Berglund, Anders E

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most lethal brain tumors, characterized by extensive immune evasion and a macrophage-dominated tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the molecular determinants governing tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) states and their immunoregulatory functions remain poorly understood. We integrated bulk- and single-cell transcriptomic datasets (TCGA, CGGA, Ivy GAP, and Brain Immune Atlas) to systematically characterize the expression, prognostic relevance, and immune contexture of the myeloid biomarker membrane-spanning 4-domain A6A, MS4A6A, in GBM. Differential expression, survival, and pathway enrichment analyses were performed. Single-cell mapping and CellChat modeling delineated MS4A6A-associated TAM subpopulations, intercellular communication networks, and ligand–receptor signaling dynamics. Spatial transcriptomic validation and pharmacogenomic modeling were conducted to assess anatomic enrichment and therapeutic vulnerabilities. High MS4A6A expression predicted unfavorable survival and correlated with increased stromal and immune infiltration. Single-cell analyses localized MS4A6A predominantly to TAMs, especially Regulatory- and Ribo-TAM states enriched for antigen presentation, T-cell regulation, and ribosomal biogenesis pathways. CellChat analysis revealed that MS4A6A-high TAMs exhibited markedly enhanced communication with CD4+ T cells and Tregs through upregulated PGE2–PTGER2/PTGER4, PECAM1–CD38, and THBS1–CD36 signaling axes, implicating MS4A6A in prostaglandin-driven immune suppression. Spatial profiling confirmed preferential localization of MS4A6A within perivascular and angiogenic niches. Pharmacogenomic prediction indicated that MS4A6A-high tumors were more sensitive to ERK, mTOR, and CDK4/6 inhibition. MS4A6A defines a macrophage-centered, immunosuppressive ecosystem in GBM, mediated by the activation of the PGE2 signaling axis. These findings position MS4A6A both as a prognostic biomarker and as a potential therapeutic node linking myeloid reprogramming to actionable pathway vulnerabilities in glioblastoma.

ABSTRACT Introduction Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing health concern, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Epigenetic aging biomarkers, reflecting cellular and tissue aging, have been linked to various age‐related pathologies, but their association with MASLD‐HCC is unknown. We investigated associations between five epigenetic aging biomarkers and MASLD‐HCC risk. Methods We performed whole blood DNA methylation assay (Infinium 850k array) and calculated principal components‐based (PC) versions of HorvathAge, HannumAge, PhenoAge and GrimAge and the DunedinPACE aging rate. We further calculated relative age accelerations for PCHorvathAge, PCHannumAge, PCPhenoAge and PCGrimAge. The aging biomarkers were modelled as continuous variables and categorised into tertiles based on distributions among controls. Associations between each aging biomarker and MASLD‐HCC were examined using logistic regression, calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for covariates. Results Data on 272 MASLD‐HCC cases and 316 cancer‐free MASLD controls recruited from six sites and matched on chronological age, sex and study site were analysed. Higher relative age accelerations of PCPhenoAge (OR T3 vs. T1 = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.45–3.50; OR continuous = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.07, p = 0.009), PCGrimAge (OR T3 vs. T1 = 3.97, 95% CI: 2.41–6.64; OR continuous = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.10–1.24, p = 8.76 × 10 −07 ) and DunedinPACE (OR T3 vs. T1 = 3.45, 95% CI: 2.17–5.55; OR continuous = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.43–2.10, p = 2.58 × 10 −08 ) were associated with MASLD‐HCC, but not PCHorvathAge or PCHannumAge. Conclusion Higher relative age accelerations of PCPhenoAge, PCGrimAge and DunedinPACE aging rate are associated with risk of MASLD‐HCC. These aging biomarkers could improve HCC risk assessment and facilitate risk stratification in patients with MASLD.

