Tagliero, Adam

Abstract Medial meniscus root tears are among the most painful and disabling injuries in knee preservation practice, frequently presenting with substantial functional decline, particularly in female patients. Recent research associates increased posterior tibial slope with both root tears and worse pain scores. Although biomechanically plausible, posterior tibial slope should be interpreted as an association rather than a primary causal driver, as small variations in slope alone are unlikely to fully account for symptom burden or structural progression. Pain and functional decline in this population more likely reflects a multifactorial mechanical environment, in which posterior tibial slope interacts with other determinants of joint loading, including meniscal extrusion, limb alignment, cartilage health, body mass index, subchondral bone response, and degenerative meniscal changes. In our view, posterior tibial slope is one contributor within a broader mechanical environment rather than the primary driver. However, the key clinical message is clear: root tears represent a critical joint‐failure event that demands early recognition and treatment.

Abstract A posterior tibial slope (PTS) greater than 12° is an established risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction failure. Reducing PTS is thus considered protective to the anterior cruciate ligament graft, and it can be achieved through an anterior closing‐wedge osteotomy. Prior to the procedure, PTS should be accurately measured to determine the amount of correction that is needed. Radiographic films remain the gold standard for measuring PTS. The purpose of this presentation is to show validated and reproducible step‐by‐step techniques for measuring PTS and anterior tibial translation for anterior closing‐wedge osteotomy using monopedal full‐length weight‐bearing tibia standing radiographs.

Abstract Tunnel convergence in multiligament knee surgery remains a technical challenge. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral sockets/tunnels and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) femoral sockets/tunnels during anatomic posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstructions are particularly vulnerable to convergence. This is secondary to the limited amount of bony real estate available on the lateral distal femur. Previous studies have attempted to define a specific angle to direct the LCL tunnel away from the ACL tunnel. However, inconsistency with ACL femoral socket creation and variability in bony architecture can make this strategy unreliable. This surgical technique describes how to minimize the risk of ACL and LCL tunnel convergence during ACL and PLC reconstructions.

Background: Acute traumatic patellar dislocations may cause intra-articular derangements of the knee in the setting of acute and chronic instability which may not always be appropriately identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose: To determine the rates of coexisting intra-articular pathology in patients with patellar instability requiring medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and to report discrepancies between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and diagnostic arthroscopy results. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction at a single institution between 2010 and 2023 were identified. Operative reports and preoperative MRIs were reviewed. Records without full MRI reports as read by a radiologist or cases in which a diagnostic arthroscopy was not conducted were excluded. Intra-articular pathologies noted on MRI and confirmed by arthroscopy were documented. MRI findings were considered to be discordant from arthroscopic findings if a lesion was identified on diagnostic arthroscopy that was not present in the full MRI report and that lesion resulted in additional surgical procedures. Results: There were 331 arthroscopic procedures conducted within the study population of 508 patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy at the time of their patellar stabilization procedures. These procedures included 180 loose body removals, 95 osteochondral lesions treated via a variety of interventions including open reduction and internal fixation (26 cases), particulated allograft chondral grafting (30 cases), osteochondral allograft transplantation (9 cases), and microfracture (30 cases), and 39 meniscal tears resulting in 33 partial meniscectomies and 6 meniscal repairs. Among these 508 patients, 105 (21%) demonstrated discordance of preoperative MRI and arthroscopic findings that necessitated additional procedures. This discordance was responsible for a total of 109 (33%) of the 331 arthroscopic procedures. These included 75 loose body removals, 2 osteochondral fracture fixation procedures, 2 microfractures for full-thickness cartilage loss, 16 partial meniscectomies, and 2 meniscal repairs, among others. Conclusion: Among patients undergoing patellar stabilization, 21% had intra-articular lesions not identified on preoperative MRI detected at the time of diagnostic arthroscopy that resulted in surgical intervention. This study, representing the largest cohort to date of patellar stabilization surgeries with both MRI and arthroscopy findings, underscores the importance of diagnostic arthroscopy for improving diagnostic accuracy and addressing associated intra-articular pathology.

