Back to Authors

Hagedorn, Jonathan M

0000-0003-1039-8166

Mayo Clinic

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 35

Teaching Points: Overview of Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Migration

Pain Medicine | August 28, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 520-522

10.1093/pm/pnaa328 | PMID 33155048

Overview of HF10 Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain and an Introduction to the Senza Omnia™ System

Pain Management | August 18, 2020 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 367-376

10.2217/pmt-2020-0047 | PMID 32808874

Effect of Patient Characteristics on Reported Outcomes Over 12 Months Following Lumbar Radiofrequency Ablation: A Retrospective Review of 500 Patients

Pain Practice | July 12, 2020 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 152-159

10.1111/papr.12938 | PMID 32654319

AbstractBackgroundLow back pain is the leading cause of years lost to disability worldwide. Approximately 15% to 45% of chronic low back pain is due to facet joint arthropathy. Currently, no large‐scale retrospective studies have investigated long‐term clinical predictors of success in individuals receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the medial branches for facet joint arthropathy.ObjectiveTo determine the clinical factors associated with success and failure of RFA of lumbar facet joints at 1‐year follow‐up.MethodsClinical data were gathered from 500 consecutive patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)‐10 diagnosis of lumbar spondylosis. VAS pain scores for patients undergoing lumbar medial branch RFA procedures were recorded at multiple time points, up to the 1‐year follow‐up visit. A responder was defined as having ≥30% improvement in VAS score from the pre‐procedural VAS score. For our primary analysis, regression analysis was conducted to identify associations between responder status and patient characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hormone use, opiate dose, and smoking history at multiple time points, up to the 1‐year follow‐up visit.ResultsA total of 500 patients were included in the study. At the 1‐year post‐RFA follow‐up visit, responder status was associated with a lower rate of prior opioid use (43.22% vs. 55.76%, odds ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.92], P = 0.018), lower pre‐procedural opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (10.16 ± 16.02 vs. 14.67 ± 20.65, β −4.50 [95% CI −8.57 to −0.44], P = 0.030), and a higher pre‐VAS pain score (6.36 ± 2.17 vs. 5.85 ± 2.17, β 0.50 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.95], P = 0.028). There were no significant associations between responder status and age, gender, BMI, hormone use, and smoking history at the 1‐year follow‐up visit.ConclusionsOur results suggest that patients prescribed opioids, particularly at higher dosages, may find less pain relief 1 year following RFA for facetogenic pain. Additionally, patients with higher pre‐procedural VAS pain scores may be more likely to have a positive response at 1 year.
Anticoagulation Use During Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial

Pain Medicine | June 18, 2020 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2595-2598

10.1093/pm/pnaa244 | PMID 32797241

Beyond Revision Surgery: Work‐Up and Interventional Treatments for the Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty

Pain Practice | June 9, 2020 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 929-936

10.1111/papr.12924 | PMID 32515912

AbstractTotal knee arthroplasty is a common and successful treatment modality for knee arthritis that is refractory to conservative management strategies. Over 600,000 arthroplasties are performed per year in the United States, and this number is expected to increase in the coming years. Unfortunately, 8% to 34% of patients experience chronic pain after having a total knee arthroplasty. These patients should undergo an appropriate work‐up by the orthopedic surgeon, but many times a surgical problem is not uncovered. In these situations, a thorough and specific plan for pain management should be sought. In this article, we outline the work‐up of a painful total knee arthroplasty. Then we provide a thorough review of interventional pain management strategies and highlight the pertinent literature. Lastly, we hypothesize future developments in the field that may provide better outcomes for patients suffering from painful total knee arthroplasty.
Impact of COVID-19 on Pain Medicine Fellowship Training

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | May 23, 2020 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 188.2-189

10.1136/rapm-2020-101534 | PMID 32345656

Device profile of the Proclaim XR neurostimulation system for the treatment of chronic pain: an overview of its safety and efficacy

Expert Review of Medical Devices | May 21, 2020 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 499-505

10.1080/17434440.2020.1773258 | PMID 32437633

A New Horizon in Neuromodulation

Pain Medicine | May 19, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1012-1014

10.1093/pm/pnaa197 | PMID 32594131

Proclaim™ DRG Neurostimulator System for the Management of Chronic, Intractable Pain

Pain Management | May 19, 2020 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 225-233

10.2217/pmt-2020-0010 | PMID 32423306

Diversity and inclusion in pain medicine

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | January 22, 2020 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 839-839

10.1136/rapm-2020-101284 | PMID 31969441