Parrondo, Ricardo D

INTRODUCTION We aim to identify factors that impact outcomes of venetoclax for patients with CLL treated in routine practice at a tertiary center. We report on the use of venetoclax in the most frequently encountered disease scenarios: first-line, relapsed/Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-naïve, and relapsed/BTKi-exposed. METHODS We identified patients who received venetoclax therapy for CLL (between 4/2012-4/2023) from the Mayo Clinic CLL Database. Undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) was defined as <1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes using 8-color flow cytometry on peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from venetoclax start until date of death or last known to be alive. Treatment-free survival (TFS) after venetoclax was defined as the time from venetoclax start until the earliest of date of next treatment, or death. Kaplan-Meier was used to display OS and TFS. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate associations of factors with time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS A total of 155 patients received venetoclax: firstline therapy (in combination with obinutuzumab, n=55) and relapsed CLL (n=100; 17 had relapsed/BTKi-naïve CLL, and 83 had previously received BTKi [55 with progression after BTKi], relapsed/BTKi-exposed). The median follow-up for the cohorts of first-line therapy, relapsed/BTKi-naïve, and relapsed/BTKi-exposed was 12.9 months, 37.0 months, and 27.6 months, respectively. Baseline characteristics at the time of venetoclax initiation for all patients are shown in Table 1. The median TFS for the overall cohort was 39.0 months. The median OS was 54.6 months. Among patients treated with venetoclax as first-line therapy (n=55), the 2-year TFS ( Figure 1) and 2-year OS rates were both 91%. MRD testing was performed in 28 patients and was uMRD in 23 (82%) patients (only PB assessed, n=7; only BM assessed, n=2; PB and BM assessed, n=14). Detectable MRD was identified in 3 patients, and 2 patients had discordant results (PB uMRD and BM detectable disease). Among patients treated with venetoclax in the relapsed/BTKi-naïve setting (n=17), the 2-year TFS rate was 73% ( Figure 1) and the 2-year OS rate was 100%. MRD testing was performed in 7 patients and was uMRD in all 7 (100%) (only PB assessed, n=3; only BM assessed, n=2; PB and BM assessed, n=2). The median time to first uMRD result was 14.1 months. Among relapsed/BTKi-exposed venetoclax-treated patients (n=83), the median TFS was 26.9 months ( Figure 1), and the median OS was 39.4 months.In this subgroup, the median TFS for patients with (n=55) and without (n=28) prior disease progression on prior BTKi were 22.3 and 42.3 months, respectively. Median TFS with venetoclax monotherapy (n=30) was 24.0 months, venetoclax in combination with rituximab (n=37) was 26.9 months, and venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab (n=16) was 39.0 months. BTKi-exposed patients that were chemotherapy-naïve (n=27) and chemotherapy-exposed (n=56) had median TFS of 29.1 and 24.0 months, respectively. MRD testing was performed in 28 patients and was uMRD in 16 (57%) patients (only PB assessed, n=9; only BM assessed, n=2; PB and BM assessed, n=5). Detectable MRD was identified in 11 patients, and 1 had discordant results (PB uMRD and BM detectable disease). The median time to first uMRD result was 11.5 months. TP53 disruption, unmutated IGHV genes, older age, complex karyotype (CK; defined as more than 3 chromosomal aberrations on CpG stimulated karyotype), and disease progression on prior BTKi were associated with shorter TFS in the overall cohort on univariate analysis. TP53 disruption, older age, CK, and disease progression on prior BTKi were associated with shorter OS in the overall cohort on univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis was performed by including only those patients where all variables significant in univariable analysis were available (OS model n=65, TFS model n=53). In these models, only CK was significantly associated with shorter TFS (HR 8.5; 95%CI 2.5-29.1; P<0.001) and shorter OS (HR 4.1; 95%CI 1.2-14; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Patients with BTKi-exposed CLL, particularly those with prior disease progression on BTKi, had worse outcomes. Our study identified CK as one of the most important baseline predictors of adverse TFS and OS in the overall cohort of patients, supporting karyotype assessment for prognostication prior to venetoclax treatment.

