Liu, Minetta C.

Abstract Genomic testing has transformed clinical care in metastatic breast cancer. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has made sequential testing feasible, however, concordance between tissue and cfDNA, sensitivity of cfDNA, and optimal sampling frequency have not been examined on large data sets with clinical annotation. Of the 648 genes in the tissue NGS Tempus xT assay, 105 genes are also included in the Tempus xF cfDNA plasma-based test. Both platforms are run on Illumina and detect SNVs, indels, CNVs, and rearrangements/fusions with high sensitivity and specificity (>90%). This study used the Tempus Labs LENS™ tool to identify the most recent ~3,300 metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent clinical testing and had either tissue-based testing, cfDNA testing or both. Of the 212 patients with xF and xT testing, 87 had xT before xF, 135 had xF before xT, and 7 had the testing performed at the same time. The most common pathogenic germline versus somatic alterations on tissue-based testing and their concordance will also be reported. In summary, this data suggests a variable amount of concordance between tissue-based and plasma-based assays. Timing of assay performance and inclusion of germline DNA might play an important role in contributing to these differences which need further exploration. Table: Count of Reported Variants and xT/xF Concordance by GeneSomatic GenesxF frequency (n)xT frequency(n)Concordance Between xF and xTTP5313911043%PIK3CA848058%ESR1584141%BRCA238217%ERBB2372629%NF1322113%RB1272416%ATM30165%GATA3213441%FGFR13353%PTEN193036%ARID1A251823% Citation Format: Minetta Liu, Jeff Schaffer, Aneta Piwowarczyk, Nike Beaubier, Kimberly Blackwell, Ben Park. Concordance and use patterns of tissue and cell-free based genomic testing in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-12.

Abstract Background: In the I-SPY 2 TRIAL, the addition of P to standard NAC resulted in more than doubling of the pathologic complete response (pCR) rates for both hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- and triple-negative (TN) early breast cancer (EBC) patients (pts) compared to NAC only (Nanda et al, JAMA Oncol, 2020). At 3 years, distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) rates in pts with pCR following NAC+P was >95%. We hypothesized that ctDNA can serve as a predictive biomarker of response and survival in pts treated with NAC. Methods: A personalized ctDNA test (Signatera) was performed on 511 serial plasma samples from 138 pts with high-risk HR+/HER2- (n=77) or TN (n=61) stage II/III EBC. Pts received P with paclitaxel (Tx) followed by AC (P arm, n=42) or standard NAC only (n=96), an exploratory subset of pts evaluated for P efficacy. Plasma was collected; pretreatment (T0), 3 weeks after treatment initiation (T1), between Tx+/-P and AC regimens (T2), and prior to surgery (T3). ctDNA was deemed positive with a minimum of 2 of the pt specific tumor mutation fragments detected in cfDNA. Association of ctDNA with response and survival was analyzed using logistic and Cox regressions with pCR and DRFS as endpoints. Median follow-up was 2.8 years. Results: Detection of ctDNA decreased over time (P arm: T0-81%, T1-50%, T2-19%, T3-3%) and NAC only: T0-82%, T1-65%, T2-26%, T3-10%). ctDNA data at T0 and T1 was available for 96% (132/138) of pts in P arm or NAC only (Table). Among ctDNA+ patients at baseline, clearance at T1 was significantly associated with pCR (OR=1.92, ctDNA+/-; OR=0.27, ctDNA+/+; LR p<0.001). This association remained significant after adjustment for HR status and treatment (LR p<0.001) and P arm or NAC only (P: LR p=0.03; NAC: LR p=0.01). ctDNA data at T0, T1, and T2 was available for 86% (118/138) pts. (Table). Among all ctDNA+ pts at baseline, dynamics through T2 was associated with pCR (OR=1.44, ctDNA+/-/-; OR=0.33, ctDNA+/+/-, OR=0.12, ctDNA+/+/+; LR p=0.0011). This association remained significant when adjusted for HR status and treatment (LR p<0.001). Analysis within individual treatments showed significant association for NAC (LR p=0.040) and a non-significant trend in NAC+P (LR p=0.063), likely due to smaller sample size. All pts who achieved pCR were ctDNA- at T3 (n=34). Among those who failed to achieve pCR (n=81), DRFS was significantly better in ctDNA- (n=72/81; 20 in P and 52 in NAC) versus ctDNA+ pts (n=9/81; 1 in P and 8 in NAC) (adjusted HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.05-0.37). Conclusions: These exploratory results align with our previous findings that early clearance of ctDNA during NAC treatment was significantly associated with increased likelihood of achieving pCR. Additionally, we show that ctDNA clearance can be an early surrogate marker for therapy response assessment. Residual ctDNA after neoadjuvant treatment was a significant predictor of metastatic recurrence