Simard, Trevor

Background Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) and replacement (TTVR) have emerged as new modalities to treat patients with symptomatic significant tricuspid regurgitation. This study aimed to compare invasive hemodynamic and right ventricular (RV) changes and symptom improvement over 1 year. Methods Patients who underwent TEER/TTVR at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, 2017–2024) were included. Hemodynamic profiles were described before and immediately after intervention, in addition to RV enlargement/dysfunction ≥moderate at 30 days and change in symptoms over time. Results Of 100 patients included (50 per group, median age 81 versus 80 years and female 62% versus 42%, in TTVR and TEER, respectively), all had ≥ moderate–severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation. Post intervention, mean right atrial pressure decreased in TEER (16 to 14 mm Hg, P <0.001), V wave decreased in both groups (to 16 mm Hg, P <0.001). RV enlargement was less prevalent in both cohorts at 30 days (60%–40% in TEER, P =0.01, and 72 to 58% in TTVR, P =0.07), yet prevalence of RV dysfunction decreased only in TEER (26 to 15%, P =0.17) as opposed to TTVR (31 to 44%, P =0.13). TTVR resulted in a higher stroke volume index and more complete tricuspid regurgitation elimination at 30 days. Both groups resulted in similar improvements in New York Heart Association class, with overall similar survival. Conclusions TEER was associated with a greater reduction in right atrial pressure and more favorable RV remodeling at 30 days, as opposed to TTVR, which achieved more complete and sustained elimination of tricuspid regurgitation with higher forward stroke volume.

Background Artificial intelligence (AI)–enabled electrocardiography has emerged as a tool for detecting cardiac dysfunction. The prognostic relevance of AI‐enabled electrocardiography–derived diastolic dysfunction (DD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement had not been assessed. Methods We analyzed 3197 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis between 2010 and 2023 with baseline 12‐lead ECGs processed by a validated AI model to classify diastolic function (grades 0–3). Multivariable Cox models and nested model comparisons assessed associations with all‐cause mortality, including a prespecified analysis in patients with indeterminate echocardiographic grading. Trajectories were defined by change in AI‐enabled electrocardiography DD grade (<2 versus ≥2) from baseline to 30‐day or 1‐year follow‐up. Results At baseline, 21% had grade 3, 57% had grade 2, 8% had grade 1, and 14% had grade 0 AI‐enabled electrocardiography DD. Higher grades were associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and comorbidities. Over a median follow‐up of 3.4 years, grade 3 AI‐enabled electrocardiography DD independently predicted mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.47–2.20]; P <0.001). AI‐enabled electrocardiography DD improved prognostic discrimination beyond clinical and echocardiographic measures (ΔHarrell concordance statistic, 0.016; Δ χ 2 =57; P <0.001). Among 1259 patients with indeterminate echocardiographic grading, AI‐enabled electrocardiography added prognostic value (ΔHarrell concordance statistic, 0.02; Δ χ 2 =13; P =0.006). Worsening or persistently high‐risk trajectories were associated with increased mortality (HRs, 1.45–1.80; all P <0.05). Conclusions AI‐enabled electrocardiography–derived DD independently predicts mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, adds value beyond echocardiographic grading, and enables dynamic risk stratification through longitudinal tracking.

ABSTRACT Background Incident atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is associated with mortality. Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has shown effectiveness in improving MR and symptoms in AFMR, but previous studies lacked comparison to conservative management. We aimed to study the association of AFMR severity and mitral TEER with symptoms, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and all‐cause mortality in moderate/severe AFMR. Methods Consecutive adults with moderate/severe AFMR managed conservatively or with TEER 2010−2023 were identified retrospectively. To ensure similar technique in evaluation in the two groups, variables were obtained from the closest transthoracic echocardiogram before TEER in the TEER group. In addition to multivariable analysis, the association of TEER (vs. conservative management) with HFH and mortality was assessed using propensity‐score matched analyses; the propensity score was based on age, sex, EuroSCORE II, effective regurgitant orifice area, integrative MR severity, and NYHA class III/IV (vs. I/II). Results Among 230 patients with moderate/severe AFMR [mean age 77; 56% females], 46 were managed with TEER. Severe (vs. moderate) AFMR was independently associated with baseline NYHA class III/IV (multivariable OR 2.18 [95% CI 1.13−4.26]) and HFH [multivariable HR 2.75 (95% CI 1.25−6.03)] but not mortality ( p = 0.26). TEER improved MR to ≤ moderate in 93% but was not associated with lower HFH or death rates versus conservative management on multivariable or matched analysis. However, 1‐year NYHA improved more with TEER versus conservative management in patients with baseline NYHA class III/IV (62% vs. 27%, p = 0.03). Rhythm control was associated with improved survival (HR 0.38 [0.15−0.98]). Conclusions AFMR severity was associated with symptoms and HFH but not mortality. MR severity and NYHA class improved with TEER, but the association of TEER with HF hospitalizations or death remains unproven. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of TEER and rhythm control on outcomes in AFMR.

