Borlaug, Barry A

Abstract Aims Patient-reported quality of life (QOL) is a highly prognostic and clinically relevant endpoint in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The relationships between QOL and different markers of HF severity remain unclear, particularly as they relate to functional capacity and directly measured activity levels. We hypothesized that QOL would demonstrate a stronger relationship with measures of exercise capacity and adiposity compared to other disease measures. Methods and results This is a secondary analysis of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored RELAX, NEAT-HFpEF and INDIE-HFpEF trials to determine the relationships between QOL (assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire) and different domains reflecting HF severity, including maximal aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption), submaximal exercise capacity (6-min walk distance), volume of daily activity (accelerometry), physician-estimated functional class, resting echocardiography, and plasma natriuretic peptide levels. A total of 408 unique patients with chronic HFpEF were split into tertiles of QOL scores defined as QOLworst, QOLintermediate, QOLbest. The QOLworst HFpEF group was youngest, with a higher body mass index, greater prevalence of class II obesity and diabetes, and the lowest N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. After adjustment for age, sex and body mass index, poorer QOL was associated with worse physical capacity and activity levels, assessed by peak oxygen consumption, 6-min walk distance and actigraphy, but was not associated with NT-proBNP or indices from resting echocardiography. QOL was similarly reduced in patients with and without prior HF hospitalization. Conclusions Quality of life in HFpEF is poorest in patients who are young, obese and have diabetes, and is more robustly tied to measures reflecting functional capacity and daily activity levels rather than elevations in NT-proBNP or prior HF hospitalization. These findings have major implications for the understanding of QOL in HFpEF and for the design of future clinical trials targeting symptom improvement in HFpEF. Clinical Trial Registration: RELAX, NCT00763867; NEAT-HFpEF, NCT02053493; INDIE-HFpEF, NCT02742129.

AbstractHemodynamics play a central role in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF), yet their proper assessment and optimization remains challenging. Heart failure is defined as the inability of the heart to deliver adequate perfusion (cardiac output) to the body at rest or exercise, or to require an elevation in cardiac filling pressures in order to do this. This bedrock definition is important because it relies on measurable quantities (filling pressures and output) that are readily assessed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Here we present three cases to illustrate how better understanding of the determinants of cardiac output and stroke volume: preload, afterload, contractility, and lusitropy, as well as the determinants of congestion (high filling pressures) may be used to guide optimization of hemodynamic status. The goal is that the readers will be able to think more critically when evaluating the hemodynamics of their patient in HF and recognize the complex interplay that determines the complex balance between cardiac ejection and filling capabilities, and how this alters symptoms and outcomes for patients with HF.Key Points Careful assessment of hemodynamics in the catheterization laboratory allows for actionable insight to a patient's volume status, cardiac function and can help prognosticate outcomes. Exercise hemodynamics in heart failure is a powerful tool to better understand the cause of symptoms and predict outcomes. Clinicians should aim to decrease biventricular filling pressures to normal values to improve morbidity and reduce risk for readmission. In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, clinicians should aim to decrease afterload as much as can be tolerated by the renal function and patient's symptoms. Low cardiac output can often be improved by optimizing preload and afterload rather than initiating inotropes, which should be reserved until needed. In advanced heart failure, the right heart function becomes a key determinant of symptoms and outcomes.

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the association between elevated ventricular‐end diastolic pressures (VEDP) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) on long‐term survival in adult Fontan patients.BackgroundThe impact of ventricular filling pressures on long‐term survival in adults post‐Fontan palliation is unknown.MethodsWe included 148 adult Fontan patients (age ≥ 18 years) without atrioventricular valve prosthesis or pulmonary vein stenosis undergoing arterial and venous catheterization between December 1999 and November 2017. VEDP was defined as ≥12 mmHg and PAWP as >12 mmHg based on optimal cut‐offs for prediction of mortality on receiver‐operator curves (AUC 0.63 and 0.66, respectively).ResultsMean age was 31.3 ± 9.2 years and 48.6% of patients were females. Most common congenital defects were tricuspid atresia (36.4%) and double‐inlet left ventricle (28.3%); 59.5% patients had atriopulmonary Fontan connections. Mean VEDP was 11.5 ± 4.7 mmHg and PAWP 10.6 ± 4.5 mmHg (correlation coefficient .76). During a follow‐up of 6.0 ± 4.8 years (median 5.4, IQR 1.4–9.4), there were 45 deaths (30.4%). Overall survival was lower in patients with VEDP ≥ 12 compared to those with VEDP < 12 mmHg (p = .02). Similarly, survival was lower in patients with PAWP>12 compared to patients with PAWP ≤ 12 mmHg (p < .0001). In the multivariate model, PAWP was an independent predictor of death (HR 1.1 per mmHg, 95% CI 1.02–1.15, p = .009) whereas VEDP was not (HR 1.1 per mmHg, 95% CI 1.0–1.13; p = .08).ConclusionPAWP but not VEDP was independently associated with long‐term overall mortality in adult Fontan patients. Perhaps PAWP rather than VEDP should be used in the risk stratification of these patients.

