Tamma, Pranita D

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to characterize susceptibility profiles of both currently approved and investigational β-lactam agents against difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR P. aeruginosa) clinical isolates, including carbapenemase-producing strains. Patients and methods A total of 502 consecutive DTR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were collected from unique hospitalized patients between 2022 and 2024 across three tertiary care centres. Isolates originated from bloodstream, respiratory, urinary and intra-abdominal infections. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for seven β-lactam agents were determined using triplicate reference broth microdilution. Susceptibility interpretations were based on CLSI criteria or, where applicable, investigational breakpoints. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to detect β-lactamase genes. Results Among the 502 isolates, cefepime-zidebactam exhibited the highest in vitro activity (100% susceptibility), followed by cefiderocol-xeruborbactam (98%), cefiderocol (95%), ceftolozane-tazobactam (90%), cefepime-taniborbactam (86%), ceftazidime-avibactam (85%), and imipenem-relebactam (41%). Notably, only 35% of isolates were susceptible to all seven agents. Carbapenemase genes were identified in 4% of isolates, including blaGES (n = 13), blaVIM (n = 7), blaKPC (n = 1) and blaIMP (n = 1). Among carbapenemase-producing isolates, cefepime-zidebactam retained activity against all isolates (100%), exceeding that of other approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (0%–24% susceptible), cefiderocol (76%), cefiderocol-xeruborbactam (86%) and cefepime-taniborbactam (81%). Conclusions While currently approved β-lactam agents retained activity against many DTR P. aeruginosa isolates, their performance was markedly compromised in the presence of carbapenemases, with the notable exceptions of cefepime-zidebactam and cefiderocol. Investigational β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations exhibited consistently robust activity across resistance phenotypes, including carbapenemase-producing isolates, representing promising options for DTR P. aeruginosa infections.

Abstract We report an eightfold increase in sulbactam-durlobactam MICs in a carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii cerebrospinal fluid isolate recovered after 14 days of sulbactam-durlobactam plus meropenem therapy. Treatment-emergent mutations in the AdeFGH efflux system were identified, accompanied by a 166-fold increase in adeG expression. Efflux pump inhibition restored sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibility.

Abstract Background Ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli infections are increasingly common, partially because of the emergence of E. coli sequence type 131 (ST131), including its subclade C2/H30Rx, which produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Methods A prospective cohort including 14 US sites, which enrolled monomicrobial ceftriaxone-resistant and susceptible E. coli bloodstream infection (BSI) cases in a 1:1 ratio, was used to compare ST131 versus non-ST131 E. coli BSI, with specific attention to E. coli ST131 C2/H30Rx. Desirability of outcome ranking was determined at 30 days after infection onset. Results This analysis included 282 patients with E. coli BSI; 43% (121/282) were E. coli ST131 and 23% (66/282) belonged to the C2/H30Rx subclade. Resistance to ceftriaxone was present in 79% (96/121) ST131, 86% (57/66) E. coli ST131 C2/H30Rx, and 27% (43/161) E. coli non-ST131. Compared to patients with non-ST131 E. coli BSI, patients with ST131 BSI were older (median 70 years, [Q1 62, Q3 76] years vs 65 years, [51, 74]; P = .005) and more often admitted from long-term care facilities (21/121 [17%] vs 7/161 [4%], P < .001). Overall and empiric carbapenem use was more frequent in the treatment of patients with ST131 BSI compared with non-ST131 BSI (overall 89/121 [74%] vs 50/161 [31%]; empiric: 58/121 [48%] vs 31/161 [19%], P < .001). Desirability of outcome ranking outcomes were similar between groups. Conclusions Most ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli from US patients with E. coli BSI belong to ST131, particularly E. coli ST131 C2/H30Rx, serving as an important driver of carbapenem use.

Abstract Objectives Evaluation of differences in the intestinal microbiome and resistome among high-risk patients (i.e. intensive care, oncology, transplant recipients) who are and are not colonized with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Methods One hundred and twelve rectal swabs were obtained from 85 patients with known CRE colonization status and cohorted. Long-read metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was performed on rectal swabs. Microbiome and resistome analysis were performed by assessing α-diversity, β-diversity, relative abundance assessment and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), comparing patients colonized (CRE positive) and not colonized (CRE negative) with CRE. Longitudinal analysis of sequential swabs collected over multiple hospital encounters on a subset of patients was performed at the patient level. Results The microbiomes of cohorts were similar when comparing α- and β-diversity measures and relative abundance. LEfSe analysis identified Gram-negative pathobionts enriched among CRE-positive samples and Gram-positive taxa enriched among CRE-negative samples. α-Diversity of the resistome differed at class, gene and allele levels. Relative abundance and LEfSe analysis demonstrated enrichment of genes conferring β-lactam resistance among CRE-positive patients; LEfSe also demonstrated enrichment of antimicrobial resistance genes to multiple antimicrobial classes. At the patient level, fluctuations in the microbiome and resistome among longitudinally collected swabs were associated with antibiotic exposure. Conclusions Differences between the microbiomes of CRE-positive- and CRE-negative-colonized patients at the cohort level were relatively muted, whereas statistically significant differences were observed among their resistomes. In patients followed longitudinally, shifts in microbiome and resistome composition were dramatic in between encounters and antibiotic exposures.

