Borlaug, Barry A

Abstract Aims Trends in upright seated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) with synchronous measurement of weight, blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) have not been compared prior to heart failure events (HFE) and other causes of hospitalization during remote monitoring. Methods We analysed 24-month data from patients in the PROACTIVE-HF trial. Participants (N = 456) used the CordellaTM HF daily to measure seated PAP, weight, BP, and HR, all taken and transmitted within minutes. Events that were analysed included HFE, those potentially related to HF treatment (HF-TRE), and others (non-HFE). Parameters were trended from 60-days before (D-60) to 30-days after (D + 30) the day of the event (D = 0), and their concurrent changes were compared between D-60 and D = 0, and D = 0 and D + 30 using a mixed effects model. Results There were 196 HFE, 276 non-HFE, and 66 HF-TRE. Prior to HFE, average mean PAP (mPAP) increased from 27.8 ± 10.9 mmHg at D-60 to 32.6 ± 11.2 mmHg at D = 0 (P < .001), and decreased to 30.0 ± 12.4 mmHg at D + 30 (P = .001). Kinetics of mPAP before HFE differed by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); mPAP rose by 3.4 ± 6.8 mmHg in 2 weeks before HFE in those with LVEF >40%, whereas a similar magnitude (3.1 ± 9.1 mmHg) of mPAP rise occurred over 6-weeks before HFE in those with LVEF ≤40%. No consistent changes in weight, SBP, or HR prior to HFE were observed (P > .05). Changes in vital signs but not mPAP were noted prior to HF-TRE and non-HFE. Conclusion Seated mPAP increased weeks in advance of HFE and vital signs did not change consistently before HFE. Differential kinetics of mPAP prior to HFE by the LVEF suggest that an uptrend in seated mPAP may need to be addressed more rapidly in those with LVEF>40%. Changes in vital signs with non-HFE and HF-TRE need further validation.

Background Coronary flow reserve reflects microvascular function, whereas filling pressure indicates myocardial hemodynamic burden. In angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries, abnormalities in either could contribute to a supply–demand mismatch; however, their combined prognostic significance remains unclear. Methods Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries who underwent invasive coronary reactivity tests were studied retrospectively. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was coronary flow reserve <2.5. An artificial intelligence–enabled ECG marker of elevated filling pressure (AIEFP) was applied as a scalable prognostic marker of myocardial hemodynamic stress. Associations with major adverse cardiovascular events were evaluated using Cox regression and propensity score overlap weighting. Results Among 1957 patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (median age, 51.8 years; 67.2% women), CMD+ was identified in 26.4% and AIEFP+ in 6.6%. Over 8 years, 204 patients (10.4%) experienced major adverse cardiovascular events. In nested models, both CMD (hazard ratio [HR]=1.42 [95% CI=1.13–1.78]; P =0.002) and AIEFP (HR=2.28 [95% CI=1.67–3.11]; P <0.001) remained associated with major adverse cardiovascular events after adjustment. Adding AIEFP to the base model improved model fitness (Δχ 2 =23.65, P <0.001; ΔAkaike Information Criterion=−21.7) and modestly improved discrimination (ΔHarrell concordance index=0.02, P =0.02). In a 4‐group model, adjusted risks increased in a graded manner. Overlap‐weighted analysis after covariate balance demonstrated distinct temporal risk trajectories: CMD+/AIEFP+ had the highest 1‐year risk (12.7%), and AIEFP+ had the highest cumulative 8‐year risk (57% in CMD− and 51.8% in CMD+). Conclusions CMD and AIEFP provide complementary prognostic information, with AIEFP remaining significantly associated with outcomes after multivariable adjustment. A dual‐axis framework integrating myocardial hemodynamic stress (AIEFP) and microvascular function (coronary flow reserve) may enhance risk stratification and enable identification of clinically distinct angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries phenotypes with divergent trajectories.

Abstract Aims We hypothesized that targeting interleukin-6—a cytokine central to NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation that is associated with both the onset and progression of heart failure (HF)—may be beneficial in patients with HF and circulating evidence of cardiovascular inflammation but without overtly reduced ejection fraction (EF). We describe the rationale and design of two clinical trials (ATHENA and HERMES) investigating ziltivekimab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the interleukin-6 ligand, in patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved EF (HFmrEF/HFpEF) and cardiovascular inflammation. Methods ATHENA (n = 673) and HERMES (n = 4900) are international, multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials randomizing adults with HFpEF/HFmrEF and cardiovascular inflammation (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/l) to ziltivekimab 15 mg or placebo, administered subcutaneously once monthly on top of standard of care. Eligible participants have a left ventricular EF &gt;40%, elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/l. The primary endpoint in ATHENA is the change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire—Clinical Summary Score at 12 months. The primary endpoint in HERMES is time to first composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for HF, or urgent HF visit. ATHENA has a fixed duration of 12 months, whereas the HERMES trial is event driven (∼845 adjudicated primary events) with a minimum exposure of 6 months from randomization to the last treatment visit. Conclusion ATHENA and HERMES will investigate the effect of ziltivekimab in HFpEF/HFmrEF and cardiovascular inflammation. ATHENA will determine the effect of ziltivekimab on health status. HERMES will determine the efficacy and safety of ziltivekimab on morbidity and mortality.