and death. Personalized monitoring of ctDNA during the course of NAC is feasible and provides information that can be combined with imaging and pathology, and may help to optimize decision making for de-escalation or escalation of therapy. Larger studies are ongoing. ctDNA dynamics and pCRctDNA status at T0 and T1 (n=132)ctDNA status at T0, T1, and T2 (n=118)ctDNA-/-ctDNA+/-ctDNA+/+ctDNA-/-/-ctDNA+/-/-ctDNA+/+/-ctDNA+/+/+Total, n (%)24 (18)28 (21)80 (61)22 (19)24 (20)43 (36)27 (23)pCR, n (%)9 (38)15 (54)11 (14)9 (41)12 (50)8 (19)2 (7)No pCR, n (%)15 (63)13 (46)69 (86)13 (59)12 (50)35 (81)25 (93) Citation Format: Mark Jesus M Magbanua, Denise Wolf, Derrick Renner, Svetlana Shchegrova, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Christina Yau, Gillian Hirst, Hsin-Ta Wu, Ekaterina Kalashnikova, Antony Tin, Amy Delson, Douglas Yee, Angela DeMichele, Raheleh Salari, Angel Rodriguez, Bernhard Zimmermann, Himanshu Sethi, Alexey Aleshin, Paul Billings, Laura Esserman, Minetta Liu, Rita Nanda, Laura van ‘t Veer, I-SPY 2 Investigators. Personalized ctDNA as a predictive biomarker in high-risk early stage breast cancer (EBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with or without pembrolizumab (P) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-02.

Abstract Background: In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, Aurora A kinase (AURKA) activation is associated with expansion of CD44+/CD24low/- tumor initiating cells, down-regulation of ERα, and endocrine therapy resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, can restore ERα expression and endocrine sensitivity. Early phase studies evaluating alisertib alone or with fulvestrant for ER+ metastatic BC (MBC) demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising antitumor activity [Haddad, Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018]. A phase II trial was conducted to determine if the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib improved objective response rate (ORR) and to assess clinical activity of alisertib alone or with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with prior fulvestrant and CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to Arm A, alisertib (50 mg PO BID Days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28 days) or Arm B, alisertib with fulvestrant (500 mg IM Day 1, 15 for Cycle 1 and q 28 days thereafter). Eligibility included postmenopausal women, history of ER+ BC, prior fulvestrant, ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy lines, and measurable disease. Stratification factors included prior CDK4/6i, ER level (<10%, ≥10%), and primary/secondary endocrine resistance. Pts on Arm A could cross over to Arm B at progression. With 45 pts per arm, a one sided alpha=0.15 sequential binomial test would have an 85% chance of detecting an increase of ≥ 20% in the ORR of ArmB when the true ORR for Arm A is ≤ 20%. ORR was defined as a partial response (PR) + complete response (CR) by RECIST v.1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), 24-week clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR + PR + absence of progression for> 6 cycles), overall survival, duration of response (DoR), and safety. Blood and tumor specimens were collected at baseline, end of Cycle 1, and progression. Results: Pts enrolled July 2017 - November 2019 with 118 pre-registered, 96 registered, and 90 evaluable for the primary endpoint (Arm A: 45, Arm B: 45). Median age was 60 (range 33, 85). Nearly all received prior fulvestrant (n=89, 98.9%), aromatase inhibitor (n=83, 92.2%), and CDK4/6i (n=88, 97.8%). Most had secondary endocrine resistance (n=71, 78.9%). Pre-registration biopsy for ER was positive in 84 pts (86.7%) and negative in 6 pts (13.3%). More pts on Arm B had prior everolimus (A: 35.6%, B: 57.8%) and prior chemotherapy (A: 44.4%, B: 55.6%) for MBC. The ORR for alisertib and fulvestrant was 20.0% (90% CI: 10.9-32.3%), not significantly greater than alisertib alone 17.8% (90% CI: 9.2-29.8%). The 24-week CBR for Arm A was 42.2% (90% CI: 29.7-55.6%; n=19, including 7 PR) and Arm B was 31.1% (90% CI: 19.9-44.3%; n=14, including 8 PR). As of July 1, 2020, the median DoR was not reached in either arm. The median PFS time was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9 - 9.3) for Arm A and 5.1 months (95%CI: 3.8 - 7.6) for Arm B. Seventeen pts (18.9%) remain on treatment (A: 12, B: 5) having received at least 11 cycles (range up to 32+ cycles). At least one dose reduction was required for pts (A: 19, B: 18), most commonly due to neutropenia. The most common severe (grade ≥3) adverse events included neutropenia (n=19, 42.2% in each arm), anemia (A: 15.6%, B: 8.8%), and fatigue (n=5, 11.1% Arm B only). Pts discontinued therapy due to disease progression equally in each arm (n=28, 62.2%), however more pts on Arm B (n=12) than Arm A (n=5) discontinued