Sluzevich, Jason C

Background/Purpose: To describe the findings and clinical course of a patient with scleromyxedema complicated by retinal vasculitis and macular edema. Methods: Interventional case report. Results: A 64-year old Caucasian woman with recently diagnosed, biopsy proven scleromyxedema presented with decreased visual acuity (20/50 OD; 20/100 OS) due to retinal vasculitis and macular edema. She received intravitreal bevacizumab and subtenon's triamcinolone acetonide for the macular edema, and bilateral pars plana vitrectomies were required for vitreous hemorrhages. Monthly intravenous infusions of immunoglobulins (IVIG) resulted in resolution of the macular edema and vasculitis, and stabilization of the VA (20/40 OD; counting fingers at 6 feet OS). Conclusion: Scleromyxedema may be complicated by retinal vasculitis and macular edema. Treatment with corticosteroids and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors may be minimally effective but IVIG should be considered for both the ocular and systemic findings.

Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL-LT) is a rare diffuse large B-cell lymphoma confined to the skin of the legs. The typical presentation is characterized by solitary or multiple growing plaques, usually confined to one leg. We report a case of PCDLBCL-LT of activated B-cell subtype characterized by multiple local relapses in the legs, initially, and systemic relapses about seven years after the diagnosis. Local relapses were sensitive to radiation therapy. Cutaneous and systemic relapses responded well to immunomodulatory therapy with lenalidomide followed by Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition with ibrutinib. Ibrutinib is the only treatment that resulted in long-lasting complete remission. Lenalidomide and especially ibrutinib appear to have a significant activity against this lymphoma and should be incorporated in the treatment of this resistant and aggressive lymphoma. To our knowledge, this is the first case of PCDLBCL-LT reported in the literature exhibiting a complete response to ibrutinib.

AbstractChronic cutaneous varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection has not been previously reported or characterized as a complication of dermatomyositis. Two patients with non‐malignancy‐associated dermatomyositis, treated with long‐term prednisone and methotrexate, developed persistent, painless ulcers ultimately established to be secondary to chronic VZV. The absence of pain or a history suggestive of acute VZV, and the lack of characteristic histopathology, resulted in a lengthy delay in diagnosis. Polymerase chain reaction and tissue immunohistochemistry were positive for VZV, and treatment with valacyclovir resulted in complete clearance. Diagnostic testing for VZV should thus be considered in the evaluation of ulcerative lesions in patients with dermatomyositis. The increased incidence of acute VZV in combination with the nature and duration of immunosuppressive treatment in this patient population may be contributory.

AbstractBackgroundVirtual microscopy is increasingly being used in dermatopathology educational settings.ObjectiveThe objective is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and attitudes between virtual microscopy and traditional glass slide microscopy among dermatology residents.MethodsA 48‐question dermatopathology examination was administered to 35 dermatology residents at three different dermatology residency training sites during the 2011–2012 academic year with half (n = 24) of the questions using the gold standard of glass slide microscopy and half (n = 24) using whole, scanned virtual slides. Correct number of questions using glass slides and virtual slides was evaluated. Participants were surveyed regarding previous experience with digital slide imaging; quality, ease of use, and speed of slide review; and overall microscopy preferences.ResultsOverall, diagnostic accuracy was better with glass slides than virtual slides (p = 0.01). However, no statistically significant difference was found in diagnostic accuracy of first‐year trainees (p > 0.99) or trainees with exposure to virtual microscopy greater than two times per month (p = 0.27). There was no overall personal preference for glass slide vs. virtual microscopy.LimitationsDifferent cases and questions were used for glass slides and virtual microscopy.ConclusionsDiagnostic accuracy with virtual microscopy is dependent on year of residency training and prior experience with virtual microscopy.