Citations 24

Influence of the Menstrual Cycle on Sympathetic Activity, Baroreflex Sensitivity, and Vascular Transduction in Young Women

Circulation | June 11, 2012 | Volume: 101 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 862-868

10.1161/01.cir.101.8.862 | PMID 10694525

Background —Our goal was to test sympathetic and cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity and the transduction of sympathetic traffic into vascular resistance during the early follicular (EF) and midluteal (ML) phases of the menstrual cycle. Methods and Results —Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was assessed by lowering and raising blood pressure with intravenous bolus doses of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine. It was defined as the slope relating muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; determined by microneurography) and diastolic blood pressure. Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was defined as the slope relating R-R interval and systolic blood pressure. Vascular transduction was evaluated during ischemic handgrip exercise and postexercise ischemia, and it was defined as the slope relating MSNA and calf vascular resistance (determined by plethysmography). Resting MSNA (EF, 1170±151 U/min; ML, 2252±251 U/min; P <0.001) and plasma norepinephrine levels (EF, 240±21 pg/mL; ML, 294±25 pg/mL; P =0.025) were significantly higher in the ML than in the EF phase. Furthermore, sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was greater during the ML than the EF phase in every subject (MSNA/diastolic blood pressure slopes: EF, −4.15; FL, −5.42; P =0.005). No significant differences in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity or vascular transduction were observed. Conclusions —The present study suggests that the hormonal fluctuations that occur during the normal menstrual cycle may alter sympathetic outflow but not the transduction of sympathetic activity into vascular resistance.
Basal forebrain malformation with hyperhidrosis and hypothermia: Variant of Shapiro’s syndrome

Neurology | May 13, 2012 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 254-256

10.1212/wnl.56.2.254 | PMID 11160966

Vascular Response to Angiotensin II in Upper Body Obesity

Hypertension | August 31, 2004 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 435-441

10.1161/01.hyp.0000142111.67601.6b | PMID 15337733

Upper body obesity is associated with insulin resistance, hypertension, and endothelial dysfunction. We examined forearm vascular function in response to vasodilator (endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent) and vasoconstrictor stimuli in 8 normotensive, upper body/viscerally obese men with a positive family history of hypertension and 8 age-matched nonobese men. We also measured body composition and insulin regulation of free fatty acid (FFA) and glucose metabolism. Forearm blood flow was measured before and during brachial artery infusions of acetylcholine (Ach), sodium nitroprusside (NTP), and angiotensin II (±nitric oxide synthase [NO]) synthase blockade with N G -monomethyl l -arginine [ l -NMMA]). On a separate day, baseline and insulin-regulated glucose ([3- 3 H]glucose) and FFA ([9,10- 3 H]palmitate) turnover were measured. The vasoconstrictor response to angiotensin II was greater ( P <0.05) in obese men than in nonobese men, whereas endothelium-dependent vasodilation was similar. The slope of the angiotensin II dose-response curve correlated significantly with the basal plasma palmitate concentration. Basal and insulin-mediated glucose disposal was significantly reduced and FFA turnover significantly increased in viscerally obese men. No differences in endothelium-independent vasodilation or relationships between vascular responsivity and palmitate and glucose kinetics or body composition were found. Angiotensin II–stimulated forearm vasoconstriction is increased in viscerally obese normotensive men.
Pneumatic Compression Boots, Lithotomy Stirrups, and Lower Limb Compartment Syndrome

Anesthesiology | November 10, 2003 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 285-285

10.1097/00000542-200207000-00055