therapy due to toxicity, refusal or other reasons. Conclusion: While the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib did not improve ORR, promising clinical activity with alisertib monotherapy was observed overall and notably for pts with endocrine and CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC. More severe toxicities and treatment discontinuation were observed in pts receiving combination therapy. Correlative blood (CTC/cfDNA) and tissue (AURKA, ERα, and stemness biomarkers) studies are underway. Citation Format: Tufia Haddad, Antonino D'Assoro, Vera Suman, Jodi Carter, Brendan McMenomy, Erica Mayer, Meghan Karuturi, Aki Morikawa, Paul Marcom, Claudine Isaacs, Sun Young Oh, Amy Clark, Ingrid Mayer, Khandan Keyomarsi, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Ciara O'Sullivan, Prema Peethambaram, Timothy Hobday, Minetta Liu, James Ingle, Matthew Goetz. Randomized phaseII trial to evaluate alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant for advanced, endocrine-resistant breast cancer (TBCRC 041) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-05.

Abstract Background: Chest wall recurrence may occur in up to 30% of patients with breast cancer, and is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that immunotherapy may be beneficial in this setting because of the inflammatory nature of this disease, and the association of chest wall disease with lymphovascular invasion. Combination immunotherapy and chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect. In this study, we combined pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody with carboplatin, in patients with chest wall disease. This combination has previously been shown to be effective in advanced lung cancer. Trial design: This is a 2:1 randomized phase II study of pembrolizumab and carboplatin (Arm A) versus carboplatin alone (Arm B) in patients with chest wall involvement from breast cancer. Pembrolizumab is dosed at 200 mg IV every 3 weeks, and carboplatin is dosed at AUC 5 IV every 3 weeks. Patients on Arm A have the option to continue on pembrolizumab alone after 6 cycles of combination treatment (Arm Ax). Patients on Arm B have the option to cross-over to pembrolizumab (+/- carboplatin) after 6 cycles of carboplatin alone (Arm Bx). Patients with HER2 positive disease may continue trastuzumab in addition to the study treatment. Patients undergo chest wall biopsies and peripheral blood collection for correlative studies at enrollment and after 2 cycles of treatment, and also imaging with CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and bone scan every 3 cycles. Eligibility criteria: Patients must have chest wall involvement from breast cancer, with or without distant metastases. Patients may have triple-negative breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER2- disease (after two prior lines of hormone therapy), or refractory HER2 positive disease. Patients may have received any number of lines of prior chemotherapy. A prior platinum is allowed as long as there was not disease progression on this agent. Specific Aims: 1. (Primary aim) Disease control rate in the chest wall and other distant sites at 18 weeks of treatment using RECIST 1.1 criteria, 2. progression-free survival, 3. toxicity, 4. response based on tumor PD-L1 expression, and 5. response based on irRECIST. Exploratory aims include evaluating: 1. Soluble PD-L1 expression, 2. changes in tumor and peripheral blood immune composition, 3. peripheral blood circulating tumor cells, 4. peripheral blood cell-free DNA, and 5. the association of MYC with PD-1 and TIM-3 on tumor cells, based on preclinical data to suggest that MYC may upregulate these inflammatory markers. Statistical Methods: 84 patients (56 in Arm A and 28 in Arm B) are being enrolled at 7 sites in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium. The study is powered to determine a 20% difference in disease control rates between arms (HR 0.52, α= 0.10, ß=0.20). A futility analysis was originally planned to occur for Arm B after 18 patients are enrolled, but a subsequent amendment has enabled an earlier assessment after 14 patients were enrolled. Accrual: Present accrual is 40 patients. (NCT03095352). This trial is funded in part by Merck and a Development Program Grant from the University of California San Francisco. Contact information: Neelima Vidula, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, nvidula@mgh.harvard.edu Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Rita Nanda, Kathy Miller, Paula Pohlmann, Vandana Abramson, Leisha A. Emens, Ben H. Park, Minetta C. Liu, Andrei Goga, Hope S. Rugo. Translational breast cancer research consortium 044 trial: Randomized phase 2 study of pembrolizumab and carboplatin versus carboplatin alone for chest wall recurrence of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-13-09.

