Davicioni, Elai

Abstract Background/purpose: Despite recent advances in the development of androgen deprivation therapies (ADT), prostate cancer (PCa) remains the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Thus, there is a critical need to improve treatment outcomes for men with aggressive PCa. The purpose of this study was to identify and functionally characterize kinases that can serve as both prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in PCa. Methods: To identify kinases associated with metastatic progression of PCa, we utilized high-density oligonucleotide arrays to interrogate the expression of all kinases in 545 prostatectomy samples, obtained from high-risk patients with long-term clinical follow-up (>10 years). We ranked all kinases by their fold change in expression between PCas that subsequently metastasized versus those that did not. We then characterized the top ranked kinase in preclinical PCa models with in vitro mechanistic experiments and in vivo therapeutic studies. Results: We nominated DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNAPK) as the top kinase associated with metastatic PCa progression. Interrogation of pathways associated with DNAPK knockdown in PC3, DU145, VCaP and C4-2B, identified canonical Wnt signaling as the top DNAPK-activated pathway. In PCa cells (PC3, LNCaP C.S. {LNCaP grown under charcoal-stripped serum condition}, C4-2B and LNCaP-AR) DNAPK inhibition significantly abrogates Wnt signaling and abolishes cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Interestingly, we found that DNAPK directly modulates the Wnt signaling independent of the androgen receptor (AR), highlighting the therapeutic potential of DNAPK inhibition in cancers resistant to ADT. Indeed, in VCaP xenograft models, pharmacologic inhibition of DNAPK with NU7441 demonstrated 3.4 fold (p<0.01) reduction of tumor growth at non-toxic doses. Using an independent prostate cancer tissue cohort, we validate DNAPK expression as a biomarker for metastatic disease progression (p = 6.4 e−06, hazard ratio = 2). Conclusion: In summary, we nominate DNAPK as a potential biomarker of disease progression and as a novel therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer. Our data suggests that DNAPK mediates PCa progression by upregulating Wnt signaling, and demonstrates that DNAPK inhibition results in significant tumor responses in PCa xenografts. Citation Format: Vishal Kothari, Jonathan F. Goodwin, Shuang Zhao, Elai Davicioni, Jeffrey R. Karnes, Robert B. Den, Rohit Mehra, Karen E. Knudsen, Felix Y. Feng. Investigating DNAPK as a biomarker and a novel therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2853. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2853

Abstract Emerging evidence demonstrates that the DNA repair kinase DNA-PK exerts divergent roles in transcriptional regulation of unsolved consequence. Here, in vitro and in vivo interrogation demonstrate that DNA-PK functions as a selective modulator of transcriptional networks that induce cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Accordingly, suppression of DNA-PK inhibits tumor metastases. Clinical assessment revealed that DNA-PK is significantly elevated in advanced disease, and independently predicts for metastases, recurrence, and reduced overall survival. Further investigation demonstrated that DNA-PK in advanced tumors is highly activated, independently of DNA damage indicators. Combined, these findings put forth new paradigms for DNA-PK function, identify DNA-PK as a potent driver of tumor progression and metastases, and nominate DNA-PK as a therapeutic target for advanced malignancies. Citation Format: Jonathan F. Goodwin, Vishal Kothari, Justin M. Drake, Shuang Zhao, Emanuela Dylgjeri, Jeffry L. Dean, Matthew J. Schiewer, Christopher McNair, Michael S. Magee, Robert B. Den, Ziqi Zhu, Nicholas A. Graham, Ajay A. Vashisht, James A. Wohlschlegel, Thomas G. Graeber, R Jeffrey Karnes, Mandeep Takhar, Elai Davicioni, Scott A. Tomlins, Nima Sharifi, Owen N. Witte, Felix Y. Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. DNA-PK-mediated transcriptional regulation drives tumor progression and metastasis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1860. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1860

