Brito, Juan P.

Background: Adolescent patients with moderate to severe idiopathic scoliosis who have completed their skeletal growth face a significant choice in their treatment path: watchful waiting or spinal fusion. Shared decision making (SDM) assists patients and clinicians to find treatments that make intellectual, practical and emotional sense. Our objective was to develop a tool that supports SDM for patients with scoliosis and their families. Methods: We used a user-centered design approach that included collaboration between patients, surgeons and SDM experts, observation of clinician encounters, and literature review. We focused on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients 13 or more years of age with less than 1 year of growth remaining (Risser stage 3 or greater) and curves between 40 and 65 degrees. Results: We included 22 patients, and collected 22 video recordings. From these videos, we identified salient patient priorities for decision making including treatment benefits, surgical complications, pain, scheduling and recovery, and cost. For each theme, we conducted a focused review to obtain the best estimate of effect. Then, an expert SDM designer developed an electronic prototype called Scoliosis Choice. Conclusions: The initial prototype of the scoliosis SDM was finalized and is currently being field tested in clinic. Scoliosis Choice may help patients and surgeons better understand the potential risks and benefits of spinal fusion vs. observation for scoliosis treatment and improve validated measures of quality in patient-parent-surgeon communication.

Abstract Background: Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) may benefit of radioiodine ablation (RAI) to reduce the probability of thyroid cancer recurrence. Guidelines recommend that thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) of >30mIU/L before RAI to optimize treatment response. However, evidence regarding this recommendation is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes (thyroid cancer recurrence and survival at 10 years of follow up) of stimulated TSH threshold before RAI with primary analysis focus on <30 mIU/L versus ≥30 mIU/L, and subgroup analysis on <90 mIU/L versus ≥90 mIU/L in patients with DTC after initial total thyroidectomy. Methods: The protocol for this study is registered and available online (CRD42020158354). Briefly, we searched several databases from their inception to April 2020. Reviewers, working independently and in duplicate selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated each study’s risk of bias. We excluded studies that used recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone before ablation. Results: We included five retrospective cohort studies, which enrolled a total of 2,514 patients. Risk of bias was low in four studies and high in one study. Mean age was 47 years old (ranged from 40.7 to 47.9) and most of them were female (69%). The most common DTC type was papillary thyroid cancer (78%). From those articles that reported tumor characteristics, 48% had a size ≤2cm (T1b) and 47% >2cm. Moreover, 73% of the patients had no regional lymph metastasis (N0). Two studies reported radioiodine mean dose given of 30 and 100 mci. A total of 301 patients were included in the TSH threshold <30 mIU/L group and 1788 patients in the TSH ≥30 mIU/L group. Comparing stimulated TSH threshold before RAI (<30 mIU/L versus ≥30 mIU/L), there was difference in recurrence at 1 year (RR 2.46 (C.I. 1.09-5.55) and at 20 years (RR 1.71 (C.I. 1.19 – 2.47). However, there was no difference in mortality at 20 years (RR 0.53 (Confidence Interval (C.I.) 0.12-2.23). In addition, 10-years recurrence was not different when we compared <90 mIU/L versus ≥90 mIU/L TSH (RR 1.06; 95%CI: 0.88 – 1.27). Conclusions: Mortality do not differ between recommended TSH goal (≥30 mIU/L) vs <30 mIU/L in thyroid hormone withdrawal-aided radioiodine ablation in DTC patients. However, the risk of recurrence is reduced when patients achieved a TSH level >30 UI/mL. These results suggest that patients may need to reach a stimulated TSH ≥30 mIU/L stimulated TSH threshold to be treated. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Introduction: Optimal initial antithyroid drugs (ATD) dosing may achieve rapid improvement in thyroid hormone levels while minimizing risk of adverse events. As ATD have become the most common first line therapy for the treatment of Graves’ disease (GD), we examined trends over time in initial ATD dosing, and the association between guideline-based ATD dosing with time to normalization of FT4 and frequency of adverse events. Methods: This is a single cohort retrospective study in Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. We identified adults (≥18 years old) diagnosed with new onset GD between January 1, 2002-December 31, 2019 treated with at least 14 days of ATD and with available initial follow up data within 3 months prior to a dose change. Propylthiouracil (PTU) doses were converted to Methimazole (MMI) equivalents at 10:1 ratio. Guideline concordant care was defined as initial ATD dosed based on 2016 American Thyroid Association guidelines (i.e. 5-10 mg for presenting FT4 between >1.7-2.55 ng/dL, 10-20 mg for 2.56-3.40 ng/dL, and 30-40 mg for 3.41 ng/dL and above). Based on the first follow up FT4 values, patients were grouped into categories of: normal range (FT4 0.9-1.7 ng/dL) and under treated (FT4 >1.7 ng/dL). Results: 398 patients were included; mean (SD) age was 49 years (16.6), and 75% were women. Mean initial (SD) Free T4 value was 3.9 ng/dL (2.8), with patients treated with ATD at mean (SD) starting dose of 21.9 mg (13.3) MMI equivalent. Over time there was a decrease in the starting ATD dose from 30 mg MMI equivalent in 2002-2004 to 20 mg in 2017-2019, despite steady presenting FT4 values (2.7 ng/dL in 2002-2005 and 3.1 ng/dL in 2017-2019). In the subset of 340 patients with overt hyperthyroidism, 181 (53%) received guideline concordant (GC) dosing. Patients receiving GC care had a higher initial FT4 (4.9 vs. 3.6 ng/dL, p=0.002), larger goiters (40 vs. 30 g, p<0.001) and higher initial ATD mean dose (SD) 25 mg (15.7) vs. 21.3 mg (9.9), p= 0.05. However at follow up (median 32 days vs 35 days respectively), both groups had similar proportion of patients with normal FT4 values (43% vs. 42%, p=0.79); undertreated patients (45% vs. 45%, p=0.99) and frequency of adverse events (4% vs. 6%, p=0.40). Conclusion: The initial dose of ATD for the treatment of GD has decreased over the past 2 decades. Most clinicians initiate ATD at a dose concordant to guidelines. Despite this, a significant proportion of patients have persistent hyperthyroidism on initial follow up. In light of evidence of risks associated with duration of hyperthyroidism, strategies to improve optimization of initial dosing are needed. Pending further subgroup analysis by presenting FT4 severity, these preliminary results suggest and approach factoring other variables apart from guideline based initial ATD dose is needed to optimize response. Our data will be utilized to pilot an individualized, patient specific predictive model to guide initial dosing to this end.