Background: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are essential regulators of the glioblastoma (GBM) microenvironment; their functional heterogeneity and interaction networks are not fully elucidated. We identify RNF135 as a novel TAM-enriched gene associated with immune activation and adverse prognosis in GBM. Methods: To evaluate RNF135’s expression profile, prognostic significance, and functional pathways, extensive transcriptome analyses from TCGA and CGGA cohorts were conducted. The immunological landscape and cellular origin of RNF135 were outlined using single-cell RNA-seq analyses and bulk RNA-seq immune deconvolution (MCP-counter, xCell and ssGSEA). Cell–cell communication networks between tumor cells and RNF135-positive and -negative tumor-associated macrophage subsets were mapped using CellChat. Results: RNF135 predicted a poor overall survival and was markedly upregulated in GBM tissues. Functional enrichment analyses showed that increased cytokine signaling, interferon response, and innate immune activation were characteristics of RNF135-high samples. Immune infiltration profiling showed a strong correlation between the abundance of T cells and macrophages and RNF135 expression. According to the single-cell analyses, RNF135 was primarily expressed in TAMs, specifically in proliferation, phagocytic, and transitional subtypes. RNF135-positive TAMs demonstrated significantly improved intercellular communication with aggressive tumor subtypes in comparison to RNF135-negative TAMs. This was facilitated by upregulated signaling pathways such as MHC-II, CD39, ApoE, and most notably, the CCL signaling axis. The CCL3/CCL3L3–CCR1 ligand–receptor pair was identified as a major mechanistic driver of TAM–TAM crosstalk. High RNF135 expression was also linked to greater sensitivity to Selumetinib, a selective MEK1/2 inhibitor that targets the MAPK/ERK pathway, according to drug sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: RNF135 defines a TAM phenotype in GBM that is both immunologically active and immunosuppressive. This phenotype promotes inflammatory signaling and communication between cells in the tumor microenvironment. Targeting the CCL–CCR1 axis or combining RNF135-guided immunomodulation with certain inhibitors could be a promising therapeutic strategies for GBM.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with a highly immunosuppressive microenvironment that promotes tumor progression and therapy resistance. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), comprising up to 50% of the tumor mass, are recruited via chemokine axes such as CCL2/CCR2, CX3CL1/CX3CR1, and CXCL12/CXCR4 and adopt an M2-like immunosuppressive phenotype, facilitating immune escape and angiogenesis. Key signaling pathways, including CSF1R, STAT3, NF-κB, PI3K/Akt, and HIF-1α, regulate TAM function, making them promising therapeutic targets. Strategies such as TAM depletion, reprogramming, and immune checkpoint blockade (PD-1/PD-L1, and CD47-SIRPα) have shown potential in preclinical models. Emerging approaches, including CAR-macrophage (CAR-M) therapy, nanotechnology-based drug delivery, and exosome-mediated modulation, offer new avenues for intervention. However, clinical translation remains challenging due to GBM’s heterogeneity and adaptive resistance mechanisms. Future research should integrate multi-omics profiling and AI-driven drug discovery to refine TAM-targeted therapies and improve patient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of TAM-mediated immune regulation in GBM and explores evolving therapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming its treatment barriers.

Background: Glioblastoma is a highly malignant brain tumor with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis, largely driven by its complex immune microenvironment. This study aimed to identify and characterize an immune-related gene signature associated with prognosis and immune regulation in glioblastoma. Methods: We performed integrative analyses using bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing data to identify prognostically significant immune-related genes. A five-gene signature (THEMIS2, SIGLEC9, CSTA, LILRB3, and MS4A6A) was derived and its expression patterns were analyzed in association with immune cell infiltration and macrophage subtypes. Functional enrichment and pathway analyses were conducted, followed by drug sensitivity profiling to explore potential therapeutic implications. Results: The five-gene signature was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes and increased immune cell infiltration. Functional analyses revealed involvement in key immune pathways, including antigen presentation, cytokine signaling, and immune cell activation. Single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated high expression of the signature in tumor-associated macrophages, particularly immune-suppressive and proliferation-associated subtypes. The high expression in proliferation TAMs suggests a role in promoting tumor angiogenesis and growth. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed distinct vulnerabilities between high- and low-risk groups based on signature expression. Conclusions: This Macrophage-Associated Prognostic Signature (MAPS) provides new insights into glioblastoma immunobiology and identifies potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. It may serve as a valuable tool to guide personalized immunotherapy-based strategies for glioblastoma patients.

