Joseph, Richard W.

Purpose Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a chromatin remodeler, is implicated in the pathogenesis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, the effect of EZH2 on outcomes in localized ccRCC is unclear, and molecular biomarkers are not currently integrated into prognostic models or adjuvant therapy trials. Methods We performed Cox regression to evaluate the association of tumor-based EZH2 gene and protein expression with survival in three independent cohorts: a cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 532), a cohort from University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (n = 122), and a cohort from Mayo Clinic (n = 1,338). Analyses were adjusted for the prognostic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score as well as within low-, intermediate-, and high-risk SSIGN groups. Results Patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort with EZH2-high gene expression were 1.5 times more likely to experience overall death than patients with EZH2-low expression (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3; P = .028). Patients in the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center cohort with EZH2-high protein expression were two times more likely to experience overall death than patients with EZH2-low expression (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.4; P = .034). Similarly, patients in the Mayo Clinic cohort with EZH2-high protein expression were 1.4 times more likely to experience overall death (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.7; P < .001). Patients in the Mayo Clinic cohort with EZH2-high protein expression were nearly two times more likely to experience RCC-specific death (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.6; P < .001); EZH2 protein expression was particularly prognostic among patients with low-risk SSIGN tumors (HR, 6.1; 95% CI, 3.4 to 11.1; P < .001). Conclusion EZH2 expression accurately predicts risk of RCC death beyond existing clinicopathologic models, particularly in low- and intermediate-risk SSIGN tumors. Further studies are required to incorporate molecular biomarkers into surveillance guidelines and adjuvant clinical trials.

We previously reported an extremely rare case of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) presented as a thyroid mass. Given the rarity of this disease, there are no personalized and molecularly targeted treatment options due to the lack of knowledge in the genomic makeup of the tumor. A 44-year-old white woman was diagnosed with an extranodal FDCS in thyroid. The patient underwent a total thyroidectomy, central compartment dissection, parathyroid re-implantation, and adjuvant radiation therapy. Tumor DNA sequencing of 236 genes by FoundationOne panel found truncating mutations in PTEN and missense mutations in RET and TP53. However, patient-matched germline DNA was not sequenced which is critical for identification of true somatic mutations. Furthermore, the FoundationOne panel doesn't measure genomic rearrangements which have been shown to be abundant in sarcomas and are associated with sarcoma tumorigenesis and progression. In the current study, we carried out comprehensive genomic sequencing of the tumor, adjacent normal tissues, and patient-matched blood, in an effort to understand the genomic makeup of this rare extranodal FDCS and to identify potential therapeutic targets. Eighty-one somatic point mutations were identified in tumor but not in adjacent normal tissues or blood. A clonal truncating mutation in the CLTCL1 gene, which stabilizes the mitotic spindle, was likely a driver mutation of tumorigenesis and could explain the extensive copy number aberrations (CNAs) and genomic rearrangements in the tumor including a chr15/chr17 local chromothripsis resulted in 6 expressed fusion genes. The fusion gene HDGFRP3→SHC4 led to a 200-fold increase in the expression of oncogene SHC4 which is a potential target of the commercial drug Dasatinib. Missense mutations in ATM and splice-site mutation in VEGFR1 were also detected in addition to the TP53 missense mutation reported by FoundationOne.