Objective Shared decision making (SDM) tools can help implement guideline recommendations for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) considering stroke prevention strategies. We sought to characterize all available SDM tools for this purpose and examine their quality and clinical impact. Methods We searched through multiple bibliographic databases, social media, and an SDM tool repository from inception to May 2020 and contacted authors of identified SDM tools. Eligible tools had to offer information about warfarin and ≥1 direct oral anticoagulant. We extracted tool characteristics, assessed their adherence to the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, and obtained information about their efficacy in promoting SDM. Results We found 14 SDM tools. Most tools provided up-to-date information about the options, but very few included practical considerations (e.g., out-of-pocket cost). Five of these SDM tools, all used by patients prior to the encounter, were tested in trials at high risk of bias and were found to produce small improvements in patient knowledge and reductions in decisional conflict. Conclusion Several SDM tools for stroke prevention in AF are available, but whether they promote high-quality SDM is yet to be known. The implementation of guidelines for SDM in this context requires user-centered development and evaluation of SDM tools that can effectively promote high-quality SDM and improve stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Abstract Objective The overuse of antibiotics for acute otitis media (AOM) in children is a healthcare quality issue in part arising from conflicting parent and physician understanding of the risks and benefits of antibiotics for AOM. Our objective was to develop a conversation aid that supports shared decision making (SDM) with parents of children who are diagnosed with non-severe AOM in the acute care setting. Materials and Methods We developed a web-based encounter tool following a human-centered design approach that includes active collaboration with parents, clinicians, and designers using literature review, observations of clinical encounters, parental and clinician surveys, and interviews. Insights from these processes informed the iterative creation of prototypes that were reviewed and field-tested in patient encounters. Results The ear pain conversation aid includes five sections: (1) A home page that opens the discussion on the etiologies of AOM; (2) the various options available for AOM management; (3) a pictograph of the impact of antibiotic therapy on pain control; (4) a pictograph of complication rates with and without antibiotics; and (5) a summary page on management choices. This open-access, web-based tool is located at www.earpaindecisionaid.org. Conclusions We collaboratively developed an evidence-based conversation aid to facilitate SDM for AOM. This decision aid has the potential to improve parental medical knowledge of AOM, physician/parent communication, and possibly decrease the overuse of antibiotics for this condition.

Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare but highly lethal form of thyroid cancer. Since the guidelines for the management of ATC by the American Thyroid Association were first published in 2012, significant clinical and scientific advances have occurred in the field. The aim of these guidelines is to inform clinicians, patients, and researchers on published evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of ATC. Methods: The specific clinical questions and topics addressed in these guidelines were based on prior versions of the guidelines, stakeholder input, and input of the Task Force members (authors of the guideline). Relevant literature was reviewed, including serial PubMed searches supplemented with additional articles. The American College of Physicians Guideline Grading System was used for critical appraisal of evidence and grading strength of recommendations. Results: The guidelines include the diagnosis, initial evaluation, establishment of treatment goals, approaches to locoregional disease (surgery, radiotherapy, targeted/systemic therapy, supportive care during active therapy), approaches to advanced/metastatic disease, palliative care options, surveillance and long-term monitoring, and ethical issues, including end of life. The guidelines include 31 recommendations and 16 good practice statements. Conclusions: We have developed evidence-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the management of ATC. While all care must be individualized, such recommendations provide, in our opinion, optimal care paradigms for patients with ATC.

Background Patients and clinicians expect the information in patient decision aids to be based on the best available research evidence. The objectives of this International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) review were to 1) check the currency of, and where needed, update evidence for the domain of “basing the information in decision aids on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the evidence”; 2) analyze the evidence characteristics of decision aids; and 3) propose updates to relevant IPDAS criteria. Methods We searched MEDLINE and PubMed to inform updates of this domain’s definitions, justifications, and components. We also searched 5 sources to identify all publicly available decision aids ( N = 471). Two assessors independently extracted each aid’s evidence characteristics. Results Minor updates to the definitions and theoretical justifications of this IPDAS domain are provided and changes to relevant IPDAS criteria proposed. Nearly all aids (97%) provided a year of creation/update, but most (81%) did not report an explicit update or expiration policy. No scientific references were cited in 33% of aids. Of the 314 that cited at least 1 reference, 39% cited at least 1 guideline, 44% cited at least 1 systematic review, and 23% cited at least 1 randomized trial. In 35%, it was unclear what statement in the aid the citations referred to. Only 14% reported any of the processes used to find and decide on evidence inclusion. Only 14% reported the evidence quality. Many emerging issues and future research areas were identified. Conclusions Although many emerging issues need to be addressed, this IPDAS domain is validated and criteria refined. High-quality patient decision aids should be based on comprehensive and up-to-date syntheses of critically appraised evidence.