Abstract Background: Several studies suggest clinical utility of serial circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as a means of assessing response status in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive pooled analysis comprising globally available data to further define and explore the role of CTC enumeration as a tool for early treatment monitoring in patients with MBC with a focus on the predictive power in different breast cancer subtypes and clinical settings. Methods: In a global effort, peer-reviewed published studies with data on repeated CTC assessments (CellSearch® technology; Menarini Silicon Biosystems; Bologna, Italy) in MBC patients were screened and investigators were asked to provide individual patient data for this pooled analysis. 2761 cases from 32 data sets with data on both baseline and one follow up CTC assessments were included in the analysis (median time interval between the two CTC assessments 35 days). Data were analyzed using log rank tests and Cox regressions to evaluate the association between serial CTC enumeration results and overall survival (OS) in the full patient cohort and defined subgroups. Results: 588 (21.3%) patients had no CTCs at both time points (neg/neg), 236 (8.5%) patients were CTC negative at baseline and CTC positive at follow up (neg/pos), 712 (25.8%) patients converted from CTC positive at baseline to CTC negative (pos/neg), and 1225 (44.4%) patients had at least one CTC at both time points (pos/pos). Log rank tests showed significant differences in OS between these four CTC change groups (p < 0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons except for the comparison between neg/pos and pos/neg, p = 0.015). Median OS for the neg/neg, neg/pos, pos/neg and pos/pos group was 45.6, 26.1, 34.6, and 17.6 months, respectively. Hazard ratios (HR) (reference group neg/neg) were 1.38 (95% CI 1.16 - 1.64) for the pos/neg group, 1.78 (95% CI 1.43 - 2.22) for the neg/pos group, and 3.06 (95% CI 2.63 - 3.56) for the pos/pos group. Results were similar if a cutoff of 5 CTCs was used for CTC positivity (pos/neg group: HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.25 - 1.63; neg/pos group: HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.91 - 2.99; pos/pos group: HR 3.54, 95% CI 3.12 - 4.02). In total, 2586 patients could be assigned to different tumor subtypes based on known hormone receptor (ER) and HER2 status of the primary tumor: 1513 (58.5%) patients had a luminal-like tumor (ER positive, HER2 negative), 682 (26.4%) patients had a HER2-positive tumor, and 391 (15.1%) patients had a triple-negative tumor. In patients with luminal-like tumors, the hazard ratios were 1.67 (95% CI 1.29 - 2.17), 2.01 (95% CI 1.45 - 2.77), and 3.87 (95% CI 3.09 - 4.83) for the pos/neg, neg/pos, and pos/pos group, respectively. In patients with HER2-positive tumors, the neg/pos group (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.12 - 2.53) and the pos/pos group (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.58 - 2.83) showed significantly worse OS compared to the neg/neg group, while in triple-negative patients, the pos/pos group had a significantly shorter OS compared to the neg/neg group (HR 2.99, 95% CI 2.11 - 4.24). The results will be up-dated by inclusion of additional large data sets (CALGB 40502, CALGB 40503, COMET, SWOG S0500, TBCRC 001) for the analysis to be presented at SABCS 2020. Conclusion: This large pooled analysis confirms that at a median of 35 days after treatment initiation, follow-up CTC assessments strongly predict overall survival. These results suggest potential clinical utility of CTC monitoring as early response marker in MBC, especially in luminal-like tumors. Citation Format: Wolfgang J Janni, Tracy C. Yab, Daniel F. Hayes, Massimo Cristofanilli, Francois-Clement Bidard, Michail Ignatiadis, Meredith M. Regan, Catherine Alix-Panabières, William E. Barlow, Carlos Caldas, Lisa A. Carey, Luc Dirix, Tanja Fehm, Jose A. Garcia-Saenz, Paola Gazzaniga, Daniele Generali, Lorenzo Gerratana, Rafael Gisbert-Criado, William Jacot, Zefei Jiang, Evi Lianidou, Mark J.M. Magbanua, Luis Manso, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Volkmar Müller, Elisabetta Munzone, Klaus Pantel, Jean-Yves Pierga, Brigitte Rack, Sabine Riethdorf, Hope S. Rugo, Kostandinos Sideras, Stefan Sleijfer, Jeffrey Smerage, Justin Stebbing, Leon W.M.M. Terstappen, José Vidal-Martínez, Rita Zamarchi, Karthik Giridhar, Thomas W.P. Friedl, Minetta C. Liu. Clinical utility of repeated circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as early treatment monitoring tool in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) - a global pooled analysis with individual patient data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-08.

