Perez Botero, Juliana

AbstractIn hemophilia B (HB), factor IX gene (F9) genotyping is used for molecular confirmation of affected individuals, for carrier testing, to facilitate the identification of those at risk for anaphylaxis/inhibitors (associated with large deletions), and to assist in assigning disease severity. Owing to test costs, optimal test utilization involves pre/post-test counseling and appropriate patient and test selection (e.g., mutation screening [F9MS] vs. known mutation [F9KM] testing). This article aims to review the trends and outcomes of F9-genotyping orders and describe the spectrum of variants identified in a sample of individuals in our reference laboratory. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive orders submitted to the Special Coagulation DNA Diagnostic Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, between 2012 and 2015. A total of 133 orders (38%) were identified for men: 118 (88%) were F9MS and 15 (12%) were F9KM. Thirteen orders (10%) were cancelled. A total of 209 orders were identified for women: 178 (85%) were F9MS and 31 (15%) were F9KM. Thirty-seven orders (18%) were cancelled and 30% of the tests performed yielded negative results. A total of 164 samples (47%) were received without clinical information. Seventeen previously unreported variants were identified. F9 genotyping provides useful information for HB management; however, 18% of our orders were cancelled and almost half were received without relevant clinical information, thus reaffirming the need for ongoing scrutiny of submitted orders. Optimal patient and test selection is important as is the accurate interpretation of variants identified. Most of the pathogenic variants identified were point mutations, with very few large deletions, consistent with the literature.

AbstractObjectivesTo analyze the economic impact of testing for activated protein C resistance (APC-R) due to factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation with APC-R with reflexive FVL genotyping (algorithmic approach) or genotyping alone.MethodsOptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) data were used to assess testing approaches. Insurance claims for APC-R and FVL in 2013 were compared with the Mayo Clinic database. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services diagnostic fee schedules were used to assign costs.ResultsOf 19.3 million OLDW-covered individuals, 74,242 (0.385%) received 75,608 tests: APC-R, 2,265 (2.9%); FVL genotyping, 70,619 (90.1%); and both APC-R and FVL, 2,724 (7.0%). In total, 1,317 tests were performed at Mayo Clinic: APC-R with reflex FVL (1,256; 95.4%) and FVL alone (61; 4.6%). Costs per evaluated individual and per total population (person/year) in OLDW and algorithmic approach were $83.77 vs $36.38 and $0.32 vs $0.14, respectively.ConclusionsThe cost-optimized algorithmic approach reduces health care costs.