Schinstock, Carrie

ABSTRACT Background Abdominal arterial calcification (AAC) is a common comorbidity in patients with end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) and a predictor of cardiovascular events post‐kidney transplant. However, prior studies lacked a standardized approach to evaluate AAC and its impact on post‐transplant outcomes. This study aimed to correlate AAC score values with post‐kidney transplant outcomes using a modified scoring system traditionally applied to coronary artery calcification. Methods This retrospective study included 14 339 adult patients listed for kidney transplant between 2002 and 2023 at three transplant centers. Among them, 3683 patients met the criteria of undergoing a kidney transplant and an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan pre‐transplant. We modified the coronary calcium score software by adjusting intake data points to quantify calcification in the abdominal aorta, common iliac, external iliac, and internal iliac arteries. Outcomes focused on post‐transplant mortality. Results In 3683 kidney transplant recipients, higher AAC scores were significantly associated with increased mortality. Each 1000‐unit increase in AAC score elevated hazard ratios (HRs) across arterial regions, including 1.116 for the aorta and 1.389 for the internal iliac (all p < 0.001). Adjusted analyses confirmed AAC as an independent risk factor for mortality. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated lower survival with increasing AAC quartiles. Conclusions AAC, measured by a standardized score, is a significant mortality risk factor in kidney transplant recipients. Integrating AAC scores into pre‐transplant evaluations could enhance risk stratification and improve outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and explore interventions to reduce AAC and improve survival.

ABSTRACT Background Ureteral stents are commonly placed during kidney transplantation (KT) to mitigate urologic complications. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in KT recipients with either early stent removal when attached to the Foley catheter or late removal via cystoscopy when unattached. Methods We conducted a multi‐center retrospective analysis of consecutive living donor KT patients (8/18/21‐4/21/23) stratified into Foley‐attached and unattached stent groups. Outcomes assessed were ureteral stricture, urine leaks, UTIs at 90 days and allograft failure and BKV DNAemia (BK virus DNAemia) at 1 year. Data are reported as mean and standard deviation. Results Among 247 patients with attached and 260 with unattached stents, baseline demographics (age, sex, diabetes) were similar between groups. There was a difference in race (87.9% vs. 77.8% Caucasian; p = 0.004). Foley catheters remained longer in the attached group (3.7 ± 1.8 vs. 3.0 ± 2.0 days; p < 0.001), but stents were removed earlier (3.7 ± 1.8 vs. 21.9 ± 4.7 days; p < 0.001). Comparing attached versus unattached, there were no differences in ureteral stricture (0.4% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.197), urine leak (0.8% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.533), BKV DNAemia (17.7% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.616), or allograft failure (0% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.167). However, UTI incidence by 90 days was lower in the attached group (5.7% vs. 11.9% p = 0.013). Induction therapy differed significantly between groups, with Alemtuzumab more common in the unattached group (58.1% vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001), Basiliximab more common in the attached group (43.3% vs. 35.0%, p < 0.001), and Thymoglobulin more common in the attached group (36.0% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001). Baseline steroid use was higher in the unattached group (81.9% vs. 57.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusion Early stent removal via connection to the Foley catheter had similarly low rates of ureteral complications while reducing urinary tract infections and avoiding cystoscopic removal.

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe diagnosis of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) requires input from several transplant professionals. Bringing clinical and laboratory experts together may help standardize care. Yet, little is known about current global practices of multidisciplinary meetings for AMR management.MethodsThe Banff Antibody‐Mediated Injury Working Group approached professional societies worldwide to distribute a survey on the availability, content, participants, perceived value, and barriers to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings.ResultsFour hundred two transplant professionals from six continents caring for kidney (90.55%), liver (21.14%), pancreas (20.65%), heart (15.17%), and lung (14.18%) transplant recipients participated in the survey, and 302 (75.12%) reported attending multidisciplinary meetings. Multidisciplinary meetings were more prevalent in academic centers, in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (81.03% and 65.99%, respectively; p < 0.001), and in mid‐to‐large size transplant programs compared to smaller programs. Perceived value included continued professional development (97.68%) and trainee education (95.70%). AMR was reported to be discussed at these meetings by 217 respondents with case presentations reviewing patient characteristics, histology, and HLA antibody data. A third of the respondents reviewed non‐HLA/pathogenic autoantibodies and/or molecular diagnostics, with the latter being more frequently applied in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (46.71% and 12.31%, respectively; p < 0.001). AMR case presentations allowed diagnosis revision, actionable management plans and were perceived as improving care. The primary barrier to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings (63.27%) was the unavailability of transplant professionals (e.g., transplant immunologists).ConclusionFacilitating multidisciplinary meetings through the remote participation of pertinent experts and incentivizing participation through remuneration, protected time, or continued medical education may help standardize AMR diagnosis and harmonize its management.

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe incidence of mortality late in the pandemic, particularly after widespread vaccine availability, is not well understood. Herein, we elucidate the effect of this impact of the COVID pandemic as well as risk factors for mortality during it.MethodsThe primary end point was death with a functioning graft with secondary endpoints of mortality rates in subgroups and at different time intervals during the pandemic.ResultsDespite widespread vaccination, mortality rates for kidney transplant (KTx) recipients almost doubled during the COVID‐19 era (6.40 deaths per 100 person years vs. 3.54 pre‐COVID). Mortality increased in all racial/ethnic groups but increased more in Native Americans, Hispanics, and African Americans compared to non‐Hispanic Caucasians. The highest mortality rate occurred during the Delta and Omicron time frames. In contrast to the general population, mortality was more evenly spread across age groups in KTx recipients.ConclusionsMortality rates during the COVID‐19 era were extremely high, more than doubling in some racial/ethnic groups. We conclude that the KTx population was a particularly vulnerable group during the COVID‐19 era and suggests the need for further research into the management of variants in the future.