AbstractThe JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway may be aberrantly activated and have various and conflicting roles in breast cancer. The current study explored prognostic implications of activated STAT3 in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive primary breast cancers in the context of a large prospective study (ALTTO). Activated STAT3 was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of STAT3 phosphorylation (Y705) performed on the primary tumors. This analysis evaluated whether patients with activated STAT3 had disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) different from patients without activated STAT3. A total of 5694 patients out of the 8381 patients enrolled in ALTTO were included in this analysis (67.9%), and 2634 of them (46%) had evidence of STAT3 activation (minimum tumor Allred score ≥2). The median follow‐up was 6.93 years (6.85‐6.97 years), at the end of which 1035 (18.18%) and 520 (9.13%) patients experienced DFS and OS events, respectively. Patients with STAT3 activation experienced improved DFS compared to those without it (multivariable hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74‐0.95; P = .006). There were no group differences in OS (multivariable HR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.78‐1.10; P = .37). This effect was limited to ER‐positive tumors. In conclusion, these findings support the role of STAT3 activation as a marker of favorable outcome in ER‐positive/HER2‐positive breast cancer patients.

Introduction: Novel targeted therapies have revolutionized treatments for both upfront and relapsed CLL. However, effective therapies have not been established for progressive CLL after developing resistance to both BTK inhibitor and BCL-2 inhibitors. Similarly, Richter's transformation (RS) remains an area of unmet clinical need. Hypothesizing that progressive CLL and RS possess significant but differential molecular abnormalities, we aimed to dissect the initial genomic profiles in a clinical cohort of patients seen in our routine clinical practice using targeted DNA sequencing and transcriptome analysis. Methods: Twelve CLL patients who had lymph node biopsies for evaluation of clinical progression at Mayo Clinic were included in this study. RNA sequencing and targeted DNA sequencing on a focused oncology panel of 1,711 genes were performed on Illumina HiSeq through Tempus Labs, Inc. (Chicago, IL). Differentially expressed (DE) genes were identified using edgeR at the cutoff of FDR <=0.05 and fold-change >=2. Somatic mutations and copy number alternations (CNAs) were identified through Mutect2 and PatternCNV, respectively. CN loss was defined to have log2(ratio) <=-0.93 and CN gain to have log2(ratio) >= 0.585. Pathway analysis was done through the Enrichr package. Results: Among the 12 patients, 7 had confirmed RS (large cell lymphoma histology) and 5 had CLL based on pathological findings. The clinical and therapeutic history for each patient is illustrated in Fig 1A. FISH results from 11 of the patients showed chromosomal abnormalities including del(13q), del(11q), del(17p) and tri(12) (Fig 1A). Hierarchical clustering of expression profiles from the top 10,000 most variable genes in expression revealed two major clusters (Fig 1A). Cluster C1 contains five RS cases, of which case S207 did not receive ibrutinib, S256 was on high-dose steroid and anti-CD20 post-ibrutinib therapy for >1 year before biopsy, and case S025 was treated for < 6 months with ibrutinib. These three form a subgroup separate from the other two RS in C1 who had 8 and 42 months of continuous ibrutinib therapy pre-biopsy, respectively. C2 contains two RS and five CLL cases. Within C2, CLL and RS cases showed similar transcriptomic profiles. Over 90% of the DE genes showed an overall increase of expression in C1, particularly within the 3-sample subgroup (Fig 1B). These genes are enriched in pathways known to play key roles in CLL, including PI3K-AKT signaling, NOTCH signaling and RAS/MAPK signaling, while genes up-regulated in C2 are enriched in WNT signaling. The results suggest marked differences in gene expression profiles and indicate molecular heterogeneity among RS and CLL patients. In addition, targeted DNA sequencing data were analyzed to identify somatic mutations and CNAs. The analysis confirmed the FISH results of del(13q), del(11q), del(17p) or tri(12) in 8 of the cases (Fig 1A). The mutation profiles are similar between C1 and C2 for the recurrently mutated genes published in CLL. However, we identified recurrent CNAs that occurred preferentially in C1 (covering 9 genes) or C2 (48 genes) (Fig 1C). Manual inspections of the reads coverage revealed that 5 of the 9 genes are from chr1q21.1 to chr1q22 that showed clear CN gains largely in C1. Of the 48 genes, 6 are from chrXp11 that showed CN losses, and 