Introduction: Treatment options for multiple myeloma (MM) are evolving rapidly with recent introduction of BCMA-targeting CAR-T (Ide-cel, Cilta-cel) and bispecific antibody (Bi-Ab; Teclistamab) alternatives. These are complex, logistically demanding therapies, and patient awareness/knowledge can affect treatment decisions. There are traditionally underserved patients in MM, and awareness among them must be investigated to uncover disparities which may impact their access to and choice of novel therapies, contributing to disparate outcome. Methods: The study involved an anonymous 25-question online English language survey covering basic demographics, understanding of available T-cell directed MM treatments (CAR-T, Bi-Ab), and preferences for these agents. MM patients within the Mayo Clinic database and members of International Myeloma Foundation's MM support groups were sent a link to the voluntary survey. The survey was active from March 30 until July 12, 2023. Descriptive statistics were calculated with R language (Bluesky Statistics, V7.40), and categorical variables among outcome demographic groups were compared using Pearson Chi-square test (p-value ≤0.05 considered statistically significant). Multiple model logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis amongst statistically significant outcomes. Results: The survey had 2370 respondents with median age 68 years (range: 30-95) and median age at MM diagnosis 62 years (range: 18-88). Time since diagnosis was <5 years in 59.5%. Majority of the respondents (89.4%) were non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Maximum education categories were high school (10.9%), some college but no degree (18.1%), associate/bachelor (39.7%), and master's/professional (32.3%). Geography and type of residence were reported as: West (24%), Midwest (46.2%), Northeast (3.3%), South (24.8%), outside U.S. (1.7%), and rural (26.7%), urban (21.4%), suburban (51.9%). The goals of MM treatment in order of reported importance were complete remission (66.1%), longer survival (55.3%) and low symptom burden (43.3%). Only 6.5% and 2.6% of respondents had received CAR-T and Bi-Ab, respectively, while 27.9% and 70.5% had never heard of CAR-T and Bi-Ab, respectively. A high proportion of respondents did not understand the risks/benefits of CAR-T (65.5%) or Bi-Ab (90.7%). Given a preference among CAR-T products, 5.4% would prefer Cilta-cel, 1.9% Ide-cel and 92.7% were not sure/no preference. Amongst only those who reported understanding the risks/benefits of CAR-T, the majority (73%) said they would prefer Cilta-cel. The majority (87.5%) were not sure of any differences between the two CAR-T products while some reported different targets (6.3%), response rate (5.9%), response duration (6.2%), side effects (4.9%), and manufacturing time (2.7%). The biggest concern for both CAR-T and Bi-Ab was side effects. Majority (89.4%) were not sure that Teclistamab Bi-Ab targeted BCMA, and nearly 70% felt that CAR-T was superior to Bi-Ab for treating MM. Reported sources of knowledge about MM treatment were healthcare team (82.6%), online resources (43.6%) and other patients/support groups (37.9%). Several demographic characteristics that significantly affected patient's responses to different questions in the survey. Selected questions and respondent categories with statistically significant results in multivariate analysis are shown in Table 1. Generally, higher education, living in northeast U.S., urban or suburban residency, and >5 years since MM diagnosis were associated with better awareness/understanding of CAR-T and Bi-Ab. Respondents with >70-year age were less likely to be aware of these agents or understand their risks/benefits. Race-ethnicity had no statistically significant associations in this cohort of predominantly NHW. Conclusions: This large cross-sectional study identifies lack of adequate awareness regarding CAR-T and Bi-Ab and provides a glimpse of current understanding of these complex therapies. There are disparate groups including rural, less educated, elderly and those with recent diagnosis of MM who have significantly lesser awareness. Some better-informed respondents had preferences among these treatments. Targeted awareness campaigns should be developed so that knowledge gaps can be bridged and patients across all sociodemographic groups are better equipped to take informed decisions about MM treatment.

