Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios

Abstract Hereditary factors play a role in the development of several cancers. Identification of germline predisposition can have implications for treatment and cancer prevention. While previous studies have found that universal multigene panel testing in patients with cancer yields increased detection of actionable heritable variants compared to targeted testing, patients belonging to racial and ethnic minority groups have been underrepresented in these studies. We undertook a prospective multi-site study of germline alternations among solid tumor cancer patients from under-represented minority (URM) populations receiving care at Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Centers between January 2020 and November 2022. Patients with a new or active cancer diagnosis (all stages) not selected for family history of cancer were tested with a >80-gene next generation sequencing panel. Of 532 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.2 [12.7] years; 320 (60.2%) female), 247 (46.4%) were Hispanic/Latino, 130 (24.4%) Black/African American, 80 (15.0%) Asian, 66 (12.4%) American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2 (0.4%) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 7 (1.3%) other. PGV were found in 43 patients (8.1%), including 29 moderate- or high- penetrance cancer susceptibility genes. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were found in 272 patients (51.1%). Of those with a PGV, 29 (67.4%) had incremental clinically actionable findings that would not have been detected by established testing criteria, of which 16 were moderate- or high-penetrance variants. Younger age of diagnosis, gender, race, ethnicity, and stage of disease were not predictive of PGV. In this study of under-represented minority cancer patients, universal genetic testing found that 1 in 12 patients harbor a PGV, more than two-thirds of whom would remain undetected using current guidelines. The paucity of genomic data in URM populations also results in a large proportion of VUS which may lead to under-estimation of disease associated variants. Table 1. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Included Patients Positive Negative VUS Total N (%) 43 217 272 532 (8.1%) (40.8%) (51.1%) Age - mean (SD) 53.7 57.0 57.8 57.2 (12.7) (12.6) (12.8) (12.7) Gender - Female 26 132 162 320 (60.5%) (60.8%) (59.6%) (60.2%) Race/Ethnicity Hispanic/Latino 24 110 113 247 (55.8%) (50.7%) (41.5%) (46.4%) Black/African 5 56 69 130 American (11.6%) (25.8%) (25.4%) (24.4%) Asian 10 (23.3%) 23 (10.6%) 47 (17.3%) 80 (15.0%) American Indian/Alaskan Native 4 (9.3%) 26 (12.0%) 36 (13.2%) 66 (12.4%) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.7%) 2 (0.4%) Other 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.9%) 5 (1.8%) 7 (1.3%) Tumor Types Breast 19 (44.2%) 80 (36.9%) 110 (40.4%) 209 (39.3%) CNS 1 (2.3%) 2 (0.9%) 1 (0.4%) 4 (0.8%) GI 7 (16.3%) 46 (21.2%) 58 (21.3%) 111 (20.9%) GU 8 (18.6%) 57 (26.3%) 62 (22.8%) 127 (23.9%) GYN 0 (0.0%) 8 (3.7%) 10 (3.7%) 18 (3.4%) Head/Neck 5 (11.6%) 8 (3.7%) 6 (2.2%) 19 (3.6%) Lung 0 (0.0%) 6 (2.8%) 11 (4.0%) 17 (3.2%) Melanoma 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.9%) 1 (0.4%) 3 (0.6%) Sarcoma 2 (4.7%) 4 (1.8%) 4 (1.5%) 10 (1.9%) Other 1 (2.3%) 4 (1.8%) 9 (3.3%) 14 (2.6%) Citation Format: Kevork A. Khadarian, Sailaja Pisipati, Jeremy C. Jones, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Donald W. Northfelt, Lindsey Gary, Idara U. Ekpoh, Giovanna G. Moreno, Edward D. Esplin, Robert Nussbaum, Brandie Heald, Margaret A. Klint, Kathleen A. Barrus, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, Aleksandar Sekulic, Michael A. Golafshar, Katie L. Kunze, Cheryl L. Willman, Konstantinos N. Lazaridis, Niloy Jewel Samadder. Universal genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in an under-represented minority population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1921.

