Camp, Christopher L.

Abstract Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement through an arthroscopic approach has gained widespread popularity in recent years. Although outcomes are generally favorable, one of the most common reasons for failure is incomplete resection of cam lesions of the femoral neck. As a result, the T‐capsulotomy has been introduced as a method for improving access to the femoral head‐neck junction, which is not always visible through a standard interportal capsulotomy. The T‐capsulotomy has the benefits of improving arthroscopic visualization of the femoral neck, reducing overall fluoroscopy exposure for the patient and surgeon, and facilitating capsular plication. We present a reliable and efficient method for creating and repairing the T‐capsulotomy. We routinely perform this technique in patients with cam lesions that are too large or too distal to safely visualize and decompress through an interportal capsulotomy. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract Capsulotomy is typically performed during arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. As the frequency of hip arthroscopy continues to expand rapidly, increased attention is being paid to the implications of interportal capsulotomy and the need for repair. To minimize the risk of postoperative instability, capsular closure has been recommended to restore the anatomy and biomechanical function of the capsule. We present a reliable, efficient, and effective method for arthroscopic closure of the interportal capsulotomy after hip arthroscopy. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract Anterior shoulder instability is often accompanied by a Hill‐Sachs defect on the humeral head that can contribute to recurrent instability if not addressed at the time of surgery. We describe a method of performing arthroscopic remplissage to treat engaging Hill‐Sachs lesions in patients with glenohumeral instability. It has the benefits of being an efficient procedure that can be performed with minimal technical difficulty and can be used to augment other stabilization procedures such as labral repair. The indications for this technique include the presence of an engaging Hill‐Sachs defect in patients will little or no glenoid bone loss. In appropriately selected patients, arthroscopic remplissage has shown reduced rates of recurrent instability. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Background: Patients with patellar instability and a tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance ≥20 mm may be candidates for distal tubercle realignment surgery. Although this variable has proven valuable in predicting recurrent dislocations, it is not individualized to patient size, bony structure, or patellofemoral mechanics. Purpose: To develop a patellar instability ratio (PIR) that predicts the risk of recurrent instability based on the TT-TG distance to patient-specific anatomy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: On magnetic resonance imaging scans of 59 knees with patellar instability, the TT-TG distance, tibial tubercle–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance, sagittal patellar length (PL), sagittal trochlear length (TL), axial patellar width (PW), and axial trochlear width (TW) were calculated by 2 observers in a blinded and randomized fashion. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with a single dislocation and those with multiple (≥2) dislocations. The ability of the TT-TG and TT-PCL distances as well as the 8 different ratios to predict recurrent instability was assessed by calculating odds ratios (ORs), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for each measure. Results: Twelve knees (20%) experienced a single dislocation, while 47 (80%) sustained multiple dislocations. A TT-TG distance ≥20 mm was predictive of recurrent instability, with a sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of 21%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The OR for TT-TG ≥20 mm was 5.38 ( P = .29), while the highest ORs for recurrent instability were noted for a TT-TG/PW ≥0.4 (OR, 7.37; P = .02) and a TT-TG/TW ≥0.5 (OR, 8.88; P = .04). The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of a TT-TG/PW ≥0.4 were 62%, 83%, and 94%, respectively, while those of a TT-TG/TW ≥0.5 were 45%, 92%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusion: Two novel PIRs (TT-TG/TW and TT-TG/PW) were identified and found to more effectively predict recurrent instability than the TT-TG distance alone. Each ratio takes into account patient-specific anatomy and can be measured in an accurate and reliable fashion by clinicians. These PIRs are a step toward overcoming some of the limitations of using the TT-TG distance in isolation. Further investigation into the clinical applications and utility of the TT-TG/TW is warranted.

