Vachon, Celine M.

SummaryPreviously, we reported increased risk of heavy‐chain (HC) monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among first‐degree (1°) relatives of multiple myeloma (MM) or HC‐MGUS probands. This study investigated whether there was comparable risk for light‐chain (LC) MGUS among 911 relatives of the same HC‐MGUS/MM probands versus a reference population of 21 463. Seventeen 1° relatives had LC‐MGUS (adjusted prevalence = 1·7%, 95% CI = 0·9–2·6%). There was increased risk of LC‐MGUS in relatives of MM probands (RR = 3·4, 95% CI = 2·0–5·5). We saw no increased risk in relatives of HC‐MGUS probands. We conclude that the prevalence of LC‐MGUS is significantly higher among 1° relatives of MM probands compared to the reference population.

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), a precursor to multiple myeloma (MM), is one of the most common premalignant conditions in the general population. The cause of MGUS is largely unknown. Recent studies show that there is an increased prevalence of MGUS in blood relatives of persons with lymphoproliferative and plasma cell proliferative disorders, suggesting presence of shared underlying genetic influences. In the past few years, additional studies have examined risk factors and biologic characteristics that may contribute to the increased prevalence of MGUS among relatives of probands with MGUS, MM, and other blood malignancies. This article reviews the known epidemiology and risk factors for familial MGUS and myeloma, the risk of lymphoproliferative disorders and other malignancies among blood-relatives of patients with MGUS and MM, and discusses future directions for research.