Abstract Background ETS gene fusions and PTEN loss are the most common genomic alteration events in prostate cancer that stratify patients into molecularly distinct subtypes. Recently, a commercially available genomic classifier (GC, DecipherTM) has been validated to predict metastasis in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. In this study we evaluated the robustness of the GC model in the light of prostate cancer molecular heterogeneity. Methods: Analysis of PTEN expression loss, ERG overexpression and GC scores were performed on a previously reported genome-wide microarray dataset (Karnes et al., 2013). Microarray probesets mapping to exons of PTEN were benchmarked to identify a representative exon whose loss of expression was highly correlated to FISH analysis for PTEN deletion (PTEN-loss) performed on an independent dataset. ERG overexpression (ERG+) was determined similarly and the microarray probesets that best correlate with the FISH status (in independent dataset) were used to annotate the ERG status of the samples in this study. Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and multivariable regression analysis were used to assess GC performance for predicting metastasis in subsets of patient tumors with genomic alterations. Results Using the microarray method 42% of the tumors had ERG overexpression, 23% had PTEN-loss and 11% had both events. ERG+ and PTEN-loss were not on their own predictive of metastasis with AUCs of 0.52 (CI:0.44-0.6) and 0.47(CI 0.39-0.56), respectively. In ERG+ tumors GC had an AUC of 0.82 (p=4e-7) and high GC score ERG+ patients had a hazard ratio (HR) of 100 (p=6e-7) for metastasis. Similarly, in PTEN-loss tumors GC had an AUC of 0.83 (p=7.9e-5) and high GC score PTEN-loss patients had an HR of 62 (p=1.8e-4) for metastasis. When GC was evaluated in patient tumors with both ERG+ and PTEN-loss the AUC was 0.85 (p=2e-15) and high GC score patients had an HR of 95 (p=4e-4) for metastasis. In multivariable analysis, Decipher was the only significant risk factor with an HR of 55 (CI 12.2-249, p=1.8e-7) for metastasis after adjusting for ERG+, PTEN-loss, Gleason score, PSA, tumor stage, margins and adjuvant treatment. Conclusion The Decipher genomic classifier is a powerful prognostic marker that retains its significance for predicting metastasis in subsets of patients with tumors that harbor common genomic alterations. Patients with high GC scores and these alterations may represent an extremely high-risk subset of prostate cancer. Citation Format: Mohammed Alshalalfa, Ismael Vergara, Nicholas Erho, Elai Davicioni, Robert Jenkins, Kollmeyer Thomas. Evaluation of a genomic classifier (Decipher®) in subsets of primary tumors with common prostate cancer genomic alterations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4720. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4720

Purpose The optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is unclear. We hypothesized that a genomic classifier (GC) would provide prognostic and predictive insight into the development of clinical metastases in men receiving post-RP RT and inform decision making. Patients and Methods GC scores were calculated from 188 patients with pT3 or margin-positive prostate cancer, who received post-RP RT at Thomas Jefferson University and Mayo Clinic between 1990 and 2009. The primary end point was clinical metastasis. Prognostic accuracy of the models was tested using the concordance index for censored data and decision curve analysis. Cox regression analysis tested the relationship between GC and metastasis. Results The cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5 years after RT was 0%, 9%, and 29% for low, average, and high GC scores, respectively (P = .002). In multivariable analysis, GC and pre-RP prostate-specific antigen were independent predictors of metastasis (both P < .01). Within the low GC score (< 0.4), there were no differences in the cumulative incidence of metastasis comparing patients who received adjuvant or salvage RT (P = .79). However, for patients with higher GC scores (≥ 0.4), cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5 years was 6% for patients treated with adjuvant RT compared with 23% for patients treated with salvage RT (P < .01). Conclusion In patients treated with post-RP RT, GC is prognostic for the development of clinical metastasis beyond routine clinical and pathologic features. Although preliminary, patients with low GC scores are best treated with salvage RT, whereas those with high GC scores benefit from adjuvant therapy. These findings provide the first rational selection of timing for post-RP RT.

