Willrich, Maria A

Abstract Background Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody developed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), used for the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Immunogenicity to this drug may lead to therapeutic failure. Various laboratory assays are used for measuring serum adalimumab and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to adalimumab, for therapeutic monitoring and evaluation of clinical non-responsiveness. This study compared the performance of 2 clinical assays used by different reference laboratories. Methods In total, 120 residual clinical samples were tested at both laboratories. A sandwich ELISA for adalimumab detecting free drug and a bridging ELISA capable of detecting both free and bound ADA were performed at the Mayo Clinic. A functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA) was used at ARUP Laboratories for measuring bioactive serum drug concentrations, and neutralizing ADA. Results Seventy-eight samples had measurable concentrations of adalimumab by both methods and yielded a correlation coefficient r = 0.93, slope = 0.886, and intercept = 0.950. Overall agreement of 92.5% was observed between the assays, with most discrepant drug results being attributed to a higher positivity rate with ELISA (8/9). One outlier positive with RGA and negative with ELISA was confirmed by LC-MS/MS to be attributed to infliximab. Overall agreement of 79.2% was observed between the ADA assays. Differences in ADA results may be due to the bridging ELISA detecting total ADA (free, drug-bound, neutralizing, and non-neutralizing), while RGA detects free, neutralizing ADA only. Conclusions Although the assays are fundamentally different, the results show significant concordance between the clinically validated tests performed in different laboratories.

Abstract Background Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry coupled to immune enrichment (MASS-FIX) as an alternative to serum immunofixation electrophoresis has demonstrated increased sensitivity in monoclonal protein (MP) detection with improved laboratory workflow. This study explored similar replacement of urine immunofixation electrophoresis (u-IFE) with urine MASS-FIX (u-MASS-FIX) by method comparison. Methods Residual urine (n = 1008) from Mayo Clinic patients with a known plasma cell disease were assayed neat by u-MASS-FIX analysis. Each sample was paired with the following: u-IFE, urine total protein, urine protein electrophoresis, serum κ/λ free light chain (LC) ratio (rFLC), and serum MASS-FIX (s-MASS-FIX). Analytical sensitivities were measured in pooled urine spiked with daratumumab. Results u-IFE and u-MASS-FIX had 91% agreement in determining the presence/absence of MPs (Cohen kappa = 0.8200). In discrepant cases, serum rFLC statistically aligned more closely with positive u-MASS-FIX cases than u-IFE. Patients positive by both s-MASS-FIX and u-MASS-FIX had matching MP masses (±20 daltons) in 94% of cases. The u-MASS-FIX spectra further identified κ/λ LC fragments and glycosylated LCs not appreciated on u-IFE. The unconcentrated u-MASS-FIX limit of detection of 0.156 mg/mL was determined equivalent to 100× concentrated u-IFE. Conclusion u-MASS-FIX is a reliable alternative to u-IFE with the added benefits of LC glycosylation detection and MP mass tracking between serum and urine. Furthermore, u-MASS-FIX is performed using neat urine. Eliminating the need to concentrate urine for u-IFE has potential to increase productivity by decreasing labor minutes per test.

Abstract Background Multiple laboratory tests are employed for detection of monoclonal proteins in patients and include serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), immunofixation electrophoresis, free light chain (FLC) immunoassay, and mass spectrometry (Mass-Fix). Recently, reports on a drift in FLC quantitation results have been brought to light. Methods We studied a cohort of 16 887 patients whose sera were tested for a monoclonal protein by a FLC assay, serum protein electrophoresis, and Mass-Fix. This is a retrospective study designed to assess the impact of a drift on the performance of FLC ratio (rFLC) in groups of patients with and without detectable plasma cell disorders (PCDs). Results The results demonstrated that 63% of patients with monoclonal protein equal or higher than 2 g/L (by SPEP) had an abnormal rFLC (reference range 0.26–1.65). Conversely, 16% of patients with undetectable monoclonal protein by other methods (i.e., SPEP and Mass-Fix) who also had no record of treated PCD had an abnormal rFLC. In these cases, there was an imbalance in the number of kappa high rFLCs to lambda low rFLCs of 201 to 1. Conclusions The results of this study suggest decreased specificity of rFLC for a monoclonal kappa FLC in the 1.65 to 3.0 range.

