Hayes, David L.

Abstract The purpose of this Consensus Statement is to focus on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) deactivation in patients with irreversible or terminal illness. This statement summarizes the opinions of the Task Force members, convened by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), based on ethical and legal principles, as well as their own clinical, scientific, and technical experience. It is directed to all healthcare professionals who treat patients with implanted ICDs, nearing end of life, in order to improve the patient dying process. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote device deactivation. Rather, the ultimate judgement regarding this procedure must be made by the patient (or in special conditions by his/her legal representative) after careful communication about the deactivation's consequences, respecting his/her autonomy and clarifying that he/she has a legal and ethical right to refuse it. Obviously, the physician asked to deactivate the ICD and the industry representative asked to assist can conscientiously object to and refuse to perform device deactivation.

Background— Whether mechanical dyssynchrony indices predict reverse remodeling (RR) or clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains controversial. This prospective study evaluated whether echocardiographic dyssynchrony indices predict RR or clinical response after CRT. Methods and Results— Of 184 patients with heart failure with anticipated CRT who were prospectively enrolled, 131 with wide QRS and left ventricular ejection fraction <35% had 6-month follow-up after CRT implantation. Fourteen dyssynchrony indices (feasibility) by M-mode (94%), tissue velocity (96%), tissue Doppler strain (92%), 2D speckle strain (65% to 86%), 3D echocardiography (79%), and timing intervals (98%) were evaluated. RR (end-systolic volume reduction ≥15%) occurred in 55% and more frequently in patients without (71%) than in patients with (42%) ischemic cardiomyopathy ( P =0.002). Overall, only M-mode, tissue Doppler strain, and total isovolumic time had a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) greater than the line of no information, but none of these were strongly predictive of RR (AUC, 0.63 to 0.71). In nonischemic cardiomyopathy, no dyssynchrony index predicted RR. In ischemic cardiomyopathy, M-mode (AUC, 0.67), tissue Doppler strain (AUC, 0.79), and isovolumic time (AUC, 0.76) -derived indices predicted RR ( P <0.05 for all), although the incremental value was modest. No indices predicted clinical response assessed by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, 6-minute walk distance, and peak oxygen consumption. Conclusions— These findings are consistent with the Predictors of Response to CRT study and do not support use of these dyssynchrony indices to guide use of CRT.

Background— Right ventricular pacing increases the risk of heart failure in adults with structural heart disease. The impact of prolonged right ventricular pacing in adults without structural heart disease is not fully characterized and may depend on interactions of pacing with abnormal substrate predisposing to ventricular dysfunction. Methods and Results— We assessed the effect of right ventricular pacing in patients who underwent pacemaker implantation for isolated congenital atrioventricular block between 1964 and 2005. To assess for immunologic contribution to cardiac dysfunction, outcomes were compared between patients with (Ab + ) and without (Ab − ) antinuclear antibody during adulthood and an age- and sex-matched Olmsted County, Minnesota, population. Of 103 patients (mean±SD age, 32±19 years), 18 were Ab + . Long-term survival free of new heart failure after pacemaker implantation in isolated congenital atrioventricular block patients was worse than in the matched population ( P <0.001). This difference was attributable to the development of heart failure in 12 Ab + patients (67%; P <0.001), without differences between Ab − patients (2%) and the matched population (2%; P =0.7). Compared with baseline, at last follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction did not decline in Ab − (53±9% to 57±12%) but decreased in Ab + (52±10% to 38±12%; P =0.03) patients. Survival was similar in Ab − patients and the Minnesota population (98%; P =0.7) but worse in Ab + patients (79%; P <0.01). Conclusions— The natural history of patients with isolated congenital atrioventricular block who require pacing depends upon their antibody status. Antinuclear antibody status was a predictor for the development of heart failure and death. Long-term right ventricular pacing alone does not appear to be associated with development of heart failure, deterioration in ventricular function, or reduced survival in Ab − isolated congenital atrioventricular block patients.

Background— Various dyssynchrony indexes derived from tissue velocity and strain imaging have been proposed to predict the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the effect of CRT on dyssynchrony indexes derived by tissue velocity and strain and to determine which baseline intraventricular dyssynchrony parameters correlate with improvement in left ventricular volume after CRT. Methods and Results— Echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 45 patients with systolic heart failure at baseline, 1 day after CRT, and a median of 6 months after CRT. We calculated septal–lateral delay and anteroseptal–posterior delay and standard deviation of time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 basal and mid-left ventricular segments (Tv-SD). The standard deviation for time to peak strain in the 12 basal and mid-left ventricular segments (Tε-SD) was calculated as a strain-derived dyssynchrony index. None of the tissue velocity–derived dyssynchrony indexes improved after CRT (septal–lateral delay, P =0.39; anteroseptal–posterior delay, P =0.46; Tv-SD, P =0.30), whereas Tε-SD decreased significantly after CRT ( P <0.001). Improvement in Tε-SD 1 day after CRT correlated with the reduction in end-systolic volume at follow-up ( r =0.66; P <0.001). Baseline Tε-SD demonstrated significant correlation with the reduction of end-systolic volume at follow-up ( r =0.57; P <0.001); however, baseline tissue velocity–derived dyssynchrony indexes failed to predict the effect of CRT. Conclusions— The strain-derived dyssynchrony index is a better measurement than the tissue velocity dyssynchrony index for monitoring changes in mechanical dyssynchrony after CRT and for predicting reduction in left ventricular volume after CRT.

