Sabbagh, Marwan Noel

Abstract Cerebral white matter rarefaction (CWMR) was considered by Binswanger and Alzheimer to be due to cerebral arteriolosclerosis. Renewed attention came with CT and MR brain imaging, and neuropathological studies finding a high rate of CWMR in Alzheimer disease (AD). The relative contributions of cerebrovascular disease and AD to CWMR are still uncertain. In 1181 autopsies by the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND), large-format brain sections were used to grade CWMR and determine its vascular and neurodegenerative correlates. Almost all neurodegenerative diseases had more severe CWMR than the normal control group. Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that Braak neurofibrillary stage was the strongest predictor of CWMR, with additional independently significant predictors including age, cortical and diencephalic lacunar and microinfarcts, body mass index, and female sex. It appears that while AD and cerebrovascular pathology may be additive in causing CWMR, both may be solely capable of this. The typical periventricular pattern suggests that CWMR is primarily a distal axonopathy caused by dysfunction of the cell bodies of long-association corticocortical projection neurons. A consequence of these findings is that CWMR should not be viewed simply as “small vessel disease” or as a pathognomonic indicator of vascular cognitive impairment or vascular dementia.

Abstract The regulatory path for drug approval is increasingly well defined. Drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) need to show statistically significant benefit over placebo with respect to cognitive and functional measures, with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale being among the most often used instruments in AD clinical trials. In contrast, there are no validated instruments for use in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies. This poses challenges for drug development because the regulatory pathway to drug approval requires demonstrable efficacy measures. In December 2021, the Lewy Body Dementia Association advisory group met with representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration to discuss the lack of approved drugs and treatments, discernment of efficacy measures, and identification of biomarkers. Highlights The Lewy Body with Dementia Association convened a listening session with the US Food and Drug Administration on dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and clinical trial design. Gaps include DLB‐specific measures, alpha synuclein biomarkers, and coexisting pathologies. DLB clinical trial design should focus on clinical value and disease specificity.

BackgroundAdvanced diffusion‐based MRI biomarkers may provide insight into microstructural and perfusion changes associated with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline.PurposeTo assess longitudinal microstructural and perfusion changes using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging (IVIM‐DWI) parameters in cognitively impaired (CI) and healthy control (HC) groups.Study TypeProspective/longitudinal.PopulationTwelve CI patients (75% female) and 13 HC subjects (69% female).Field Strength/Sequence3 T; Spin‐Echo‐IVIM‐DWI.AssessmentTwo MRI scans were performed with a 12‐month interval. ADC and IVIM‐DWI metrics (diffusion coefficient [D] and perfusion fraction [f]) were generated from monoexponential and biexponential fits, respectively. Additionally, voxel‐based correlations were evaluated between change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (ΔMoCA) and baseline imaging parameters.Statistical TestsAnalysis of covariance with sex and age as covariates was performed for main effects of group and time (false discovery rate [FDR] corrected) with post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Partial‐η2 and Hedges' g were used for effect‐size analysis. Spearman's correlations (FDR corrected) were used for the relationship between ΔMoCA score and imaging. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSignificant differences were found for the main effects of group (HC vs. CI) and time. For group effects, higher ADC, IVIM‐D, and IVIM‐f were observed in the CI group compared to HC (ADC: 1.23 ± 0.08.10−3 vs. 1.09 ± 0.07.10−3 mm2/sec; IVIM‐D: 0.82 ± 0.01.10−3 vs. 0.73 ± 0.01.10−3 mm2/sec; and IVIM‐f: 0.317 ± 0.008 vs. 0.253 ± 0.009). Significantly higher ADC, IVIM‐D, and IVIM‐f values were observed in the CI group after 12 months (ADC: 1.45 ± 0.05.10−3 vs. 1.50 ± 0.07.10−3 mm2/sec; IVIM‐D: 0.87 ± 0.01.10−3 vs. 0.94 ± 0.02.10−3 mm2/sec; and IVIM‐f: 0.303 ± 0.007 vs. 0.332 ± 0.008), but not in the HC group at large effect size. ADC, IVIM‐D, and IVIM‐f negatively correlated with ΔMoCA score (ρ = −0.49, −0.51, and −0.50, respectively).Data ConclusionThese findings demonstrate that longitudinal differences between CI and HC cohorts can be measured using IVIM‐based metrics.Level of Evidence2Technical Efficacy Stage2

Abstract Introduction A phase 2b clinical trial, HEADWAY‐DLB, was performed to assess treatment with intepirdine, a serotonin receptor antagonist, in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Methods HEADWAY‐DLB was a multinational, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Two hundred sixty‐nine DLB patients were randomized to receive placebo, 70 mg/day intepirdine, or 35 mg/day intepirdine over 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 24 on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale–Part III (UPDRS‐III). Results Both intepirdine groups did not demonstrate significant benefits over placebo at 24 weeks on the UPDRS‐III (35 mg/day: P = .1580, 70 mg/day: P = .6069). All other endpoints were not significant. Intepirdine was well tolerated, with a slightly higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events observed in the intepirdine groups versus placebo. Discussion Intepirdine treatment did not lead to improvements over placebo in patients with DLB. As one of the largest DLB studies to date, HEADWAY‐DLB demonstrates that international trials for DLB are feasible within a reasonable timeframe.

