Parrondo, Ricardo D

Abstract Most patients with solitary bone plasmacytomas (SBP) progress to multiple myeloma (MM) after definitive radiation therapy as their primary treatment. Whether the presence of high-risk (HR) cytogenetic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the clonal plasma cells, obtained either directly from the diagnostic SBP tissue or the corresponding bone marrow examination at the time of diagnosis, is associated with a shorter time to progression (TTP) to MM is unknown. This study evaluated all patients diagnosed with SBP at the Mayo Clinic from January 2012 to July 2022. The presence of del(17p), t(14;16), t(4;14), or +1q (gain or amplification) by FISH in clonal plasma cells was defined as HR. A total of 114 patients were included in this cohort, and baseline FISH was available for 55 patients (48%), of which 22 were classified as HR (40%). The median TTP to MM for patients with SBP and HR FISH was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-26) compared with 42 months (95% CI, 25-not reached [NR]) in patients with SBP without HR FISH (P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, only HR FISH was a significant predictor for shorter TTP to MM, independent of minimal marrow involvement and an abnormal serum free light chain ratio at diagnosis. Deletion (17p) and gain 1q abnormalities were the most common FISH abnormalities responsible for the short TTP to MM. Thus, assessing for HR FISH abnormalities in clonal plasma cells derived from either the diagnostic SBP tissue or the staging bone marrow examination of patients with newly diagnosed SBP is feasible and prognostic for a shorter TTP to MM.

8024 Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is prognostic for survival in multiple myeloma (MM). MRD is usually assessed in the bone marrow (BM) by flow cytometry or NGS. MRD by FDG PET/CT provides a global representation of the tumor burden, including response assessment of extramedullary disease. We examined MRD status in MM pts using both BM and PET/CT at Mayo Clinic. Methods: Medical records were reviewed retrospectively for MM pts who received CAR-T between 4/2018 and 12/2022. All PET/CT scans were assessed by radiologists. BM MRD was assessed by flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-5. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among the 157 CAR-T pts, including 89 pts who received FDA-approved CAR-T, median age was 63 years, 59% (92/157) were males, 42% (66/157) had high risk cytogenetics with median of 5 prior lines of therapy, 36% (57/157) had plasmacytoma. Incidence of CRS was 83%, 5% grade ≥ 3 CRS. Incidence of ICANS was 19%, 4% grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CR/sCR rate was 37%. One hundred and thirty-seven pts (87%) had evaluable BM at month (mo) 1, 85% (117/137) were BM MRDneg at mo 1. Baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups except age, % BM plasma cells and use of bridging therapy. Among the MRDneg pts, CR/sCR rate was 44% (51/117) and 95% (111/117) had sFLC below normal. At median follow-up of 13.8 months, median PFS among pts with BM MRDneg at 1 mo was 12 mo (95% CI: 11, 30) vs 3 mo (95%CI: 2, 7) for BM MRDpos (p<0.001). Median OS among pts with BM MRDneg at 1 mo was 34 mo (95% CI: 24, NR) vs 22 mo (95%CI: 7, NA) for BM MRDpos (p<0.01). At month 1, 112 pts had both BM and PET/CT assessments available, 64/112(57%) were both BM MRDneg/PET MRDneg, 38/112 (34%) were MRDneg for either BM or PET and 10/112 (9%) were positive for both BM and PET (MRDpos/PET MRDpos). Baseline demographics except age were comparable between the 2 groups (Table). Rate of conversion from MRDpos to MRDneg was low. Rate of sustained BM and PET MRDneg at mo 12 was 44% (8/18). The median PFS and OS for BM MRDneg/PET MRDneg was significantly longer as compared to others (Table). Conclusions: Achieving FLC below normal, BM MRDneg and PET MRDneg at 1 month, regardless of IMWG response at that time, is prognostic for both PFS and OS in MM pts receiving CAR-T. Failure to achieve any of these confers poor prognosis. [Table: see text]