LBA4500 Background: Cisplatin-based chemo is a standard 1L treatment (tx) for mUC and the only tx that prolongs OS; however, age or comorbidities render many pts ineligible, and 30-50% receive no tx. Atezo (MPDL3280A) is active and well tolerated in platinum-treated mUC, justifying testing atezo as 1L tx in cisplatin-ineligible pts. Methods: Pts were chemo naive in the metastatic setting and cisplatin ineligible (renal [GFR > 30 but < 60 mL/min]/hearing impairment, ≥ G2 peripheral neuropathy [PN] or ≥ ECOG PS2). Atezo 1200 mg was given IV q3w until PD (RECIST v1.1). Centrally assessed PD-L1 on tumor infiltrating immune cells (IC; SP142 IHC assay) was scored IC2/3, 1 or 0. The primary efficacy endpoint was confirmed ORR assessed per RECIST v1.1 (central independent review facility) using a data cutoff of Sep 14, 2015. Results: 119 efficacy/safety-evaluable pts of any PD-L1 IC had a median age of 73 y: 21% ≥ 80 y. 18% had prior systemic tx (21% [neo]adjuvant); 10% had radiotherapy. 66% had visceral mets. 71% had CrCl < 60 mL/min; 13% had hearing loss ≥ 25 dB; 6% had prior PN ≥ G2; 20% had ECOG PS2. ORR was 19% (95% CI 13-28; 5% CR), and responses occurred in all IC subgroups (Table; includes DCR/PFS/OS) and in pts with poor prognostic factors. 22/23 responses were ongoing with mDOR not reached. Median follow-up was 8.5 mo (range 0.2-14.3); median tx duration was 15 wk. Atezo was generally well tolerated. Tx-related all-G and G3-4 AEs were seen in 64% and 12% of pts, respectively. Related all-G AEs ≥ 10% included fatigue, pruritus, diarrhea. 1 G5 related AE occurred (sepsis). 3% had a G3-4 immune-mediated AE. Conclusions: Atezo has clinically meaningful activity in 1L cisplatin-ineligible mUC pts, and preliminary OS is encouraging. The durable nature of response and favorable AE profile makes this an attractive alternative to chemo. NCT02108652. Clinical trial information: NCT02108652. [Table: see text]

Abstract Anti–PD-1 therapy has improved clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma, but most patients experience intrinsic resistance. Responding patients can develop acquired resistance to anti–PD-1. We retrospectively reviewed 488 patients treated with anti–PD-1 from three academic centers and identified 36 patients with acquired resistance, defined as disease progression following objective response. The incidence, timing, disease sites, post-progression survival (PPS), and outcomes were evaluated descriptively. The acquired resistance cohort consisted of 67% with more than 1 feature of poor prognosis (stage M1c, elevated LDH, or brain metastasis), and 67% had previously received ipilimumab. Partial and complete responses were achieved in 89% (n = 32) and 11% (n = 4) of patients, respectively, and median time to resistance (progression-free survival; PFS) was 11.1 months (range 4.3–32.8 months). Most progression was isolated (78% of patients, n = 28) and occurred while receiving therapy (78%, n = 28). The median PPS was 12.8 months (range 0.1–51.8 months), and the median overall survival was 33.7 months. Among isolated progressors, 15 received localized therapy (12 with surgery, 3 with radiation). Patients with isolated versus systemic progression exhibited a trend for improved PPS (P = 0.081), and patients with an initial PFS ≥ 15 months showed significant PPS improvement (P = 0.036). Two patients experienced subsequent responses to anti–PD-1 resumption. In conclusion, acquired resistance to anti–PD-1 was frequently associated with excellent clinical outcomes and often presented as isolated progression amenable to localized therapy (surgery or radiation) or systemic progression sensitive to therapy resumption. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(5); 357–62. ©2017 AACR.

