Nishimura, Rick

Introduction: Isolated functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) in the absence of structural heart disease may develop secondary to elevation in left heart pressures caused by left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (DD), as in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). FTR may also herald the presence of occult DD or indicate greater risk for new-onset DD. However, prevalence and incidence of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in isolated FTR have not been studied. Aims: Investigate the prevalence and incidence of DD across the different severities of FTR of unclear cause. Methods: Adults with normal EF and without structural heart disease undergoing echocardiography at a tertiary medical center with a repeat study ≥6 months from baseline were identified. Severe DD was defined by ≥3/4 abnormal DD parameters (medial e’, medial E/e’, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, left atrial volume index) and moderate DD by ≥2. Results: Among 30,428 patients (median age 60; 50% women), FTR was absent in 73%, mild in 22%, moderate in 4%, and severe in 0.4%. Severe DD was present in 2%, 5%, 11%, and 13% patients, respectively, (p<.001) and moderate DD in 9%, 19%, 31%, and 48%, respectively (p<.001). The association of DD with increasing FTR was independent of all clinical characteristics. Over median 3.0 (IQR 1.5-5.4) years, incident severe and moderate DD developed more frequently with increasing FTR severity ( Figure) . Findings were confirmed in a propensity-matched subset where patients were matched for age, sex, BMI, atrial fibrillation, and comorbidities and in patients without lung disease or ≥moderate right ventricular enlargement. Conclusions: Patients with FTR of undefined etiology commonly have DD suggesting the presence of underlying left heart disease. Patients without apparent DD or HF at baseline who have FTR remain at significantly increased risk of developing DD over follow-up and may be a target population for therapies to prevent progression to clinical HFpEF.

ABSTRACT Aim Left atrial (LA) myopathy is increasingly recognized as an important phenotypic trait in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Right atrial (RA) remodelling and dysfunction also develop in HFpEF, but little data are available regarding the clinical characteristics and pathophysiology among patients with isolated LA, RA, or biatrial myopathy. Methods and results Patients with HFpEF underwent invasive haemodynamic exercise testing, comprehensive imaging including speckle tracking strain echocardiography, and clinical follow-up at Mayo Clinic between 2006 and 2018. LA myopathy was defined as LA volume index &gt;34 ml/m2 and/or LA reservoir strain ≤24% and RA myopathy by RA volume index &gt;39 ml/m2 in men and &gt;33 ml/m2 in women and/or RA reservoir strain ≤19.8%. Of 476 consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF defined by invasive exercise testing with evaluable atrial structure/function, 125 (26%) had no atrial myopathy, 147 (31%) had isolated LA myopathy, 184 (39%) had biatrial myopathy, and 20 (4%) had isolated RA myopathy. Patients with HFpEF and biatrial myopathy had more atrial fibrillation, poorer left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, more severe pulmonary vascular disease, tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular dysfunction, and poorer cardiac output reserve with exercise. There were 94 patients with events over a median follow-up of 2.9 (interquartile range 1.4–4.6) years. Individuals with biatrial myopathy had an 84% higher risk of HF hospitalization or death as compared to those with isolated LA myopathy (hazard ratio 1.84; 95% confidence interval 1.16–2.92, p = 0.01). Conclusions Biatrial myopathy identifies patients with more advanced HFpEF characterized by more severe pulmonary vascular disease, right HF, poorer cardiac reserve, and a greater risk for adverse outcomes. Further study is required to define optimal strategies to treat and prevent biatrial myopathy in HFpEF.

Abstract Aims To study the impact of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. aortic stenosis (AS) lesion severity on left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, left atrial (LA) dysfunction, haemodynamics, and exercise capacity. Methods and results Patients (n = 206) with at least moderate AS (aortic valve area ≤0.85 cm/m2) and discordant symptoms underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography. The population was stratified according to the probability of underlying HFpEF by the heavy, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, elder, filling pressure (H2FPEF) score [0–5 (AS/HFpEF−) vs. 6–9 points (AS/HFpEF+)] and AS severity (Moderate vs. Severe). Mean age was 73 ± 10 years with 40% women. Twenty-eight patients had Severe AS/HFpEF+ (14%), 111 Severe AS/HFpEF− (54%), 13 Moderate AS/HFpEF+ (6%), and 54 Moderate AS/HFpEF− (26%). AS/HFpEF+ vs. AS/HFpEF− patients, irrespective of AS severity, had a lower LV global longitudinal strain, impaired diastolic function, reduced LV compliance, and more pronounced LA dysfunction. The pulmonary arterial pressure–cardiac output slope was significantly higher in AS/HFpEF+ vs. AS/HFpEF− (5.4 ± 3.1 vs. 3.9 ± 2.2 mmHg/L/min, respectively; P = 0.003), mainly driven by impaired cardiac output and chronotropic reserve, with signs of right ventricular pulmonary arterial uncoupling. AS/HFpEF+ vs. AS/HFpEF− was associated with a lower peak aerobic capacity (11.5 ± 3.7 vs. 15.9 ± 5.9 mL/min/kg, respectively; P &lt; 0.0001) but did not differ between Moderate and Severe AS (14.7 ± 5.5 vs. 15.2 ± 5.9 mL/min/kg, respectively; P = 0.6). Conclusion A high H2FPEF score is associated with a reduced exercise capacity and adverse haemodynamics in patients with moderate to severe AS. Both exercise performance and haemodynamics correspond better with intrinsic cardiac dysfunction than AS severity.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors reduce risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the hemodynamic mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unclear. This study sought to determine whether treatment with dapagliflozin affects pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at rest and during exercise in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial testing the effects of 10 mg of dapagliflozin once daily in patients with HFpEF. Patients with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure, ejection fraction ≥50%, and elevated PCWP during exercise were recruited. Cardiac hemodynamics were measured at rest and during exercise using high-fidelity micromanometers at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment. The primary end point was a change from baseline in rest and peak exercise PCWPs that incorporated both measurements, and was compared using a mixed-model likelihood ratio test. Key secondary end points included body weight and directly measured blood and plasma volumes. Expired gas analysis was performed evaluate oxygen transport in tandem with arterial lactate sampling. RESULTS: Among 38 patients completing baseline assessments (median age 68 years; 66% women; 71% obese), 37 completed the trial. Treatment with dapagliflozin resulted in reduction in the primary end point of change in PCWP at rest and during exercise at 24 weeks relative to treatment with placebo (likelihood ratio test for overall changes in PCWP; P <0.001), with lower PCWP at rest (estimated treatment difference [ETD], −3.5 mm Hg [95% CI, −6.6 to −0.4]; P =0.029) and maximal exercise (ETD, −5.7 mm Hg [95% CI, −10.8 to −0.7]; P =0.027). Body weight was reduced with dapagliflozin (ETD, −3.5 kg [95% CI, −5.9 to −1.1]; P =0.006), as was plasma volume (ETD, −285 mL [95% CI, −510 to −60]; P =0.014), but there was no significant effect on red blood cell volume. There were no differences in oxygen consumption at 20-W or peak exercise, but dapagliflozin decreased arterial lactate at 20 W (−0.70 ± 0.77 versus 0.37 ± 1.29 mM; P =0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, treatment with dapagliflozin reduces resting and exercise PCWP, along with the favorable effects on plasma volume and body weight. These findings provide new insight into the hemodynamic mechanisms of benefit with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in HFpEF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04730947.