Abstract Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and its presence is associated with more severe echocardiographic abnormalities and poorer outcomes through unclear mechanisms. CKD-associated endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and activation of profibrotic pathways could worsen pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) in HFpEF, but such relationships have not been explored. Methods Consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF undergoing invasive haemodynamic cardiopulmonary exercise testing were stratified by baseline kidney function to characterize potential differences in pulmonary vascular loading, haemodynamics, cardiopulmonary reserve, and outcomes based upon the presence and severity of kidney dysfunction. Results Of 925 patients with HFpEF, 319 (34.5%) had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt; 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients with more severe kidney dysfunction were older and more likely to have diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. At rest, reduced kidney function was associated with lower haemoglobin, higher biventricular filling pressures, and lower cardiac output, but the severity of kidney dysfunction was most conspicuously associated with worsening PVD, evidenced by increasing pulmonary arterial (PA) pressures due to marked increases in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) as kidney dysfunction progressed (median [IQR] 1.3 [0.86, 1.88] to 2.8 [2.0, 3.8] WU from eGFR ≥ 90 to eGFR &lt; 30, P &lt; .001), along with progressively lower PA compliance (PAC, 4.7 [3.6, 5.8] to 2.2 [1.8, 3.4] ml/mmHg from eGFR ≥ 90 to eGFR &lt; 30, P &lt; .001). With exercise, differences in the severity of PVD became even more striking, with more severe elevation in PA pressures and PVR, and lower PA compliance, leading to lower transmural left-sided distending pressures, with no difference in exertional PA wedge pressure. Patients with worse kidney dysfunction displayed the most dramatic cardiac output limitations with exercise, which along with more severe anaemia and markedly reduced O2 delivery, caused marked impairment in aerobic capacity. Worsening kidney function was associated with a striking gradient of increased risk of a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization [ranging from HR 2.38 (95% CI 1.01–5.59) for eGFR 60–90 to HR 16.77 (95% CI 6.65–42.28) for eGFR &lt; 30 (vs. reference eGFR ≥ 90)]. Conclusions Kidney dysfunction in patients with HFpEF is characterized by more severe PVD at rest and with exercise, leading to reduced cardiac output reserve, impaired exercise capacity, and increased risk for adverse events. Further study is warranted to better understand causal relationships between CKD and PVD, and determine whether novel therapies to improve kidney function might target these impairments to improve clinical status.

BACKGROUND: The metabolic mechanisms underlying right ventricular (RV) dysfunction are poorly understood, particularly outside of group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH). We aimed to identify metabolites and pathways associated with RV systolic function and explored whether associations differed by pulmonary vascular resistance, PH group 1 status, and sex. METHODS: We analyzed data from the multicenter PVDOMICS (Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics) cohort. RV systolic function metrics included fractional area change (echo), global longitudinal strain (echo), and ejection fraction (cardiac magnetic resonance). We used linear regression adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and PH group to assess associations between metabolites and RV function. Pathway enrichment analyses were used to identify pathways significantly associated with RV function. Interaction terms were assessed to determine whether metabolite associations were modified by pulmonary vascular resistance, group 1 PH status, or sex. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to develop metabolite-based scores for RV function, and prognostic performance was assessed. RESULTS: There were 979 participants with plasma metabolomics and RV function data. Linear regression identified 170 metabolites that were significantly associated with all 3 RV metrics. Androgenic steroid, gamma-glutamyl amino acid, polyamine, vitamin A, fatty acid, and sterol pathways are most strongly associated with RV systolic function. Two metabolites interacted with group 1 PH status, and 6 interacted with pulmonary vascular resistance. Four androgenic steroids are associated more strongly with RV systolic function in women compared with men. Metabolite-based scores were prognostically equivalent to RV systolic function metrics and less accurate than REVEAL Lite 2 scores. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a blueprint of metabolites and metabolic pathways associated with RV systolic function across the spectrum of PH. Novel links to vitamin A and glutathione metabolites were observed. We detected few metabolites that associated with RV systolic function differentially by group 1 PH status or degree of pulmonary vascular resistance elevation. Androgenic steroids may associate more strongly with RV systolic function in women compared with men.