Background Teclistamab, the first-in-class B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific therapy was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) after ≥ 4 prior lines of therapy. Because of the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), the step-up dosing (SUD) of teclistamab is commonly administered in an inpatient setting among early users. Mayo Clinic has a well-established hospital-based outpatient program for novel immunotherapies. Since the FDA approval, teclistamab SUD has been administered as part of this program. Each dose of the SUD is administered in an outpatient setting, and the patient is given a remote monitoring kit to regularly measure vital signs and stay connected with the command center for signs and symptoms of CRS and ICANS throughout the entire SUD period. This study aimed to evaluate early safety outcomes and healthcare resource utilization during SUD in real-world (RW) patients who initiated teclistamab under the outpatient administration model across 3 Mayo Clinic locations (Rochester, MN, Phoenix/Scottsdale, AZ, Jacksonville, FL). Methods This was a retrospective study using Mayo Clinic's electronic medical records from October 26, 2022 to June 12, 2023. Eligible patients were adults diagnosed with MM who had initiated commercial teclistamab at any of the 3 Mayo Clinic locations. Patient characteristics, rates and severity of CRS and ICANS, as well as healthcare resource utilization during SUD were described. Time between teclistamab administration and patient check-out was reported for SUD and treatment doses, respectively. Results At the time of data cutoff, 39 patients received at least 1 teclistamab dose across the 3 locations (median age 67.2 years; male: 74%; White: 87%; non-Hispanic: 92%), including 36 patients who initiated teclistamab SUD directly in an outpatient setting. A total of 8 (21%) patients had MM with high-risk cytogenetics and 14 (36%) had prior exposure to other BCMA-targeted therapies. Prevalent comorbidities prior to receiving teclistamab included anemia (77%), hypertension (56%), lytic bone lesions (51%), neutropenia (49%), and hypogammaglobulinemia (41%). Renal impairment or failure was observed in 31% of the patients (Table 1). Almost all patients received acetaminophen (95%), diphenhydramine (95%), and dexamethasone (92%) as pre-medications on the same day as teclistamab administrations during SUD. Of the teclistamab doses with clinic time data, the majority (62%) of doses during SUD required 30 minutes to 1 hour of clinic time for monitoring between administration and check-out. After SUD, the clinic time for weekly treatment doses decreased to less than 30 minutes for most (79%) doses (Figure 1). In patients who completed SUD by data cutoff (n = 37), most patients (70%) received the SUD on a 3-day dose interval (i.e., day 1, 4, 7). The mean time between the first and third doses was 6.3 days. Among the 37 patients with complete SUD, 12 (32%) developed CRS. The highest CRS grade was grade 1 for 10 patients; 1 patient had a grade 2 CRS, and 1 patient had a grade 4 CRS. The patient with grade 4 CRS concurrently decompensated during a dialysis session and all symptoms were considered for CRS grading. A total of 6 patients had recurrent CRS, including 1 patient with 3 events during SUD. All patients who developed CRS during SUD (n=12) were admitted to the hospital for treatment, with a total of 19 admissions across all patients and a median length of stay of 1.7 days per admission. Among patients who were admitted for CRS (n=12), the majority were treated with acetaminophen (92%), diphenhydramine (83%) and dexamethasone (83%); tocilizumab was given to the 2 patients with CRS grade 2 or higher. Only 1 ICANS event (grade 2) was observed in 1 patient during SUD, after dose 3, and the patient was admitted to the hospital for treatment. Conclusion This study evaluated early RW safety outcomes of teclistamab under an outpatient administration model and found the CRS rate and severity to be comparable with other RW evidence generated from various data sources. Outcomes related to teclistamab SUD from Mayo Clinic supported the safety and feasibility of outpatient administration model as a potential option to reduce healthcare resource utilization and improve treatment experiences.