Background: Arthrofibrosis is seen in 1.7% to 38% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and has been associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There are limited data regarding the optimal time to intervene in cases of arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Purpose: To assess if timing of arthrofibrosis treatment after ACLR affects final knee range of motion (ROM) and to help establish guidelines with regard to timing of intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Databases were retrospectively screened at 2 high-volume practices for patients who underwent lysis of adhesions (LOA; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29884 and 29875) with or without manipulation under anesthesia (CPT 27570) after ACLR (CPT 29888). Clinical ROM assessments were collected at multiple time points. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on timing of LOA. Comparative analysis was performed to assess for relationships between ROM and timing of intervention. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent LOA after ACLR: 25 patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, 23 patients between 3 and 6 months, and 31 patients >6 months. Earlier LOA was associated with greater total loss of motion before LOA. The final total arc of motion was 132.7°, 133.7°, and 131.8° for patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, between 3 and 6 months, and >6 months, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups in final flexion ( P = .8), extension ( P = .746), or total arc of motion ( P = .781). Linear regression modeling did not identify time from ACLR to LOA as a predictive variable ( P = .982) in final ROM. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate a linear relationship between the timing of LOA and final ROM. Regardless of the time to intervention, ROM improved significantly; however, patients with more severe arthrofibrosis underwent LOA at earlier time points.

Background: In skeletally immature patients, alternative surgical approaches should be undertaken for the treatment of patellofemoral instability that respect the open physis. Remaining growth can be exploited for correction of genu valgum, a known anatomic risk factor of patellofemoral instability. Indications: A skeletally immature 14-year-old boy with bilateral genu valgum and patella alta presented with symptomatic, recurrent left knee patellar instability precluding sports participation and causing dysfunction in his activities of daily living. Technique Description: A midline approach to the knee was used. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) was completed up until the point of femoral-sided allograft fixation. The socket for femoral-sided graft fixation was reamed with an all-epiphyseal technique. Next, growth modulation with temporary hemiepiphysiodesis of the medial distal femoral physis was undertaken with an 8-plate bilaterally. Patellar tendon shortening was completed. Femoral-sided graft fixation for the MPFL-R was then completed. Results: There were no acute complications associated with surgery. Surgical management led to resolution of the patient’s patellar instability. The patient is being followed for timing of hemiepiphysiodesis plate removal. Discussion/Conclusion: In skeletally immature patients, a physeal-sparing MPFL-R is a viable treatment option to address recurrent patellar instability. Other anatomic risk factors, such as genu valgum and patella alta, may be concomitantly addressed using techniques that are respective of the open physis. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Background: Patellofemoral instability (PFI) is a condition that leads to recurrent dislocation events and is typically secondary to extensor mechanism malalignment and rotational deformities. To correct malalignment, a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) can be performed; however, an understanding of the associated complications, recurrence rates, and potential for reoperation is necessary. Purpose: To systematically review the literature to determine the incidence of postoperative complications, rate of recurrent instability, and all-cause reoperation rate after TTO for PFI. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence 4. Methods: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were queried for studies that reported complications after TTO. No date limits were applied. A total of 1050 studies were identified. Complications were categorized into “minor” and “major” groups using a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine complication rates, recurrent instability, and all-cause reoperation, utilizing a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. A meta-analysis for recurrent instability was subgrouped according to follow-up periods of ≤2 years and >2 years. Results: A total of 38 studies were included, comprising 1546 patients, representing 1733 knees. The study dates ranged from 1989 to 2024, and the level of evidence ranged from 2 to 4. The weighted mean age at surgery was 24.1 years (range, 20-54 years), and 67% of patients were women. The weighted mean follow-up of all studies was 4.2 years. Overall, 197 minor complications, 39 major complications, 90 recurrent instability events, and 275 reoperations were identified. The minor complication rate was 9% (range, 0%-65% [95% CI, 6%-13%]). The major complication rate was 3% (range, 0%-10% [95% CI, 3%-4%]). Seven studies had a ≤2-year follow-up, and the remaining 31 studies had a >2-year follow-up. The recurrent instability rate was 3% in studies with ≤2 years of follow-ups (range, 0%-26% [95% CI, 1%-13%]). In studies with >2 years of follow-up, the recurrent instability rate was 8% (range, 0%-31% [95% CI, 6%-12%]). The all-cause reoperation rate was 16% (range, 0%-54% [95% CI, 11%-21%]). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified the incidence of complications (17%), the rate of recurrent instability (3%-8%), and the all-cause reoperation rate (16%) after TTO. TTO, performed alone or in combination with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for the treatment of PFI, reliably improved clinical outcome scores in the setting of variable complication rates. Interestingly, rates of recurrent instability increased over time, and most reoperations were undertaken for hardware removal rather than revision patellar stabilization surgery.