Abstract Aims We aimed to assess regression and development rates of ≥moderate secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Methods Patients with a &lt;1 year diagnosis of HFrEF with mildly (40% ≤ EF &lt; 50%) or moderately (&lt;40%) reduced EF enrolled in GDMT titration programme 2019–2024 were identified. Regression rates of ≥moderate MR/TR to ≤mild and development rates of incident ≥moderate MR/TR were calculated. Results Among 844 patients [median age 64; 68% men; 26% mildly reduced EF; 24% New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV], 28% had ≥moderate MR and 14% had ≥moderate TR. Over median 7.1 months, 171 (75%) patients with ≥moderate MR and 87 (75%) of patients with ≥moderate TR experienced regression to no/mild MR and TR, respectively. Conversely, over median 13 months, incident ≥moderate MR and TR developed in 5% and 6%, respectively, of patients with no/mild baseline MR and TR. Number of GDMT medications at follow-up was less in patients who did not have MR/TR regression (vs who did) and in patients who developed MR/TR (vs who did not). Patients with NYHA Class I/II received a similar number of GDMT and had a similar rate of MR and TR regression and development vs patients with NYHA Class III/IV. However, patients with mildly reduced EF received less GDMT medications vs patients with moderately reduced EF and experienced less MR regression. Conclusion In patients with a recent diagnosis of HFrEF receiving contemporary GDMT, the majority with ≥moderate secondary MR and TR achieved regression of MR/TR, and the minority without significant baseline MR/TR developed ≥moderate regurgitation at follow-up.

BACKGROUND: With pulmonary hypertension (PH), a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP)>15 mm Hg is used to diagnose left heart dysfunction, but some patients with adjudicated group 1 PH demonstrate PAWP>15 mm Hg. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate group 1 PH with high PAWP>15 mm Hg. METHODS: Patients with adjudicated group 1 PH from PVDOMICS between 2016 and 2019 were separated into high PAWP(>15 mm Hg) or normal PAWP and compared with adjudicated combined pre- and postcapillary (Cpc) PH related to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Participants underwent dynamic right heart catheterization and metabolomics. Findings were validated in 3 independent cohorts with adjudicated group 1 PH (validation cohorts 1 and 2 with exercise right heart catheterization and validation cohort 3 with resting right heart catheterization). RESULTS: Of 325 patients with group 1 PH (73% women, mean age 53.0±14.3 years), 15% (n=48) had high PAWP. Group 1 PH+high PAWP demonstrated greater obesity, left ventricular hypertrophy ( P <0.0002), left ventricular strain impairment ( P <0.0001), and decreased left ventricular compliance ( P <0.0001) compared with group 1 PH+normal PAWP, with changes comparable to Cpc-PH HFpEF (n=75). Compared with Cpc-PH HFpEF, left atrial function was better in group 1 PH+high PAWP with lower PAWP V wave, higher left atrial compliance, and left atrial ejection fraction ( P <0.0001 for all). Metabolomics demonstrated little difference between group 1 PH with high versus normal PAWP but large differences between group 1 PH+high PAWP versus Cpc-PH HFpEF (100 metabolites altered at false discovery rate P <0.05). Elevated PAWP was also observed in 18% of group 1 PH in the validation cohort 1 (n=402), with exercise PAWP response intermediately abnormal in group 1 PH+high PAWP relative to Cpc-PH HFpEF and group 1 PH+normal PAWP (interaction P <0.0001). Elevated PAWP was similarly observed in 22% and 19% of group 1 PH in validation cohorts 2 (n=55) and 3 (n=787), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 adjudicated patients with group 1 PH has elevation in resting PAWP despite severe pulmonary vascular dysfunction and metabolomics consistent with traditionally defined group 1 PH. Despite resting PAWP elevation, these patients with group 1 PH were metabolomically and biologically distinct from Cpc PH HFpEF, with better left atrial function and diastolic reserve during exercise. These data emphasize the limitations of using resting PAWP alone to separate group 1 PH from HFpEF and call for development of more integrated clinical diagnostic criteria.

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often complain of dyspnea, raising the question that symptoms could be related to unrecognized heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We used the HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF algorithm to estimate the probability of undiagnosed HFpEF in CABANA (Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy), and its interaction with catheter ablation on quality of life (QOL). Probable HFpEF was defined as patient‐reported dyspnea with HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability≥75%. Absence of dyspnea or HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability<75% was considered to reflect patients without HFpEF. The effect of randomization to catheter ablation on QOL (Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory questionnaire and EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score) was assessed using mixed models. Results Of participants without known HF, 70% (n=1225) had probable HFpEF and the remaining 30% (n=522) did not. Those with probable HFpEF had worse New York Heart Association class, EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score, Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity, and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory frequency scores ( P <0.0001 for all), with higher risk of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.11–4.31], P =0.01). Ablation resulted in greater improvement in EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity/frequency scores in probable HFpEF (interactions P =0.005, P =0.05, and P =0.04 respectively). In probable HFpEF, catheter ablation was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66–0.92], P =0.003, interaction P =0.03) but not HF hospitalization (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.55–1.64], P =0.84). Conclusions Nearly three quarters of CABANA participants had potentially undiagnosed HFpEF, with worse QOL and risk of HF hospitalization. Catheter ablation in probable HFpEF resulted in greater improvement in QOL, but residual QOL impairment and HF risk remained elevated despite ablation. These data reinforce the importance of diligent consideration of HFpEF among patients with symptomatic AF to ensure optimal use of foundational treatments for HF.