Objective To better characterize the genomics of patients with biochemical recurrence ( BCR ) who have metastatic disease progression in order to improve treatment decisions for prostate cancer. Methods The expression profiles of three clinical outcome groups after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) were compared: those with no evidence of disease ( NED ; n = 108); those with BCR (rise in prostate‐specific antigen [ PSA ] level without metastasis; n = 163); and those with metastasis ( n = 192). The patients were profiled using Human Exon 1.0 ST microarrays, and outcomes were supported by a median 18 years of follow‐up. A metastasis signature was defined and verified in an independent RP cohort to ensure the robustness of the signature. Furthermore, bioinformatics characterization of the signature was conducted to decipher its biology. Results Minimal gene expression differences were observed between adjuvant treatment‐naïve patients in the NED group and patients without metastasis in the BCR group. More than 95% of the differentially expressed genes (metastasis signature) were found in comparisons between primary tumours of metastasis patients and the two other outcome groups. The metastasis signature was validated in an independent cohort and was significantly associated with cell cycle genes, ubiquitin‐mediated proteolysis, DNA repair, androgen, G‐protein coupled and NOTCH signal transduction pathways. Conclusion This study shows that metastasis development after BCR is associated with a distinct transcriptional programme that can be detected in the primary tumour. Patients with NED and BCR have highly similar transcriptional profiles, suggesting that measurement of PSA on its own is a poor surrogate for lethal disease. Use of genomic testing in patients undergoing RP with an initial rise in PSA level may be useful to improve secondary therapy decision‐making.

Abstract Introduction: Multivariable models that predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) can indicate patients at higher risk for developing clinical progression after prostatectomy. However, most patients that experience BCR do not metastasize or die from prostate cancer, making BCR an unreliable surrogate endpoint. In this study we compared the clinical and genomic characteristics of prostatectomy patients in order to better delineate the relationship between BCR and aggressive prostate cancer. Methods: Postoperative patients were retrospectively classified into three outcome groups: NED (no evidence of disease recurrence); BCR-only (patients that experienced BCR but didn't have progressive disease as evidenced by bone or CT scans); and CP (clinical progression with BCR plus positive CT or bone scans). Patient specimens were from the Mayo Clinic Radical Prostatectomy Registry, selected using a nested case-control design with 14 years median follow-up. RNA expression levels from FFPE tumor specimens were measured with 1.4 million feature whole-transcriptome oligonucleotide microarrays on 106 matching patients from each outcome group (total 318 patients). We analyzed the clinical covariates of the outcome groups in a pairwise manner (NED vs. BCR-only; NED vs. CP; CP vs. BCR-only), using a conditional logistic model in univariable and multivariable analyses. We performed feature reduction for the genomic data set using Kruskal-Wallis tests and regularized logistic regression. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to quantify the variance of the genomic data with respect to the patient outcome groups. Results: Our initial hypothesis was that all three outcome groups would have different clinical and genomic characteristics. Univariable analysis of clinical variables failed to show statistically significant differences between NED and BCR-only groups. Multivariable analysis of the clinical variables also failed to show statistically significant differences between NED and BCR-only groups. Among the clinical variables only pathological Gleason score was statistically significant when comparing the BCR-only vs. CP and NED vs. CP groups. Genomic analysis found 363 coding and non-coding features that passed thresholds for differential expression between the three outcome groups. PCA established that the primary source of variance in the genomic data stemmed from the separation of CP from NED and BCR-only patients; whereas only a small amount of variance separates NED and BCR-only groups. The 363 features were further compared in the three outcome groups using Wilcoxon tests, adjusting for false-discovery using Benjamini-Hochberg. At a cutoff of p &lt; 0.001 there were no features differentially expressed between NED and BCR-only, while 52 and 34 statistically significant features were found in the NED vs. CP and CP vs. BCR-only comparisons, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the clinical and genomic results together, we find that: 1) Patients that developed clinical progression were significantly different from those that did not, irrespective of whether they experienced BCR or not; 2) the NED and BCR-only groups were statistically very similar to each other. We therefore conclude that BCR may not be the most appropriate endpoint for predictive models that attempt to stratify patients at risk for progression. This abstract is also presented as Poster B44. Citation Format: Anamaria Crisan, Elai Davicion, R. Jeffery Karnes, Robert B. Jenkins, Mercedeh H. Ghadessi, Christine Buerki, Eric J. Bergstrahl, Nicholas Erho, Ismael A. Vergara, Karla V. Ballman, Peter C. Black, Timothy J. Triche. Biochemical recurrence is not a definitive surrogate endpoint for development of clinically useful predictive models for post-prostatectomy patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Prostate Cancer Research; 2012 Feb 6-9; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PR4.

