Boon, Andrea J.

AbstractPhrenic nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and needle electromyography (EMG) can provide important information on the underlying pathophysiology in patients presenting with unexplained shortness of breath, failure to wean from the ventilator, or consideration of phrenic nerve pacemaker implantation. However, these techniques are often technically challenging, require experience, can lack sensitivity and specificity, and, in the case of diaphragm EMG, involve some degree of risk. Diagnostic high‐resolution ultrasound has been introduced in recent years as an adjuvant technique readily available at the bedside that can increase the overall sensitivity and specificity of the neurophysiologic evaluation of respiratory symptoms. Two‐dimensional ultrasound in the zone of apposition can identify atrophy and evaluate contractility of the diaphragm, in addition to localizing a safe zone for needle EMG. M‐mode ultrasound can identify decreased excursion or paradoxical motion of the diaphragm and can increase the reliability of phrenic NCSs. When used in combination, ultrasound, phrenic NCSs and EMG of the diaphragm can differentiate neuropathic, myopathic, and central disorders, and can offer aid in prognosis that is difficult to arrive at solely from clinical examination. This article will review techniques to successfully perform phrenic NCSs, needle EMG of the diaphragm, and ultrasound of the diaphragm. The discussion will include technical pitfalls and clinical pearls as well as future directions and clinical indications.

Summary: The tibial nerve is bound tightly to the posterior tibial artery in the tarsal tunnel where expansion capacity is limited. Therefore, the nerve may be vulnerable to, and damaged by chronic pulsatile trauma from an atypically positioned overriding artery, labeled “punched-nerve syndrome”. In this article, we present a 49-year-old woman who presented with two months of severe burning pain in the left medial ankle and sole of the foot without antecedent trauma. Neurological examination identified dysesthetic sensation to light touch in the left medial sole of the foot, and both active and passive dorsiflexion worsened the painful paresthesia. Nerve conduction studies demonstrated a reduced left medial plantar mixed nerve action potential amplitude, 50% less than the right. High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) showed an increased left tibial nerve cross-sectional area of 26 mm2 (normal <22.3 mm2) at the level of the ankle with side-to-side difference of 6 mm2 (normal <5.7 mm2). The distal tibial nerve and its medial plantar branch were atypically positioned immediately deep to the left posterior tibial artery and abnormally flattened with focal enlargement of the nerve on longitudinal view. Dynamic analysis demonstrated the nerve being compressed with each pulsation of the tibial artery immediately above. Active dorsiflexion of the ankle narrowed the space underneath the flexor retinaculum resulting in further compression of the nerve against the artery. In conclusion, HRUS as an adjunct to electrophysiological studies identified punched-nerve arterial compression as an etiology of tarsal tunnel syndrome.

AbstractNeuromuscular ultrasound has become an integral part of the diagnostic workup of neuromuscular disorders at many centers. Despite its growing utility, uniform standard scanning techniques do not currently exist. Scanning approaches for similar diseases vary in the literature creating heterogeneity in the studies as reported in several meta‐analysis. Moreover, neuromuscular ultrasound experts including the group in this study have different views with regards to technical aspects, scanning protocols, and the parameters that should be assessed. Establishing standardized neuromuscular scanning protocols is essential for the development of the subspeciality to ensure uniform clinical and research practices. Therefore, we aimed to recommend consensus‐based standardized scanning techniques and protocols for common neuromuscular disorders using the Delphi approach. A panel of 17 experts participated in the study, which consisted of three consecutive electronic surveys. The first survey included voting on six scanning protocols addressing the general scanning technique and five common categories of suspected neuromuscular disorders. The subsequent surveys focused on refining the protocols and voting on new steps, rephrased statements, or areas of non‐agreement. A high degree of consensus was achieved on the general neuromuscular ultrasound scanning technique and the scanning protocols for focal mononeuropathies, brachial plexopathies, polyneuropathies, amyotophic lateral sclerosis, and muscle diseases. In this study, a group of neuromuscular ultrasound experts developed six consensus‐based neuromuscular ultrasound scanning protocols that may serve as references for clinicians and researchers. The standardized protocols could also aid in achieving high‐quality uniform neuromuscular ultrasound practices.

