Abeykoon, Jithma P

PURPOSE BRAF and MEK inhibitors are standard treatments in histiocytic disorders, such as Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD). Some patients lack MAPK-pathway alterations, making these treatments less effective. METHODS We describe three patients with histiocytic disorders who have novel non-MAPK pathway alterations. These alterations were studied through genomic and in silico analyses when applicable, then treated with off-label medications rationally selected on the basis of genomic alterations. RESULTS Patient 1 had rapidly progressive ECD involving the CNS. A CSF1R in-frame deletion (p.S560_P566del) was identified, and in silico modeling predicted a gain-of-function mutation. This alteration was targeted with pexidartinib, which led to a clinical complete response (CR) within 2 months, and a partial response (PR) on imaging after 3 months. After 15 months, the disease became resistant to pexidartinib and transformed to histiocytic sarcoma. Patient 2 has skin-only involvement of a xanthogranuloma disorder. A KIF5B-FGFR1 fusion was identified on RNA sequencing and targeted with pemigatinib. At 24 months of follow-up, she remains in a clinical PR. Patient 3 has ECD involving the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract, and subcutaneous tissues. A MEF2C-FLT3 fusion was identified and targeted with sorafenib. He achieved a clinical CR and radiographic PR within 3 months, which has continued for 30 months. CONCLUSION We report three patients with histiocytic disorders harboring novel alterations who had sustained responses to off-label kinase inhibitors specific to their histiocytic disorder. Pathogenic variants outside of the MAPK pathway, including variants of unknown significant, may be targeted with readily available small molecules.

Summary Histiocytic neoplasms are diverse clonal haematopoietic disorders, and clinical disease is mediated by tumorous infiltration as well as uncontrolled systemic inflammation. Individual subtypes include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Rosai–Dorfman–Destombes disease (RDD) and Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD), and these have been characterized with respect to clinical phenotypes, driver mutations and treatment paradigms. Less is known about patients with mixed histiocytic neoplasms (MXH), that is two or more coexisting disorders. This international collaboration examined patients with biopsy‐proven MXH with respect to component disease subtypes, oncogenic driver mutations and responses to conventional (chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressive) versus targeted (BRAF or MEK inhibitor) therapies. Twenty‐seven patients were studied with ECD/LCH (19/27), ECD/RDD (6/27), RDD/LCH (1/27) and ECD/RDD/LCH (1/27). Mutations previously undescribed in MXH were identified, including KRAS, MAP2K2, MAPK3, non‐V600‐BRAF, RAF1 and a BICD2‐BRAF fusion. A repeated‐measure generalized estimating equation demonstrated that targeted treatment was statistically significantly (1) more likely to result in a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) (odds ratio [OR]: 17.34, 95% CI: 2.19–137.00, p = 0.007), and (2) less likely to result in progression (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03–0.23, p < 0.0001). Histiocytic neoplasms represent an entity with underappreciated clinical and molecular diversity, poor responsiveness to conventional therapy and exquisite sensitivity to targeted therapy.

Abstract Purpose: IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) represent a disease spectrum with highly varied therapeutic management, ranging from observation to chemoimmunotherapy. The current classification relies solely on clinical features and does not explain the heterogeneity that exists within each of these conditions. Further investigation is warranted to shed light on the biology that may account for the clinical differences. Experimental Design: We used bone marrow (BM) clonal CD19+ and/or CD138+ sorted cells, matched BM supernatant, and peripheral blood serum from 32 patients (7 MGUS, 25 WM) to perform the first multi-omics approach including whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, proteomics, metabolomics, and mass cytometry. Results: We identified three clusters with distinct pathway activation, immune content, metabolomic, and clinical features. Cluster 1 included only patients with WM and was characterized by transcriptional silencing of genes involved in cell cycle and immune response, enrichment of mitochondrial metabolism, infiltration of senescent T effector memory cells, and aggressive clinical behavior. Genetic/structural alterations of TNFAIP3 were distinct events of this cluster. Cluster 2 comprised both MGUS and WM patients with upregulation of inflammatory response, senescence and glycolysis signatures, increased activated T follicular helper and T regulatory cells, and indolent clinical behavior. Cluster 3 also included both MGUS and WM patients and exhibited intermediate features, including proliferative and inflammatory signaling, as well as glycolysis and mitochondrial metabolism. Conclusions: We have identified three distinct molecular clusters, suggesting a potential biologic classification that may have therapeutic implications.