Abstract The radiation sensitivity index (RSI) and 12-chemokine gene expression signature (12CK GES) are two gene expression signatures (GES) that were previously developed to predict tumor radiation sensitivity or identify the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures in tumors, respectively. To advance the use of these GESs into clinical trial evaluation, their assays must be assessed within the context of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) process. Using HG-U133Plus2.0 arrays, we first established CLIA laboratory proficiency. Then the accuracy (limit of detection and macrodissection impact), precision (variability by time and operator), sample type (surgery vs. biopsy), and concordance with a reference laboratory were evaluated. RSI and 12CK GES were reproducible (RSI: 0.01 mean difference, 12CK GES: 0.17 mean difference) and precise with respect to time and operator. Taken together, the reproducibility analysis of the scores indicated a median RSI difference of 0.06 (6.47% of range) across samples and a median 12CK GES difference of 0.92 (12.29% of range). Experiments indicated that the lower limit of input RNA is 5 ng. Reproducibility with a second CLIA laboratory demonstrated reliability with the median RSI score difference of 0.065 (6% of full range) and 12CK GES difference of 0.93 (12% of observed range). Overall, under CLIA, RSI and 12CK GES were demonstrated by the Moffitt Cancer Center Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory to be reproducible GESs for clinical usage. Significance: The RSI and 12CK GES are two GESs that predict tumor radiation sensitivity or the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures in tumors, respectively. These GESs were assessed within the CLIA process for future clinical use. We established proficiency, reproducibility, and reliability characteristics for both signatures in a controlled setting, indicating these GESs are suitable for validation within future clinical trials.

Abstract Introduction Men with African ancestry have the highest incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer (PCa) worldwide. Methods This study aimed to identify differentially methylated genes between tumor vs. adjacent normal and aggressive vs. indolent PCa in 121 African American patients. Epigenome‐wide DNA methylation patterns in tumor DNA were assessed using the human Illumina Methylation EPIC V1 array. Results Around 5,139 differentially methylated CpG‐sites (q < 0.01, lΔβl > 0.2) were identified when comparing normal vs. tumor, with an overall trend of hypermethylation in prostate tumors. Multiple representative differentially methylated regions (DMRs), including immune‐related genes, such as CD40 , Galectin3 , OX40L , and STING , were detected in prostate tumors when compared to adjacent normal tissues. Based on an epigenetic clock model, we observed that tumors’ total number of stem cell divisions and the stem cell division rate were significantly higher than adjacent normal tissues. Regarding PCa aggressiveness, 2,061 differentially methylated CpG‐sites (q < 0.05, lΔβl > .05) were identified when the grade group (GG)1 was compared with GG4/5. Among these 2,061 CpG sites, 155 probes were consistently significant in more than one comparison. Among these genes, several immune system genes, such as COL18A1 , S100A2 , ITGA4 , HLA‐C , and ADCYAP1 , have previously been linked to tumor progression in PCa. Conclusion Several differentially methylated genes involved in immune‐oncologic pathways associated with disease risk or aggressiveness were identified. In addition, 261 African American‐specific differentially methylated genes related to the risk of PCa were identified. These results can shedlight on potential mechanisms contributing to PCa disparities in the African American Population.