27 are from chr17q12 to chr17q25 that showed CN gains. Therefore, the majority of the 57 genes are from large-scale CNAs. Notably, for the CNAs mostly occurring in C2, the affected genes are enriched in WNT signaling, Cell cycle/protein kinase activity and chromatin modifying enzymes. Collectively, the results support the variability of transcriptomic signatures and genetic lesions between RS and CLL. Conclusion: This study revealed a noticeable heterogeneity in gene expression and genetic variation between RS and CLL, albeit in a small cohort. The vast majority of the DE genes showed elevated expression in C1 containing only RS cases, and these genes are enriched in PI3K-AKT signaling, NOTCH signaling, and RAS/MAPK signaling. The pattern is more pronounced for a subgroup in C1 who were overall less exposed to ibrutinib. For somatic variation, there is a strong tendency of occurrence of recurrent CNAs towards C2 cohort, mainly involving gains of chr17q and deletions of chrXp11. Given these advances we are encouraged to further pursue the genetic abnormalities with defined roles in aggressive and transformed CLL. Disclosures Liu: Eisal: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GRAIL: Research Funding; Menarini Silicon Biosystems: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Tesaro: Research Funding. Parikh:Genentech: Honoraria; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kenderian:Gilead: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding. Kay:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ding:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding.

Introduction: PD-1 inhibits the cytotoxic T-cell functions via the interaction with its ligands (PDL1 and PDL2). Recently, our group showed a selective response (~40%) with PD-1 blocking antibody pembrolizumab in patients with Richter transformation (RT), particularly after prior exposure to ibrutinib (Wei Ding et al, Blood, 2017). Additionally, PD-1 showed an increased expression in tumor B-cells of patients with RT (Rong He et al, AJSP, 2018). Here we investigated the functional implications of the PD-1 signaling axis in lymphoma B-cell pathobiology. Methods: 26 CLL-involved lymph node (LN) and 20 RT-involved LN samples were tested for PD-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (mouse clone NAT105, Abcam). Then, we checked PD-1 expression in 10 lymphoma cell lines and 1 CLL cell line (MEC-1) by both, flow cytometry and Western blot (WB) analysis. Over-expression of PD-1 using pLEX-lentiviral system (Thermo Scientific) was evaluated for in vitro cell cycle regulation and in vivo tumor growth. Overexpression of PD-1 was further examined on the regulation of cell signaling pathways using human phospho kinase array kit (R&D) and WB analysis. Gene expression signatures in CLL and RT patients were also identified by Illumina-based RNA sequencing using Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE)-nodal tissue obtained by clinical biopsy (Tempus Labs; Chicago, IL). Results: The expression of PD-1 was significantly increased in RT-LN compared to CLL-LN (mean ± SEM in RT vs. CLL, 30.6% ± 4.7% vs. 11.5% ± 2.8%, p < 0.001) [Fig 1A]. PD-1 expression was highest in patients with RT where the last prior CLL therapy was ibrutinib. To test the role of PD-1 in lymphoma B-cells, its expression was assessed in lymphoma and CLL cell lines. The expression of PD-1 was found to be variable, but at very low-levels in lymphoma lines OCI-LY7 and OCI-LY19 (data not shown). Constitutive lentiviral (pLEX-PD-1)-mediated overexpression of PD-1 in OCI-LY7 and OCI-LY19 cells led to increased cell growth (1.4 and 1.9 fold compared to original lines on day 4, respectively, Fig 1BI-II), which was further confirmed by cell cycle analysis which showed an increase in S phase by 20.4% and 24.53% in OCI-LY7 and OCI-LY19 cells (Fig 1B III), respectively. When the luciferase + PD-1 expressing OCI-LY7 cells were injected intravenously (1X106 cells) into NSG mice, increased tumor growth was observed at 22 days of follow up by bioluminescence imaging (p<0.01, Fig 1C). Using phospho-kinase array, an overall decrease of phosphorylation was detected on multiple sites of p53 (S392, S15, S46) and CHK2 (T68) (data not shown). This finding was further confirmed by WB analyses (Fig1DI). In addition, decreased of total p53 and increased phosphorylation on both SHP-1 and SHP-2 were found in PD-1 overexpressing OCI-LY19 and OCI-LY17 cell lines (Fig 1DI). Immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-PD1 antibody showed that PD-1 was in the same complex with SHP-1 and SHP-2 in OCI-LY7 cells but only with SHP-2 in OCI-LY19 cells (Fig 1DII). In parallel, mRNA sequencing was performed on 11 nodal tissues from either RT (n=8) or progressive CLL (n=3) after they developed clinical progression. The expression of PD-1 (PDCD1) was