Demaerschalk, Bart M.

Objective: The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the role of prophylactic antiseizure medication in patients presenting with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included resident neurologists, a medical librarian, and content experts in the fields of epilepsy, stroke neurology, neurohospitalist medicine, and neurocritical care. Results: A randomized clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. The trial assessed whether prophylactic levetiracetam (LEV) use reduced the risk of acute seizures in patients with ICH, as defined by clinical or electrographic seizure, captured by continuous electroencephalogram 72 hours after enrollment. A total of 42 patients were included in the final analysis (19 in the LEV group and 23 in the placebo group). There was a significantly higher occurrence of seizures in the placebo versus LEV group (LEV 16% vs placebo 43%, P = 0.043). There were no differences in functional outcomes between the groups at 3, 6, or 12 months (P > 0.1). Conclusions: The role of prophylactic treatment with antiseizure medication in ICH remains unclear.

Introduction Prehospital telestroke evaluations may improve stroke triage compared to paramedic-applied large vessel occlusion scales, but ambulance-based video National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale assessments are challenging. The accuracy of telestroke-administered large vessel occlusion scales has not been investigated, so we sought to evaluate this further. Methods This retrospective study included all in-hospital telestroke encounters in a large academic telestroke network from 2019 to 2020. We retrospectively calculated seven large vessel occlusion scales using the in-hospital telestroke National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation, Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool, Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, 3-Item Stroke Scale, Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity, Vision-Aphasia-Neglect, and Gaze-Face-Arm-Speech-Time). Diagnostic performance was assessed via sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy using established scale thresholds. These results were compared to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at thresholds of 6, 8, and 10. The area under curve was calculated using c-statistics by treating scales as continuous variables. Results A total of 625 patients were included; 111 (17.8%) patients had an anterior large vessel occlusion, 118 (18.9%) patients had any large vessel occlusion, and 182 (29.1%) patients had stroke mimic diagnosis. The mean age (SD) was 67.9 (15.9), 48.3% were female, and 93.4% were white. The Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (SD) was 14.9 (8.4) for patients with anterior large vessel occlusion, 4.7 (5.0) for patients with non-large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke, and 4.4 (5.8) for stroke mimic ( p < 0.001). Compared to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, and Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scales demonstrated higher accuracy and area under curve for large vessel occlusion detection. Discussion Both the Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination and Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scales outperformed the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for large vessel occlusion detection in patients evaluated by in-hospital telestroke. These scales may be valid alternatives to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale examination in this setting.

Electronic health record (EHR) systems collate patient data, and the integration and standardization of documents through Health Information Exchange (HIE) play a pivotal role in refining patient management. Although the clinical implications of AI in EHR systems have been extensively analyzed, its application in HIE as a crucial source of patient data is less explored. Addressing this gap, our systematic review delves into utilizing AI models in HIE, gauging their predictive prowess and potential limitations. Employing databases such as Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, and Web of Science and adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, we unearthed 1021 publications. Of these, 11 were shortlisted for the final analysis. A noticeable preference for machine learning models in prognosticating clinical results, notably in oncology and cardiac failures, was evident. The metrics displayed AUC values ranging between 61% and 99.91%. Sensitivity metrics spanned from 12% to 96.50%, specificity from 76.30% to 98.80%, positive predictive values varied from 83.70% to 94.10%, and negative predictive values between 94.10% and 99.10%. Despite variations in specific metrics, AI models drawing on HIE data unfailingly showcased commendable predictive proficiency in clinical verdicts, emphasizing the transformative potential of melding AI with HIE. However, variations in sensitivity highlight underlying challenges. As healthcare’s path becomes more enmeshed with AI, a well-rounded, enlightened approach is pivotal to guarantee the delivery of trustworthy and effective AI-augmented healthcare solutions.

