Abstract INTRODUCTION Similarities between frontotemporal lobar degeneration with transactive response DNA‐binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP‐43) (FTLD‐TDP) and limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC) raise questions about whether they represent distinct entities or a single disease spectrum. The literature mostly examined series with disproportionate numbers of LATE‐NC over FTLD‐TDP. METHODS Leveraging a clinicopathological collection of FTLD‐TDP ( N = 148) from the University of California, San Francisco, we compared demographic, clinical, genetic, and neuropathological features of FTLD‐TDP, particularly FTLD‐TDP type A ( N = 39), and LATE‐NC ( N = 42). RESULTS FTLD‐TDP type A cases were younger at onset and death, had shorter disease duration, and frequent genetic causes ( GRN , C9ORF72 ) compared to LATE‐NC, which were mostly sporadic and older. Blinded evaluation of middle frontal gyrus (MFG) TDP‐43 immunostaining alone proved insufficient to reliably differentiate FTLD‐TDP type A from LATE‐NC stage 3. However, factoring in all neuropathologic features, FTLD type A and LATE‐NC could be differentiated with >95% confidence. DISCUSSION These overall findings support distinct diagnostic entities for FTLD‐TDP and LATE‐NC.
Clinical Associations of Cerebrospinal Fluid TMEM106B in Familial and Sporadic Frontotemporal Dementia
Importance TMEM106B is a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) genetic susceptibility factor, and TMEM106B protein aggregates are a feature of aging and neurodegeneration. Whether TMEM106B protein levels are associated with clinical features is unknown. Objective To investigate the clinical associations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TMEM106B in FTLD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 independent frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts (recruitment from April 2009 through July 2023, with analyses from January 2025 through April 2026), with a 2-year follow up. This multicenter clinical study integrated clinical, genetic, biomarker, and neuroimaging data. Individuals were recruited through the University of California, San Francisco (n = 3733), or ALLFTD (n = 2343). Participants with available CSF were included. A discovery cohort (n = 271) included participants with sporadic neuropathology-confirmed FTLD; presymptomatic or symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants in C9orf72 , GRN , or MAPT ; or controls. An independent validation cohort (n = 383) included participants with clinically diagnosed sporadic FTD, Alzheimer disease (AD), and controls. Exposures CSF samples for TMEM106B quantification with aptamer proteomics (SomaScan version 3.0 [discovery cohort] and SomaScan version 4.1 [validation cohort]). Main Outcomes and Measures Parametric tests compared the primary outcome, CSF TMEM106B, by disease severity, TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, sex, clinical syndrome, pathological diagnosis, and pathogenic variant and determined associations with brain volume. Results In the discovery (n = 271; 136 women [51%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [38-80] years) and validation (n = 383; 183 women [48%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [50-78] years) cohorts, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe disease (β, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003), lower frontotemporal brain volumes (β, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; P < .001), and faster clinical progression (β, −2.21; 95% CI, −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001). Associations of TMEM106B with clinical disease severity were independent of those with neurofilament light chain. TMEM106B levels were influenced by TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, where individuals with the protective G/G genotype had lower levels than the risk A/A genotype. CSF TMEM106B levels did not differentiate between FTLD subtypes or between FTLD and AD. Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this cross-sectional study, TMEM106B is detectable in CSF and levels reflect disease severity in sporadic and genetic FTLD and AD, but levels are also influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype. CSF TMEM106B could support further studies to understand the mechanisms of disease and develop clinical tools in FTLD and other neurodegenerative diseases.