Purpose To compare clinical and functional outcomes (including range of motion, clinical laxity, reoperation/revision rates, and patient‐reported outcome measures) of combined anterior cruciate ligament/posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR/PCLR) with and without suture tape (ST) augmentation via a propensity‐matched cohort analysis. Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent simultaneous primary ACLR/PCLR between 2001 and 2022. A 1:1 propensity match was performed using patient sex, Schenck classification grade, age ±8 years, and body mass index ±10 to produce 2 cohorts: ACLR/PCLR with and without (control) ST augmentation. Clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], range of motion, Tegner activity scale, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score) were analyzed. Results The propensity match produced a final cohort of 50 ACLR/PCLR patients: 25 with ST augmentation and 25 nonaugmented controls. Most patients had a KD3M injury (12 in each cohort), and no significant differences were noted in concomitant neurovascular, meniscal, or chondral injuries between the groups. Forty patients (80%) completed follow‐up at a mean of 4.7 years for the ST cohort and 8.5 years for the control cohort ( P > .05). Postoperative ST versus control values for outcome measures including VAS at rest (0.9 vs 1.5; P = .71), VAS with use (3.0 vs 2.2; P = .24), International Knee Documentation Committee (75.7 vs 76.3; P = .37), Lysholm (81.8 vs 77.6; P = .91), and Tegner activity (4.8 vs 5.4; P = .37) scores showed no differences ( P > .05 for all). There were no differences in excessive postoperative clinical laxity between ST and control cohorts (ST n = 1 vs control n = 2, Lachman 2+, P = .140; ST n = 3 vs control n = 1, posterior drawer 2+, P = .122). The total number of patients who underwent reoperation was 7 of 25 (28%) for the ST cohort and 8 of 25 (32%) for the control cohort ( P = .76). Conclusions Concomitant ACLR/PCLR utilizing ST augmentation showed similarly satisfactory postoperative clinical outcomes at a minimum 2‐year follow‐up compared to a matched cohort without ST. The use of an independent ST did not limit motion or increase the incidence of complications or revision surgery. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Background: Treatment decisions in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are influenced by multiple factors, such as the desire to return to sports or symptomatic instability. Identifying the differential treatment effect of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) compared with nonoperative management on a patient-specific level can inform surgical decision-making. Hypothesis: Unsupervised machine learning can identify distinct patient subgroups based on outcome achievement after ACL injury, and ACLR will exert a protective effect on the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) over nonoperative management. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A longitudinal populational registry identified patients with ACL injuries from 1990 to 2016 with a minimum 7.5-year follow-up. An unsupervised random forest algorithm was utilized to develop and validate patient subgroups. Treatment effects of ACLR on outcomes were analyzed using a machine learning causal inference estimator. Patient subgroup membership was incorporated into a multivariable logistic regression to identify factors predictive of optimal outcomes. Results: A total of 923 patients (785 primary ACLR, 138 nonoperative) were included. The random forest algorithm arrived at an optimal partition of 2 subgroups, with 653 patients in the optimal outcome subgroup (368 male [56.4%]; mean age, 26.0 ± 10.2 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 26.5 ± 4.30) and 270 patients in the suboptimal outcome subgroup (152 male [56.3%]; mean age, 35.0 ± 10.1 years; mean BMI, 30.5 ± 5.54). The latter group demonstrated significantly increased rates of secondary meniscal injury, development of symptomatic PTOA, and progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at the final follow-up (all P < .01). In the optimal outcome subgroup, ACLR had significantly protective treatment effects on the risk of secondary meniscal injury (average treatment effect [ATE], 61%), contralateral ACL injury (ATE, 8%), symptomatic PTOA (ATE, 16%), and progression to TKA (ATE, 6%) (all P < .01). Conversely, in the suboptimal outcome subgroup, ACLR only protected against symptomatic PTOA (ATE, 11%) and progression to TKA (ATE, 8%) (both P < .01). Conclusion: Two clinically meaningful subgroups were identified from retrospectively collected data and found to experience differential treatment responses after ACL injuries. ACLR decreased the rate of development of PTOA and TKA in both subgroups but was not as effective in preventing secondary meniscal injuries or contralateral ACL injuries in patients who were older, heavier, or had concomitant medial meniscus injuries.

Abstract Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft remains one of the most common autografts used, and there is significant evidence to support its title as the “gold standard.” There are nuances and technical challenges associated with every step of an ACLR, which always leave room for improvement. The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide reproducible, technical pearls where errors are commonly encountered during ACLR. In this article, we detail 10 technical pearls that surgeons should consider to enhance operative workflow and optimize success during ACLR with a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.