Objectives: Patients with patellar instability and tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distances ≥ 20 mm are often considered to have pathologic lateralization of the tibial tubercle (TT) relative to the femoral trochlea and may be candidates for TT realignment surgery. Although this variable has proven valuable in predicting risk of recurrent dislocations, the measure is limited in that it is not individualized to the patient and does not consider patient size, bony morphology, or patellofemoral mechanics. The purpose of this study was to develop a Patellar Instability Ratio (PIR) that predicts the risk of recurrent instability based on the TT-TG distance relative to patient specific anatomy. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with a clinical diagnosis of patellar instability were included in the study. A number of measures were calculated on MRI by two observers (one staff orthopedic surgeon and one senior resident) in a blinded and randomized fashion. Variables analyzed included: TT-TG, tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance (TT-PCL), sagittal patellar length (PL), sagittal trochlear length (TL), axial patellar width (PW), axial trochlear width (TW), sagittal patellofemoral engagement (SPE; SPE=TL/PL) and axial patellofemoral engagement (APE; APE=PW/TW). Patients were divided into two groups: those with ≤ 1 dislocation and those with ≥ 2 dislocations. Using these groups, the ability of TT-TG, TT-PCL, and 12 different ratios with cut-off values to predict recurrent instability was assessed by calculating odds ratios (OR), C-statistics, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for each of the ratios. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Mean follow up was 6.6 years. Twelve patients (20%) did not experience recurrent instability while 47 (80%) sustained two or more dislocations during the study period. Pathologic TT-TG (≥ 20 mm) was predictive of recurrent instability with an OR of 5.38 (p=0.29). The highest OR's for recurrent instability were noted for TT-TG/PW ≥ 0.40 (OR > 7.37, p=0.02) and TT-TG/TW ≥ 0.5 (OR 8.88, p=0.04)(Table 1). PW was defined as the largest medial to lateral width of the articular surface of the patella. TW is defined as the largest articular width of the trochlea that is articulating with the patella and can be conceptualized as the “jump distance” that must be overcome for the patella to dislocate. The sensitivity and specificity of TT-TG/PW ratio ≥ 0.40 was 61% and 83% and that of TT-TG/TW ≥ 0.50 was 59% and 92%, respectively. PPV for TT-TG/PW ≥ 0.40 was 94% while that of TT-TG/TW ≥ 0.49 was 97%. Conclusion: Two distinct PIR (TT-TG/PW and TT-TG/TW) have been identified that predict recurrent patellar instability more accurately than TT-TG ≥ 20 mm with PPV's ≥ 94% and OR's > 7 for both measures. These ratios take into consideration the TT-TG relative to patient specific size and anatomy. Further research is needed to determine if patients with increased PIR benefit from TT osteotomy.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine failure rates, functional outcomes, and risk factors for failure after revision anterior shoulder stabilization surgery in high‐risk adolescent athletes. Methods Adolescent athletes who underwent primary anterior shoulder stabilization were reviewed. Patients undergoing subsequent revision stabilization surgery were identified and analyzed. Failure rates after revision surgery were assessed by Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Failure was defined as recurrent instability requiring reoperation. Functional outcomes included the Marx activity score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and University of California, Los Angeles score. The characteristics of patients who required reoperation for recurrent instability after revision surgery were compared with those of patients who required only a single revision to identify potential risk factors for failure. Results Of 90 patients who underwent primary anterior stabilization surgery, 15 (17%) had failure and underwent revision surgery (mean age, 16.6 years; age range, 14 to 18 years). The mean follow‐up period was 5.5 years (range, 2 to 12 years). Of the 15 revision patients, 5 (33%) had recurrent dislocations and required repeat revision stabilization surgery at a mean of 50 months (range, 22 to 102 months) after initial revision. No risk factors for failure were identified. The Kaplan‐Meier reoperation‐free estimates were 86% (95% confidence interval, 67% to 100%) at 24 months and 78% (95% confidence interval, 56% to 100%) at 48 months after revision surgery. The mean final Marx activity score was 14.8 (range, 5 to 20); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 82.1 (range, 33 to 100); and University of California, Los Angeles score, 30.8 (range, 16 to 35). Conclusions At 5.5 years' follow‐up, adolescent athletes had a high failure rate of revision stabilization surgery and modest functional outcomes. We were unable to convincingly identify specific risk factors for failure of revision surgery. Level of Evidence Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

Abstract We present our arthroscopic technique for fixation of an unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion. This technique includes arthroscopic evaluation of cartilage and bone quality of the OCD fragment, hinging open the lesion, debridement of fibrous nonunion tissue, reducing the fragment, and obtaining multi‐point compression screw fixation. This technique avoids the morbidity of an open arthrotomy and should be considered when treating an unstable OCD lesion with adequate bone for fixation. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Context: Articular cartilage injuries are common in patients presenting to surgeons with primary complaints of knee pain or mechanical symptoms. Treatment options include comprehensive nonoperative management, palliative surgery, joint preservation operations, and arthroplasty. Evidence Acquisition: A MEDLINE search on articular cartilage restoration techniques of the knee was conducted to identify outcome studies published from 1993 to 2013. Special emphasis was given to Level 1 and 2 published studies. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Results: Current surgical options with documented outcomes in treating chondral injuries in the knee include the following: microfracture, osteochondral autograft transfer, osteochondral allograft transplant, and autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Generally, results are favorable regarding patient satisfaction and return to sport when proper treatment algorithms and surgical techniques are followed, with 52% to 96% of patients demonstrating good to excellent clinical outcomes and 66% to 91% returning to sport at preinjury levels. Conclusion: Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes may be improved in the majority of patients with articular cartilage restoration surgery; however, some patients may not fully return to their preinjury activity levels postoperatively. In active and athletic patient populations, biological techniques that restore the articular surface may be options that provide symptom relief and return patients to their prior levels of function.