Background— Several echocardiographic dyssynchrony indexes have been proposed to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy using tissue velocity and strain. The present study aimed to compare tissue velocity–derived and strain-derived dyssynchrony indexes in patients with or without systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block. Methods and Results— Tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 120 subjects divided into 4 groups: group 1 (n=40), normal subjects; group 2 (n=20), normal left ventricular ejection fraction and left bundle-branch block; group 3 (n=20), left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and normal conduction; and group 4 (n=40), left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and left bundle-branch block. Dyssynchrony indexes based on time to peak tissue velocity (septal-lateral delay, anteroseptal-posterior delay, and SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments) and strain (SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments) were measured. The SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments was greater in group 4 (54 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 46 to 64 ms) than group 1 (44 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 28 to 53 ms; P =0.006), but there was a considerable overlap of all tissue velocity–derived indexes among 4 groups, with 40% to 68% of group 1 having values proposed for predicting the responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy. The SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments distinguished these groups with much less overlap ( P <0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Conclusions— A substantial proportion of normal subjects have tissue velocity–derived dyssynchrony indexes higher than the cutoff value proposed for predicting beneficial effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Strain-derived timing index appears to be more specific for dyssynchrony in patients with systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block. Identifying an optimal tissue velocity– or strain-derived dyssynchrony index requires a large prospective clinical trial.

Background— Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective therapy for patients with moderate to severe heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and symptomatic benefit from CRT were sustained at 12 months, and if so, in what proportion of patients this occurred. Methods and Results— Serial Doppler echocardiograms were obtained at baseline and 6 and 12 months after CRT in 228 patients enrolled in the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) trial. Measurements were made of LV end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes, ejection fraction, LV mass, severity of mitral regurgitation (MR), peak transmitral velocities during early (E wave) and late (A wave) diastolic filling, and myocardial performance index. At both 6 and 12 months, respectively, CRT was associated with reduced LV EDV ( P <0.0001 and P =0.007) and LV ESV ( P <0.0001 and P <0.0001), improved ejection fraction ( P <0.0001 and P <0.0001), regression of LV mass ( P =0.012 and P <0.0001), and reduced MR ( P <0.0001 and P <0.0001). LV filling time, transmitral E/A ratio, and myocardial performance index all improved at 12 months compared with baseline ( P <0.001, P =0.031, and P <0.0001). Reverse LV remodeling with CRT occurred in more patients at 6 than at 12 months (74% versus 60%, respectively; P <0.05) and was greater in patients with a nonischemic than an ischemic etiology. Conclusions— Reverse LV remodeling and symptom benefit with CRT are sustained at 12 months in patients with New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure but occur to a lesser degree in patients with an ischemic versus a nonischemic etiology, most likely owing to the inexorable progression of ischemic disease.

Objective. To determine whether children with pallid breath-holding spells associated with bradycardia can be treated safely and successfully with permanent pacemaker implantation. Methods. The records of pediatric patients who had apparent breath-holding spells and associated bradycardia and were treated with permanent pacemaker implantation were reviewed. Results. Ten pediatric patients with apparent breath-holding spells associated with bradycardia were treated with a permanent ventricular demand pacemaker at the Mayo Clinic between 1985 and 1995. Patients had onset of symptoms between ages 6 days and 12 months and presented for evaluation between ages 12 months and 5 years. Duration of spells was 15 seconds to 10 minutes. Medications to prevent spells were unsuccessful. Electrocardiograms documented asystolic pauses of 1.7 to 24 seconds (mean: 11.9 seconds). Permanent ventricular demand pacemakers were implanted at 10 months to 5 years of age (median: 14.5 months): 9 endocardial and 1 epicardial. Three patients required pacemaker revision. At follow-up of 38 to 170 months (median: 65.5), 5 patients had complete resolution of spells, 2 had only mild color change without loss of consciousness or seizure activity, and 3 continued to have minor brief spells. Conclusions. Permanent pacemaker therapy for children with pallid breath-holding spells associated with severe bradycardia is safe, efficacious, and warranted.