Tack, Jan

INTRODUCTION: Bloating, distention, and gas-related gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are frequently reported by patients across the spectrum of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We aimed to characterize these using latent class modeling in a large multinational survey. METHODS: A nationwide survey of adults in the United States, United Kingdom, and Mexico used quota sampling for demographic balance. It included Rome IV diagnostic questions, Intestinal Gas Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaires for anxiety and depression (PHQ-4) and somatization (PHQ-12), quality of life (PROMIS Global-10), and lifestyle questions. Latent class analysis was performed using “depmix” in RStudio 4.2.3. RESULTS: A total of 3,471 subjects experiencing bloating and/or distention (mean age 43 years, 57% female) were included. Using 42 demographic and pertinent clinical variables, latent class analysis revealed 6 distinct clusters. The first 2 clusters demonstrated limited-to-moderate impairment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with both characterized by some degree of dietary and supplement associations; however, cluster 2 lacked specific triggers observed in other clusters. The subsequent 2 clusters showed favorable HRQoL and mild gas-related symptoms, with only cluster 4 exhibiting distinct dietary triggers. The final 2 clusters, associated with bowel dysfunction, showed a higher prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation and IBS mixed in cluster 5, and IBS with diarrhea in cluster 6. These bowel dysfunction clusters exhibited severe gas symptoms in the preceding 24 hours and greater HRQoL impairment compared with the other 4 clusters. Notably, cluster 5 was linked to dietary triggers, whereas cluster 6 was defined by psychosocial comorbidities. DISCUSSION: Bloating and distention patients are likely driven by variable influences of dietary, psychological, and bowel dysfunction. Further studies are needed to identify mechanisms and titrate treatment suited to specific mechanistic drivers.

ABSTRACTBackgroundData are limited on the natural history and symptom patterns of cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), a disorder of gut–brain interaction characterized by recurrent stereotypical vomiting, retching, and nausea episodes.MethodsA 6‐month, observational, remote study prospectively assessed symptom patterns in adults with CVS using an electronic daily diary. Patients recorded their disease experience, including CVS symptoms and associated severity, in the daily diary. The study defined a CVS episode start as the first day of 5 or more vomiting and/or retching (V + R) events. Episode end was defined as the first day of ≥ 7 (prespecified main analysis) or ≥ 4 (sensitivity analysis) days without any diary V + R events.Key ResultsEighty‐eight of 93 (94.6%) enrolled patients (62 female; mean age, 37.7 years) had daily diary data recorded during the study; 61 (69.3%) patients had at least one episode. In the prespecified main analysis, 191 episodes (median, 0.6 per 30 diary days) were reported (median duration, 3.0 days); 17.8% of the episodes lasted > 10 days. In the sensitivity analysis, 248 episodes (median, 0.7 per 30 diary days) were reported (median duration, 2.0 days). Thirteen of 88 (14.8%) patients with diary data had interepisodic V + R (reported V + R events without meeting the threshold for study‐defined episode). Other CVS‐related (non‐V + R) symptoms (most frequently nausea, abdominal pain, and sweating) were reported more frequently during the episode versus the interepisodic period.Conclusions and InferencesThis prospective longitudinal study shows marked heterogeneity of CVS episodes and highlights the need to better define and characterize episodes in these patients.

AbstractIntroductionThe American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index‐Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI‐DD) is a patient‐reported outcome (PRO) instrument for gastroparesis. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the ANMS GCSI‐DD and determined a meaningful change threshold using the data from a phase 2b trial in adults with moderate‐to‐severe idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis (DG).MethodsThe psychometric properties of ANMS GCSI‐DD were analyzed using other clinician‐ and patient‐reported outcomes from 242 patients during the 12‐week trial. Trial exit interviews were conducted in a cohort of 32 patients to capture their perspectives on meaningful change from the trial.ResultsANMS GCSI‐DD demonstrated good performance: unidimensionality scores exhibited good fit; internal consistency reliability was >0.70; test–retest reliability was above 0.90, and convergent validity showed strong correlations (0.70–0.90) with overall severity rating and moderate correlations (0.30–0.70) with other outcomes. ANMS GCSI‐DD scores discriminated among groups with varying severity of gastroparesis symptoms in known‐groups validity (p < 0.001) and were responsive to symptom improvement. Triangulation of the quantitative anchor‐based estimates of 0.9–1.4 category points as a meaningful change in the ANMS GCSI‐DD composite score, and the qualitative exit interview findings of 0.5–1.5 as meaningful change, supports a one‐point change on a five‐point scale (0–4) as the meaningful change threshold.ConclusionThe ANMS GCSI‐DD is a reliable and valid PRO instrument to employ in clinical development for patients with moderate‐to‐severe idiopathic or DG, and a one‐point score change in the ANMS GCSI‐DD composite score is recommended as a meaningful change threshold of symptom change.

