Kohlhagen, Mindy C

Abstract BACKGROUND Free light chain (FLC) quantification is the most analytically sensitive blood-based method commercially available to diagnose and monitor patients with plasma cell disorders (PCDs). However, instead of directly detecting monoclonal FLCs (mFLCs), FLC assays indirectly assess clonality based on quantifying κ and λ FLCs and determination of the к/λ FLC ratio. Often an abnormal FLC ratio is the only indication of a PCD, and confirmation by a direct method increases diagnostic confidence. The aim of this study was to develop an analytically sensitive method for direct detection of mFLCs. METHODS Patient sera (n = 167) previously assessed by nephelometric FLC quantification and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) were affinity enriched for IgG, IgA, and total and free κ and λ light chains and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS. Relative analytical sensitivity of these methods was determined using serially diluted sera containing mFLCs. RESULTS In sera with abnormal FLC ratios (n = 127), 43% of monoclonal proteins were confirmed by IFE, 57% by MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, and 87% with FLC enrichment MALDI-TOF MS. In sera with normal FLC ratios (n = 40), the FLC MALDI-TOF MS method identified 1 patient with an mFLC. Serial dilution and analysis of mFLC containing sera by IFE, nephelometry, and FLC MALDI-TOF MS demonstrated that FLC MALDI-TOF MS analysis had the highest analytical sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS FLC immunoenrichment coupled to MALDI-TOF MS enables direct detection of mFLCs and significantly increases the confirmation of abnormal serum FLC ratios over IFE and MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, thereby providing added confidence for diagnosing FLC PCDs.

The detection and quantification of monoclonal‐proteins (M‐proteins) are necessary for the diagnosis and evaluation of response in plasma cell dyscrasias. Immunoglobulin enrichment‐coupled with matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass‐spectrometry (MASS‐FIX) is a simple and inexpensive method to identify M‐proteins, but its clinical generalizability has not yet been elucidated. We compared MASS‐FIX to protein electrophoresis (PEL), serum/urine immunofixation‐electrophoresis (IFE), and quantitative serum free‐light chain (FLC) for the identification of M‐proteins in different clinical diagnoses. Paired serum and urine samples from 257 patients were tested. There were six patients for whom s‐IFE and FLC ratio were positive and serum MASS‐FIX was negative, but when serum and urine MASS‐FIX results were combined, only one patient with light chain‐MGUS was missed. Serum/urine‐MASS‐FIX detected M‐proteins in 18 patients with negative serum/urine‐PEL/IFE and serum‐FLC, 10 of whom had multiple myeloma or AL amyloidosis, who were mistakenly thought to have complete hematologic response by serum/urine‐PEL/IFE and serum‐FLC. Nearly half of the AL amyloidosis patients had atypical spectra, which may prove to be a clue to the diagnosis and pathogenesis of the disease. In conclusion, MASS‐FIX has a comparable sensitivity with PEL/IFE/FLC methods and can help inform the clinical diagnosis.