ABSTRACT Standardized approaches to phage susceptibility testing (PST) are essential to inform selection of phages for study in patients with bacterial infections. There is no reference standard for assessing bacterial susceptibility to phage. We compared agreement between PST performed at three centers: two centers using a liquid assay standardized between the sites with the third, a plaque assay. Four Pseudomonas aeruginosa phages: PaWRA01ø11 (EPa11), PaWRA01ø39 (EPa39), PaWRA02ø83 (EPa83), PaWRA02ø87 (EPa87), and a cocktail of all four phages were tested against 145 P . aeruginosa isolates. Comparisons were made within measurements at the two sites performing the liquid assay and between these two sites. Agreement was assessed based on coverage probability (CP 8 ), total deviation index, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), measurement accuracy, and precision. For the liquid assay, there was satisfactory agreement among triplicate measurements made on different days at site 1, and high agreement based on accuracy and precision between duplicate measurements made on the same run at site 2. There was fair accuracy between measurements of the two sites performing the liquid assay, with CCCs below 0.6 for all phages tested. When compared to the plaque assay (performed once at site 3), there was less agreement between results of the liquid and plaque assays than between the two sites performing the liquid assay. Similar findings to the larger group were noted in the subset of 46 P . aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis. Results of this study suggest that reproducibility of PST methods needs further development.

Abstract Background Ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) are common. Methods This is a prospective cohort of patients with E coli BSI at 14 United States hospitals between November 2020 and April 2021. For each patient with a CRO-R E coli BSI enrolled, the next consecutive patient with a ceftriaxone-susceptible (CRO-S) E coli BSI was included. Primary outcome was desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 30, with 50% probability of worse outcomes in the CRO-R group as the null hypothesis. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce confounding. Results Notable differences between patients infected with CRO-R and CRO-S E coli BSI included the proportion with Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 (23% vs 15%, P = .079) and the median time to active antibiotic therapy (12 hours [interquartile range {IQR}, 1–35 hours] vs 1 hour [IQR, 0–6 hours]; P < .001). Unadjusted DOOR analyses indicated a 58% probability (95% confidence interval [CI], 52%–63%) for a worse clinical outcome in CRO-R versus CRO-S BSI. In the IPW-adjusted cohort, no difference was observed (54% [95% CI, 47%–61%]). Secondary outcomes included unadjusted and adjusted differences in the proportion of 30-day mortality between CRO-R and CRO-S BSIs (−5.3% [95% CI, −10.3% to −.4%] and −1.8 [95% CI, −6.7% to 3.2%], respectively), postculture median length of stay (8 days [IQR, 5–13 days] vs 6 days [IQR, 4–9 days]; P < .001), and incident admission to a long-term care facility (22% vs 12%, P = .045). Conclusions Patients with CRO-R E coli BSI generally have poorer outcomes compared to patients infected with CRO-S E coli BSI, even after adjusting for important confounders.

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa has the ability to exhibit resistance to a broad range of antibiotics, highlighting the importance of identifying alternative or adjunctive treatment options, such as phages. Patients and methods We report the case of a 25-year-old male who experienced an accidental electrocution resulting in exposed calvarium in the left parieto-temporal region, complicated by a difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa (DTR-P. aeruginosa) infection. Cefiderocol was the sole antibiotic with consistent activity against six bacterial isolates obtained from the infected region over a 38 day period. Results WGS analysis identified a blaGES-1 gene as well as the MDR efflux pumps MexD and MexX in all six of the patient’s ST235 DTR-P. aeruginosa isolates, when compared with the reference genome P. aeruginosa PA01 and a P. aeruginosa ST235 isolate from an unrelated patient. After debridement of infected scalp and bone, the patient received approximately 6 weeks of cefiderocol in conjunction with IV phage Pa14NPøPASA16. Some improvement was observed after the initiation of cefiderocol; however, sustained local site improvement and haemodynamic stability were not achieved until phage was administered. No medication-related toxicities were observed. The patient remains infection free more than 12 months after completion of therapy. Conclusions This report adds to the growing literature that phage therapy may be a safe and effective approach to augment antibiotic therapy for patients infected with drug-resistant pathogens. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of the GES β-lactamase family in contributing to inactivation of a broad range of β-lactam antibiotics in P. aeruginosa, including ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam.

Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, dosing, route of administration, and outcomes.

Abstract In December 2019, the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) was awarded funding for another 7-year cycle to support a clinical research network on antibacterial resistance. ARLG 2.0 has 3 overarching research priorities: infections caused by antibiotic-resistant (AR) gram-negative bacteria, infections caused by AR gram-positive bacteria, and diagnostic tests to optimize use of antibiotics. To support the next generation of AR researchers, the ARLG offers 3 mentoring opportunities: the ARLG Fellowship, Early Stage Investigator seed grants, and the Trialists in Training Program. The purpose of this article is to update the scientific community on the progress made in the original funding period and to encourage submission of clinical research that addresses 1 or more of the research priority areas of ARLG 2.0.