Background: Cytopenias are a common complication of and prolonged (beyond month 3 post CAR-T infusion), severe (grade 3 or higher) cytopenias can be difficult to manage. Stem cell boosts have been reported to restore hematopoiesis; however, stem cells would need to be available prior to CAR-T therapy for potential use post CAR-T. Most lymphoma patients and limited number of myeloma patients may have pre-collected stem cells in storage. Identifying patients at high risk for prolonged and severe cytopenia post CAR-T at the time of CAR-T evaluation (baseline), before leukapheresis, can help identify the patients for coordination of stem cell collection during CAR-T manufacturing and increase the likelihood that the collected stem cells would be used. In this study, we aim to identify clinical variables at the time of CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis, that are associated with severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T infusion and identify patients who could be considered for pre-emptive stem cell collection prior to CAR-T therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who received CAR-T products at Mayo Clinic from 01/2016 to 06/2022. Patients with progressive disease in the first year post CAR-T were excluded from the analysis. Baseline (at CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis) variables were compared between those with and without severe cytopenia at month 3 post CAR-T. Severe cytopenias were defined as hemoglobin (Hg) < 8 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.5 x 10 9/L, and/or platelet count (PLT) < 50 x 10 9/L. Statistically significant variables (p<0.05) by analysis were examined for statistical significance in multivariate analysis (MVA). Results: Among the 166 patients who received CAR-T (88 NHL, 78 MM) during the study period, 31 (18.67%) had a severe cytopenia at month . Twenty baseline variables were examined; HGB, PLT, ANC, and c-reactive protein (CRP) We devised a cytopenia risk score using 1 point each for Hg<10 or PLT<100k at baseline, with a range of 0 to 2. Demographics and clinical outcome by cytopenia risk score is shown in Table 1B. A higher percentage of patients with a score of 1 or 2 had a severe cytopenia at month 3 (Figure 1). In particular, there was a . In addition Conclusion: Baseline cytopenias before leukapheresis may identify patients with increased risk for severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T. These patients can have continued slow hematopoietic recovery in the first year. Stem cell collection, if feasible, could be considered before CAR-T to alleviate post-CAR-T severe prolonged cytopenias.

Introduction: BTK inhibitors (BTKis) are approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Disease that progresses on BTKis often has BTK mutations that lead to treatment (tx) resistance; novel BTK-targeting agents that overcome BTKi resistance are needed. BGB-16673 is a heterobifunctional small molecule that binds to BTK and E3 ligase, resulting in BTK degradation via ubiquitination. In preclinical models, BGB-16673 degraded wild-type (WT) BTK and known covalent and noncovalent BTKi-resistant mutant proteins, leading to tumor suppression. Methods: Pts with R/R CLL, WM, MCL, MZL, non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), or Richter transformation (RT) were eligible for this open-label, first-in-human, phase 1 trial (BGB-16673-101; NCT05006716). Pts must have received ≥2 prior therapies (≥1 for RT) and have an ECOG performance status of 0-2 and adequate end-organ function. In the US and Australia, pts must have received a covalent BTKi (cBTKi) if approved for their disease. BGB-16673 was dosed daily by mouth in 28-day cycles. Escalation using a Bayesian optimal interval design with 6 dose levels (50-600 mg once daily) is planned. Primary objectives are to assess safety/tolerability and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose. Key secondary objectives are to assess pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary antitumor activity. Safety was assessed according to CTCAE v5.0 (all pts) and iwCLL hematologic toxicity criteria (pts with CLL). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first 4 weeks. Response was assessed per Lugano criteria for all except CLL (iwCLL 2018 criteria) and WM (iwWM-6 criteria). Results: As of May 26, 2023, 26 pts (10 CLL, 4 MCL, 2 MZL, 4 WM, 4 FL, 1 DLBCL, 1 RT) were enrolled at 5 dose levels (50 mg, 4; 100 mg, 9; 200 mg, 9; 350 mg, 3; 500 mg, 1). Median age was 70.5 y (range, 25-83). Median number of prior therapies was 3.5 (range, 2-9), including cBTKis (n=21; 10 CLL, 4 WM, 4 MCL, 1 MZL, 1 RT, 1 DLBCL), BCL2 inhibitors (n=12; 9 CLL, 2 WM, 1 RT), and noncovalent BTKis (ncBTKis; n=4; 2 CLL, 1 WM, 1 FL). In CLL, del17p/ TP53 mutation (n=8) and unmutated IGHV (n=7) were frequent. Median follow-up was 3.5 mo (range, 0.2-13.9). MTD was not reached. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported by 88.5% of pts (grade [gr] ≥3, 46.2%; serious, 38.5%). The most common TEAEs were contusion (30.8%; no gr ≥3), pyrexia (23.1%; no gr ≥3), neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (23.1%; gr ≥3, 15.4%), and lipase increased (23.1%; gr ≥3, 3.8%; all transient and asymptomatic). No hypertension or atrial fibrillation was observed. One pt died from sepsis with possible disease progression. No discontinuations due to AEs occurred. Two pts had dose reductions due to TEAEs (gr 3 hematuria with urinary tract infection and recurrent urothelial carcinoma and gr 2 arthralgia). One DLT occurred in 1 pt at 200 mg (gr 3 maculopapular rash on day 27; after 5-day dose hold, assigned dose was recommenced with persistent gr 1 rash). BGB-16673 exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner. At steady state with doses ≥50 mg daily, BGB-16673 exposure exceeded the calculated half maximal degradation concentration for WT and cysteine 481-mutated BTK for the dosing interval. Preliminary PD data showed deep, sustained reductions in BTK protein levels in peripheral blood and tumor tissue, even at the lowest dose. Most CLL pts experienced lymphocytosis during the first 3 cycles of tx. Twenty of 26 pts (77%) remain on therapy (discontinuation: 4 progressive disease, 2 withdrawal). Of 18 response-evaluable pts, 12 (67%) responded (5/6 CLL, 1/3 MCL, 2/2 MZL, 3/4 WM, 1/2 FL, 0/1 DLBCL; 1 CR in MCL, all others had PR; Figure), including pts who received a cBTKi (n=10) and an ncBTKi (n=2). Responses started at the lowest dose level. All responders remain in response, the longest responder remaining on tx for 60 weeks. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this ongoing, first-in-human study of the novel BTK degrader BGB-16673 demonstrate a tolerable safety profile and clinical responses in heavily pretreated pts with B-cell malignancies, including those with BTKi-resistant disease. Substantial reductions in BTK protein levels in peripheral blood and tumor tissue were also observed, demonstrating proof-of-concept of a strong, on-target effect.

INTRODUCTION Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and SLL represent a single entity in current classifications per the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC. Both are characterized by malignant B cells with an identical immunophenotype, but they are distinguished by the predominant site of disease burden, such as peripheral blood for CLL and nodal compartments for SLL. Most clinical trials and retrospective studies involving CLL/SLL do not separate out SLL patients. In this study, we report reasons for treatment initiation and outcomes in a cohort of SLL patients seen at our institution. METHODS Using the Mayo Clinic CLL Database, we retrospectively identified patients with SLL who received first line therapy between 12/1995 and 2/2023. Patients were classified as having SLL if they met at least one of the following criteria for diagnosis: 1) presence of lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly (either by exam or scans) and an absolute clonal B cell count of < 5 x 109/L; or 2) presence of lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly (either by exam or scans) and an absolute lymphocyte count of < 11 x 109/L (if absolute clonal B cell count was not available). Although the presence of anemia (hemoglobin < 11 g/dL) and thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 x 109/L) are considered as exclusion criteria for a diagnosis of SLL, patients were included if these cytopenia were due to autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) or immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) with < 50% bone marrow involvement by SLL (bone marrow biopsy confirmed). Patients treated for SLL with extranodal involvement were also included. Indications for SLL treatment were abstracted by chart review and included one of the following: 1) symptomatic or progressive lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly, 2) autoimmune cytopenias, 3) extranodal/direct organ infiltration; and 4) other (e.g., cryoglobulinemia, paraneoplastic, non-infiltrative renal disease such as minimal change disease). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from treatment start until date of death or last known to be alive. Treatment-free survival (TFS) was defined as the time from treatment start until the earliest of date of next treatment, or death. Kaplan-Meier method was used to display OS and TFS. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate associations of factors with time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS We identified 182 patients with SLL who received first line treatment. The median age at treatment start was 66 years, and 132 (73%) were male. Unmutated IGHV was identified in 60/82 (73%) patients and peripheral blood fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assessed pre-treatment start showed del13q in 10%, trisomy 12 in 43%, del11q in 7%, del17p in 8%, and no abnormalities in 33%. TP53 disruption (del17p and/or TP53 mutation) was present in 7/89 (8%) patients prior to first therapy. The median follow-up after diagnosis was 6.9 years. The indications for treatment were grouped as follows: symptomatic or progressive lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly (n=130), extranodal/direct organ infiltration (n=30), AIHA/ITP (n=10), and other (n=12). For the entire cohort, the median TFS was 2.9 years and the median OS was 12.3 years. The median TFS by the treatment indication groups were 3.3, 5.1, 1.6, and 5.3 years, respectively (Figure 1). The median OS by treatment indication groups were 11.1, 10.5, 8.8, and 19.9 years, respectively. Among the 160 patients with symptomatic or progressive lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly or extranodal disease, the treatments administered include: mAb alone (n=35), chemotherapy alone (n=33), chemoimmunotherapy (n=57), targeted agent (n=33; Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor [BTKi] based n=28; venetoclax-based n=3, BTKi + venetoclax n=2), and other (n=2). The median TFS by treatment groups were 2.4, 2.0, 3.8, and 6.0 years (Figure 2), respectively (excluding the small “other” subgroup of 2 patients). The median OS for these groups were 9.5, 9.7, 15.0, and not evaluable, respectively. Only older age at treatment start predicted for shorter TFS (HR 1.02; 95%CI 1.002-1.038; p=0.03) and shorter OS (HR 1.05; 95%CI 1.03-1.07; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In this study of patients with SLL who received therapy, the most frequent indications for treatment included symptomatic lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly, followed by extranodal disease. Trisomy 12 was the most frequently detected abnormality on peripheral blood FISH testing. Treatment with novel agents achieved durable TFS and OS.

Introduction: Teclistamab (TEC) is a bispecific BCMA-CD3 directed T-cell antibody (BsAb), recently approved by EMA and FDA. Approval was based on the MajesTEC-1 study showing high overall response rates (≥PR in 63.0%) in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM). Few reports have described Real-World experience despite that TEC can induce unique side effects including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity (ICANS) and a high incidence of infection (MajesTEC-1: incidence 76.4%; ≥Gr3: 44.8%). Thus, we performed a Real-World analysis of TEC therapy from 7 International Myeloma Foundation (IMF) associated MM academic centers. Methods: Patients treated with standard-of-care TEC were included. Data was collected until 7/28/2023. Results: 103 pts were included; median age 63 (range 33-91y); 15 pts. (14.5%) >75 yrs; 56.5% were male, 71.8% Caucasian, 11.6% Hispanic, and 12.6% Asian. Pts received a median of 6 PLT (range 1-16); 75% were triple-class-refractory (n=41/52 (79%), 30/85 (35%) had high-risk cytogenetics/FISH and 32/80 (40%) had 1q21 gain. At least 57/76 (75%) of pts would not have been eligible for MajesTEC-1 (mostly from prior BCMA (n=28 CAR-T, n=14 ADC; n=3 BsAb; n=5 CAR-T+ADC). 14 pts had CrCl <30ml/min with 2 on HD. Median number of hospital days was 8 (n= 72) but 31 patients were treated entirely as outpatients (Mayo clinic (MN, AZ, FL)). CRS was seen in 52 (50.4%) (all grade 1: except 6 Gr2, 1 Gr4), generally resolved within 24 hrs and was managed with tocilizumab alone (n= 27) or dex alone (n=9) or dex+toci (n=12). CRS was more common with inpatient (56.9%) vs outpatient (35.4%) TEC Rx. CrCl <30 ml, did not appear to alter the incidence or severity of CRS (50%; 1 Gr4). ICANS was infrequent (n=5; 4.85%), 1 pt with Gr 4-Sz requiring HD-steroids and TEC discontinuation). Infections were common, seen in 54 (52.4%) of patients, the majority were viral URI or CMV reactivation (n=26; 3 pts receiving CMV Rx, 1 pt with CMV organ disease). IVIG was given in 43/67 (64%) pts. The overall response rate for evaluable patients (n=82) was 63%; (sCR/CR 14; VGPR 23; PR 15; MR 2, SD 14; PD 14). In evaluable pts treated with prior BCMA (n=43), the ORR was 53% (sCR/CR 4; VGPR 14; PR 5; 1 MR; SD 10; PD 9). The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was PD (26.2%). 14 pts have died by the time of data cut-off (7/28/23), with the most common cause of death being disease progression. Conclusions: In this Real-World evaluation of TEC, a high ORR was seen, similar to the MajesTEC-1 study. Responses were rapid and are expected to deepen over time (median f/u 5m). CRS rates were similar to MajesTEC-1 and no new toxicity signal was noted. The rates of infection appear low but may be related to short follow-up. Details regarding the incidence and types of infection and the global use of IVIG will be described. With longer follow-up, additional efficacy/toxicity data will be presented.