431 Background: While targeting VEGF improves outcomes for mRCC pts, resistance invariably develops, often within the first year. Here, we describe the efficacy and safety of atezo (anti-PD-L1) with bev (anti-VEGF) and atezo monotherapy vs sun (TKI) in first-line mRCC. Methods: Treatment-naïve mRCC pts were enrolled in a hypothesis generating Ph II study (IMmotion150; NCT01984242) and randomized to atezo 1200 mg IV q3w + bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w, atezo alone or sun 50 mg PO QD 4 wk on/2 wk off. Crossover to atezo + bev after disease progression was allowed for pts receiving atezo or sun. PD-L1 expression was scored on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC, SP142 IHC assay). Coprimary endpoints were PFS (RECIST v1.1 by independent review [IRF]) in ITT pts and pts with PD-L1 expression on ≥ 1% of IC (PD-L1+). Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across arms and between ITT and PD-L1+ pts. The majority of sun and atezo pts subsequently received atezo + bev. Median survival follow up was 20.7 mo. The PFS HR in ITT pts for atezo + bev vs sun was 1.00 and 1.19 for atezo vs sun. In PD-L1+ pts, the PFS HR for atezo + bev vs sun was 0.64 and 1.03 for atezo vs sun (table). Tx-related Gr 3-4 AEs were seen in 40%, 16% and 57% of pts in the atezo + bev, atezo and sun arms, respectively. AEs leading to death occurred in 3%, 2% and 2% of pts, respectively. Conclusion: Atezo + bev resulted in encouraging antitumor activity in the PD-L1+ subgroup of first-line RCC pts. Atezo + bev safety is consistent with the known profile of atezo and bev individually. The clinical benefit of atezo + bev vs sun will be evaluated in the ongoing Ph III study IMmotion151 (NCT02420821). Clinical trial information: NCT01984242. [Table: see text]

478 Background: Resistance invariably develops in all patients with metastatic ccRCC treated with mTOR inhibitors. Previously we demonstrated that dual inhibition of Hsp90 and the mTOR pathway in lung cancer models leads to synergistic reductions in tumor growth. Herein, we tested the efficacy of ganetespib as a single agent and in combination with mTOR inhibition using in vitro and in vivoccRCC models. Methods: For the in vitro work we utilized the following seven ccRCC cell lines: Caki-1, Caki-2, A-498, A-704, 769-P, 786-O, ACHN. For the in vivo work we used A498 xenografts. In vitro, we determined the single agent EC50 of everolimus and ganetespib at 72 hours by assessing percent viability of A498 cells compared to vehicle using the MTS assay. We then performed combinations of ganetespib and everolimus at EC20, EC30, and EC50 in A498 cells. Translating these studies in vivo, we compared the combinatorial activity of ganetespib and temsirolimus to monotherapy in mice bearing A498 tumor xenografts. Results: As a single agent, all ccRCC cell lines tested were sensitive to ganetespib at nanomolar concentration (EC50 15 – 75 nm) and to everolimus at micromolar concentrations (EC50 4 – 54 mm). In vitro, the combination of ganetespib and everolimus also decreased cell viability in an additive fashion. In vivo, ganetespib and temsirolimus demonstrated comparable single agent activity at sub-MTD doses (T/C = 63 and 60, respectively). Combining ganetespib with temsirolimus improved tumor growth suppression by ~30% (T/C = 43). Conclusions: Given the broad in vitro sensitivity of ccRCC cell lines to single agent ganetespib as well as the in vivo activity of the combination of ganetespib and temsirolimus, we believe ganetespib warrants further study in ccRCC. Updated results will be presented at the conference including the in vivo activity of the combination of ganetespib and antivascular endothelial growth factor agents.

464 Background: Although the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene is mutated in 60% of ccRCC, deletion of VHL in mice is insufficient for tumorigenesis. Sequencing of ccRCC tumors identified mutations in SETD2, a histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36) trimethyltransferase. We hypothesize that loss of SETD2 methyltransferase activity alters the genome wide pattern of H3K36 trimethylation (H3K36me3) in ccRCC, and contributes to the cancer phenotype. Methods: To generate a genome-wide profile of H3K36me3 in frozen nephrectomy samples and RCC cell lines, we optimized a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for the isolation of DNA associated with H3K36me3. H3K36me3 is associated with open chromatin and an H3K36me3-specific antibody was used for immunoprecipitation of endogenous H3K36me3-bound DNA. ChIP PCR primers were optimized for active genes, such as actin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and a “gene desert” on chromosome 12 (negative control). ChIP libraries were then generated from 3 paired uninvolved kidney and RCC and 2 RCC cell lines. In order to identify H3K36Me3 upregulated regions in uninvolved kidney and RCC, reads from the ChIP sequencing were mapped to the human genome using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner and SICER algorithms. Results: Using ChIP PCR, we found that active genomic regions were enriched 15-30 fold over the negative controls indicating that the quality and yield of immunoprecipitated DNA/chromatin complexes from frozen tissue was sufficient for ChIP sequencing. A preliminary ChIP sequencing analysis of RCC cell lines and frozen ccRCC tissue indicates that H3K36me3 enriched DNA sequences were mapped to exons (31.3%) compared to introns (13.5%, p<0.001), consistent with the role of H3K36me3 in transcription. Conclusions: Genomic regions enriched for H3K36Me3 binding were identified from patient-derived tissue and RCC cell lines. Current efforts are focused on comparing the H3K36me3 profiles between matched tumor and uninvolved kidney ChIP libraries to generate a genome wide map of dysregulated H3K36me3 modifications.