TPS780 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a limited number of therapeutic options. One subset of patients (up to 15%) carries germline and/or somatic mutations in homologous recombination repair genes, most notably BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 amongst others, that confer sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Combinations of PARP inhibitors with anti-PD1 immunotherapy have shown activity in breast and ovarian cancer and have not yet been thoroughly studied in pancreatic cancer. Methods: We designed a single-arm phase 2 investigator-initiated study utilizing the combination of niraparib, a highly selective PARP inhibitor and a dostarlimab, an anti PD1 antibody, in the subset of pancreatic cancer patients with germline or somatic mutations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C, or RAD51D. Additional inclusion criteria include metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, receipt of a platinum agent in 1st or 2nd line unless contraindicated, and at least 1 but not more than 2 prior lines of systemic therapy not including maintenance. Prior PARP inhibition is allowed, but not immediately prior to enrollment. Exclusion criteria include active unstable autoimmune disease or prior malignancy requiring active treatment within 2 years. Patients are treated with niraparib 200 mg orally once daily on days 1 through 21 of a 21 day cycle. Dostarlimab is administered IV 500 mg every 3 weeks for the 1st 4 cycles and then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks subsequently. The primary endpoint of the study is the disease control rate at 12 weeks using standard iRECIST criteria. Twenty patients will be enrolled to ensure 19 evaluable. The design has 80% power to detected improvement in disease control rate from 25-50% with significance level of 0.10. Descriptive factors include gene mutated for inclusion, germline/somatic, and platinum refractoriness. Given the size of the study along with genetic heterogeneity there will be no interim analysis. Patients are being enrolled at 3 Mayo clinic sites in Rochester Minnesota, Phoenix Arizona, Jacksonville Florida. To date, 13 patients have been enrolled across all 3 sites. Full accrual is anticipated by early 2023. Correlative studies include genomic characterization of baseline tumors, assessment of immune infiltration of tumor microenvironment, tumor collection for organoid/xenograft, and serial circulating cell-free DNA and immune biomarkers. Trial Identifiers: NCT04493060, Mayo: MC1841. Supported by Glaxo Smith Kline. Clinical trial information: NCT04493060 .

TPS623 Background: Despite advances in treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), long-term survival rates remain poor. The combination of bevacizumab (Bev) and atezolizumab (Atezo) is the preferred frontline therapy for advanced HCC, but a minority of patients (pts) respond, and secondary resistance usually occurs within months. HCC has an immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment, mediated by activated immune checkpoint signaling and angiogenesis pathways, which may contribute to therapeutic resistance. RP3 is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) that expresses the fusogenic GALV-GP R- protein, an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule, CD40 ligand, and 4-1BB ligand. The direct oncolytic effect coupled with immune stimulation by RP3 in the tumor microenvironment is intended to provide systemic anti-tumor activity and reverse therapeutic resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Pre-clinical data has demonstrated improved distribution of oncolytic HSV within tumors in combination with Bev supporting the clinical combination of RP3 with Bev. RP3 combined with anti-PD1 therapy has demonstrated clinical activity and safety in pts with various malignant solid tumors. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP3 combined with Atezo and Bev as 1st (1L) and 2nd (2L) line systemic therapies for inoperable and advanced HCC. Methods: The 1L and 2L cohorts will each enroll up to 30 pts with advanced, unresectable HCC. Pts in the 1L cohort may not have received prior systemic treatment; pts in the 2L cohort must have progressed on or following one prior line of systemic therapy, which must have included a PD-(L)1 directed agent. Key inclusion criteria include advanced unresectable HCC with at least 1 measurable tumor of ≥1 cm in longest diameter, Childs-Pugh Class A, and ECOG Score of 0 or 1. Important exclusion criteria include untreated esophageal and/or gastric varices with bleeding or at high risk for bleeding, and macroscopic invasion of tumor into major blood vessels and/or main bile ducts. Pts with a history of medically refractory hepatic encephalopathy and/or hepato-renal syndrome are also excluded. Pts in 1L cohort will receive 1200 mg Atezo and 15mg/kg Bev Q3W together with RP3 intratumorally (IT) Q3W for a total of up to 8 doses. In 2L pts will receive RP3 Q2W for 4 doses with Bev Q3W starting on C1D1, then RP3 and Bev Q3W for up to 4 more doses with Atezo Q3W being added on C4D1. The primary endpoint includes overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints are safety, ORR using HCC mRECIST, duration of response, complete response rate, and progression-free survival.