Objectives: TT-TG distance is a commonly used measurement for surgical decision-making in patients with patellofemoral malalignment and instability. This measurement has historically been performed utilizing axial CT scans. More recently, MRI has been proposed as an equivalent test for measurement of TT-TG distance. We sought to determine the reliability of TT-TG measurements on both MRI and CT, and to determine whether the measurements can be used interchangeably. Methods: All patients diagnosed with patellar instability who had received both CT and MRI of the knee between 2003 and 2011 were included (n=59 knees in 54 patients). Two fellowship trained musculoskeletal radiologists measured the TT-TG distances for each patient by CT and MRI in a randomized, blinded fashion for a total of 236 measurements. Inter-observer reliability was calculated between radiologists for both imaging modalities and inter-methods reliability was calculated between the two imagining modalities. The results are reported using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland Altman analysis (BAA). Results: The 59 knees had a mean TT-TG distance of 16.9 mm (range: 8.3-25.8) by CT and 14.7 mm (range: 1.5-25.1) by MRI. Eighteen patients (31%) had a TT-TG ≥ 20 mm by CT, and only 9 (15%) had a TT-TG ≥ 20 mm by MRI. Inter-observer reliability between the radiologists was considered excellent for both CT and MRI (ICC = 0.777 and 0.843 respectively). When comparing CT to MRI, however, the ICC was considered only fair for each of the two raters (0.532 and 0.539). A total of 11 patients (19%) had a TT-TG ≥ 20 mm on CT preoperatively and underwent distal realignment by tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). In this surgical subgroup, the mean TT-TG on CT was 22.5 mm (range 19.8-25.8) while the mean TT-TG on MRI was only 18.7 mm (range 14.4-22.8). Conclusion: TT-TG distance can be measured with excellent inter-rater reliability on both MRI and CT scans; however, the values derived from these two tests may not be interchangeable. This observation should be taken into consideration when MRI is used for surgical planning since MRI may underestimate TT-TG distance when compared to CT.

Background: Tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) is a commonly used measurement for surgical decision making in patients with patellofemoral malalignment and instability. This measurement has historically been performed utilizing axial computed tomography (CT). More recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as an equivalent method, but this has not yet been fully validated. Purpose: To determine the reliability of TT-TG distance measurements on both MRI and CT and to determine whether the measurements are interchangeable with one another. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: All patients with patellar instability who underwent both CT and MRI of the knee from 2003 to 2011 were included (n = 59 knees in 54 patients). Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists measured the TT-TG distances for each patient by CT and MRI in a randomized, blinded fashion. Interobserver reliability was calculated between radiologists for both imaging modalities, and intermethod reliability was calculated between the 2 imaging modalities. The results are reported using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The 59 knees had a mean TT-TG distance of 16.9 mm (range, 8.3-25.8 mm) by CT and 14.7 mm (range, 1.5-25.1 mm) by MRI. Interobserver reliability between the radiologists was considered excellent for both CT and MRI (ICC = 0.777 and 0.843, respectively). When comparing CT to MRI, the ICC was considered only fair for each of the raters (0.532 and 0.539). Eleven patients (19%) had a TT-TG distance of ≥20 mm on CT preoperatively and underwent distal realignment by tibial tubercle osteotomy. In this surgical subgroup, the mean TT-TG distance was 22.5 mm (range, 19.8-25.8 mm) by CT and only 18.7 mm (range, 14.4-22.8 mm) by MRI for a mean difference of 3.80 mm ( P < .001). Conclusion: The TT-TG distance can be measured with excellent interrater reliability on both MRI and CT; however, the values derived from these 2 tests may not be interchangeable. This observation should be taken into consideration when MRI is used for surgical planning because MRI may underestimate the TT-TG distance when compared with CT.