Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R

Caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) is an intestine-specific transcription factor that serves as a diagnostic marker of enteric differentiation and may also reflect tumor behavior and therapeutic susceptibility. Emerging evidence suggests that CDX2 expression may predict sensitivity to fluoropyrimidine-based therapy independent of tissue of origin. We report a retrospective case series of three patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma (aggressive variant prostate, minor salivary gland, and intestinal-type sinonasal tract) exhibiting strong CDX2 nuclear expression. In all cases, tumors were refractory to or lacked established standard systemic therapy. Treatment decisions were informed by the CDX2-positive enteric phenotype, leading to the initiation of fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. Response was assessed using PET-CT and MRI. All three patients achieved marked metabolic and clinical responses, including a sustained complete metabolic response in the prostate cancer case and durable disease control in the salivary gland and sinonasal tumors. These findings highlight CDX2 as a potential biomarker requiring validation, which may identify tumors intrinsically susceptible to fluoropyrimidines regardless of anatomical origin. CDX2 immunohistochemistry is widely available and inexpensive, and may complement genomic profiling in rare malignancies or in settings where standard treatment algorithms are limited. This report is hypothesis-generating and not intended to estimate response rates or treatment efficacy.

The prognosis of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is highly variable and reported median overall survival remains low. There is no established standard of care for patients with higher grade 2 (G2) (Ki-67 ≥ 10% and ≤ 20%) and grade 3 (G3) (Ki-67 ≥ 20% and ≤ 55%) GEP-NETs and most of the current treatment regimens, particularly for G3 NETs, are extrapolated from lower-grade GEP-NET treatments or based on data from small retrospective studies. Robust evidence to support treatment recommendations for high-grade NETs, especially in the first-line (1L) setting, is limited and the optimal treatment sequence has not been clearly defined. This review summarizes the latest literature on sequencing of therapies, identifies patient selection considerations for utilizing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and offers data-driven expert opinions and clinical practice recommendations in high-grade GEP-NETs. As authors, we recommend that all patients with well-differentiated, higher G2 and G3 NETs are evaluated with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide positron emission tomography (PET) for baseline somatostatin receptor expression and if positive, a 1L treatment option of PRRT should be considered, especially in clinically stable patients. Somatostatin analog therapy may benefit patients with low-volume, indolent disease, and chemotherapy is usually a better fit for patients in visceral crisis, in need of urgent treatment, or with no access to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET. In complex cases, a robust discussion at a multidisciplinary NET tumor board can be beneficial.

Abstract Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with lutetium-177-Dotatate (177Lu-DOTATATE) has transformed neuroendocrine tumor (NET) treatment, improving progression-free survival, symptom control, and quality of life. However, long-term hematologic toxicities, including therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMN), are increasingly recognized. These rare but severe complications, such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), appear multifactorial, influenced by prior cytotoxic therapies, radiation exposure, clonal hematopoiesis, and germline predispositions. This review synthesizes data on PRRT-related hematologic toxicities, including findings from pivotal studies and real-world evidence. We explore risk factors, underlying mechanisms, and the potential role of biomarkers, such as clonal hematopoiesis and germline mutations, in predicting toxicity. Emerging approaches, including alpha particle radioligand therapy and advanced dosimetry, are explored as strategies to optimize patient selection and minimize adverse outcomes. To maximize the benefits of PRRT while safeguarding patient safety, future efforts should focus on integrating predictive biomarkers, refining treatment sequencing, and developing personalized risk-stratified approaches to therapy.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more. PURPOSE To develop a clinical practice guideline and recommendations for symptom management of patients with well-differentiated grade 1 to grade 3 metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to develop a clinical practice guideline by reviewing the literature for relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies to develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS The literature review identified eight guidelines, 19 systematic reviews, and three RCTs that informed the development of guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations are included for carcinoid syndrome, carcinoid heart disease and carcinoid crisis, and functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor syndromes. Recommendations are provided for surgical management, liver-directed therapy, and systemic therapy options, as well as palliative care. Limited guidance is provided for sequencing of interventions. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Abstract Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have an age-adjusted incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 people, with a notable rise in the incidence of small (≤2 cm) non-functional PanNETs (NF-PanNETs) in recent decades. While surgery is traditionally the preferred treatment for localized NF-PanNETs, active surveillance is now an accepted management strategy for tumors smaller than 2 cm due to their relatively benign behavior. However, this approach has not yet been fully integrated into routine clinical practice. There is considerable histopathological heterogeneity observed in NF-PanNETs, which results in significant variability in clinical presentation, behavior and treatment outcomes. Hence, tumor size alone does not provide sufficient certainty regarding a benign clinical course for decision-making. Although studies advocate for incorporating WHO grade into clinical prognostic assessments, this marker also has limitations. Several established tissue-based markers, such as ATRX and DAXX alterations, alternative lengthening of telomeres, and copy number variations, can be used for PanNET subtyping and correlate with metastatic risk. Combining these markers with traditional histopathological parameters may yield a more comprehensive and accurate prognostic assessment. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of current prognostication methods for small NF-PanNETs and highlights recently established prognostic markers, along with the requirements for their implementation into routine clinical practice. It also proposes practical solutions to address the challenges associated with the immediate integration of these biomarkers into routine care.

