Warner, Lindsay

ABSTRACT Background Intrathecal opioids are widely used for postoperative analgesia in pediatric spine surgery, but optimal dosing remains undefined. We evaluated the relationship between intrathecal hydromorphone (ITH) dose, analgesia, and adverse effects in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Methods In this single‐center, prospective, blinded dose‐escalation study using a biased‐coin up‐down sequential allocation design, patients aged 10–17 years undergoing PSF received ITH starting at 3.5 mcg kg −1 , with dose adjustments based on analgesic response (range 2.0 to 7 mcg kg −1 with a maximum of 400 mcg). The primary outcome was maximum postoperative pain within 18 h. Secondary outcomes included pain burden (area under the curve), 24‐h systemic opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents [OME], excluding ITH), adverse effects, supplemental diazepam use, and rescue opioid use. Associations between dose and outcomes were assessed using Spearman correlation and logistic regression. Results Twenty‐seven patients completed the study. The median ITH dose received was 5.5 mcg kg −1 (IQR, 3.5–7.0), with a median absolute dose of 370 mcg (IQR, 180–400). No significant association was observed between ITH dose and maximum pain ( r = 0.16, p = 0.41), pain burden ( r = 0.32, p = 0.10), or 24‐h OME ( r = 0.13, p = 0.52). ITH dose was not significantly associated with the time to rescue opioid (HR = 1.24; 95% CI 0.68–2.25; p = 0.485) or diazepam (HR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.72–1.71; p = 0.655). Adverse respiratory events occurred at doses > 5 mcg kg −1 without improved analgesia. Conclusions Increasing ITH dose was not associated with improved analgesia or change in supplemental opioid or diazepam use. Doses > 5 mcg kg −1 were associated with adverse respiratory effects. These findings support conservative dosing strategies and underscore the need to define the minimum effective dose in pediatric populations.

AbstractBackgroundThe use of spinal anesthesia in infants is seeing resurgence as an alternative to general anesthesia.AimsOur primary aims are to describe our institution's experience introducing a spinal anesthesia and sedation protocol for infants undergoing urologic surgery, to describe methods of improving prolonged anesthesia, and to describe the failure rate of spinal anesthesia in these patients. Sedation was provided for some infants with intranasal dexmedetomidine ± fentanyl.MethodsThis is a retrospective case series examining infants aged 1‐<14 months who received spinal anesthesia for circumcision, orchiopexy, orchiectomy, hypospadias repair, or epispadias repair. The electronic medical record was reviewed and compared with unmatched historical controls who received general anesthesia.ResultsA total of 230 patients underwent a urologic procedure; 102 patients received spinal anesthesia and 128 received general anesthesia. Length of surgical time with spinal anesthesia ranged from 4 to 189 minutes. The hospital length of stay was shorter in the spinal anesthesia group (median [IQR] of 5.3 hours [4.3, 7.2]) compared to the general anesthesia group (17.1 hours [15.6, 17.5]).The median bupivacaine dose was 0.75 mg/kg [0.67, 0.85]. There was one case in which cerebral spinal fluid was unable to be obtained, and one case that required conversion to general anesthesia after surgery had started. There were no cases of apnea, bleeding, infection, or neurologic compromise.ConclusionsWe describe the successful implementation of an infant spinal anesthesia and sedation protocol and a technique that uniquely provides prolonged surgical anesthesia with a low failure rate. We also report shorter anesthesia time, surgical time, and recovery room length of stay in patients who received spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia.