Back to Authors

McWilliams, Robert

Mayo Clinic

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Citations 4

Second-line therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab: multicenter single institution cohort experience

The Oncologist | December 14, 2024 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/oncolo/oyae342 | PMID 39674576

Abstract Background Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B. Patients and Methods We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy. Results Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival. Conclusion Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.
Sinonasal mucosal melanoma: An analysis of treatment‐related adverse events and associated factors

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | December 3, 2022 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1037-1041

10.1002/alr.23118 | PMID 36462156

The role of serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a prognostic indicator in resected, high risk melanoma

Dermatologic Therapy | January 9, 2019 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e12813

10.1111/dth.12813 | PMID 30620137

Genomic Profiling of Small-Bowel Adenocarcinoma

JAMA Oncology | June 15, 2017 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1546

10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1051 | PMID 28617917