positively correlated with the expression of SHP-1 (PTPN6, r=0.56) and Cyclin E1 (CCNE1, r=0.62), implicating a direct role of PD-1 in regulating cellular proliferation and the induction in phosphatase expression in RT and CLL. Conclusion: Our data support the notion that PD-1 overexpression in lymphoma cells modifies cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo and regulates the function of phosphatase SHP and p53- pathways. These findings also indicate that aggressive lymphoma or CLL leukemic cells have the ability to hijack the PD-1 pathway and may result in downregulation of the p53 mediated DNA repair. This novel information provide for new strategies to further evaluate the interaction of checkpoint signals with DNA repair pathway, and possibly provide novel targets for Richter's transformation. Disclosures Ding: alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sakemura:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding. Liu:Eisal: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GRAIL: Research Funding; Menarini Silicon Biosystems: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Tesaro: Research Funding. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ansell:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Kenderian:Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Kay:Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background: Early detection decreases patient mortality for many cancers, but prevailing paradigms focus on distinct screening modalities for each cancer type. A minimally invasive test that detects multiple tumor types could substantially reduce cancer mortality and improve screening efficiency. In preliminary studies, we showed that a targeted methylation cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test can detect cancer and determine the tissue of origin (TOO) of abnormally methylated cfDNA with high sensitivity and specificity; however, blood was collected at the time of diagnosis and results were not disclosed to inform care. The current study includes disclosure of results to the study investigator to understand the care pathways prompted by a “signal detected” test result, and the benefits, harms, and burdens associated with a multi-cancer detection test. Methods: PATHFINDER (NCT04241796) is a prospective, longitudinal, multi-center clinical study. Approximately 6,200 participants with varying levels of cancer risk will be enrolled at 5-10 clinical sites in the United States. Participants must be ≥50 years of age. If participants have at least 1 of the following–a smoking history of ≥100 cigarettes, a genetic cancer predisposition, or a history of invasive or hematologic malignancy with definitive treatment completed >3 years prior to enrollment–they are eligible for the Elevated Risk Cohort (n = 4340); otherwise, they are eligible for the Non-Elevated Risk Cohort (n = 1860). Individuals being evaluated for cancer or who have a history of invasive or hematologic malignancy within 3 years of enrollment will be excluded. Blood drawn at study sites will be analyzed at GRAIL, Inc. (Menlo Park, CA). Participants and study investigators will be informed of the test results. Participants with “signal not detected” results will be advised to continue routine clinical care, including age- and risk-based cancer screening. Those with “signal detected” test results will be informed of the predicted origin and undergo diagnostic evaluation. The primary study objective is to determine the extent of diagnostic testing required to achieve diagnostic resolution following a “signal detected” test result, defined as the date when the study investigator determines to end diagnostic evaluation triggered by a “signal detected” test result. Health resource utilization, the number and types of tests and time required to reach this point, is the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives include evaluation of test performance (specificity, positive predictive value, and TOO accuracy), and assessment of participants' perceptions about the test and changes in anxiety and health-related quality of life. Exploratory aims include assessment of the number and types of invasive cancer diagnoses among participants with “signal not detected” test results and changes in attitude toward adherence to guideline-recommended screening. Citation Format: Lincoln Nadauld, Charles H. McDonnell III, Minetta C. Liu, Eric Klein, Tomasz M. Beer, Deborah Schrag, Andrew G. Hudnut, Richard Whittington, Bruce Taylor, Joanna Tierney, Catherine Marinac, Jafi Lipson, Margarita Lopatin, Karen C. Chung, Eric Fung, Anne-Renee Hartman, Geoffrey R. Oxnard. The PATHFINDER Study: Assessment of the implementation of an investigational multi-cancer early detection test into clinical practice [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT291.

