Back to Authors

Diasio, Robert B

0000-0002-9648-9570

Mayo Clinic

Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Citations 4

Precision Management of a Patient With Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Liver-Predominant Metastatic Rectal Cancer Using Hepatic Arterial Floxuridine

JCO Precision Oncology | February 27, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/po.22.00442 | PMID 36848609

DPYD Testing: Time to Put Patient Safety First

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 23, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2701-2705

10.1200/jco.22.02364 | PMID 36821823

Association of Pharmacogenetics With Adverse Events of Fluorouracil/Capecitabine in Patients With Cancer

JCO Oncology Practice | April 1, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 453-454

10.1200/op.20.01072 | PMID 33793308

Haplotype structure defines effects of common DPYD variants c.85T > C (rs1801265) and c.496A > G (rs2297595) on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity: Implication for 5‐fluorouracil toxicity

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | January 25, 2021 | Volume: 87 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 3234-3243

10.1111/bcp.14742 | PMID 33491253

AimsThe aim of this study was to identify risk variants and haplotypes that impair dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and are, therefore, candidate risk variants for severe toxicity to 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) chemotherapy.MethodsPlasma dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2/U) ratios were measured as a population marker for DPD activity in a total of 1382 subjects from 4 independent studies. Genotype and haplotype correlations with UH2/U ratios were assessed.ResultsSignificantly lower UH2/U ratios (panova < 2 × 10−16) were observed in carriers of the 4 well‐studied 5‐FU toxicity risk variants with mean differences (MD) of −43.7% for DPYD c.1905 + 1G > A (rs3918290), −46.0% for DPYD c.1679T > G (rs55886062), −37.1%, for DPYD c.2846A > T (rs67376798), and −13.2% for DPYD c.1129‐5923C > G (rs75017182). An additional variant, DPYD c.496A > G (rs2297595), was also associated with lower UH2/U ratios (P < .0001, MD: −12.6%). A haplotype analysis was performed for variants in linkage disequilibrium with c.496A > G, which consisted of the common variant c.85T > C (rs1801265) and the risk variant c.1129‐5923C > G. Both haplotypes carrying c.496A > G were associated with decreased UH2/U ratios (H3, P = .003, MD: −9.6%; H5, P = .002, MD: −16.9%). A haplotype carrying only the variant c.85T > C (H2) was associated with elevated ratios (P = .004, MD: +8.6%).ConclusionsBased on our data, DPYD‐c.496A > G is a strong candidate risk allele for 5‐FU toxicity. Our data suggest that DPYD‐c.85T > C might be protective; however, the deleterious impacts of the linked alleles c.496A > G and c.1129‐5923C > G likely limit this effect in patients. The possible protective effect of c.85T > C and linkage disequilibrium with c.496A > G and c.1129‐5923C > G may have hampered prior association studies and should be considered in future clinical studies.