TPS268 Background: Among patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC, BRAF mutations occur in approximately 30%. MSI-H/dMMR and BRAF mutations are both associated with poor prognosis; in patients who have both biomarkers, poor prognosis is thought to be driven by the BRAF mutation. Pembrolizumab is indicated for the treatment of patients with MSI-H/dMMR unresectable or metastatic CRC (mCRC). The BRAF inhibitor encorafenib, in combination with cetuximab, an anti-EGFR antibody, is indicated for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Currently, there are no first-line treatment options indicated specifically for patients with both MSI-H/dMMR and BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. To assess the safety and efficacy of combining pembrolizumab with encorafenib + cetuximab, the SEAMARK study will evaluate this combination vs pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Methods: SEAMARK (NCT05217446) is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 2 study. Approximately 104 patients (randomized 1:1; stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status [ECOG PS] 0 vs 1) will receive either pembrolizumab + encorafenib + cetuximab or pembrolizumab. Enrolled patients must be aged ≥16 or ≥18 years (per country-specific regulations) and have previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant MSI-H/dMMR mCRC; measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1); ECOG PS 0 or 1; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. Patients who received prior treatment with BRAF/EGFR inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors, or who have brain metastases (unless radiologically stable) or RAS mutation (or unknown RAS status), will be excluded. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and quality of life. Enrollment started in July 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05217446 .

TPS261 Background: Current standard of care (SOC) for treatment (tx) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is multi-agent chemotherapy, w/ or w/o a VEGF- or EGFR-inhibitor. HER2 is a validated clinical target in breast and gastric cancers. HER2 amplification occurs in 3%-5% of patients (pts) w/ mCRC; the rate of HER2 amplification can increase to ~10% in pts w/ RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC tumors. Tucatinib (TUC), a highly selective, HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple regions for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and is being investigated in gastrointestinal cancers. MOUNTAINEER (NCT03043313) evaluated the safety and efficacy of TUC and trastuzumab (Tras) in pts w/ tx refractory RAS wild-type, HER2+ mCRC. Results from the primary endpoint analysis showed clinically meaningful activity (confirmed ORR of 38.1% and median DOR of 12.4 months) and demonstrated TUC + Tras was well tolerated with a low discontinuation rate (5.8%) and no deaths due to AEs. MOUNTAINEER-03 will further investigate TUC in combo w/ mFOLFOX and Tras in pts w/ RAS wild-type, HER2+ mCRC. Methods: MOUNTAINEER-03 (NCT05253651) is a global, open label, randomized, phase 3 study for 1L tx of HER2+ and RAS wild-type mCRC. Approximately 400 pts will be randomized 1:1 to the TUC experimental arm (TUC [300 mg PO BID] + Tras + mFOLFOX) or the SOC arm (mFOLFOX alone or in combo w/ either bevacizumab or cetuximab). HER2 status is determined centrally w/ tissue based HER2 immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays. Eligible pts must not have received prior tx in the metastatic setting but may have received adjuvant tx if completed > 6 months prior to enrollment. Pts must be ≥18 years of age w/ an ECOG performance status of ≤1 and RAS wild-type mCRC. Pts w/ treated stable central nervous system metastases are eligible. Randomization is stratified by primary tumor location (left-sided vs other) and liver metastases (presence/absence). Primary endpoint is progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1, assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Key secondary endpoints are overall survival and confirmed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 assessed by BICR. Enrollment is ongoing in the US, w/ global sites planned. Clinical trial information: NCT05253651 .