AbstractThe role of long‐term parenteral support in patients with underlying benign conditions who do not have intestinal failure (IF) is contentious, not least since there are clear benefits in utilising the oral or enteral route for nutritional support. Furthermore, the risks of long‐term home parenteral nutrition (HPN) are significant, with significant impacts on morbidity and mortality. There has, however, been a recent upsurge of the use of HPN in patients with conditions such as gastro‐intestinal neuromuscular disorders, opioid bowel dysfunction, disorders of gut–brain interaction and possibly eating disorders, who do not have IF. As a result, the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), the European Society of Neuro‐gastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) and the Rome Foundation for Disorders of Gut Brain Interaction felt that a position statement is required to clarify – and hopefully reduce the potential for harm associated with – the use of long‐term parenteral support in patients without IF. Consensus opinion is that HPN should not be prescribed for patients without IF, where the oral and/or enteral route can be utilised. On the rare occasions that PN commencement is required to treat life‐threatening malnutrition in conditions such as those listed above, it should only be prescribed for a time‐limited period to achieve nutritional safety, while the wider multi‐disciplinary team focus on more appropriate biopsychosocial holistic and rehabilitative approaches to manage the patient's primary underlying condition.

AbstractBackgroundGastrointestinal dysmotility is frequently suspected in patients with gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, and ileus, and in the intensive care unit. Monitoring of gastric motility in clinical practice remains challenging. A novel technology was developed to meet the medical need for a widely available bedside tool to monitor gastric motility continuously. The VIPUN™ Gastric Monitoring System (GMS) comprises a nasogastric feeding tube with intragastric balloon to allow for measuring gastric contractions.AimsTo compare the performance of the VIPUN GMS versus a reference technique (manometry).MethodsIn this validation study in healthy subjects, the investigational catheter and a solid‐state manometry catheter were placed in the stomach concomitantly. Motility was recorded for 2.5 h: 2 h in a fasting state, followed by a 400‐kcal liquid meal, and monitoring of the fed state for the remaining half hour. The performance of both systems was compared by automated recognition and manual identification of the contractile activity. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation).Key ResultsThe analysis set comprised 13 healthy subjects (6 women, age: 27.5 (8.1) years, BMI: 22.2 (2.46) kg/m2). Automatically‐recognized contractility was strongly correlated between the two techniques (endpoint: contraction duration; Spearman ρ = 0.96, p < 0.001). A correlation was also observed between the number of individual contractions identified by expert gastroenterologists on both technologies independently (ρ = 0.71, p = .007) and between the contractions identified by the experts and by the GMS software (ρ = 0.87, p = 0.001). No serious or unanticipated adverse events occurred.Conclusions & InferencesThe observed strong correlations with the gold standard, manometry, validate the performance of the VIPUN GMS as a gastric monitoring system.

AbstractBackgroundProkinetics are a class of pharmacological drugs designed to improve gastrointestinal (GI) motility, either regionally or across the whole gut. Each drug has its merits and drawbacks, and based on current evidence as high‐quality studies are limited, we have no clear recommendation on one class or other. However, there remains a large unmet need for both regionally selective and/or globally acting prokinetic drugs that work primarily intraluminally and are safe and without systemic side effects.PurposeHere, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of six classes of prokinetic drugs, including their pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, safety and tolerability and potential indications.