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an increasingly common clinical syndrome with diagnostic challenges and no effective treatment. The high heterogeneity of HFpEF clinical syndrome demands novel technologies to distinguish from heart failure with reduced ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Currently, invasive hemodynamic exercise testing is performed to evaluate for HFpEF with right heart catheterization. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that a deep learning model can noninvasively detect patients with HFpEF using phonocardiogram (PCG). Methods: Eligible patients undergoing right heart catheterization were recruited after IRB approval. Eko duo stethoscope was used to record simultaneous ECG & PCG at the mitral area on the patients prior to right heart catheterization at baseline. Each recording was 30 seconds in length with a frequency range between 250 - 5000 Hz. R-wave peak detection was performed & beat to beat PCG annotations were performed. The annotated PCG signals were converted into Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) and padded to account for the difference in lengths. Deep Learning model was developed using a Sequential Neural Network with 80% data to train and validate the model and 20% hold out data was used for testing accuracy of the model. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was obtained to estimate area under the curve (AUC) for performance analysis. Results: 42 patients were enrolled with 25 patients diagnosed as HFpEF by right heart catheterization and 17 were reported as controls. 2544 & 1771 individual PCG annotations for HFpEF and controls were used for model training/validation and testing. The model performed reasonably well with accuracy of 0.89, F1 score of 0.88, precision of 0.80 and recall of 0.97 on the test data. ROC was obtained with AUC of 0.94. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the ability of the deep learning model to noninvasively detect HFpEF using PCG. Larger study is needed to validate these findings.

Abstract Aims It is widely held that heart failure (HF) does not cause exertional hypoxaemia, based upon studies in HF with reduced ejection fraction, but this may not apply to patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here, we characterize the prevalence, pathophysiology, and clinical implications of exertional arterial hypoxaemia in HFpEF. Methods and results Patients with HFpEF (n = 539) and no coexisting lung disease underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous blood and expired gas analysis. Exertional hypoxaemia (oxyhaemoglobin saturation &lt;94%) was observed in 136 patients (25%). As compared to those without hypoxaemia (n = 403), patients with hypoxaemia were older and more obese. Patients with HFpEF and hypoxaemia had higher cardiac filling pressures, higher pulmonary vascular pressures, greater alveolar–arterial oxygen difference, increased dead space fraction, and greater physiologic shunt compared to those without hypoxaemia. These differences were replicated in a sensitivity analysis where patients with spirometric abnormalities were excluded. Regression analyses revealed that increases in pulmonary arterial and pulmonary capillary pressures were related to lower arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), especially during exercise. Body mass index (BMI) was not correlated with the arterial PaO2, and hypoxaemia was associated with increased risk for death over 2.8 (interquartile range 0.7–5.5) years of follow-up, even after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI (hazard ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.01–3.96; p = 0.046). Conclusion Between 10% and 25% of patients with HFpEF display arterial desaturation during exercise that is not ascribable to lung disease. Exertional hypoxaemia is associated with more severe haemodynamic abnormalities and increased mortality. Further study is required to better understand the mechanisms and treatment of gas exchange abnormalities in HFpEF.

Abstract Pericardial effusions can result in acute haemodynamic compromise and require rapid intervention. Understanding pericardial restraint is essential to determine the approach to newly identified pericardial effusions in the intensive care unit. As pericardial effusions stretch the pericardium, the pericardial compliance reserve is eventually exhausted, with an exponential rise in compressive pericardial pressure. The severity of pericardial pressure increase depends on both the rapidity and volume of pericardial fluid accumulation. This increase in pericardial pressure is reflected in an increase in measured left- and right-sided ‘filling’ pressures, but paradoxically left ventricular end-diastolic volume (the true left ventricular preload) is decreased. This uncoupling of filling pressures and preload is the hallmark of pericardial restraint. When this occurs acutely from a pericardial effusion, rapid recognition and pericardiocentesis can be lifesaving. In this review, we will discuss the haemodynamics and pathophysiology of acute pericardial effusions, provide a physiological guide to determine the need for pericardiocentesis in acute care, and discuss important caveats to management.