Back to Authors

Fockens, Paul

0000-0002-2382-0672

A5069316397 | I2802928900

Mayo Clinic

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam

Citations 3

International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer

Gut | November 8, 2012 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 339-347

10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303108 | PMID 23135763

Background Screening individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC) detects early, potentially curable, pancreatic neoplasia. Objective To develop consortium statements on screening, surveillance and management of high-risk individuals with an inherited predisposition to PC. Methods A 49-expert multidisciplinary international consortium met to discuss pancreatic screening and vote on statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. Results There was excellent agreement that, to be successful, a screening programme should detect and treat T1N0M0 margin-negative PC and high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). It was agreed that the following were candidates for screening: first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with PC from a familial PC kindred with at least two affected FDRs; patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome; and p16 , BRCA 2 and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) mutation carriers with ≥1 affected FDR. Consensus was not reached for the age to initiate screening or stop surveillance. It was agreed that initial screening should include endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography not CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. There was no consensus on the need for EUS fine-needle aspiration to evaluate cysts. There was disagreement on optimal screening modalities and intervals for follow-up imaging. When surgery is recommended it should be performed at a high-volume centre. There was great disagreement as to which screening abnormalities were of sufficient concern to for surgery to be recommended. Conclusions Screening is recommended for high-risk individuals, but more evidence is needed, particularly for how to manage patients with detected lesions. Screening and subsequent management should take place at high-volume centres with multidisciplinary teams, preferably within research protocols.
New classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the colon

Endoscopy | October 4, 2011 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1076-1081

10.1055/s-0030-1256767 | PMID 21971922

Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

Endoscopy | August 4, 2011 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 882-891

10.1055/s-0030-1256632 | PMID 21818734