While acknowledging that newer therapies have improved survival rates in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), patients with high-risk disease features are at an increased risk of treatment failure. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was traditionally offered as front-line consolidation in high-risk CLL; however, with the emergence of targeted therapies like Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors, the role of allo-HCT has been relegated to later stages of the disease. Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL who have failed both BTK and BCL-2 inhibitors represent a therapeutic challenge owing to a poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies targeting CD19 have improved response rates and overall survival in various types of R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. For CLL, no approved CAR T-cell therapies are yet available. Emerging data appear to show a therapeutic benefit of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with R/R CLL, even after failing an allo-HCT.

While immunotherapies, such as CAR T therapy and bi-specific antibodies, have revolutionized the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), patients with AL amyloidosis have been excluded from trials with these agents due to concerns of underlying autonomic, cardiac, and renal dysfunction, leading to potentially fatal toxicities from these therapies. In this communication, we described the outcomes of two patients with AL amyloidosis and concurrent MM with underlying cardiac and/or renal dysfunction who underwent anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy with ide-cel or cilta-cel, received cytokine release syndrome prophylaxis, and tolerated therapy well with manageable toxicities and achieved a MRD-negative state. We described the preliminary efficacy and safety of CAR T in patients with AL amyloidosis and highlighted the importance of patient selection and medical optimization of cardiac and renal function prior to CAR T.

AbstractIntroductionHealth information technology (HIT) has the potential to improve healthcare delivery and engagement. Studying racial‐ethnic disparities in HIT engagement will help understand and overcome challenges to healthcare utilization.MethodsWe undertook a patient‐reported survey among patients with lymphoid malignancies at two campuses of Mayo Clinic, Florida to explore HIT‐related disparities. Variables between Whites and non‐Whites, and non‐Whites from the two campuses were compared.ResultsThe survey was completed by 1004 respondents, with 71% whites, 27% non‐Whites (race‐ethnicity not reported by 2%). Non‐Whites included 30% responders at the main campus and 64% at an inner‐city campus. Whites were significantly older and had higher education, while non‐Whites had lesser access to a computer. Only 51% of non‐Whites were registered to use electronic medical records (EMR) as compared to 72% Whites (p < 0.001) and significantly lesser number of non‐Whites even knew that EMR existed (81% vs. 92%, p < 0.001). Encouragingly, a higher number of non‐Whites wanted to engage in EMR. Non‐Whites from the main campus were older, more educated and had more access to a computer as compared to those from the inner‐city campus. Similar disparate factors were noted among minorities from the two campuses, suggesting impact of socioeconomic backgrounds on EMR usage among non‐Whites. Linguistic barriers were more striking among inner‐city campus non‐Whites.ConclusionsNon‐Whites continue to struggle with suboptimal utilization of the healthcare system and barriers related to integration in HIT, including disparities representing socioeconomic differences. Efforts need to be made at several levels to help racial‐ethnic minorities overcome awareness, access, and linguistic barriers to HIT utilization.