AbstractBackgroundIt is important to determine the natural history of sporadic and familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and generate clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biofluid data for planning disease‐modifying trials.MethodAs part of the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD; U19 AG063911) protocol, investigators at 19 centers in North America will enroll 2100 participants with FTLD over the next 5 years beginning in early 2020.ResultAs of 1/20/20, the ARTFL/LEFFTDS (A/L) Consortium had enrolled 1832 participants, including 850 in kindreds with familial FTLD (239 associated with mutations in MAPT, 192 in GRN, 370 in C9orf72, 4 with mutations in both GRN and C9orf72, and 45 with a mutation in a different gene or no mutation in any known FTLD‐associated gene). Over 500 participants have undergone 2 or more annual visits to date. MRI has been performed in 1105. Biofluid samples have also been collected, with blood (DNA, plasma, serum, mRNA, PBMC) in 1413 and CSF in 303. Over 60 manuscripts using A/L data or samples have been published to date. Five clinical trials involving A/L and ALLFTD participants are in progress or planned. The longitudinal arm in ALLFTD will enroll 500 of existing A/L and 600 future participants for annual assessments with similar methodology to A/L. An additional 1000 FTLD patients will undergo focused one‐time clinical evaluations and biofluid collection.ConclusionThe data/samples from already‐enrolled and planned participants in ALLFTD and findings published to date underscore the utility of evaluating FTLD subjects. The absence of identifiable mutations in some with familial FTLD suggests that other genes are yet to be discovered. ALLFTD data will inform clinical trial design, and many participants will be eligible for future trials. The key data and samples in ALLFTD are available to interested investigators worldwide. Supported by: AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976, AG21886.

Twelve cases (6 M, 6F; mean age 87.9) with incidental Lewy bodies (no clinical diagnosis of parkinsonism or dementia) had medical histories of supraventricular arrhythmia (6/12), dysphagia (5/12), depression (5/12) and falls (4/12). Standardized movement disorder assessments were performed antemortem on 6 cases. The mean Part III UPDRS score was 7 (range 2–14). Motor findings included kinetic tremor (5/6), rest tremor (3/6), postural instability (3/6), postural tremor (2/6), and voice tremor (2/6). Of these 6 cases one was considered to have a normal movement exam, 2 were diagnosed as essential tremor, and 3 as nonspecific tremor disorder. Mean MMSE score in 7 cases was 26.6 (range 23–30). Medical records review revealed 4/12 cases had cognitive impairment not meeting criteria for dementia. Of these 12 cases, 5 had received standardized cognitive assessments: 3 were categorized as cognitively normal and 2 as mild cognitive impairment. Our series of incidental Lewy body disease cases reveal a range of neurologic findings including tremor and cognitive impairment. Antemortem standardized evaluations suggest there may be early clinical markers for Lewy body disorders. Supported by the State of AZ Department of Health Services, NIA P30 AG19610 and the Prescott Family Parkinson's Initiative: a Partnership of the Michael J. Fox Foundation and the Arizona Parkinson's Disease Consortium.

AbstractObjectiveThere are few neuropathological studies on Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD‐MCI). Those published reveal coexisting Lewy body and Alzheimer's disease pathology. Our objective is to determine the pathology that underlies PD‐MCI.MethodsWe used data from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders, a longitudinal clinicopathological study. Of 736 autopsied subjects with standardized movement and cognitive assessments, 25 had PD‐MCI. Neuropathological findings, including Lewy body and Alzheimer's disease pathology, were compared in PD subjects with amnestic MCI (A‐MCI) and nonamnestic MCI (NA‐MCI).ResultsSignificant pathological heterogeneity within PD‐MCI was found. This included varying Lewy body stages, Alzheimer's disease pathology, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. There was a significant increase in the severity of Lewy body pathology (meeting The Unified Staging System for Lewy Body disorders neocortical stage) in nonamnestic MCI (7/1, 63%) when compared with amnestic MCI (3/14, 21%, P = 0.032).ConclusionAlthough a small study, distinct pathological changes may contribute to PD‐MCI phenotype. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society