Citations 3

Peri-intubation Cardiovascular Collapse in Patients Who Are Critically Ill: Insights from the INTUBE Study

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | May 10, 2022 | Volume: 206 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 449-458

10.1164/rccm.202111-2575oc | PMID 35536310

Abstract Rationale Cardiovascular instability/collapse is a common peri-intubation event in patients who are critically ill. Objectives To identify potentially modifiable variables associated with peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse (i.e., systolic arterial pressure <65 mm Hg [once] or <90 mm Hg for >30 minutes; new/increased vasopressor requirement; fluid bolus >15 ml/kg, or cardiac arrest). Methods INTUBE (International Observational Study to Understand the Impact and Best Practices of Airway Management In Critically Ill Patients) was a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients who were critically ill and undergoing tracheal intubation in a convenience sample of 197 sites from 29 countries across five continents from October 1, 2018, to July 31, 2019. Measurements and Main Results A total of 2,760 patients were included in this analysis. Peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse occurred in 1,199 out of 2,760 patients (43.4%). Variables associated with this event were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.03), higher heart rate (OR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.004–1.012), lower systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98–0.99), lower oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/Fi O2 before induction (OR, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.997–0.999), and the use of propofol as an induction agent (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.57). Patients with peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse were at a higher risk of ICU mortality with an adjusted OR of 2.47 (95% CI, 1.72–3.55), P < 0.001. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method identified the use of propofol as the only factor independently associated with cardiovascular instability/collapse (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.49). When administered before induction, vasopressors (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.84–2.11) or fluid boluses (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.96–1.44) did not reduce the incidence of cardiovascular instability/collapse. Conclusions Peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse was associated with an increased risk of both ICU and 28-day mortality. The use of propofol for induction was identified as a modifiable intervention significantly associated with cardiovascular instability/collapse. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03616054).
Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries

JAMA | March 23, 2021 | Volume: 325 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1164

10.1001/jama.2021.1727 | PMID 33755076

Effect of Low Isoflurane Concentrations on the Ventilation–Perfusion Distribution in Injured Canine Lungs

Anesthesiology | November 10, 2003 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 652-659

10.1097/00000542-200209000-00020 | PMID 12218533

Background Rapid recovery and weaning from ventilatory support and cardiovascular stability are suggested advantages of isoflurane inhalation, in concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 vol%, for long-term sedation in mechanical ventilated patients. This study was designed to determine whether isoflurane in low concentrations impairs pulmonary gas exchange by increasing ventilation and perfusion (V(A)/Q) mismatch during lung injury. Methods Fourteen anesthetized dogs received in random order 0, 0.25, or 0.5 vol% end-tidal isoflurane before and after induction of lung injury with oleic acid. Gas exchange was assessed by blood gas analysis and by estimating the V(A)/Q distributions using the multiple inert gas elimination technique. Results Administration of oleic acid produced a lung injury with severe V(A)/Q mismatch and 38 +/- 4% intrapulmonary shunting of blood. During lung injury, isoflurane accounted for a dose-related increase in blood flow to shunt units from 38 +/- 4 to 42 +/- 3 (0.25 vol%) and 48 +/- 4% (0.5 vol%) (P < 0.05), dispersion pulmonary blood flow distribution from 0.94 +/- 0.07 to 1.01 +/- 0.09 (0.25 vol%) and 1.11 +/- 0.11% (0.5 vol%) (P < 0.05), and a decrease in perfusion of normal V(A)/Q units from 58 +/- 5 to 55 +/- 4 (0.25 vol%) and 50 +/- 4% (0.5 vol%) (P < 0.05) (mean +/- SE). Isoflurane decreased arterial oxygen partial pressure from 72 +/- 4 to 62 +/- 4 mmHg (0.25 vol%) and 56 +/- 4 mmHg (0.5 vol%) (P < 0.05) and oxygen delivery from 573 +/- 21 to 529 +/- 19 ml. kg. min (0.25 vol%) and 505 +/- 22 ml. kg. min (0.5 vol%) (P < 0.05). Gas exchange, perfusion of shunt and normal V(A)/Q units, and pulmonary blood flow distribution was similar in absence of lung injury with and without isoflurane. Isoflurane 0.5 vol% lowered cardiac output during all conditions (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Inhalation of low concentrations of isoflurane contributed to increased V(A)/Q mismatch and decreased systemic blood flow and oxygen delivery in mechanically ventilated animals with injured lungs.