Linder, Brian J.

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative morbidity of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) and nonmesh apical vaginal surgeries for repair of vaginal vault prolapse using data from a contemporary nationwide cohort. Methods The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify women who underwent apical prolapse surgery via vaginal approach or MISC from 2010 to 2016. Those undergoing concomitant hysterectomy or transvaginal mesh placement were excluded. Associations of surgical approach with 30-day complications, prolonged hospitalization, and reoperation were evaluated using logistic regression. Readmission within 30 days was calculated using the person-years method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Overall, 6390 women underwent surgery, including 3852 (60%) via vaginal approach and 2538 (40%) via MISC. Patients undergoing MISC were younger ( P < 0.0001) and less likely to have hypertension ( P = 0.04) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( P = 0.008), with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores ( P < 0.0001) and higher preoperative hematocrit ( P = 0.009). The MISC cohort had a lower unadjusted rates of minor complications (3.9% vs 5.6%; P = 0.004), urinary tract infection (3.3% vs 4.8%; P = 0.004), and prolonged hospitalization (5.2% vs 7.9%; P < 0.0001), with a higher rate of nephrologic ( P = 0.01) complications. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant associations of MISC with the risk of 30-day complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–2.51; P = 0.11), prolonged hospitalization (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76–1.21; P = 0.72), readmission (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.71–1.49; P = 0.88), or reoperation (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.57–1.60; P = 0.86). Conclusions Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy is associated with similar rates of 30-day complications, prolonged hospitalization, readmission, and reoperation compared with nonmesh vaginal surgeries for apical prolapse.

ObjectiveArtificial urinary sphincter malfunctions can occur in any of the individual components. Preoperative identification of the malfunctioning component can be valuable for patient counseling and surgical planning. The optimal strategy for repair of failed artificial urinary sphincter components is debated given the relative rarity of the situation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship of time to failure with failed artificial urinary sphincter component and to compare our outcomes of specific component versus complete device replacement.MethodsFrom 1983 to 2011, 1805 artificial urinary sphincter procedures were carried out at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota, USA), of which 1072 patients underwent primary artificial urinary sphincter placement. Clinical variables, including time to failure, were evaluated for association with component failure. Bootstrap analysis was used to estimate the differences in time to reach a fixed percentage of component failure.ResultsA total of 115 patients experienced device failure at a median follow up of 4.2 years. Urethral cuff, abdominal reservoir, scrotal pump and tubing malfunction occurred in 53 (4.9%), 26 (2.4%), 11 (1%) and 25 (2.3%) patients, respectively. Increasing age at the time of primary surgery was protective of cuff malfunction (hazard ratio 0.97, P = 0.04). Time to 3% urethral cuff failure outpaced other component failures (P < 0.05). Secondary failure‐free rates after whole device versus specific component revisions were comparable (P = 0.38).ConclusionsClinical predictors for artificial urinary sphincter failure continue to be difficult to establish. Although single component versus entire device replacement have similar outcomes, if pursuing single component revision, we recommend cuff‐first interrogation in devices in place for >3 years, as this represents the most likely component to fail.

Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate the utility of urodynamic studies performed before primary midurethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence in predicting the need for subsequent sling release for voiding dysfunction. Methods The health records of women managed with primary synthetic midurethral sling placement at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2012, were reviewed. The primary outcome was surgical sling release for postoperative voiding dysfunction (ie, prolonged retention, elevated postvoid residual volumes with new voiding symptoms, or de novo onset or worsening of overactive bladder symptoms). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between potential clinical risk factors and the primary outcome. Results Overall, 1629 women underwent primary synthetic midurethral sling placement during the study time frame, including 1081 patients (66%) who underwent a preoperative multichannel urodynamic evaluation. A sling release for voiding dysfunction was performed for 51 patients (3.1%) at a median of 1.9 months postoperatively (interquartile range, 1.3–9.3 months). Patients undergoing sling release were significantly more likely to have had retropubic sling placement (P = 0.003) and concomitant prolapse surgery (P = 0.005). On univariate analysis, no urodynamic parameters were associated with the risk of sling release; evaluated parameters included peak flow rate (P = 0.20), postvoid residual volume (P = 0.37), voiding without detrusor contraction (P = 0.96), and detrusor pressure at maximal flow (P = 0.23). Conclusions Sling release for voiding dysfunction was rare in our cohort. No urodynamic parameters were associated with the risk of sling release.

The aim of the present study was to review major organizational guidelines on the evaluation and management of asymptomatic microscopic haematuria ( AMH ). We reviewed the haematuria guidelines from: the American Urological Association; the consensus statement by the Canadian Urological Association, Canadian Urologic Oncology Group and Bladder Cancer Canada; the American College of Physicians; the Joint Consensus Statement of the Renal Association and British Association of Urological Surgeons; and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. All guidelines reviewed recommend evaluation for AMH in the absence of potential benign aetiologies, with the evaluation including cystoscopy and upper urinary tract imaging. Existing guidelines vary in their definition of AMH (role of urine dipstick vs urine microscopy), the age threshold for recommending evaluation, and the optimal imaging method (computed tomography vs ultrasonography). Of the reviewed guidelines, none recommended the use of urine cytology or urine markers during the initial AMH evaluation. Patients should have ongoing follow‐up after a negative initial AMH evaluation. Significant variation exists among current guidelines for AMH with respect to who should be evaluated and in what manner. Given the patient and health system implications of balancing appropriately focused and effective diagnostic evaluation, AMH represents a valuable future research opportunity.