Jagust, William J

Abstract Histopathological assessment has served as the gold standard for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Emerging technological advancements, including the development of amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), have enabled early detection of amyloid pathology, one of the neuropathological hallmarks of AD. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) across cohorts of aging and AD, leveraging different measurements of amyloid burden, may facilitate the identification of novel genetic variants that drive the earliest neuropathological changes in AD. This study presents the largest GWAS of brain amyloidosis to date, leveraging amyloid β (Aβ) measured by in vivo amyloid PET and postmortem histopathology from 13,555 individuals of European ancestry. Amyloid positivity was defined as moderate or frequent neuritic plaques according to the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) staging scores for each postmortem cohort. A Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was applied to each amyloid PET cohort to identify the cohort and tracer-specific cut-offs that differentiate amyloid positive and negative populations. In silico and ex vivo analyses further characterized implicated loci, including interrogating the association between bulk and single-nucleus gene expression profiles and AD-related traits. Genetic covariance analysis assessed the extent amyloid PET and postmortem measures reflect the shared genetic architecture of brain amyloidosis. Our combined amyloidosis GWAS identified three established AD risk loci: BIN1 (rs6733839, OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.26, P = 1.32 × 10−11), CR1 (rs4844610, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.16-1.32, P = 4.21 × 10−10), APOE (rs429358, OR = 4.01, 95% CI = 3.66-4.38, P = 4.54 × 10−201), and a newly identified brain amyloidosis-associated variant on chromosome 17 (rs35635959, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.12-1.25, P = 1.47 × 10−8). SuSiE fine-mapping identified a single credible set of 15 putative causal variants with rs35635959 as the lead variant. Subsequent eQTL and SuSiE-based colocalization analyses prioritized rs35635959 as a strong eQTL for TUBG2, encoding tubulin gamma 2, which is involved in microtubule organization and synaptic plasticity. Further cell-type-specific characterization of this gene in neurons from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tissue indicated that decreased TUBG2 expression was associated with increased Aβ burden and AD case status (PFDR < 0.045). Furthermore, our study is the first to report a modest genetic covariance (covariance=0.17, P < 6.54 × 10−8) between the genetic architecture of amyloid burden captured by different modalities. While APOE showed a strong association with both amyloid endophenotypes, the observed genetic covariance was not substantially attenuated after excluding variants within the APOE region (covariance=0.16, P < 1.32 × 10−7). Our results highlight the benefits of leveraging compatible, harmonized AD endophenotypes to increase power to uncover new molecular insights into the etiology of AD neuropathology. Wang et al. present the largest GWAS of brain amyloidosis to date, analysing 13,555 individuals using amyloid PET and postmortem Aβ measures. They identify a novel amyloidosis-associated variant on chromosome 17, demonstrate genetic covariance between modalities, and highlight complex traits sharing genetic architecture with Aβ burden.

Decades of research on biomarker identification and integration in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have helped to advance biologically driven disease models, disease subtypes, and disease-modifying treatments. Key lessons learned from AD biomarker development include the need for integration of new biological insights, investment in large cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, a multicomponent biomarker approach, and recruitment of clinical trial cohorts and biosamples that are representative of the target population. We describe how these lessons are being applied in Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and psychotic disorders as use cases to inform biomarker-based approaches across central nervous system disorders.

AbstractThe extent to which the pathophysiology of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease corresponds to the pathophysiology of ‘sporadic’ late onset Alzheimer's disease is unknown, thus limiting the extrapolation of study findings and clinical trial results in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease to late onset Alzheimer's disease.We compared brain MRI and amyloid PET data, as well as CSF concentrations of amyloid-β42, amyloid-β40, tau and tau phosphorylated at position 181, in 292 carriers of pathogenic variants for Alzheimer's disease from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, with corresponding data from 559 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Imaging data and CSF samples were reprocessed as appropriate to guarantee uniform pipelines and assays. Data analyses yielded rates of change before and after symptomatic onset of Alzheimer's disease, allowing the alignment of the ∼30-year age difference between the cohorts on a clinically meaningful anchor point, namely the participant age at symptomatic onset.Biomarker profiles were similar for both autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and late onset Alzheimer's disease. Both groups demonstrated accelerated rates of decline in cognitive performance and in regional brain volume loss after symptomatic onset. Although amyloid burden accumulation as determined by PET was greater after symptomatic onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease than in late onset Alzheimer's disease participants, CSF assays of amyloid-β42, amyloid-β40, tau and p-tau181 were largely overlapping in both groups. Rates of change in cognitive performance and hippocampal volume loss after symptomatic onset were more aggressive for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease participants.These findings suggest a similar pathophysiology of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and late onset Alzheimer's disease, supporting a shared pathobiological construct.

Abstract In vivo gold standard for the ante-mortem assessment of brain β-amyloid pathology is currently β-amyloid positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid measures of β-amyloid42 or the β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40 ratio. The widespread acceptance of a biomarker classification scheme for the Alzheimer’s disease continuum has ignited interest in more affordable and accessible approaches to detect Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid pathology, a process that often slows down the recruitment into, and adds to the cost of, clinical trials. Recently, there has been considerable excitement concerning the value of blood biomarkers. Leveraging multidisciplinary data from cognitively unimpaired participants and participants with mild cognitive impairment recruited by the multisite biomarker study of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, here we assessed to what extent plasma β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40, neurofilament light and phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 biomarkers detect the presence of β-amyloid pathology, and to what extent the addition of clinical information such as demographic data, APOE genotype, cognitive assessments and MRI can assist plasma biomarkers in detecting β-amyloid-positivity. Our results confirm plasma β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40 as a robust biomarker of brain β-amyloid-positivity (area under curve, 0.80–0.87). Plasma phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 detected β-amyloid-positivity only in the cognitively impaired with a moderate area under curve of 0.67, whereas plasma neurofilament light did not detect β-amyloid-positivity in either group of participants. Clinical information as well as MRI-score independently detected positron emission tomography β-amyloid-positivity in both cognitively unimpaired and impaired (area under curve, 0.69–0.81). Clinical information, particularly APOE ε4 status, enhanced the performance of plasma biomarkers in the detection of positron emission tomography β-amyloid-positivity by 0.06–0.14 units of area under curve for cognitively unimpaired, and by 0.21–0.25 units for cognitively impaired; and further enhancement of these models with an MRI-score of β-amyloid-positivity yielded an additional improvement of 0.04–0.11 units of area under curve for cognitively unimpaired and 0.05–0.09 units for cognitively impaired. Taken together, these multi-disciplinary results suggest that when combined with clinical information, plasma phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 and neurofilament light biomarkers, and an MRI-score could effectively identify β-amyloid+ cognitively unimpaired and impaired (area under curve, 0.80–0.90). Yet, when the MRI-score is considered in combination with clinical information, plasma phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 and plasma neurofilament light have minimal added value for detecting β-amyloid-positivity. Our systematic comparison of β-amyloid-positivity detection models identified effective combinations of demographics, APOE, global cognition, MRI and plasma biomarkers. Promising minimally invasive and low-cost predictors such as plasma biomarkers of β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40 may be improved by age and APOE genotype.