Abstract The 19p13.1 breast cancer susceptibility locus is a modifier of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers and is also associated with the risk of ovarian cancer. Here, we investigated 19p13.1 variation and risk of breast cancer subtypes, defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status, using 48,869 breast cancer cases and 49,787 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Variants from 19p13.1 were not associated with breast cancer overall or with ER-positive breast cancer but were significantly associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk [rs8170 OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–1.15; P = 3.49 × 10−5] and triple-negative (ER-, PR-, and HER2-negative) breast cancer (rs8170: OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13–1.31; P = 2.22 × 10−7). However, rs8170 was no longer associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk when triple-negative cases were excluded (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07; P = 0.62). In addition, a combined analysis of triple-negative cases from BCAC and the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC; N = 3,566) identified a genome-wide significant association between rs8170 and triple-negative breast cancer risk (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18–1.33; P = 3.31 × 10−13]. Thus, 19p13.1 is the first triple-negative–specific breast cancer risk locus and the first locus specific to a histologic subtype defined by ER, PR, and HER2 to be identified. These findings provide convincing evidence that genetic susceptibility to breast cancer varies by tumor subtype and that triple-negative tumors and other subtypes likely arise through distinct etiologic pathways. Cancer Res; 72(7); 1795–803. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Percent mammographic breast density (PMD) is a strong heritable risk factor for breast cancer. However, the pathways through which this risk is mediated are still unclear. To explore whether PMD and breast cancer have a shared genetic basis, we identified genetic variants most strongly associated with PMD in a published meta-analysis of five genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and used these to construct risk scores for 3,628 breast cancer cases and 5,190 controls from the UK2 GWAS of breast cancer. The signed per-allele effect estimates of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were multiplied with the respective allele counts in the individual and summed over all SNPs to derive the risk score for an individual. These scores were included as the exposure variable in a logistic regression model with breast cancer case–control status as the outcome. This analysis was repeated using 10 different cutoff points for the most significant density SNPs (1%–10% representing 5,222–50,899 SNPs). Permutation analysis was also conducted across all 10 cutoff points. The association between risk score and breast cancer was significant for all cutoff points from 3% to 10% of top density SNPs, being most significant for the 6% (2-sided P = 0.002) to 10% (P = 0.001) cutoff points (overall permutation P = 0.003). Women in the top 10% of the risk score distribution had a 31% increased risk of breast cancer [OR = 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08–1.59] compared with women in the bottom 10%. Together, our results show that PMD and breast cancer have a shared genetic basis that is mediated through a large number of common variants. Cancer Res; 72(6); 1478–84. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancers are an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival, but there remains little known about the etiologic factors that promote its initiation and development. Commonly inherited breast cancer risk factors identified through genome-wide association studies display heterogeneity of effect among breast cancer subtypes as defined by the status of estrogen and progesterone receptors. In the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC), 22 common breast cancer susceptibility variants were investigated in 2,980 Caucasian women with triple-negative breast cancer and 4,978 healthy controls. We identified six single-nucleotide polymorphisms, including rs2046210 (ESR1), rs12662670 (ESR1), rs3803662 (TOX3), rs999737 (RAD51L1), rs8170 (19p13.1), and rs8100241 (19p13.1), significantly associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Together, our results provide convincing evidence of genetic susceptibility for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res; 71(19); 6240–9. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The centrosome is the primary microtubule organizing center of the cell. Numerical or functional defects of the centrosome can result in improper chromosome segregation, leading to aneuploidy and polyploidy. Because many cancer cells have aberrant numbers of chromosomes, many have suggested a link between centrosomes and cancer. We conducted an association study to determine whether common genetic variations in 100 genes involved in maintaining and regulating centrosome structure and function account in part for the contribution of the pathway to breast cancer risk. METHODS: Incident cases of BC were identified at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN from 2001 through 2005. Controls (N=843) were frequency matched to cases (N=798) on age and region of residence. Seven hundred-eighty-two tagging and candidate functional SNPs were selected from 100 genes involved in the structure and/or function of the centrosome. Genotyping was performed on an Illumina BeadLab using the Illumina GoldenGate genotyping assay. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for BC. Women having two copies of the most common allele were defined as the referent category. Linear regression was used to estimate mean and 95% CI for PD for each additional copy of the variant allele. All models were adjusted for age, residence, and confounding factors. RESULTS: Forty-eight SNPs from 29 genes (out of 782 SNPs examined) showed evidence of significant associations with breast cancer risk in our population in the log-additive (1 degree of freedom (d.f.)) model (Ptrend< 0.05). One SNP, rs1374468 SNP in TACC3, displayed the most significant association with risk in the overall analyses (Ptrend = 0.001). Two SNPs from each of seven genes (AJUBA, CHUK, MCPH1, NEK7, PAK1, PIK3CB, and PINS) were significantly associated with risk of breast cancer (Ptrend < 0.05). Three genes, AXIN2, NIN, NUMA1, had four or more SNPs that were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (Ptrend < 0.05). All of the SNPs in these four genes were in strong linkage disequilibrium (r2>0.6). No single SNP association was significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons via permutation testing. Haplotype analyses showed 20 genes for which global haplotypes were significantly associated with breast cancer risk. Of these, haplotype blocks in six genes (14-3-3 Epsilon, CDC16, CD-TOG, KIF2, NEK9, NPM2) were significantly associated with risk (global P<0.05), although none of the individual SNPs in these six genes displayed significant associations. This suggests that the associations of these specific combinations of alleles with risk were not due to the effects of individual SNPs. CONCLUSION: These analyses provide some evidence to support an association between genetic variation in centrosomal genes and risk of breast cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2852.