414 Background: While mutations in PBRM1 (~40%) and BAP1(~10%) are associated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the impact of protein expression of these genes remains unknown. Herein, we quantify PBRM1/BAP1 protein expression in a large cohort of patients with localized ccRCC and associate expression with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and pathologic features. Methods: We utilized the Mayo Clinic Renal Registry and identified 1,416 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between 1/3/1990 and 4/14/2009. We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect PBRM1/BAP1 expression, and a central pathologist blinded to the outcomes scored tumors as either positive or negative. Tumors with heterogeneous or equivocal staining were excluded from this analysis. We generated Cox proportional hazard regression models for associations with ccRCC-SS, and we employed Mann-Whitney U tests for associations with pathologic features. Results: Of the 1,416 samples, 1,232 (87%) were PBRM1/BAP1 positive or negative, 163 (11%) had heterogeneous staining, and 21 (1%) could not be assessed. The distribution and association of PBRM1/BAP1 phenotypes with clinical outcomes are listed in the table below. PBRM1+/BAP1+ tumors have the best CSS, and PBRM1-/BAP1- have the worst. In addition, PBRM1/BAP1 expression strongly associated with the tumor size, stage, grade, and tumor necrosis (p<0.0001). Conclusions: This study is the first and largest to quantify PRBM1/BAP1 protein expression in ccRCC tumors. We were able to quantify PBRM1/BAP1 through IHC in the vast majority of tumors (87%), and PRBM1/BAP1 expression strongly associates with both CSS and pathologic tumor characteristics. Our data confirms our previous findings of the importance of PRBM1/BAP1 in the molecular pathogenesis of ccRCC. [Table: see text]

446 Background: Despite the development of prognostic algorithms based on clinico-pathologic features, the ability to identify aggressive forms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains suboptimal. Topoisomerase IIA (TOP2a) is a biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents. Herein, we evaluate the association of TOP2a expression in ccRCC tumors with pathologic features of aggressiveness and risk of cancer-specific death. Methods: We identified 947 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between January 16, 1990, and September 27, 2006. TOP2a expression was assessed using IHC and scored as number of positive cells per mm2. We evaluated TOP2a expression using a continuous variable and tertile categories. For associations with pathologic features, we employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and for associations with cancer-specific survival, we generated Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: HigherTOP2a expression is associated with later stage, higher grade and higher Mayo SSIGN score (all p < 0.001). The risk of death from RCC increases with increasing TOP2a expression (p trend < 0.0001). Compared to patients in the lowest tertile, those patients with tumors in the highest tertile of TOP2a expression were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=2.31 95% CI 1.64-3.25; p < 0.0001). Interestingly, among those patients with low risk disease (SSIGN score 0-3; ~95% 10 year survival), those with high TOP2a were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=3.09 95% CI 1.29-7.40; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Higher TOP2a expression is associated with more aggressive pathologic features and increased risk of cancer-specific death among patients undergoing surgery for localized ccRCC. If confirmed, these data support further inquiry for TOP2a as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for ccRCC patients.