Finnoff, Jonathan T

Objective To describe the incidence of injuries and illnesses among paediatric Team USA athletes competing in the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games, and the 2022 Beijing Olympic and Paralympic Games. Methods An electronic medical record system documented all injuries and illnesses that occurred while competing in the four Games periods. Incidence (IR) with 95% CI per 1000 athlete days were calculated for both injuries and illnesses. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated to compare injury and illness rates based on age (paediatric vs non-paediatric) sex, Games period and sport type. Results Two hundred paediatric athletes (age range, 15–21 years) competed across the four Games periods, representing 16.1% of all Team USA athletes. The overall injury IR (95% CI) was 13.4 (9.8 to 18.1), and the overall illness IR was 5.5 (3.3 to 8.7). There were no differences in incidence between paediatric and non-paediatric athletes for either injury (IRR (95% CI): 0.9 (0.6 to 1.2)) or illness (IRR (95% CI): 0.9 (0.5 to 1.5)). Female paediatric athletes were more likely to sustain an injury compared with male paediatric athletes (IRR (95% CI): 2.4 (1.1 to 5.3)). The most common mechanism of injury was gradual onset (IR, 4.3 (2.3 to 7.2)), and injuries most commonly occurred during practices (IR, 7.0 (4.5 to 10.5)). Conclusion Paediatric athletes account for a substantial proportion of Team USA athletes. It is essential that paediatric sports medicine experts are included in the medical team given that paediatric Team USA athletes are just as likely as their adult teammates to sustain an injury or illness.

Objectives The current lack of agreement regarding standardized terminology in musculoskeletal and sports ultrasound presents challenges in education, clinical practice, and research. This consensus was developed to provide a reference to improve clarity and consistency in communication. Methods A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened consisting of 18 members representing multiple specialty societies identified as key stakeholders in musculoskeletal and sports ultrasound. A Delphi process was used to reach consensus which was defined as group level agreement >80%. Results Content was organized into seven general topics including: 1) General Definitions, 2) Equipment and Transducer Manipulation, 3) Anatomic and Descriptive Terminology, 4) Pathology, 5) Procedural Terminology, 6) Image Labeling, and 7) Documentation. Terms and definitions which reached consensus agreement are presented herein. Conclusions The historic use of multiple similar terms in the absence of precise definitions has led to confusion when conveying information between colleagues, patients, and third‐party payers. This multidisciplinary expert consensus addresses multiple areas of variability in diagnostic ultrasound imaging and ultrasound‐guided procedures related to musculoskeletal and sports medicine.

Abstract: Many sports medicine physicians are currently considering introducing regenerative medicine into their practice. Regenerative medicine and the subclassification of orthobiologics are a complicated topic and have produced widely varying opinions. Although there is concern by government regulators, clinicians, scientists, patient advocacy organizations, and the media regarding the use of regenerative medicine products, there is also excitement about the potential benefits with growing evidence that certain regenerative medicine products are safe and potentially efficacious in treating musculoskeletal conditions. Sports medicine physicians would benefit from decision-making guidance about whether to introduce orthobiologics into their practice and how to do it responsibly. The purpose of this position statement is to provide sports medicine physicians with information regarding regenerative medicine terminology, a brief review of basic science and clinical studies within the subclassification of orthobiologics, regulatory considerations, and best practices for introducing regenerative medicine into clinical practice. This information will help sports medicine physicians make informed and responsible decisions about the role of regenerative medicine and orthobiologics in their practice.

BackgroundMedial meniscal extrusion (MME) has been correlated with medial meniscal injury and progression of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA).ObjectiveTo examine the difference in MME between non‐weight‐bearing (supine) and weight‐bearing (standing) positions in patients with and without medial knee OA. Determine the correlation between body mass index (BMI), Kellgren‐Lawrence (KL) grade, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and MME.DesignProspective.SettingTertiary institution PM&R Department.ParticipantsForty five participants (29 female, 16 male), 24 with healthy knees and 21 with OA.Methods or InterventionsA single physician sonographer measured supine and standing MME with ultrasound (US) on each participant. The physician was blinded to all measurements. BMI was recorded on all participants. KL grades and KOOS questionnaires were obtained for the OA group.Main Outcome MeasuresMME in supine and standing positions, change in MME from supine to standing, BMI, KL grade, and KOOS subscale scores.ResultsMME increased .52 mm from supine to standing (P < .001). MME was greater in the OA group in both the supine (P = .002) and standing (P < .001) positions. Increasing BMI was moderately correlated with increasing MME (supine P = .001, standing <.001). Increasing age was correlated with increasing MME (supine P = .012, standing P = .002). Increasing KL grade (from 1 to 4) was correlated with increasing MME (supine P = .015, standing = .006). There was a small‐to‐moderate correlation between KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) subscale score and change in MME from supine to standing (P = .035). The change in MME from supine to standing positions had a small‐to‐moderate correlation (P = .035) with KOOS ADL subscale score alone but did not correlate with any of the other KOOS subscale scores or KOOS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested a standing MME value of 4.2 mm provides a positive likelihood ratio of 6.02 for knee OA.ConclusionsMME is greater in those with OA and with weight‐bearing. MME correlates with BMI, age, KL grade, and the KOOS ADL subscale score. Finally, standing MME of 4.2 mm yielded a higher positive likelihood ratio to differentiate between healthy knees and those with medial compartment OA than the previously reported value of 3.0 mm.