8012 Background: Cilta-cel was FDA approved in 2022 for the treatment of RRMM. We evaluated the outcomes of patients treated with intended SOC cilta-cel. Methods: 12 US academic medical centers contributed data to this retrospective study. As of 12/31/2022, 177 patients were leukapheresed and 139 received cilta-cel. Results: The table describes the study population compared to the CARTITUDE-1 trial. More patients in our study had extramedullary disease (EMD, 35%) and high-risk cytogenetics (41%). 55% of the patients would not have met eligibility criteria for CARTITUDE-1. Common reasons for ineligibility were cytopenias (19%), prior BCMA therapy (14%), organ dysfunction (12%), oligosecretory disease (13%), and plasma cell leukemia (8%). 83% of the patients received bridging chemotherapy (overall response rate, ORR: 28%). Lymphodepletion included fludarabine (Flu) + cyclophosphamide (Cy): 81%, bendamustine: 11%, Cy: 4%, and cladribine + Cy: 4%. Median CAR-T cells infused were 0.6 million/kg (range: 0.1-0.9), and 19% of patients were treated on an expanded access protocol (EAP). Median follow-up was 2.3 months (range: 0-8). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was seen in 81% (≥ grade 3: 7%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 22% (≥ grade 3: 8%) of patients. Tocilizumab, steroids, and anakinra were used in 61%, 44%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Delayed neurotoxicity (NT) was seen in 9% (cranial nerve palsy: 8, Parkinsonism: 2, others: 3). Grade ≥ 3 cytopenias at day ≥ 30 were seen in 75% of patients. Infections were seen in 32% of patients. Day 30 (N=115) and best response rates (N=118) were: ≥ partial response (PR), 75/80%; ≥ very good PR, 44/62%; and ≥ complete response (CR), 26/40%, respectively. In the non-EAP FluCy population (N=88), best ORR/≥CR were 89/49%. 17 patients died by data cut-off, 4 due to disease progression and 13 (9%) due to non-relapse mortality (NRM) (grade 5 CRS: 3, infection: 6, CRS/infection: 1, grade 5 ICANS: 1, delayed NT: 2). Conclusions: Patients treated with intended SOC cilta-cel had a favorable ORR (80%) despite a larger proportion of patients having high-risk features relative to trial patients and limited follow-up. Response rates were higher in patients receiving conforming products with FluCy conditioning (89%). Delayed NT and NRM were seen in 9% of patients. Results will be updated with continued follow-up. D.K.H., K.K.P, M.J., Y.L. & S.S. contributed equally. [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose: This global phase I trial investigated the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of lisaftoclax (APG-2575), a novel, orally active, potent selective B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (R/R CLL/SLL) and other hematologic malignancies (HMs). Patients and Methods: Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose were evaluated. Outcome measures were safety and tolerability (primary) and pharmacokinetic variables and antitumor effects (secondary). Pharmacodynamics in patient tumor cells were explored. Results: Among 52 patients receiving lisaftoclax, MTD was not reached. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included diarrhea (48.1%), fatigue (34.6%), nausea (30.8%), anemia and thrombocytopenia (28.8% each), neutropenia (26.9%), constipation (25.0%), vomiting (23.1%), headache (21.2%), peripheral edema and hypokalemia (17.3% each), and arthralgia (15.4%). Grade ≥ 3 hematologic TEAEs included neutropenia (21.2%), thrombocytopenia (13.5%), and anemia (9.6%), none resulting in treatment discontinuation. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results demonstrated that lisaftoclax had a limited plasma residence and systemic exposure and elicited rapid clearance of malignant cells. With a median treatment of 15 (range, 6–43) cycles, 14 of 22 efficacy-evaluable patients with R/R CLL/SLL experienced partial responses, for an objective response rate of 63.6% and median time to response of 2 (range, 2–8) cycles. Conclusions: Lisaftoclax was well tolerated, with no evidence of tumor lysis syndrome. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached at the highest dose level. Lisaftoclax has a unique pharmacokinetic profile compatible with a potentially more convenient daily (vs. weekly) dose ramp-up schedule and induced rapid clinical responses in patients with CLL/SLL, warranting continued clinical investigation.

Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 mAb, used frequently in combination with lenalidomide and pomalidomide. No studies compared daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) to daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) in lenalidomide-exposed multiple myeloma. We identified 504 consecutive multiple myeloma patients who received daratumumab at Mayo Clinic between January 2015 and April 2019. We excluded patients who received daratumumab in the first line, received more than four lines of therapy prior to daratumumab use, did not receive lenalidomide prior to daratumumab, or had an unknown status of lenalidomide exposure, and patients who received daratumumab combinations other than DRd or DPd. We examined the impact of using DRd compared to DPd on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Out of 504 patients, 162 received DRd or DPd and were included; 67 were lenalidomide-exposed and 95 were lenalidomide-refractory. DRd was used in 76 (47%) and DPd in 86 (53%) patients. In lenalidomide-exposed multiple myeloma, there was no difference in median PFS; 34.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 22.8–44.6] for DRd compared to 25.2 months (95% CI, 4.9–35.3) for DPd, P = 0.2. In lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma, there was no difference in median PFS; 18.6 months (95% CI, 13–32) for DRd compared to 9 months (95% CI, 5.2–14.6) for DPd, P = 0.09. No difference in median OS was observed in DRd compared to DPd. Our study shows combining daratumumab with lenalidomide in patients with prior lenalidomide use is a viable and effective treatment option.

AbstractBackgroundLenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) results in superior progression‐free survival and overall survival. However, patients with high‐risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) do not derive the same survival benefit from lenalidomide maintenance compared with standard‐risk patients. The authors sought to determine the outcomes of bortezomib‐based maintenance compared with lenalidomide maintenance in patients with HRMM undergoing ASCT.MethodsIn total, the authors identified 503 patients with HRMM who were undergoing ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis from January 2013 to December 2018 after receiving triplet novel‐agent induction in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRMM was defined as deletion 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), t(14;20), or chromosome 1q gain.ResultsThree hundred fifty‐seven patients (67%) received lenalidomide alone, and 146 (33%) received bortezomib‐based maintenance (with bortezomib alone in 58%). Patients in the bortezomib‐based maintenance group were more likely to harbor two or more high‐risk abnormalities and International Staging System stage III disease (30% vs. 22%; p = .01) compared with the lenalidomide group (24% vs. 15%; p < .01). Patients who were receiving lenalidomide maintenance had superior progression‐free survival at 2 years compared with those who were receiving either bortezomib monotherapy or combination therapy (75% vs. 63%; p = .009). Overall survival at 2 years was also superior in the lenalidomide group (93% vs. 84%; p = .001).ConclusionsNo superior outcomes were observed in patients with HRMM who received bortezomib monotherapy or (to a lesser extent) in those who received bortezomib in combination as maintenance compared with lenalidomide alone. Until prospective data from randomized clinical trials are available, post‐transplant therapy should be tailored to each patient with consideration for treating patients in clinical trials that target novel therapeutic strategies for HRMM, and lenalidomide should remain a cornerstone of treatment.

Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 proteins play a role in multiple myeloma (MM) cell survival, for which targeted inhibitors are being developed. AT-101 is an oral drug, which disrupts Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 function, impedes mitochondrial bioenergetic processes and induces apoptosis in MM cells. When combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), AT-101 significantly reduced tumor burden in an in vivo xenograft model of MM. These data provided rationale for a phase I/II study to establish the effective dose of AT-101 in combination with Rd (ARd regimen) in relapsed/refractory MM. A total of 10 patients were enrolled, most with high-risk cytogenetics (80%) and prior stem cell transplant (70%). Three patients were lenalidomide-refractory, 2 were bortezomib-refractory and 3 were daratumumab-refractory. The ARd combination was well tolerated with most common grade 3/4 adverse events being cytopenia’s. The overall response rate was 40% and clinical benefit rate was 90%. The median progression free survival was 14.9 months (95% CI 7.1-NE). Patients responsive to ARd showed a decrease in Bcl-2:Bim or Mcl-1:Noxa protein complexes, increased CD8+ T and NK cells and depletion of T and B-regulatory cells. The ARd regimen demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory MM prompting further investigation in additional patients.