and Ascites Accumulation in Patient Mouse Tumorgrafts
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | February 19, 2015 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 973-981
Abstract Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States. Despite advances in treatment for other cancers, ovarian cancer patient prognosis has not improved significantly since the advent of platinum-based chemotherapy. It is a highly heterogeneous disease with at least four distinct histological subtypes: serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell. However, no subtype- or biomarker-specific therapies are approved for ovarian cancer. Identifying targeted therapies is crucial to improving clinical outcomes. Specific therapies will likely vary based on tumor histology and biomarkers. Expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) is a well established biomarker of response to endocrine therapies in breast cancer. Despite the success of anti-estrogen therapies in treating breast cancer, little attention has been given to their potential in ovarian cancer. However, epidemiologic studies show that approximately 70% of epithelial ovarian tumors express ER, particularly serous and endometrioid subtypes, and that estrogen plays a role in ovarian cancer etiology. Further, clinical data suggest that a subset of ovarian cancer patients can be successfully treated with endocrine therapy. We hypothesize that some ovarian tumors require estrogen for growth and that predictive biomarkers will identify patients who will benefit from endocrine therapy. Using cell line models, we examined the response of ovarian cancer cells to estrogen (E2) and anti-estrogens with regard to gene expression and cell proliferation. E2 induces expression of canonical ER target genes (e.g. GREB1) in these cells, suggesting that they are estrogen-responsive. We observe that 4-hydroxytamoxifen and fulvestrant inhibit growth of ovarian cancer cells including the chemo-resistant line PEO4. Gene expression microarray studies identified additional E2-regulated genes in ovarian cancer cells that may be utilized as biomarkers of ER activity. We are expanding our studies to in vivo models (human primary tumor xenografts) to evaluate the role of E2 in driving tumor progression and determine the efficacy of anti-estrogens in treating serous ovarian cancer. There is a critical need for targeted therapies in ovarian cancer. Our studies will determine if endocrine responsiveness correlates with gene expression of specific biomarkers, which may lead to the identification of predictive clinical markers of response to endocrine therapy. Citation Format: Courtney L. Andersen, Matthew J. Sikora, Paul Haluska, Steffi Oesterreich. Identifying biomarkers of estrogen response in models of serous ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 94. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-94
Abstract PR05: In vivo antitumor activity of the PARP inhibitor niraparib (MK-4827) in homologous recombination deficient and proficient ovarian cancer
Clinical Cancer Research | August 14, 2014 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: PR05-PR05
Abstract Purpose: The therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors is predicted to extend beyond BRCA mutant phenotypes to homologous recombination (HR)-deficient cancers. Response of individual ovarian cancers to niraparib was characterized using treatment naïve, patient-derived tumorgraft models and correlated with predicted HR status and gene expression profile. Methods: Utilizing a living tumor bank of patient-derived ovarian xenografts (PDXs), niraparib (MK-4827) was evaluated in five high-grade ovarian cancer tumorgrafts (PDX077, PDX087, PDX039, PDX080 and PDX95) as monotherapy, combination with carboplatin ± paclitaxel and maintenance therapy. Intraperitoneal tumorgrafts were monitored for tumor growth with twice-weekly transabdominal ultrasound imaging. In vivo response to niraparib was correlated to massively parallel sequencing data (BROCA) for HR genes and with each source patient's platinum response. Tumorgrafts were accordingly classified into predicted HR-proficient and HR-deficient phenotypes. PARP1 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymer (pADPr) expression as well as gene expression by DNA microarray were compared between treatment and control tumor replicates, and HR-deficient vs. HR-proficient tumors. Results: PDX077 (verified to harbor a somatic BRCA2 mutation (predicted HR deficient)) and PDX039 without any HR mutations detected by BROCA (predicted HR proficient) both responded to niraparib monotherapy and combination therapy in vivo (p=0.002 and 0.009 for treated vs. control