Abstract Background. MBL is defined as a monoclonal expansion of B lymphocytes (< 5 × 109/L) in the blood without associated lymphadenopathy or organomegaly; MBLs with a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) immunophenotype have been termed as CLL-like MBL. The prevalence of CLL-like MBL in the general population is 3.5-12% but increases with age; however, the frequency is even higher (∼13-18%) among unaffected relatives from CLL families (i.e., families with two or more CLL members). We and others have found that a small proportion of individuals with CLL-like MBL individuals and lymphocytosis will progress to CLL requiring treatment (∼1.1% per year). Because CLL and NHL have been shown to aggregate together within families, suggesting a shared pathogenesis, we evaluated the frequency of MBL in NHL families. Methods. Individuals were obtained from an ongoing study of NHL families (i.e., families with 2 or more NHL members). However, we limited to NHL families with at most 1 individual with CLL due to the known increased frequency of MBL in CLL families. Multi-color flow cytometry was performed on fresh peripheral blood samples. A CBC and differential count was simultaneously obtained using an automated blood cell counter. Five possible flow diagnoses were defined as: CLL-like MBL (CD5+CD20dim), atypical MBL (CD5+CD20bright), non-CLL like MBL (CD5−), and normal immunophenotype (NIPT). Medical records of NHL cases were reviewed to confirm disease. Results. A total of 30 individuals from 16 NHL families had available flow cytometry results. The mean age at flow analysis was 56 years (range 37− 83 years). We identified 5 individuals with MBL from 4 families: 3 of the 6 had CLL-like MBL, 1 had atypical MBL, and 1 had non-CLL like MBL. The remaining 25 individuals had a NIPT. Thus, the MBL rate in NHL families is 17% (5/30). Among the CD5+ MBL (both CLL-like and atypical MBL) individuals, all were female and the mean absolute lymphocyte count was 1.4 × 109/L. Of interest, 1 of the CLL-like MBL individuals is from a family where two members had monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS). Conclusion: Our data show that MBLs of various phenotypes can be found at a higher prevalence in NHL families than that of the general population. Further, the frequency of MBL in NHL families is comparable to that of CLL families. Although more work is needed, our results suggest that MBL may be clustering within NHL families, and thus support a possible common inherited predisposition of NHL and CLL, with MBL signifying a shared early pathogenetic step. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1853.

Abstract Introduction: Mammographic breast density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer and appears to be modifiable. However, whether longitudinal changes in density are associated with breast cancer risk is unknown. We hypothesize that decreases in breast density are associated with reduced breast cancer risk. Methods: The Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort enrolled 19,924 women having a screening mammogram (mgm) at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 2003 and 2006. Participants were 35 years and older, had no prior breast cancer and lived in the tri-state area (MN, IA and WI). Risk factor data were collected through self-administered questionnaire and clinic databases. Incident breast cancers were identified through tumor registries (Mayo Clinic, MN, IA, WI). The BI-RADS, 4-category clinical density measure (fatty, scattered density, heterogeneous density and extreme density) was available on all mgms performed after 1996. A case-cohort design consisting of incident cases (n=241) and a random selection of the cohort (n=2300, 28 developed cancer) was used to examine the association between change in BI-RADS density and breast cancer. BI-RADS densities measured from the earliest available, and enrollment mgms (average 6 years apart) were used to assess density change. Proportional hazards regression was performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) associated with a change in one or more BI-RADS density categories over time, relative to staying within the same category. Age was used as the time scale, and the subcohort was weighted by the inverse of the sampling proportion. Analyses were adjusted for age, years between mgms, BI-RADS density at earliest mgm, and changes in BMI, postmenopausal hormone use, and menopausal status. Results: Longitudinal analyses were conducted on the 219 cases and 1900 non-cases in the subcohort with at least one mgm available prior to enrollment mgm. Compared to the subcohort, cases were older (56.8 vs. 52.9 years), more likely postmenopausal (73.4% vs. 61.6%), had higher BMI (29.0 vs 28.1) and were more frequently screened (8.0 vs. 6.9 pre-enrollment mgms). As expected, cases were more likely to have extreme density (BI-RADS=4) at earliest mgm than non-cases (16.2% vs 14.3%). Cases were less likely than non-cases to experience a reduction of one density category or more (37.0% vs 38.6%) following earliest mgm. Adjusting for potential confounders, women who decreased one BI-RADS category or more over an average 6 years were at reduced risk of breast cancer (HR=0.72, 95%CI: 0.50-0.99) compared to those whose density was unchanged. However, women who increased one or more BI-RADS categories had suggestion of increased risk (HR=1.52, 95%CI: 0.97-2.4). Conclusion: Women with a decrease in BI-RADS density category over 6 years may have decreased breast cancer risk relative to women whose breast density category remains stable. Two measures of breast density may inform women's risk beyond a measure at one point in time. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4828.