Abstract Background: The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (NCT02889978) is a multi-center, case-control, observational study with longitudinal follow-up (n=15,254; 56% cancer, 44% non-cancer) to support development of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) multi-cancer early detection test. Previously, we reported that a targeted methylation assay detected and localized >20 cancer types at >99% specificity in individuals with cancer.1,2 Here, we report prediction of cancer (presence/absence) and tissue of origin (TOO) in individuals enrolled with clinical suspicion of cancer but without pathologic diagnosis or treatment at time of enrollment. Methods: Plasma cfDNA from blood samples collected prior to clinical diagnosis was subjected to targeted methylation sequencing. Samples were divided into a training set and an independent validation set to train and validate a machine learning classifier to assess cancer and predict TOO. Performance was assessed in a subset of participants enrolled with suspicion of cancer; subsequently, cancer was confirmed by evaluating a pathologic specimen. Results: Participants being evaluated for suspicion of cancer were classified as confirmed cancer (>20 cancer types; n=164 in training, n=75 in validation) or confirmed non-cancer (n=49 training, n=15 validation). In the confirmed non-cancer group, all training and validation samples were correctly predicted as non-cancer (100% specificity). In the confirmed cancer group, cancer detection across all stages was 40.2% (66/164; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32.7-48.2%) in training and 46.7% (35/75; 95% CI, 35.1-58.6%) in validation. Excluding stage I renal cancers (where detection/tumor fraction is low in plasma and which comprised 20% of participants in this subset) detection across stages was 50.4% (66/131; 95% CI, 41.5-59.2%) and 59.3% (35/59; 95% CI, 45.7-71.9%), respectively. In stages II and above, detection was 70.7% (58/82; 95% CI, 59.6-80.3%) and 78.9% (30/38; 95% CI, 62.7-90.4%), respectively. For detected cancers, TOO was predicted in 93.9% (62/66) samples in training and 100% (35/35) in validation. Of those with a TOO call, accuracy was 85.5% (53/62; 95% CI, 74.2-93.1%) and 97.1% (34/35; 95% CI, 85.1-99.9%), respectively. Conclusion: A cfDNA multi-cancer detection test has shown the potential to predict cancer and TOO in individuals with suspicion of cancer ahead of histologic diagnosis with performance comparable to those with confirmed cancer at the time of blood collection. This was achieved with high specificity and TOO accuracy. The high specificity suggests that the false positive rate could be comparable in populations with average versus higher risk (suspicion) of cancer. These findings suggest that a cfDNA multi-cancer detection test could accelerate the diagnostic resolution of suspicion of cancer. References: 1. Oxnard GR, et al. ASCO Breakthrough Meeting 2019; Abstract 44. 2. Oxnard GR, et al. ESMO Annual Meeting 2019; Abstract 5639. Citation Format: David D. Thiel, Xiaoji Chen, Kathryn N. Kurtzman, Jessica Yecies, Tony Wu, Quan Zhang, Hai Liu, Nan Zhang, Eric T. Fung, Michael V. Seiden, Minetta C. Liu, Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Earl Hubbell, Alexander M. Aravanis, Anne-Renee Hartman, Eric A. Klein. Prediction of cancer and tissue of origin in individuals with suspicion of cancer using a cell-free DNA multi-cancer early detection test [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT021.