ABSTRACTCellular senescence is a biological mechanism of aging and age‐related diseases. The aim of this study was to examine whether senescence biomarkers are associated with frailty and physical function trajectories in patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT). We also discussed the relationship between senescence biomarkers and KT function. In this multicenter study, we prospectively assessed plasma levels of senescence biomarkers, frailty as measured by the Physical Frailty Phenotype, and physical function as measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery prior to KT. Frailty, physical function, and KT function were also measured 1 year after KT. Variable associations were assessed using Cox and relaxed least absolute shrinkage and selection operation regression. The cohort consisted of 197 participants (mean age 53 ± 13 years, 61.4% male, and 80.2% White race). Higher pre‐KT levels of macrophage‐derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22) and growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15) were independently associated with less improvement in frailty and/or physical function during the first year after KT. Higher pre‐KT levels tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6 (FAS) and MMP‐9 levels were independently associated with lower KT function one year after KT. Pre‐KT cellular senescence may contribute to frailty, physical function, and kidney function trajectories during the first year after KT.

ABSTRACTBackgroundAdenovirus (ADV) infection can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in those with hematopoietic stem cells or solid organ transplants. The incidence of ADV infection in kidney transplant (KT) is not well‐defined as ADV is often asymptomatic and not routinely checked.MethodsThis retrospective case‐series study included KT and simultaneous pancreas‐KT (SPKT) recipients from January 1, 2008, to January 31, 2024, across three Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) with symptomatic adenovirus polymerase chain reaction cases. The primary outcomes were allograft function at various intervals post‐ADV infection, allograft, and patient survival.ResultsWe report one of the largest multi‐site case series regarding outcomes of ADV in KT with 17 patients. The median time to ADV infection was 30 weeks (5–74). Five patients (29%) developed disseminated infection. Nine patients (53%) of the entire cohort experienced graft loss within a median of 35 (4–168) weeks, with four (44%) of graft loss attributed to ADV. Nine patients (53%) developed rejections post‐ADV infection with a median of 4 (2–8) weeks after resolution. One patient died from acute hypoxic respiratory failure from ADV infection.ConclusionADV should be considered in KT/SPKT patients with renal dysfunction, hematuria, and with or without fever. Despite the low mortality rate, there is a significant risk of graft loss and rejection after ADV infection. It is crucial to screen for ADV and develop intervention strategies for treatment. Further multicenter studies are needed to better define, stage, and manage ADV infection. image

ABSTRACTPerformance‐based measures of frailty are associated with healthcare utilization after kidney transplantation (KT) but require in‐person assessment. A promising alternative is self‐reported frailty. The goal of this study was to examine the ability of performance‐based and self‐reported frailty measures to predict 30‐day rehospitalizations after KT. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study involving 272 adults undergoing KT at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Florida, or Arizona. We simultaneously measured frailty before KT using the physical frailty phenotype (PFP), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and self‐report (the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] 4‐item physical function short form v2.0). Both the PFP and self‐reported frailty were independently associated with more than a 2‐fold greater odds of 30‐day rehospitalizations, while the SPPB was not. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prognostic value of all three of the above frailty measures in patients undergoing KT. The PFP is more prognostic than the SPPB when assessing the risk of 30‐day rehospitalizations; self‐reported frailty can complement the PFP but not replace it. However, the 4‐item survey assessing self‐reported frailty represents a simple way to identify patients undergoing KT surgery who would benefit from interventions to lower the risk of rehospitalizations.

AbstractLarge multicenter, randomized controlled trials are the paradigm for determining the efficacy and safety of new therapies. However, applying this classical approach to many areas of transplantation is difficult. For most types of organ transplants, the number of transplants performed is too small for such a trial (lung, pancreas, or vascular composite transplantation are examples). In larger populations such as kidney transplantation, the major unmet needs commonly involve small subsets of patients (antibody‐mediated rejection, recurrent renal disease, etc). This issue is not unique to transplantation and has been successfully overcome in other areas of medicine. In oncology, for example, novel trial designs such as adaptive trial design and master protocols are now relatively common. In addition, the existence of multicenter, ongoing clinical research consortia have greatly enhanced the successful implementation of these novel trial designs. In this manuscript, we examine how novel trial designs, master protocols, and research consortia might enhance studies in transplantation aimed at the regulatory approval of new agents. Our premise is that more efficient approaches to clinical trials already exist and, through a coordinated effort by researchers, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory bodies like the FDA, they can be implemented in transplantation.

AbstractKidney paired donation (KPD) and the new kidney allocation system (KAS) in the United States have led to improved transplantation rates for highly sensitized candidates. We aimed to assess the potential need for other approaches to improve the transplantation rate of highly sensitized candidates such as desensitization. Using the UNOS STAR file, we analyzed transplant rates in a prevalent active waiting‐list cohort as of June 1, 2016, followed for 1 year. The overall transplantation rate was 18.9% (11 129/58769). However, only 9.7% (213/2204) of candidates with a calculated panel reactive antibody ≥99.9% received a transplant, and highly sensitized candidates were less likely to receive a living donor transplant. Among candidates with a CPRA ≥ 99.5% (ie. 100%), only 2.5% of transplants were from living donors (13 total, 7 from KPD). Nearly 4 years after KAS (6/30/2018), 1791 actively wait‐listed candidates had a CPRA of ≥99.9% and 34.6% (620/1791) of these had ≥5 years of waiting time. Thus, despite KPD and KAS, many sensitized candidates have not been transplanted even with prolonged waiting time. We conclude that candidates with a CPRA ≥ 99.9% and sensitized candidates with an incompatible living donor and prolonged waiting time may benefit from desensitization to improve their ability to receive a transplant.