AbstractEculizumab is effective for complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (CM-TMA), also known as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Although lifelong therapy had been suggested, discontinuation does not universally lead to relapse. Comprehensive data evaluating risk factors for recurrence following discontinuation are limited. Our aim was to systematically review available literature assessing the role of complement genetic variants in this setting. Reports on CM-TMA and eculizumab withdrawal published before 1 January 2021, were included. Key reasons for patient exclusion were no follow-up after drug withdrawal and patients lacking complement genetic testing. Two-hundred eighty patients from 40 publications were included. Median age was 28 years, and 25 patients had a known history of renal transplant. Complement genetic variants were identified in 60%, most commonly in CFH (n = 59) and MCP/CD46 (n = 38). Of patients with a complement gene variant, 51.3% had ≥1 likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant whereas the remaining had variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Overall relapse rate after therapy discontinuation was 29.6%. Relapse rate was highest among patients with CFH variants and MCP/CD46 variants in canonical splice regions. VUS (P < .001) and likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants (P < .001) were associated with increased relapse. Presence of a renal allograft (P = .009); decreasing age (P = .029); and detection of variants in CFH (P < .001), MCP/CD46 (P < .001), or C3 (P < .001) were all independently associated with relapse after eculizumab discontinuation. Eculizumab discontinuation is appropriate in specific patients with CM-TMA. Caution should be exerted when attempting such a strategy in patients with high risk of recurrence, including a subgroup of patients with MCP/CD46 variants.

Abstract Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory demyelinating disease in which analysis of clinical presentation, imaging studies, and laboratory tests aid in diagnosis. Content This review discusses laboratory tests ordered to rule out and rule in MS, such as the traditional measurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) IgG index and oligoclonal bands. Biomarkers discovered in the past 2 decades, such as aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies, have been incorporated into clinical practice in the diagnosis of disorders referred to as MS mimics. The importance of test selection, assay methodology, optimal sample for testing, and diagnostic utility of these biomarkers is reviewed. Other laboratory testing that can aid in the differentiation between MS and these biomarker-defined CNS demyelinating diseases is described. There is a focus on emerging biomarkers such as the use of kappa immunoglobulin free light chain concentration in CSF and kappa CSF index measurement as an alternative to oligoclonal bands which has a potential for an improvement in laboratory workflows. Finally, the role of biomarkers of disease activity and prognosis are discussed, including neurofilament light chain, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and myelin basic protein. Future perspectives with improved laboratory testing tools and discovery of additional biomarkers are provided. Summary Laboratory testing for demyelinating disorders using CSF and serum are routine practices that can benefit from an update, as novel biomarker-defined entities have reduced the potential for MS misdiagnosis, and CSF/serum biomarkers reinstated in the diagnostic criteria of MS.

Key Points Women with severe preeclampsia demonstrate abnormal levels of the complement alternative pathway components. Genetic variants in the complement alternative pathway are more prevalent in those with severe phenotype preeclampsia compared with the general population. Future studies should explore the role of medications that block the complement alternative pathway in treatment of preeclampsia. Background Preeclampsia and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome share many clinical and biologic features with thrombotic microangiopathy syndromes caused by complement abnormalities. Our hypothesis was that similar functional and genetic alterations in the complement alternative pathway (CAP) are present in these disorders of pregnancy. Methods We conducted quantitative analysis of proteins involved in CAP using ELISA and nephelometry on prospectively collected blood samples from patients with severe phenotype preeclampsia (defined as delivery ≤34 weeks due to preeclampsia), HELLP syndrome, or eclampsia, and matched normotensive controls ( n =25 in each arm) between 2011 and 2016. Sequencing was performed to interrogate 14 genes encoding CAP components. Results Both groups were similar in age, gravidity, parity, marital status, and race. The study group had a higher BMI (mean±SD, 32±8 versus 25±4 kg/m 2 ; P =0.002) and earlier gestational age at delivery (32.5±3.6 versus 40.3±1 weeks; P <0.001). Serologic studies demonstrated elevated Bb subunit (median [range], 1.2 [0.5–4.3] versus 0.6 [0.5–1] μ g/ml; P<0.001), complement C5 concentration (28 [18–33] versus 24 [15–34] mg/dl; P =0.03), and sMAC (371 [167–761] versus 184 [112–249] ng/ml; P<0.001) concentrations in patients with preeclampsia. Two thirds of patients with preeclampsia had at least one nonsynonymous sequence variant in CAP genes. Conclusion Patients with severe phenotype preeclampsia manifest functional alterations in CAP activation. Genetic variants in the CAP genes were detected in several patients, but a larger population study is necessary to fully evaluate genetic risk. Genetic screening and complement-targeted treatment may be useful in risk stratification and novel therapeutic approaches.

Abstract Objective Regulations for clinical laboratories in the United States are complex. The goal of this review is to improve the clarity of laboratory-developed test (LDT) regulation to facilitate innovation. Methods A literature and regulation review of current legislation for compliance by U.S. clinical laboratories was performed, and examples of the steps to implement LDTs within compliance with the regulatory environment are shared. Results Many federal and state jurisdictions are critical to the functionality of a laboratory in addition to upcoming potential promulgation of the Verifying Accurate Leading-Edge IVCT Development Act. Increased regulation, although imperative to maintain consistent, high-standard clinical care, could mean additional costs for developers and healthcare while also hindering innovation. Conclusion An extensive discussion of proposed regulations for LDTs needs to occur. Laboratory testing requires the sustained use of innovative methods at a cost that will permit continued, timely, uninterrupted high-quality service.