Abstract Introduction: Alterations in components of the stromal tissue that underlie the epithelium can initiate, promote or inhibit epithelial tumorigenesis. Decorin (DCN) and lumican (LUM) are stromal genes with reduced expression in serous ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes may influence susceptibility to serous ovarian cancer. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we compared genotype frequencies of 11 tagSNPs in DCN and LUM between 397 Caucasian cases with primary serous ovarian cancer and 920 Caucasian controls in two studies conducted at Mayo Clinic and Duke University (discovery set). Associations were evaluated further in a third Caucasian population of 436 cases and 1,098 controls in Australia (replication set). TagSNPs were selected from unrelated Caucasian samples within HapMap based on the following criteria: (i) minor allele frequency ≥ 0.05, (ii) pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) of r2 ≥ 0.8, and (iii) location within, and 5kb upstream and downstream of, each gene region. Genotyping was performed using the Illumina GoldenGate™ assay and associations between SNPs and serous cancer were evaluated using unconditional logistic regression to estimate per allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Untyped genotypes for DCN rs13312816 in the discovery set, and for DCN rs3138165 and LUM rs17018765 in the replication set, were imputed using the MACH software. Results: In the discovery set, we observed inverse associations between DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0), DCN rs516115 (OR=0.8; 95%CI=0.7-1.0) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0) and risk of serous ovarian cancers (all Ptrend=0.06). Associations were confirmed in the replication set for DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.4-0.9; Ptrend=0.009), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.01) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.4-0.9; Ptrend=0.008), but not for DCN rs516115 (Ptrend=0.20). To increase statistical power, data from the discovery and replication sets were combined (833 cases and 2,013 controls) following confirmation of no statistical heterogeneity in the ORs between study sites. In the combined sample, associations were strengthened for DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.002), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.002), DCN rs516115 (OR=0.9; 95%CI=0.8-1.0; Ptrend=0.03) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.5-0.8; Ptrend=0.001). All four SNPs were in the same LD block on chromosome 12, suggesting that serous ovarian cancer susceptibility may be driven by a single, correlated variant in the region. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that genetic variation in DCN and LUM may influence susceptibility to serous ovarian cancer and contribute to the mounting evidence that supports the role of the stroma in epithelial ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2854.

Abstract Background. Breast density assessed from mammography is a strong predictor of breast cancer risk, but the strength of the association may vary with adiposity. To examine effect modification by adiposity, we combined data from four case-control studies on breast density that represented an ethnically diverse population with a wide variation in level of adiposity as measured by body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). Methods. We combined data from four case-control studies representing different locations: California, Hawaii and Minnesota in the United States, and Gifu in Japan. All studies included incident breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1994 and 2002 and matched controls representing the underlying case population. One mammographic image per subject was selected, specifically the mammogram at diagnosis for the studies from California, Minnesota, and Japan and the closest prediagnostic mammogram for Hawaii. Percent density was measured by one reader, who was blinded to case status, using a computer-assisted method. Self-reported anthropometric measures were used to classify women as normal, overweight, and obese according to ethnic-specific BMI cut points (<23, 23-27.4, and ≥27.5 for Asian women and <25, 25-29.9, and ≥30 for other ethnic groups). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and to evaluate interactions using the likelihood ratio while adjusting for potential confounders, including age and ethnicity. Heterogeneity across studies was marginally significant as assessed by examining density-by-study interaction (P = 0.09) and, therefore, we also adjusted for study-site. Results. The study included 1,699 cases and 2,422 controls of diverse ethnicity: 45% Caucasian, 40% Asian, 9% African-American, and 7% Other. Of these women, we classified 34% as overweight and19% as obese. Age-adjusted mean percent density was significantly greater for cases than for controls: 31.7% versus 28.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). BMI was inversely associated with breast density; the estimated age-adjusted mean percent density was 36.5%, 26.8%, and 19.3% for normal, overweight, and obese, respectively (Ptrend < 0.001). The overall OR for a 10% higher percent density was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.18) with higher estimates in overweight (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.29) and obese (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.41) than normal BMI (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.18). The effect modification by BMI was statistically significant (Pinteraction = 0.01). Conclusions. Our findings confirm that the elevated risk of breast cancer associated with breast density differs by level of adiposity, with a higher risk for overweight and obese than normal BMI. Further research is needed to understand the underlying biological reasons for these noted differences in association by adiposity. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(12 Suppl):B25.