groups, respectively). Significant growth attenuation, but not regression, in response to single agent treatment was demonstrated in PDX080 (CDK12 mutation; predicted HR-deficient; p=0.02 vs. control). In comparison, a BRCA2-mutant model (PDX095) failed to respond to niraparib monotherapy (p=0.97). As predicted, niraparib was not active as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy in a BRCA wild-type, predicted HR-proficient tumorgraft (PDX087; p=not significant). Niraparib enhanced tumor regression with carboplatin but not with paclitaxel/carboplatin in an HR-deficient tumorgraft (PDX077), and maintenance niraparib therapy was effective in prolonging recurrence-free survival. pADPr inhibition was demonstrated in all niraparib-treated tumorgrafts, while PARP1 degrada-tion was evident in tumorgrafts responsive to single agent niraparib. Differential gene expression was seen in niraparib treated vs. control tumors in HR-deficient tumorgrafts in comparison to HR-proficient tumors at the end of 4 weeks of treatment. Clustering of 6 most/least differentially expressed genes was predictive of response to niraparib. Furthermore, RAD51C and PTEN gene expression were diminished in PDX039 (HR proficient by BROCA; niraparib responsive), suggesting a possible mechanism for its sensitivity to niraparib. Conclusion: Response to niraparib was seen in both BRCA-mutant and BRCA-wildtype xenografts. Thus, BRCA or HR gene mutational status alone was not sufficient to predict response to niraparib. Low RAD51C, PTEN and loss of PARP1 expression following treatment were most characteristic of tumors responding to niraparib. Paclitaxel may be detrimental to the sensitizing effects of PARP inhibition on carboplatin, which may have clinical implications for the incorporation of PARP inhibitors in front-line treatment. Our data are supportive of the phase III study of niraparib as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This abstract is also presented as Poster A30. Citation Format: Mariam Al Hilli, S. John Weroha, Marc Becker, Xiaonan Hou, Sean Harrington, Sarah McKinstrey, Kimberly Kalli, Karin Goodman, Keith Wilcoxen, Elizabeth Swisher, Scott Kaufmann, Paul Haluska. In vivo antitumor activity of the PARP inhibitor niraparib (MK-4827) in homologous recombination deficient and proficient ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: From Concept to Clinic; Sep 18-21, 2013; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2013;19(19 Suppl):Abstract nr PR05.
Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of MEDI-573, a Bispecific, Antiligand Monoclonal Antibody against IGFI and IGFII, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Clinical Cancer Research | July 15, 2014 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 4747-4757
In the era of targeted therapies, patients with gynecologic malignancies have not yet been major beneficiaries of this new class of agents. This may reflect the fact that the main tumor types—ovarian, uterine, and cervical—are a highly heterogeneous group of cancers with variable response to standard chemotherapies and the lack of models in which to study the diversity of these cancers. Cancer-derived cell lines fail to adequately recapitulate molecular hallmarks of specific cancer subsets and complex microenvironments, which may be critical for sensitivity to targeted therapies. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) generated from fresh human tumor without prior in vitro culture, combined with whole genome expression, gene copy number, and sequencing analyses, could dramatically aid the development of novel therapies for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecologic tumors can be engrafted in immunodeficient mice with a high rate of success and within a reasonable time frame. The resulting PDX accurately recapitulates the patient's tumor with respect to histologic, molecular, and in vivo treatment response characteristics. Orthotopic PDX develop complications relevant to the clinic, such as ascites and bowel obstruction, providing opportunities to understand the biology of these clinical problems. Thus, PDX have great promise for improved understanding of gynecologic malignancies, serve as better models for designing novel therapies and clinical trials, and could underpin individualized, directed therapy for patients from whom such models have been established.
North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance trial N08CA—the use of glutathione for prevention of paclitaxel/carboplatin‐induced peripheral neuropathy: A phase 3 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study
Cancer | March 11, 2014 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1890-1897