Abstract Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (panNEN) is a rare malignancy and the second most common type of pancreatic cancer after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but its etiology is poorly understood. We investigated whether the risk factors of panNEN are concordant with those known for PDAC. We performed the largest case-control study to date on panNENs, comprising 927 sporadic nonfunctional panNEN cases and 1807 frequency-matched controls, using data from the Mayo Clinic Biospecimen Resource for Pancreas Research. We assessed associations for obesity, first-degree family history of pancreatic cancer, cigarette smoking, overall type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), new-onset T2DM (<1 year before panNEN diagnosis), longstanding T2DM (≥5 years), alcohol intake and aspirin use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our results show that overall T2DM (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.37–2.14) and new-onset T2DM (OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.92–3.69) are associated with higher odds of panNEN, but not longstanding T2DM (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.94–1.75). A non-significant elevated odds of panNEN was observed among participants with a positive family history of pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.96–2.14). Alcohol use was inversely related to panNEN (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.42–0.66, ever-vs-never). No association was observed for smoking, obesity or aspirin use. These findings indicate that overall T2DM and new-onset T2DM are associated with higher odds of panNEN. Unlike PDAC, alcohol use was inversely related to panNEN, and we found no associations for cigarette smoking, obesity or aspirin use. These results indicate differences in the risk factor profiles of panNEN and PDAC.

PURPOSE Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare and aggressive form of pancreatic cancer that originates in the acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with PACC at our institution. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients with PACC seen at Mayo Clinic between 2002 and 2023. Baseline patient characteristics, tumor pathology, treatment strategies used, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated using newsurv macros in SAS. RESULTS The study included a total of 65 patients with PACC. The median age at diagnosis was 66 years. Almost half of the patients (48%) presented with resectable/borderline-resectable disease (n = 28). Five-year overall survival (OS) for resectable/borderline-resectable, locally advanced/unresectable, and metastatic disease were 72.0%, 21.6%, and 20.9%, respectively. Somatic and germline next-generation sequencing identified numerous potentially actionable targets including homologous recombination (43% somatic, 33% germline), RAF alterations (29% somatic), and mismatch repair (14% somatic). CONCLUSION Our findings underscore the heterogeneity and aggressive nature of PACC. Despite the improved prognosis for patients with resectable/borderline-resectable disease, OS remains poor, particularly for those with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The identification of actionable molecular targets in a significant proportion of patients highlights the potential for personalized therapeutic approaches. Future research should focus on tailored treatment strategies to exploit these molecular vulnerabilities, which may offer new options for improving outcomes in this rare malignancy.

Abstract Purpose: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are relatively indolent but can be more aggressive. The current recommendations for using serum chromogranin A (CgA) for patients with GEP-NET are equivocal. This study was designed to validate an automated CgA immunofluorescence assay for monitoring disease progression in patients with GEP-NET. Patients and Methods: A prospective, multicenter, blinded observational study was designed to validate an automated CgA immunofluorescence assay for monitoring disease progression in patients with GEP-NET. Tumor progression was evaluated with RECIST 1.1 by CT/MRI. An increase ≥50% above the prior CgA concentration to a value >100 ng/mL in the following CgA concentration was considered positive. Results: A total of 153 patients with GEP-NET were enrolled. Using the prespecified cut-off of CgA change for tumor progression, specificity was 93.4% (95% confidence interval, 90.4%–95.5%; P < 0.001), sensitivity 34.4% (25.6%–44.3%), positive predictive value 57.9% (45.0–69.8), negative predictive value 84.3% (80.5–87.6), and AUC 0.73 (0.67–0.79). Conclusions: Changes in serial measurements of serum CgA had a favorable specificity and negative predictive value, making this test a useful adjunct to routine radiographic monitoring.

PURPOSE Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a syndrome comprising metastatic cancers without a clinically identified primary site. Although patients with CUP have an unfavorable prognosis, treatment with site-specific therapies guided by clinical features, standard pathology, and molecular assays can improve overall survival. The 92-gene assay (CancerTYPE ID) is a gene expression–based classifier that helps identify the tissue of origin for metastatic cancers with unknown or uncertain diagnoses. This study reports the frequency of selected molecular aberrations of oncogenes, including KRAS, IDH1/2, BRCA1/2, and BRAF, in patients with CUP in the MOSAIC database to highlight potential treatment options. METHODS MOSAIC is a database of patients with CUP submitted for CancerTYPE ID testing and NeoTYPE biomarker testing. Tumor biopsy samples were analyzed by CancerTYPE ID for tumor type identification and further tested for molecular aberrations of oncogenes, including KRAS, IDH1/2, BRCA1/2, and BRAF. RESULTS CancerTYPE ID identified a specific tumor type in 92.5% (2,929 of 3,168) of CUP cases in the MOSAIC database. The most commonly identified histological type was adenocarcinoma (75.4%), with pancreaticobiliary being the most common molecularly diagnosed cancer (24.9%). Aberrations in KRAS, IDH1/2, BRCA, and BRAF genes were identified in 18.8% (n = 597) of biopsies. A cancer-specific US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved or investigational targeted therapy was potentially available for 24.6% (n = 147) of these patients. CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis supports incorporating CancerTYPE ID into the evaluation for patients with CUP to help determine the tissue of origin and identify actionable genetic alterations. This approach may allow more patients with CUP to benefit from site-specific FDA-approved targeted therapies or enrollment into clinical trials.

The classification and management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arising in the tubular gastrointestinal (GI) tract and pancreas have significantly evolved over the last decades. In the latest WHO classification published in 2022, NEN are separated regardless of their primary origin into two main groups: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The substantial changes in grading system changed the definition of grade 3 to include high grade well differentiated NETs (G3-NETs), and poorly differentiated NECs (-NECs). Although, these two subgroups are considered high grades with Ki-67 >20%, they have different genomic profiles, prognosis and clinical behavior which critically influence their treatment strategies. The available clinical trial data to guide therapy of these high-grade subgroups are extremely limited which impact their management. In this review, we will summarize the current advances in the multidisciplinary approach for management of high grade GEP-NENs including G3-NETs and NECs.