Background The iliopsoas is a common source of anterior hip pain. Refractory cases may require surgical intervention, with reported complication rates ranging from 3% to 50%. Development of a minimally invasive, outpatient method of iliopsoas tendon release is desirable and may reduce costs, lower complications, and improve recovery time. Objective To describe and evaluate the safety and reproducibility of an ultrasound‐guided (USG) iliopsoas tendon release using a spinal needle in a cadaveric model. Design Prospective, cadaveric laboratory investigation. Setting Academic Institution Procedural Skills Laboratory. Participants Five unembalmed cadaveric specimens (three female, two male), 69 to 93 years of age (mean 83.2 years), with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 kg/m 2 (range 19.2 to 30.3 kg/m 2 ). Interventions Two operators each performed five USG iliopsoas tendon releases. Three additional investigators dissected the pelves to assess completeness of tendon release and damage to adjacent structures. Main Outcome Measures Successful transection, completeness (%) of the tendon transection, damage to adjacent structures, and procedural time. Results Nine of 10 releases achieved the target release of ≥75% tendon transection. One procedure achieved 50% tendon release. No injury to adjacent structures was identified. The mean duration of the procedure was 6.19 minutes. Conclusions USG iliopsoas tendon release can be performed in a cadaveric model, consistently achieve the desired percentage of tendon release, does not result in injury to adjacent neurovascular structures, and takes approximately 6 minutes to perform. Although results cannot be generalized to a clinical setting, due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, it is likely that this procedure can be performed safely in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia, will cost less, and will facilitate a more rapid recovery when compared to standard surgical procedures. Further research is warranted for clinical application.

Management of hip region disorders is challenging. Orthobiologic treatments including platelet rich plasma (PRP), mesenchymal stem cells, and amniotic injectables have gained popularity as promising treatments despite a lack of robust evidence for their effectiveness. We review rationale and current evidence for orthobiologics for three common hip region conditions: hip osteoarthritis, gluteal tendinopathy, and proximal hamstring tendinopathy. Overall, the current state of evidence is extremely limited for orthobiologic treatments and is predominantly relevant to PRP injections. There is currently a lack of data to support the use of mesenchymal stem cells or amniotic injectables in these conditions of the hip.

PurposeIncreasing stride‐rate by 5%‐10% has been used for injury prevention and rehabilitation but evidence is limited if an independent program can alter stride‐rate in runners. The objective of this study was to determine whether the preferred stride‐rate of recreational runners can be increased by 5%‐10% following a 6‐week independent training program.MethodsThirty‐eight runners running a minimum of 15 miles/wk with a preferred stride‐rate ≤85 strides/min determined during treadmill testing were randomized into two groups: (a) Experimental group was instructed to increase stride‐rate by 10% using a watch and foot pod for stride‐rate feedback; and (b) Control group was instructed to continue normal running. Compliance was tracked with a training log. One stride being defined as two sequential steps. Preferred running stride‐rate was retested at 6 weeks using the same testing protocol.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline preferred running stride‐rates between the experimental or control groups. A significant (P < .001) increase in stride‐rate from 79.9 ± 4.8 to 86.8 ± 5.7 strides/min (8.6% increase) was found in the experimental group. The control group did not significantly change their stride‐rate (Baseline: 80.4 ± 4.2, 6 weeks: 81.3 ± 3.3 strides/min).ConclusionA 6‐week home training program using a watch and foot pod can increase the preferred running stride‐rate by 5%‐10% in runners with a stride‐rate of 85 or less. Clinicians may be able to apply this type of gait retraining in recreational runners when designing injury prevention and rehabilitation programs.

BackgroundUltrasound has become a useful instrument in evaluating musculoskeletal pathology. Recent studies suggest that ultrasound imaging of weight‐bearing menisci may enhance the assessment of knee pathology, such as osteoarthritis (OA) and meniscal injuries.ObjectiveThe primary aim of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of ultrasound measurements of medial meniscal extrusion (MME) after a brief training session.DesignProspective reliability study.SettingPhysical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) department within a tertiary care institution.ParticipantsForty‐five participants (29 female, 16 male) were recruited to serve as models, 24 of whom had healthy knees and 21 of whom had radiographically confirmed medial compartment knee OA. Three physician sonographers (1 = experienced, 1 = sports medicine fellow, 1 = post‐graduate year [PGY]‐4 PM&R resident) were recruited to serve as operators.Methods or InterventionsOperators received a brief training session on identifying and measuring MME. All operators measured bilateral MME in each model in the standing and supine positions on two separate days. Operators were blinded to all measurements.Main Outcome MeasurementsPrimary outcomes were inter‐ and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of MME measurements among operators with different levels of ultrasound experience.ResultsSupine MME intrarater reliability ICCs were 0.927, 0.885, and 0.780 for the experienced physician, sports medicine fellow, and PGY‐4 operators, respectively. Standing MME intrarater reliability ICCs were 0.941, 0.902, and 0.824 for the experienced physician, sports medicine fellow, and PGY‐4 operators, respectively. Interrater reliability ICCs were 0.896 and 0.842 for supine and standing measurements, respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in intrarater reliability with experience between the PGY‐4 resident and experienced physician operators.ConclusionsOperators with different levels of ultrasound experience demonstrated good MME measurement intra‐ and interrater reliabilities in both supine and standing positions.