Abstract Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), also referred to as idiopathic brachial plexitis and Parsonage‐Turner syndrome, is a peripheral nerve disorder characterized by acute severe shoulder pain followed by progressive upper limb weakness and muscle atrophy. While NA is incompletely understood and often difficult to diagnose, early recognition may prevent unnecessary tests and interventions and, in some situations, allow for prompt treatment, which can potentially minimize adverse long‐term sequalae. High‐resolution ultrasound (HRUS) has become a valuable tool in the diagnosis and evaluation of NA. Pathologic HRUS findings can be grouped into four categories: nerve swelling, swelling with incomplete constriction, swelling with complete constriction, and fascicular entwinement, which may represent a continuum of pathologic processes. Certain ultrasound findings may help predict the likelihood of spontaneous recovery with conservative management versus the need for surgical intervention. We recommend relying heavily on history and physical examination to determine which nerves are clinically affected and should therefore be assessed by HRUS. The nerves most frequently affected by NA are the suprascapular, long thoracic, median and anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) branch, radial and posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) branch, axillary, spinal accessory, and musculocutaneous. When distal upper limb nerves are affected (AIN, PIN, superficial radial nerve), the lesion is almost always located in their respective fascicles within the parent nerve, proximal to its branching point. The purpose of this review is to describe a reproducible, standardized, ultrasonographic approach for evaluating suspected NA, and to share reliable techniques and clinical considerations when imaging commonly affected nerves.

Abstract Introduction/Aims Carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome (CTS, CuTS) are common among patients with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure‐palsies (HNPP) and Charcot–Marie‐Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) and may impact quality of life. We aimed to evaluate the utility of nerve decompression surgeries in these patients. Methods Medical records were reviewed for patients with PMP22 mutations confirmed in Mayo Clinic laboratories from January 1999 to December 2020, who had CTS and CuTS and underwent surgical decompression. Results CTS occurred in 53.3% of HNPP and 11.5% of CMT1A, while CuTS was present in 43.3% of HNPP and 5.8% of CMT1A patients. CTS decompression occurred in 10‐HNPP and 5‐CMT1A patients, and CuTS decompression with/without transposition was performed in 5‐HNPP and 1‐CMT1A patients. In HNPP, electrodiagnostic studies identified median neuropathy at the wrist in 9/10 patients and ultrasound showed focal enlargements at the carpal and cubital tunnels. In CMT1A, median and ulnar sensory responses were all absent, and the nerves were diffusely enlarged. After CTS surgery, pain, sensory loss, and strength improved in 4/5 CMT1A, and 6/10 HNPP patients. Of clinical, electrophysiologic and ultrasound findings, only activity‐provoked features significantly correlated with CTS surgical benefit in HNPP patients (odds ratio = 117.0:95% confidence interval, 1.94 > 999.99, p = 0.01). One CMT1A and one HNPP patient improved with CuTS surgery while 2 HNPP patients worsened. Discussion CTS symptom improvement post‐surgery can be seen in CMT1A and (less frequent) in HNPP patients. CuTS surgery commonly worsened course in HNPP. Activity‐provoked symptoms in HNPP best informed benefits from CTS surgery.

Abstract Background Exosomes are regenerative mediators for skin rejuvenation. Human platelet extract (HPE) is an allogeneic exosome product derived from US-sourced, leukocyte-reduced apheresed platelets with consistent purity and potency. Objectives The authors sought to better characterize the safety and tolerability of novel HPE (plated) Intensive Repair Serum (Rion Aesthetics, Rochester, MN) and its maximal effects on skin rejuvenation at 6 weeks. Methods This prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, longitudinal study investigated the safety and efficacy of HPE. Structured sub-analysis evaluated multifactorial improvement in skin health following standardized skin care regimen to determine the maximal effect. Evaluation at baseline and 6 weeks included participant questionnaires and photo documentation with VISIA-CR Generation 5 3D PRIMOS (Canfield Scientific Inc, Fairfield, NJ). Results VISIA-CR imaging yielded quantifiable and statistically significant improvements in overall skin health (skin health score). A greater score correlated to greater overall skin health, and there was a statistically significant mean delta improvement of 224.2 ± 112.8 (mean ± standard deviation, P ≤ 0.0001) in skin health score at 6 weeks compared with baseline. This correlated to reduction in redness, wrinkles, and melanin production across all cosmetic units (P = 0.005, P = 0.0023, P ≤ 0.0001, respectively) and significant improvements in luminosity and color evenness (P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions A topically applied platelet-derived exosome product, HPE, induced normalization to skin health at 4 to 6 weeks with improved various clinical measures of facial photodamage and cutaneous aging. It is safe, well-tolerated, and well-liked by participants. Level of Evidence: 4