Abstract MYC oncoproteins regulate transcription of genes directing cell proliferation, metabolism, and tumorigenesis. A variety of alterations drive MYC expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and enforced MYC expression in hematopoietic progenitors is sufficient to induce AML. Here we report that AML and myeloid progenitor cell growth and survival rely on MYC-directed suppression of Transcription Factor EB (TFEB), a master regulator of the autophagy–lysosome pathway. Notably, although originally identified as an oncogene, TFEB functions as a tumor suppressor in AML, where it provokes AML cell differentiation and death. These responses reflect TFEB control of myeloid epigenetic programs by inducing expression of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) and IDH2, resulting in global hydroxylation of 5-methycytosine. Finally, activating the TFEB–IDH1/IDH2–TET2 axis is revealed as a targetable vulnerability in AML. Thus, epigenetic control by an MYC–TFEB circuit dictates myeloid cell fate and is essential for maintenance of AML. Significance: Alterations in epigenetic control are a hallmark of AML. This study establishes that a MYC–TFEB circuit controls AML differentiation and epigenetic programs by inducing IDH1/IDH2 and hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine, that TFEB functions as a tumor suppressor in AML, and that this circuit is a targetable vulnerability in AML. See related commentary by Wu and Eisenman, p. 116.

Abstract Purpose: The role of immune-oncologic mechanisms of racial disparities in prostate cancer remains understudied. Limited research exists to evaluate the molecular underpinnings of immune differences in African American men (AAM) and European American men (EAM) prostate tumor microenvironment (TME). Experimental Design: A total of 1,173 radiation-naïve radical prostatectomy samples with whole transcriptome data from the Decipher GRID registry were used. Transcriptomic expressions of 1,260 immune-specific genes were selected to assess immune-oncologic differences between AAM and EAM prostate tumors. Race-specific differential expression of genes was assessed using a rank test, and intergene correlational matrix and gene set enrichment was used for pathway analysis. Results: AAM prostate tumors have significant enrichment of major immune-oncologic pathways, including proinflammatory cytokines, IFNα, IFNγ, TNFα signaling, ILs, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition. AAM TME has higher total immune content score (ICSHIGH) compared with 0 (37.8% vs. 21.9%, P = 0.003). AAM tumors also have lower DNA damage repair and are genomically radiosensitive as compared with EAM. IFITM3 (IFN-inducible transmembrane protein 3) was one of the major proinflammatory genes overexpressed in AAM that predicted increased risk of biochemical recurrence selectively for AAM in both discovery [HRAAM = 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21–4.34; P = 0.01] and validation (HRAAM = 2.42; 95% CI, 1.52–3.86; P = 0.0001) but not in EAM. Conclusions: Prostate tumors of AAM manifest a unique immune repertoire and have significant enrichment of proinflammatory immune pathways that are associated with poorer outcomes. Observed immune-oncologic differences can aid in a genomically adaptive approach to treating prostate cancer in AAM.

AbstractBackground: We studied the utility of the tumor suppressor Tristetraprolin (TTP, ZFP36) as a clinically relevant biomarker of aggressive disease in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy (RP).Methods: TTP RNA expression was measured in an RP cohort of patients treated at Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) and obtained from six publically available RP datasets with biochemical recurrence (BCR; total n = 1,394) and/or metastatic outcome data (total n = 1,222). TTP protein expression was measured by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray of 153 MCC RP samples. The time to BCR or metastasis based on TTP RNA or protein levels was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were performed on multiple cohorts to evaluate if TTP is a clinically relevant biomarker and to assess if TTP improves upon the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment postsurgical (CAPRA-S) score for predicting clinical outcomes.Results: In all of the RP patient cohorts, prostate cancer with low TTP RNA or protein levels had decreased time to BCR or metastasis versus TTP-high tumors. Further, the decreased time to BCR in TTP-low prostate cancer was more pronounced in low-grade tumors. Finally, pooled survival analysis suggests that TTP RNA expression provides independent information beyond CAPRA-S to predict BCR.Conclusions: TTP is a promising prostate cancer biomarker for predicting which RP patients will have poor outcomes, especially for low-grade prostate cancer patients.Impact: This study suggests that TTP RNA expression can be used to enhance the accuracy of CAPRA-S to predict outcomes in patients treated with RP. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(11); 1376–83. ©2018 AACR.