Back to Authors

Borlaug, Barry A

0000-0001-9375-0596

Mayo Clinic

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 185

Differential Hemodynamic Effects of Exercise and Volume Expansion in People With and Without Heart Failure

Circulation: Heart Failure | October 24, 2014 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 41-48

10.1161/circheartfailure.114.001731 | PMID 25342738

Background— Invasive hemodynamic exercise testing is commonly used in the evaluation of patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or pulmonary hypertension. Saline loading has been suggested as an alternative provocative maneuver, but the hemodynamic changes induced by the 2 stresses have not been compared. Methods and Results— Twenty-six subjects (aged, 67±10 years; n=14 HFpEF; n=12 control) underwent right heart catheterization at rest, during supine exercise, and with acute saline loading in a prospective study. Exercise and saline each increased cardiac output and pressures in the right atrium, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary capillary wedge positions. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, rate–pressure product, and cardiac output were greater with exercise compared with saline. In controls subjects, right atrial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased similarly with saline and exercise, whereas in HFpEF subjects, exercise led to ≈2-fold greater increases in right atrial pressure (10±4 versus 6±3 mm Hg; P =0.02), pulmonary arterial pressure (22±8 versus 11±4 mm Hg; P =0.0001), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (18±5 versus 10±4 mm Hg; P <0.0001) compared with saline. Systolic reserve assessed by stroke work and cardiac power output was lower in HFpEF subjects with both exercise and saline. Systemic and pulmonary arterial compliances were enhanced with saline but reduced with exercise. Conclusions— Exercise elicits greater pulmonary capillary wedge pressure elevation compared with saline in HFpEF but not controls, suggesting that hemodynamic stresses beyond passive stiffness and increased venous return explain the development of pulmonary venous hypertension in HFpEF. Exercise testing is more sensitive than saline loading to detect hemodynamic derangements indicative of HFpEF. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01418248.
The Hemodynamic Basis of Exercise Intolerance in Tricuspid Regurgitation

Circulation: Heart Failure | September 5, 2014 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 911-917

10.1161/circheartfailure.114.001575 | PMID 25190672

Background— Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) frequently present with exertional fatigue and dyspnea, but the hemodynamic basis for exercise limitation in people with TR remains unclear. Methods and Results— Twelve subjects with normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and grade ≥3 TR underwent high-fidelity invasive hemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous expired gas analysis and were compared with 13 age- and sex-matched controls. At rest, TR subjects had lower pulmonary blood flow (3.6±0.4 versus 5.1±1.9 L/min; P =0.01), increased right atrial pressure (12±5 versus 4±1 mm Hg; P =0.0002), and higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (17±5 versus 9±3 mm Hg; P =0.0001). However, LV transmural pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure−right atrial pressure), which reflects LV preload independent of right heart congestion and pericardial restraint, was similar in TR and controls (6±3 versus 4±2 mm Hg; P =0.3). With exercise, TR subjects displayed lower peak V O 2 (10.3±2.8 versus 13.8±4.2 mL/min per kg; P =0.02), lower pulmonary blood flow (6.4±1.3 versus 10.3±3.3 L/min; P =0.001), and less increase in pulmonary blood flow relative to V O 2 (+4.6±1.1vs +6.2±0.7; P =0.001). TR subjects displayed higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with exercise, but this was solely because of RA hypertension (27±9 versus 8±3 mm Hg; P <0.0001), because LV transmural pressure dropped with exercise in subjects with TR (−5±6 versus +3±3 mm Hg; P =0.0007), suggesting inadequate LV diastolic filling, despite high pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Conclusions— Impaired exercise capacity in people with severe TR is related to low cardiac output reserve relative to metabolic needs, coupled with elevated systemic and pulmonary venous pressures. Left heart pressures are elevated with exercise in subjects with TR, despite low LV preload, secondary to enhanced ventricular interaction.
Response to Letters Regarding Article, “Systemic Hypertension in Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction”

Circulation | July 1, 2014 | Volume: 130 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circulationaha.114.009350 | PMID 24982126

The sHunt for Better Breathing in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

European Journal of Heart Failure | June 11, 2014 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 709-711

10.1002/ejhf.120 | PMID 24920438

Resting Ventricular–Vascular Function and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation: Heart Failure | May 16, 2014 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 580-589

10.1161/circheartfailure.114.001192 | PMID 24833648

Background— Exercise intolerance is a hallmark of heart failure, but factors associated with impaired exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are unclear. We hypothesized that in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the severity of resting ventricular and vascular dysfunction are associated with impairment in exercise tolerance as assessed by peak oxygen consumption. Methods and Results— Subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction enrolled in the PhosphodiesteRasE-5 Inhibition to Improve CLinical Status And EXercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX) clinical trial (n=216) underwent baseline Doppler echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and cardiac MRI. RELAX participants were elderly (median age 69 years) and 48% were women. Ejection fraction (60%) and stroke volume (77 mL) were normal, while diastolic dysfunction (medial E / e ′, 16; deceleration time, 185 ms; left atrial volume, 44 mL/m 2 ) and increased arterial load (arterial elastance, 1.51 mm Hg/mL) were evident. Peak oxygen consumption was reduced (11.7 mLkg −1 min −1 , 1141 mL/min) and age, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin, and chronotropic response collectively explained 64% of the variance in raw peak oxygen consumption (mL/min). After adjustment for these variables, left ventricular structure (diastolic dimension [1.5%, P =0.008] and left ventricular mass [1.6%, P =0.008]), resting stroke volume (2.0%, P =0.002), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (deceleration time [0.9%, P =0.03] and E / e ′ [1.4%, P =0.009]), and arterial function (arterial elastance [2.1%, P =0.002] and systemic arterial compliance [1.5%, P =0.007]), each explained only a small additional portion of the variance in peak oxygen consumption. Conclusions— In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, potentially modifiable factors (obesity, anemia, and chronotropic incompetence) are strongly associated with exercise capacity, whereas resting measures of ventricular and vascular structure and function are not. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00763867