Gettman, Matthew T.

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a risk score utilizing C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin to better predict a clinical infection for patients with obstructive urolithiasis. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients presenting to the emergency room from December 2017 to February 2019 and who underwent upper urinary tract decompression due to concern for infection in the setting of obstructing urolithiasis. Over 30 clinical parameters were assessed and a composite risk score was created. Univariate and multivariate, forward, stepwise regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of true urinary tract infection (UTI). Results: Ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria, of which a true UTI was identified in 50 (51%). The standard model of serum white blood cells >15 or temperature >38°C had an area under curve (AUC) of only 0.67 to predict UTI. A multivariable regression-based 4-point risk score (1 point for each of the following: positive urinary Gram stain, perinephric fat stranding on CT, serum CRP >21.95, and serum procalcitonin >0.36) had an AUC of 0.91 to predict UTI. Individually, these components had an AUC of 0.68, 0.68, 0.80, and 0.77, respectively. The chances of confirmed UTI were 8%, 11%, 68%, and 100% for risk scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to 4, respectively ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Only 50% of patients with a suspected UTI and an obstructing stone were ultimately confirmed to have a UTI. A risk score consisting of Gram stain, perinephric fat stranding, CRP, and procalcitonin can improve UTI prediction and warrants further study.

TPS380 Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most common surgical treatment for prostate cancer (PC). Yet even with nerve-sparing RP (NS-RP), a significant proportion of men experience transient or permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) partially due to intraoperative neurovascular bundle (NVB) damage from thermal or mechanical trauma. Studies have shown that platelet released growth factors counteract trauma and facilitate healing. We evaluate the use of platelet rich plasma (PRP) to facilitate early nerve healing and decrease ED after NS-RP. Methods: A prospective, open label, 20 subject human trial evaluating intraoperative topical NVB PRP application was approved by the IRB and FDA under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE 16915) for the investigational use of an approved blood separation device. Men aged 50-60 with newly diagnosed, localized PC and normal preoperative sexual and urinary function, defined as a Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score of >19 and an answer of “none” on question 5 of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) are eligible. Intraoperatively, a 10ml PRP product is created from a 180 mL sample of the patient’s whole blood using the Angel Concentrated Platelet Rich Plasma System (Cytomedix, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD USA). PRP is applied via mechanical transfer to the NVB after completion of the vesicourethral anastomosis. The primary endpoint is the safety and tolerability of PRP on the NVB after NS-RP. Secondary endpoints include feasibility of intraoperative PRP application and longitudinal assessment of erectile function and urinary continence by questionnaire administration at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after NS-RP. Clinical trial information: NCT02957149.

Introduction: Tissue retraction during minimally invasive surgery has been achieved to date with patient positioning or additional instrumentation. The Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System (San Mateo, CA), a novel, noninvasive, magnetic retraction device for minimally invasive surgery, has been used to facilitate reduced-port robotic prostatectomy using a multiport robotic platform. With the release of the da Vinci SP robotic system (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, CA), we now report a multi-institutional initial case series of magnet-assisted robotic prostatectomy using the single-port robotic platform. Materials and Methods: An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review was performed of all patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system and a single Levita magnetic retractor in treatment of prostatic adenocarcinoma at two institutions from November 2018 to January 2019. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected for descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 15 men, median age 62 years (range 57–71), with mean PSA 7.0 ± 2.3 underwent surgery. The robotic cannula and a single 12-mm assistant port were utilized in all cases, the latter for suction, suture passage, and clip placement; the magnetic retractor aided with posterior dissection, dorsal venous complex stitch placement, bladder neck dissection, and lymphadenectomy. No cases required conversion to a multiport robotic platform, laparoscopy, or open surgery, nor placement of additional assistant ports. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Average operative time was 224 ± 43 minutes and blood loss was 198 ± 115 mL. All patients were discharged home within 2 days of surgery. Conclusions: Robotic prostatectomy utilizing the da Vinci SP system is feasible, safe, and effective. Use of the magnetic retractor facilitates tissue exposure and improves procedure ergonomics, mimicking the conventional multiport technique. Further exploration of magnet utilization in robotic surgery and optimization of assistant port placement for true single-site surgery is warranted.

SAGE-Journals-Accessible-Video-Player 10.1089/vid.2018.0051.M1 sj-vid-1-vid-10.1089_vid.2018.0051

Purpose The medical student performance evaluation (MSPE) summarizes a residency applicant’s academic performance. Despite attempts to improve standardized clerkship grading, concerns regarding grade inflation and variability at United States medical schools persist. This study’s aim was to describe current patterns of clerkship grading and applicant performance data provided in the MSPE. Method The authors evaluated Electronic Residency Application Service data submitted to a single institution for the 2016–2017 Match cycle. Clerkship grading characteristics regarding grading tiers, school rank, location, and size were obtained. Data regarding methods for summative comparisons such as key word utilization were also extracted. Descriptive statistics were generated, and generalized linear modeling was performed. Results Data were available for 137/140 (98%) MD-granting U.S. medical schools. Pass/fail grading was most commonly used during the preclinical years (47.4%). A 4-tier system was most common for clerkship grading (31%); however, 19 different grading schemes were identified. A median of 34% of students received the highest clerkship grade (range, 5%–97%). Students attending a top 20 medical school were more likely to receive the highest grade compared with those attending lower-rated schools (40% vs 32%, P < .001). Seventy-three percent of schools ranked students, most commonly using descriptive adjectives. Thirty-two different adjectives were used. Conclusions There is significant institutional variation in clinical grading practices and MSPE data. For core clerkships where most students received the highest grade, the ability to distinguish between applicants diminishes. A standardized approach to reporting clinical performance may allow for better comparison of residency applicants.