Introduction Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) evaluation requires urgent etiology identification and targeted stroke prevention, traditionally performed via hospital admission. The literature suggests that outpatient evaluation may be safe and cost‐effective. Hence, we implemented an expedited outpatient pathway (OP) for patients presenting to our institution’s Emergency Department (ED) with TIA. To further guide future practice, we compared clinical features and outcomes between expedited OP and our well‐established inpatient pathway (IP). Methods We implemented an algorithm of direct communication between ED providers and Vascular Neurologists for all TIA patients. Certain screening studies (head CT, CT angiogram, basic laboratories) and acute therapies were implemented in the ED, whereas others (brain MRI, echocardiogram, etc) and Vascular Neurology consultations were expedited outpatient within 48–72 hours.We included all patients that underwent OP evaluation from May 2021‐May 2022. Further, we extracted patients with a final diagnosis of TIA and compared them with IP TIA patients hospitalized (2017‐2021), matched by age, gender, and clinical severity (ABCD2). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics, clinical data, treatments, and 3‐month outcomes. Continuous variables were summarized with mean and standard deviations while categorical variables were shown as counts and percentages. Chi‐square test was used for categorical variables and Mann‐Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. P‐values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and all tests were two‐sided. Statistical Analysis was completed in R 4.0.3. Results Of 43 patients who underwent expedited OP TIA workup, TIA or minor stroke was diagnosed in 21/43 (48.9%). 18 TIAs underwent comparative analyses. Mean symptom duration was longer in the IP (2.06 hours) than OP (0.99 hours), p = 0.370%. TIA was more likely to be diagnosed in the OP 14/18 (78%) versus IP 12/18 (67%), (p = 0.423). OP had more transesophageal echocardiograms (17% vs 5%, p = 0.630) and longer duration of ambulatory cardiac monitoring (mean 574.3 vs 381.7 hours, p = 0.100). IP patients were more likely to get started on anticoagulation compared to OP (38% vs 11%, p = 0.258) and high‐intensity statin (38% vs 17%, p = 0.260). All laboratories, echocardiograms and brain MR imaging were performed significantly sooner for the IP (p< 0.05 for all). IP had higher rate of return ED visits (22%) and readmissions at 3 months (11%), whereas OP had none. OP had no deaths or recurrent strokes, whereas 11% and 5.6% respectively were noted in the IP at 3 months (p = 0.310, p = 0.310). Conclusions Our study shows that routine IP evaluation for patients presenting with TIA in the ED may not offer diagnostic superiority nor lead to improvement of short‐term clinical outcomes, as compared to the expedited OP evaluation. Careful evaluation of TIA patients in the ED followed by expedited OP evaluation might be a plausible approach to help lower costs and avoid hospitalization without compromising the safety of these patients.

Background: Cerebrovascular disease is a life-threatening neurological event and a leading cause of long-term disability and death worldwide. Early detection of characteristic behavioral and physiological changes associated with cerebrovascular disease is critical to improving patient outcomes and quality of life measures. The growing prevalence of remote monitoring tools, from wearable devices to smartphone applications, that facilitate in situ observation of patients and the environments of daily life holds promise for more timely recognition and possible prevention of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) like stroke. Objective: The goal of this scoping review is to examine and establish categories of innovation with digital sensors that monitor physiological and behavioral variables in situ to augment the current screening and diagnostic processes for patients with cerebrovascular disease. Methods: Guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist, a robust search strategy for spanning multiple databases from 2012 to September 30, 2022, excluding review articles, articles including interventions, and articles not published in English, was implemented. Among the databases searched were Web of Science; Scopus; Ovid Embase; Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; and Ovid MEDLINE and Epub ahead of print, in-process and other nonindexed citations, and daily. Results: This search strategy aggregated 689 articles, of which 101 (14.7%) articles met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Articles were divided into two categories based on their focus: physiological and behavioral. Articles with a physiological focus were sorted into one of nine subcategories according to the signal(s) monitored: motor function, heart rhythm, heart rate, kinematic analysis, physical activity, blood pressure, sensory deficit, electrodermal activity, and intracranial pressure. Articles focusing on behavioral variables were sorted into two subcategories: mood and fatigue. Most studies used an ECG-enabled smartwatch, like an Apple Watch 3, or passive smartphone sensors. Conclusions: This scoping review identified disparate methods and conclusions associated with the use of digital sensors for in situ physiological and behavioral monitoring of cerebrovascular disease patients. While most articles evaluated pilot validation and feasibility trials, the lack of randomized controlled trials is a critical literature gap specific to this evolving research area.

Introduction: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an under-recognized stroke subtype that may benefit from hyperacute reperfusion therapies. We aimed to evaluate the ability of telestroke activations to provide CRAO diagnosis and thrombolysis. Methods: This retrospective observational study investigates all encounters conducted for acute visual loss between 2010 and 2021 in our multicentric Mayo Clinic Telestroke Network. Demographics, time from visual loss to telestroke evaluation, ocular examination, diagnostic, and therapeutic recommendations were collected for CRAO subjects. Results: Out of 9,511, 49 encounters (0.51%) were conducted for an acute ocular complaint. Five patients had possible CRAO, and 4 presented within 4.5 h from symptom onset (range 1.5–5 h). None received thrombolytic therapy. All telestroke physicians recommended ophthalmology consultation. Conclusion: Current telestroke assessment of acute visual loss is suboptimal and patients eligible for acute reperfusion therapies may not be offered treatment. Teleophthalmologic evaluations and advanced ophthalmic diagnostic tools should complement telestroke systems.