LBA661 Background: Liposomal irinotecan administered with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is approved in the USA and Europe for mPDAC following progression with gemcitabine-based therapy. A phase 1/2 study (Wainberg et al. Eur J Cancer 2021;151:14–24; NCT02551991) demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in patients with mPDAC who received first-line liposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m2 + 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 + LV 400 mg/m2 + oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 (NALIRIFOX). Herein, we present results from NAPOLI-3 (NCT04083235), a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study investigating the efficacy and safety of NALIRIFOX compared with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with mPDAC. Methods: Eligible patients with histopathologically/cytologically confirmed untreated metastatic PDAC were randomized (1:1) to receive NALIRIFOX on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (Gem+NabP) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Randomization was stratified by ECOG performance status, geographic region and presence or absence of liver metastases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. OS was evaluated when ≥ 543 events were observed using a stratified log-rank test with an overall 1-sided significance level of 0.025. Results: Overall, 770 patients (NALIRIFOX, n = 383; Gem+NabP, n = 387) were included. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. At a median follow-up of 16.1 months, 544 events had occurred. The median OS was 11.1 months in the NALIFIROX arm as compared with 9.2 months in the Gem+NabP arm (HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71–0.99]; p = 0.04); PFS was also significantly improved (7.4 months vs 5.6 months; HR 0.70 [0.59–0.84]; p = 0.0001). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with ≥ 10% frequency in patients receiving NALIRIFOX versus Gem+NabP included diarrhea (20.3% vs 4.5%), nausea (11.9% vs 2.6%), hypokalemia (15.1% vs 4.0%), anemia (10.5% vs 17.4%) and neutropenia (14.1% vs 24.5%). Conclusions: First-line NALIRIFOX demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in OS and PFS compared with Gem+NabP in treatment-naïve patients with mPDAC. The safety profile of NALIRIFOX was manageable and consistent with the profiles of the treatment components. Funding: Funded by Ipsen. Clinical trial information: NCT04083235 .[Table: see text]

559 Background: Cabozantinib, a multikanase inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following progression on sorafenib. The CELESTIAL study which demonstrated benefit from cabozantinib following sorafenib included only patients with Child Pugh class A liver function. Recently, bevacizumab plus atezolizumab has replaced sorafenib as the first line treatment for HCC. It is unclear whether there is benefit from using Cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy as CELESTIAL trial included very few patients who received prior immunotherapy. We describe the outcomes of individuals with advanced stage HCC treated with Cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010-2021 at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Progression free survival (PFS) and median overall survival analysis were performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified a total of 26 patients with advanced stage HCC who received cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. The median age of patients was 61 years (range, 39 – 81) and the majority were male (85%). Eighteen (72%) patients had Child Pugh A at initiation of cabozantinib therapy. Four (15%) patients received cabozantinib as second line therapy, the rest received it as third line or later. PFS on cabozantinib was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.3 – 3.9) and median overall survival from time of cabozantinib initiation was 7.7 months (95% CI: 5.3 – 14.9). PFS was shorter with Child Pugh Class B, 1.3 months (95% CI: 0.9 – NE) compared to those with Child Pugh Class A, 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.5 – 4); although this difference was not significant (p=0.55). Common adverse events included fatigue (50%), anorexia (35%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (35%), and diarrhea (31%); 7 (26%) patients experienced Grade 3 or greater adverse events including hypertension, diarrhea, anorexia, and bowel obstruction. Two patients discontinued cabozantinib due to side effects including one for uncontrolled blood pressure elevations and the other due to fatigue. Conclusions: The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy is unknown. Treatment with cabozantinib may improve clinical outcomes following progression on immunotherapy with similar adverse event profile. This study included patients with Child Pugh class B liver disease (28%) and heavily pretreated population and demonstrated mPFS and mOS similar to other work examining outcomes of cabozantinib in real world setting after progression on sorafenib. Further studies to determine optimal treatment sequencing for this patient population are needed.