ABSTRACT Background The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains a challenge in some patients, and hemodynamic exercise testing has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in this population. However, the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in AS is limited. Methods Retrospective review of 34 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ≥ moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing exercise invasive hemodynamics (supine cycle protocol) with simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures. Results Age was 77.1 (IQR 68.6; 84.1) years, and 50% were female. LVEF was 62.1 ± 6.6%. All patients were symptomatic. Resting aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 ± 0.2 cm 2 and aortic valve (AV) systolic mean gradient 22.0 ± 7.3 mmHg. At peak exercise (40 [IQR 30; 60] W), AV systolic mean gradient (Δ3 [0.6; 7] mmHg, p < 0.001) and AVA (Δ0.2 [0; 0.6] cm 2 , p = 0.002) significantly increased, while stroke volume (SV) did not (Δ6.8 ± 19.4 ml; p = 0.07). Exercise‐induced changes in AV systolic mean gradient were directly related to changes in cardiac output ( r = 0.53, p = 0.003), being inversely related to exercise systemic vascular resistance ( r = −0.60, p = 0.002). Elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure was present in 41.2% at rest (≥ 15 mmHg) and 69.7% during exercise (≥ 25 mmHg). Conclusions Symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF experience small increases in AV mean gradient with exercise, and unlike the normal physiological response to exercise, there was no significant increase in SV. In most patients, AVA rose during exercise. Exercise‐induced elevation in filling pressures was highly prevalent.

Background/Objectives: Atrial fibrillation is a frequent comorbidity amongst patients undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for mitral regurgitation. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) can be performed to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Both procedures require large-bore venous access, transseptal puncture, and real-time imaging of the left atrium. However, limited data exist evaluating the safety and feasibility of concomitant M-TEER and LAAO. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all concomitant M-TEER and LAAO procedures at our institution between May 2019 and September 2024 to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this approach. Results: Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion was successful in all 15 patients, requiring an additional 15 min (IQR 11–29) of procedural time. No patients died or had a major vascular complication. Routine transesophageal echocardiography performed within 90 days showed no device related thrombus, and no significant peri-device leak in any patients. Conclusions: Concomitant M-TEER and LAAO are feasible but additional prospective studies or randomized trials are needed to evaluate the potential clinical benefit.

AbstractBackgroundElevated transmitral gradient post transcatheter mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been associated with worse outcomes. Whether an elevated baseline transmitral diastolic mean gradient (MG) ≥5 mmHg is associated with hemodynamic outcomes after TEER is unknown.MethodsA total of 164 consecutive patients undergoing TEER at Mayo Clinic between June 2014 and May 2018 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Baseline demographics, as well as clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural data were obtained. Data on direct left atrial pressure (LAP) before and after TEER were recorded. Logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between preprocedure transmitral diastolic mean gradient (pre‐MG) and (1) improvement in LAP following TEER, (2) postprocedure transmitral diastolic mean gradient (post‐MG). A decrease in LAP post TEER was considered an improvement in hemodynamic response. Pre‐MG was categorized as: ≥5 and <5 mmHg.ResultsMedian age of the cohort was 81.5 years (Q1: 76.3, Q3: 87) and 34% were female. At baseline, median transmitral diastolic MG was 4 mmHg (Q1: 3, Q3: 5) and median LAP was 19 mmHg (Q1:16, Q3: 23.5). In a multivariable model, adjusted for age and sex, patients with pre‐MG ≥ 5 mmHg were less likely to see an improvement in LAP post TEER (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09, 0.55; p = 0.001) and more likely to have elevated post‐MG (aOR; 7.08, 95% CI: 2.93, 17.13; p < 0.001).ConclusionHigher pre‐MG (≥5 mmHg) was associated with a lower reduction in LAP and higher residual transmitral gradient following TEER suggesting other potential contributors to increased LAP besides mitral regurgitation as a cause of elevated baseline MG.