Approximately half of the patients with signs and symptoms of heart failure have a left ventricular ejection fraction that is not markedly abnormal. Despite the historically initial surprise, heightened risks for heart failure specific major adverse events occur across the broad range of ejection fraction, including normal. The recognition of the magnitude of the problem of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the past 20 years has spurred an explosion of clinical investigation and growing intensity of informative outcome trials. This article addresses the historic development of this component of the heart failure syndrome, including the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and existing and planned therapeutic studies. Looking forward, more specific phenotyping and even genotyping of subpopulations should lead to improvements in outcomes from future trials.

Abstract Despite improvements in outcomes in the last few decades for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there still remains a need for novel therapies as many patients incompletely recover with existing therapies and progress to advanced HF. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in the management of HFrEF with a focus on upcoming therapies that hold the greatest promise for clinical use. We will discuss novel pharmacological therapies and areas of uncertainty with existing therapies. We will also discuss the potential utility and controversy surrounding novel interventions for HF such as percutaneous mitral valve repair, atrial fibrillation ablation, and other emerging interventions with positive signals for benefit in HFrEF. Finally, we will summarize the current state of stem cell and gene therapy for HFrEF and future directions.

Abstract Aims Left atrial (LA) function is impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and predicts disease severity and risk of adverse outcome. We sought to evaluate whether LA strain could enhance diagnosis of HFpEF. Methods and results Consecutive patients with unexplained exertional dyspnoea and image quality suitable for measuring LA strain underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing to ascertain the presence of HFpEF or non-cardiac causes of dyspnoea (NCD). LA reservoir strain was measured in all patients, while LA conduit and booster strain were measured in patients with sinus rhythm. LA strain was measurable in 363 of 378 examinations (96.5%; HFpEF: 238, NCD: 125). LA reservoir strain (29 ± 16% vs. 40 ± 13%, P &lt; 0.0001) and conduit strain (18 ± 10% vs. 22 ± 10%, P = 0.0001) were significantly impaired in HFpEF compared to NCD. Of all echocardiographic indices, LA reservoir strain best discriminated HFpEF from NCD [area under the curve (AUC) 0.719, P &lt; 0.0001], outperforming E/e' (AUC difference +0.117, P &lt; 0.0001), LA enlargement (+0.090, P = 0.001), tricuspid regurgitation velocity &gt; 2.8 m/s (+0.082, P = 0.0085), left ventricular hypertrophy (+0.0159, P &lt; 0.0001) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (+0.0198, P &lt; 0.0001). Indexing LA reservoir strain to estimated LA pressure (E/e') as a surrogate for LA compliance further improved diagnostic performance (AUC 0.772, P &lt; 0.0001; +0.053 compared to LA reservoir strain alone, P = 0.003). Conclusion Left atrial reservoir strain may provide enhanced diagnostic accuracy beyond conventional echocardiographic measures to discriminate HFpEF from NCD. Further study is required to verify the diagnostic utility of LA strain.

Background Optimal management of patients with severe mitral stenosis ( MS ) and low transmitral gradient is incompletely understood. Methods and Results We examined 101 consecutive patients with severe rheumatic MS (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm 2 ) who underwent balloon valvuloplasty. Low gradient was defined as mean transmitral gradient <10 mm Hg and low flow as stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m 2 by echocardiography. Symptoms and mortality data were collected. Systolic, diastolic, and arterial function were characterized by measuring left ventricular (LV) end‐systolic elastance, LV stiffness constant (β), diastolic capacitance (predicted LV end‐diastolic volume at a common LV filling pressure of 30 mm Hg), and effective arterial elastance. Low gradient (<10 mm Hg) was present in 55 patients, including low flow/low gradient in 11 and normal flow/low gradient in 44 patients, and high gradient was present in 46 patients. Participants with low‐flow/low‐gradient (LG) MS were older with higher rates of atrial fibrillation (64%) and subvalvular thickening, higher afterload, and decreased LV compliance with lower ejection fraction (57±10% versus 65±4% versus 63±6%, P =0.002) but similar end‐systolic elastance compared with patients with normal‐flow/ LG and high‐gradient MS . The normal‐flow/ LG group had larger mitral valve area and lower left atrial pressure by catheterization, as well as favorable long‐term outcomes compared with the low‐flow/ LG and high‐gradient MS group. A total of 40% of patients with LG MS had no symptomatic benefit from valvuloplasty compared with 18% of patients with high‐gradient MS ( P =0.02). Conclusions Presence of low gradient in patients with severe MS was associated with lesser symptomatic benefit from valvuloplasty. In the subset with low stroke volume index, this may be related to independent ventricular‐vascular uncoupling, decreased LV compliance, and high prevalence of atrial fibrillation in addition to intrinsic MS .