507 Background: Lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, is an FDA approved treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the first line setting. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab are considered new standard of care as first line therapy after results of the IMBrave 150 trial. Currently, we do not have data to suggest any second-line treatment after administration of immunotherapy. We describe the clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib following treatment with immunotherapy. Methods: We conducted a multicentric, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021 at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. The study was reviewed and approved by the intuitional review board. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: We identified 53 patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib following immunotherapy. Most patients (83%) were male. Median age at start of lenvatinib was 67 years old. Forty-two (79%) patients had a Child-Pugh score of A at diagnosis while 30 (58%) patients were still Child-Pugh A at time of lenvatinib initiation. Risk factors for HCC included Hep C (43%), alcohol use (34%), NASH (15%) and hepatitis B (7%). Forty-five (85%) patients received lenvatinib in the 2nd line and 8 (15%) patients received it as third line or later. At time of data extraction, 38 (72%) patients had died. Median PFS was 4 months (95% CI: 3 – 6) and median OS from time of lenvatinib initiation was 13 months (95% CI: 6 – 24). The most common adverse events of any grade included fatigue (53%), hypertension (37%), AST elevation (30%), anorexia (28%), bilirubin elevation (25%) and diarrhea (25%). Twenty-one (40%) patients experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events including hypertension (25%), confusion (6%), acute kidney injury (2%), hyperkalemia (2%), ALT elevation (2%), proteinuria (2%), arthralgia (2%), heart failure (2%), AST elevation (2%), bilirubin elevation (2%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (2%), oral mucositis (2%), weight loss (2%), hypothyroidism (2%), anorexia (2%), fatigue (2%) and diarrhea (2%). Seven patients stopped treatment due to adverse events: 1 for hypertension, 2 for confusion, 1 for heart failure, 2 for fatigue, and 1 for elevated bilirubin. Conclusions: The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown. We found that median OS was 13 months in patients who received lenvatinib after immunotherapy which is comparable to survival in other studies when used as first line therapy. Our experience demonstrates that patients may benefit from treatment with lenvatinib following initial progression on immunotherapy.

225 Background: HR deficient (HRD) CRC has improved outcomes following exposure to DNA damaging agent (DDA) (irinotecan, IR; oxaliplatin, OX) compared to HRP CRC. Low expression of wild type (WT) BRCA1 mRNA is associated with prolonged OS in ovarian cancer; however, this finding has not been investigated in CRC or outside of BRCA. Here, we examine the effect of low expression of HR genes in HRP CRC on post-DDA survival. Methods: 12,860 CRC samples were analyzed by NGS (592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq) and WTS (NovaSeq) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Samples were classified by RNA expression percentiles. Real world OS was extracted from insurance claims and calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates for molecularly defined cohorts from first of OX or IR to last contact. Results: Post-IR survival was prolonged with low expression of ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 in WT ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2 WT CRC, respectively (bottom vs. top 10%, bottom vs. top 25%; p<0.05). Notably, low PALB2 expression (bottom 10%) showed a 14.5-month post-IR benefit compared to high PALB2 expression (top 10%) in WT PALB2 CRC (p=0.003). Post-OX survival was not significantly prolonged with low expression of CHEK2 in WT CHEK2 CRC (bottom 10% vs top 10%, bottom 25% vs top 25%) but was with low expression of ATM (+9.7 months, p=0.02) and PALB2 (+5.6 months, p=0.03) in WT ATM and PALB2 CRC, respectively (all bottom 25% vs top 25%). Conclusions: Here we report the first findings to suggest a novel subclass of CRC defined as the low expression of mRNA of non-mutated HRD genes that exhibit sensitivity to DDA. Low expression of WT ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 correlates with prolonged OS following IR, post-OX survival was prolonged with low expression of ATM and PALB2. Further characterization defining sensitivity of low expressing HRP genes to DDA may help guide treatment considerations in HRP CRC. [Table: see text]