Objective Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a highly prevalent arrhythmia with significant burden on morbidity and mortality. The impact of AF in the revascularised population remains incompletely described. Given the high prevalence of AF in the revascularised population, we sought to evaluate the incidence and prognosis in patients with pre-existing and new-onset AF following revascularisation. Methods We used the University of Ottawa Heart Institute Revascularisation Registry to identify patients who underwent revascularisation between August 2015 and March 2020, who were prospectively followed for an average of one year. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysing the association between AF and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation and cerebrovascular accidents. Moreover, secondary outcomes include the individual components of MACE and bleeding. Results A total of 6704 patients underwent revascularisation and completed 1-year clinical follow-up. Median time to follow-up was 12.8 (IQR 11.2–15.9) months. One-year MACE occurred in 166 (21.8%) and 683 (11.5%) patients in AF and non-AF groups, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.61; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.01; p<0.0001). AF was independently predictive of 1-year mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation, cerebrovascular accident and bleeding. Within 1 year, 299 (4.5%) episodes of new-onset AF was observed. New-onset AF following revascularisation was also associated with 1-year MACE, mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident and unplanned revascularisation. Conclusions Preprocedural and new-onset AF following revascularisation remains highly predictive 1-year MACE. AF should be considered in addition to traditional risk factors for adverse outcomes following revascularisation.

AbstractBackgroundMitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (MTEER) is an established therapeutic approach for mitral regurgitation (MR). Functional mitral regurgitation originating from atrial myopathy (A‐FMR) has been described.ObjectivesWe sought to assess the clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic considerations in A‐FMR patients undergoing MTEER.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2020, patients undergoing MTEER for degenerative MR (DMR), functional MR (FMR), and mixed MR were assessed. A‐FMR was defined by the presence of MR > moderate in severity; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%; and severe left atrial (LA) enlargement in the absence of LV dysfunction, leaflet pathology, or LV tethering. The diagnosis of A‐FMR (vs. ventricular‐FMR [V‐FMR]) was confirmed by three independent echocardiographers. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes as well as clinical and echocardiographic follow‐up are reported. Device success was defined as final MR grade ≤ moderate; MR reduction ≥1 grade; and final transmitral gradient <5 mmHg.Results306 patients underwent MTEER, including DMR (62%), FMR (19%), and mixed MR (19%). FMR cases included 37 (63.8%) V‐FMR and 21 (36.2%) A‐FMR. Tricuspid regurgitation (≥ moderate) was higher in A‐FMR (80.1%) compared to V‐FMR (54%) and DMR (42%). Device success did not significantly differ between A‐FMR and V‐FMR (57% vs. 73%, p = 0.34) or DMR (57% vs. 64%, p = 1.0). The A‐FMR cohort was less likely to achieve ≥3 grades of MR reduction compared to V‐FMR (19% vs. 54%, p = 0.01) and DMR (19% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.01). Patients with V‐FMR and DMR demonstrated significant reductions in mean left atrial pressure (LAP) and peak LA V‐wave, though A‐FMR did not (LAP −0.24 ± 4.9, p = 0.83; peak V‐wave −1.76 ± 9.1, p = 0.39). In follow‐up, echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were similar.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing MTEER, A‐FMR represents one‐third of FMR cases. A‐FMR demonstrates similar procedural success but blunted acute hemodynamic responses compared with DMR and V‐FMR following MTEER. Dedicated studies specifically considering A‐FMR are needed to discern the optimal therapeutic approaches.

AbstractBackgroundThough infrequent, incomplete left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may result from residual leaks. Percutaneous closure has been described though data is limited.MethodsWe compiled a registry from four centers of patients undergoing percutaneous closure of residual leaks following LAAC via surgical means or with the Watchman device. Leak severity was classified as none (no leak), mild (1–2 mm), moderate (3–4 mm), or severe (≥5 mm). Procedural and clinical success was defined as the elimination of leak or mild residual leak at the conclusion of the procedure or follow‐up, respectively.ResultsOf 72 (age 72.2 ± 9.2 years; 67% male) patients, 53 had undergone prior LAAC using the Watchman device and 19 patients surgical LAAC. Mean CHADS2‐VA2Sc score was 4.0 ± 1.8. The median leak size was 5 mm, range: 2–13). A total of 13 received Amplatzer Vascular Plug‐II, 18 received Amplatzer Duct Occluder‐II and 40 patients received coils. One underwent closure using a 21 mm‐Watchman. Procedural success was 94%. Zero surgical and nine Watchman patients (13%) had a residual leak at procedural‐end (five mild, three moderate, and one severe)—only one patient had no reduction in leak size. Overall leak size reduction was 94%. Two (3%) had intraoperative pericardial effusion. There were no device embolizations, device‐related thrombi, or procedural deaths. Clinical success was maintained at 94%. Two had cerebrovascular accidents—at 2 days (transient ischemic attack) and 10 months postprocedure. Two had major bleeding outside the 30‐day periprocedural window.ConclusionPercutaneous closure of residual leaks following left atrial appendage closure is feasible and associated with good outcomes. The procedural risk appears to be satisfactory.