Abstract Motivations: Gleason score is the most prognostic variable in prostate cancer pathology. Patients with high Gleason (8+) are the most likely to experience biochemical recurrence (BCR), clinical progression (CP) and prostate-cancer specific mortality (PCSM), whereas patients with Gleason ≤6 are expected to have excellent long-term outcomes. However, the majority of prostate cancer patients are diagnosed with Gleason score 7, a heterogeneous group in terms of patient outcomes. In the absence of adverse pathological factors (APF, such as preoperative PSA, SM+, ECE and SVI) most Gleason 7 patients will have excellent outcomes. In contrast, Gleason 7 patients with APF are considered at high-risk for recurrence and therefore are candidates for adjuvant therapy. In this study, we have investigated whether a classifier based on differentially expressed genomic features could be used to improve prognostication of Gleason 7 patients, independent of APF. Methods: Two whole-transcriptome (1.4 million feature) oligonucleotide microarray expression datasets from radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed. The first one (GEO accession: GSE21032) consisted of 125 fresh frozen (FF) samples from the MSKCC Oncogenome Project and the second dataset had 545 formalin-fixed-paraffin- embedded (FFPE) samples from the Mayo Clinic tumor registry. For genomic feature selection, differential expression in the FF dataset between Gleason ≤6 (n=40) and ≥8 (n=15) was assessed with false discovery rate adjusted t-tests (p&lt;0.05). Next, a k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier was trained and tuned using the selected features to predict clinical progression (i.e., positive bone or CT scans after BCR) in the FFPE dataset, again using samples with Gleason score ≤6 (n=63) and ≥8 (n=211). The KNN classifier was evaluated on Gleason score 7 (n=209) FFPE samples (not used for training) using multivariable logistic regression. Results: The KNN classifier segregated the Gleason 7 samples into high and low risk CP groups. The KNN odds ratios were 2.9 (p&lt;0.005), 2.1 (p&lt;0.05) and 2.8 (p&lt;0.05) for BCR, CP and PCSM end-points, respectively when comparing high and low risk groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that the KNN classifier was independently prognostic. Conclusions: A KNN classifier developed using differentially expressed genomic features significantly stratified Gleason score 7 patients for several clinically relevant endpoints. Future validation studies will address the utility of this classifier in predicting pathological Gleason score from biopsy specimens, which may be particularly useful for evaluation of biopsy Gleason 6 cases. In these patients, deferring prostatectomy in favour of active surveillance is an appealing treatment option unless the ‘true’ Gleason of the index lesion is in fact a Gleason 7 or higher, where immediate surgery is likely a life-saving procedure. Citation Format: Nicholas Erho, Thomas Sierocinski, Elai Davicioni, Robert B. Jenkins, Mercedeh Gadhessi, Christine Buerki, Ismael A. Vergara, Anamaria Crisan, Zaid Haddad, Benedikt Zimmermann, Anirban Mitra, Timothy J. Triche. Identification of biomarkers for stratification of Gleason score 7 patients using whole-transcriptome expression profiling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Prostate Cancer Research; 2012 Feb 6-9; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(4 Suppl):Abstract nr B46.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among United States men. However, disease aggressiveness is varied, with low-grade disease often being indolent and high-grade cancer accounting for the greatest density of deaths. Outcomes are also disparate among men with high-grade prostate cancer, with upwards of 65% having disease recurrence even after primary treatment. Identification of men at risk for recurrence and elucidation of the molecular processes that drive their disease is paramount, as these men are the most likely to benefit from multimodal therapy. We previously showed that androgen-induced expression profiles in prostate development are reactivated in aggressive prostate cancers. Herein, we report the down-regulation of one such gene, Sparcl1 , a secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) family matricellular protein, during invasive phases of prostate development and regeneration. We further demonstrate a parallel process in prostate cancer, with decreased expression of SPARCL1 in high-grade/metastatic prostate cancer. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that SPARCL1 loss increases the migratory and invasive properties of prostate cancer cells through Ras homolog gene family, member C (RHOC), a known mediator of metastatic progression. By using models incorporating clinicopathologic parameters to predict prostate cancer recurrence after treatment, we show that SPARCL1 loss is a significant, independent prognostic marker of disease progression. Thus, SPARCL1 is a potent regulator of cell migration/invasion and its loss is independently associated with prostate cancer recurrence.