Objective Braak’s hypothesis states that Parkinson’s disease (PD) originates in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and similar associations have been established for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cerebrovascular diseases (CVD). We aimed to determine the incidence of GI syndromes and interventions preceding PD compared with negative controls (NCs), AD and CVD. Design We performed a combined case-control and cohort study using TriNetX, a US based nationwide medical record network. Firstly, we compared subjects with new onset idiopathic PD with matched NCs and patients with contemporary diagnoses of AD and CVD, to investigate preceding GI syndromes, appendectomy and vagotomy. Secondly, we compared cohorts with these exposures to matched NCs for the development of PD, AD and CVD within 5 years. Results We identified 24 624 PD patients in the case-control analysis and matched 18 cohorts with each exposure to their NCs. Gastroparesis, dysphagia, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) without diarrhoea and constipation showed specific associations with PD (vs NCs, AD and CVD) in both the case-control (odds ratios (ORs) vs NCs 4.64, 3.58, 3.53 and 3.32, respectively, all p<0.0001) and cohort analyses (relative risks (RRs) vs NCs 2.43, 2.27, 1.17 and 2.38, respectively, all p<0.05). While functional dyspepsia, IBS with diarrhoea, diarrhoea and faecal incontinence were not PD specific, IBS with constipation and intestinal pseudo-obstruction showed PD specificity in the case-control (OR 4.11) and cohort analysis (RR 1.84), respectively. Appendectomy decreased the risk of PD in the cohort analysis (RR 0.48). Neither inflammatory bowel disease nor vagotomy were associated with PD. Conclusion Dysphagia, gastroparesis, IBS without diarrhoea and constipation might specifically predict Parkinson’s disease.

Abstract: Disorders of gastric motor and sensory function affect 10%-20% of the world’s population and adversely impact nutrition, quality of life, work productivity, and health care costs. Classifying these disorders can be challenging given the heterogeneity of symptom presentation, the presence of symptoms unexplained by endoscopic, radiographic and/or laboratory evaluation, and overlap with other luminal gastrointestinal disorders. Accurately diagnosing these highly prevalent disorders relies upon an understanding of epidemiology and risk factors, the ability to take a careful clinical history focused on symptoms, and the presence of predisposing medical, surgical, and psychological conditions. A variety of diagnostic studies are now available to assess gastric motor function and identify maladaptive relaxation, accommodation, and abnormal sensation. FDA-approved treatment options are limited and thus many patients undergo a series of empirical treatment trials that target individual symptoms, often without much benefit. This article provides updated recommendations for identifying and classifying the most common gastric motor and sensory disorders using currently accepted diagnostic tests, and provides a brief supplemental overview on treatment options. “Things sweet to taste prove in digestion sour.” –Shakespeare, Richard II , 1595.

Abstract Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high‐resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty‐two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two‐years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ metrics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for patterns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJ.

Objective Antireflux surgery can be proposed in patients with GORD, especially when proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use leads to incomplete symptom improvement. However, to date, international consensus guidelines on the clinical criteria and additional technical examinations used in patient selection for antireflux surgery are lacking. We aimed at generating key recommendations in the selection of patients for antireflux surgery. Design We included 35 international experts (gastroenterologists, surgeons and physiologists) in a Delphi process and developed 37 statements that were revised by the Consensus Group, to start the Delphi process. Three voting rounds followed where each statement was presented with the evidence summary. The panel indicated the degree of agreement for the statement. When 80% of the Consensus Group agreed (A+/A) with a statement, this was defined as consensus. All votes were mutually anonymous. Results Patients with heartburn with a satisfactory response to PPIs, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH), patients with oesophagitis Los Angeles (LA) grade B or higher and patients with Barrett’s oesophagus are good candidates for antireflux surgery. An endoscopy prior to antireflux surgery is mandatory and a barium swallow should be performed in patients with suspicion of a HH or short oesophagus. Oesophageal manometry is mandatory to rule out major motility disorders. Finally, oesophageal pH (±impedance) monitoring of PPI is mandatory to select patients for antireflux surgery, if endoscopy is negative for unequivocal reflux oesophagitis. Conclusion With the ICARUS guidelines, we generated key recommendations for selection of patients for antireflux surgery.